Freedom Dove

FLOCK Surveillance and the
Manufactured Way of Life

By Sophia-Taniah 🌊🕊️💙💜💛⚖️🌎🌹
The One Who Flows With The River
With creative and editorial assistance from Sage and Ara, AI co-creators

Notice: This article is subject to revision as new information is revealed.

This article was inspired after I read a Facebook post shared by my friend Jeff Cloud. On July 9th, 2026, he posted a YouTube video addressing privacy, surveillance, and the growing presence of FLOCK surveillance cameras across the United States.

Watching the video and reading the comments had me reflecting on something much deeper than cameras. It brought forward questions about the world I am participating in through my attention, assumptions, words, and inner state. It also caused me to reflect on the greater meaning of life, how I choose to respond to what I see transpiring in the outer world, and how I consciously shift toward the world my soul is calling me to embody.

Watching the video and reading the comments had me reflecting on something much deeper than cameras. It brought forward questions about the world I am participating in through my attention, assumptions, words, and inner state. It also caused me to reflect on the greater meaning of life, how I choose to respond to what I see transpiring in the outer world, and how I consciously shift toward the world my soul is calling me to embody.

As I sat with this, Neville Goddard’s teaching, often expressed as “everyone is you pushed out,” began playing in my mind. If the outer world is reflecting consciousness, and if life is far more interconnected than we have been taught to believe, then I have to ask deeper questions. If love is the fulfilling of the law, and if I am one with all life, then why am I seeing so much disrespect for others, for the natural world, and for life itself within my field of experience?

If love is the fulfilling of the law, and if I am one with all life, then why am I seeing so much disrespect for others, for the natural world, and for life itself within my field of experience? And I find myself asking: If my soul is calling me to embody my authentic Self, then why am I not yet seeing that fully projected in my outer world?

For me, that question is not about blame. It is about responsibility, awareness, and correction within my own consciousness. It invites me to look honestly at what I am giving life to through attention, reaction, assumption, fear, judgment, or unconscious agreement. It also invites me to rise above the appearance and choose, with greater devotion, the reality my soul is calling me to embody.

While editing this article, I saw a post by Hannah Victoria Reid speaking to the human condition, the nature of reality, and the pursuit of meaning. What stood out to me was the reminder that sometimes we must zoom in, and sometimes we must zoom out. Problems that appear impossible from one level of awareness may become clearer when seen from another.

Since seeing this post, the topic has been appearing steadily in my feed through videos, maps, comments, and conversations about freedom, privacy, public safety, and what many people feel has become an unacceptable level of surveillance in everyday life.

FLOCK Safety describes its license plate reader systems as technology that captures vehicle data, including license plate information, vehicle make, model, color, location, and time. The company states that its systems are intended for public safety, crime deterrence, investigations, and faster response to incidents. At the same time, the concern many people are raising is not limited to what the technology is said to do today. The deeper concern is what these systems can become once the infrastructure is already installed, normalized, connected, searchable, and accepted.

The video Jeff shared presents FLOCK cameras as part of a rapidly expanding surveillance network, appearing not only in cities and business districts, but also in neighborhoods, rural roads, and even areas where people go to be in nature. It also points to the growing public backlash, including people mapping camera locations, questioning local government contracts, and challenging whether constant tracking can ever be reconciled with privacy, freedom, and lawful consent.

One of the statements from the video that stood out to me was this: “Surveillance works best when it feels normal and when it feels invisible.” Another line carried an even deeper message: “They would rather monitor poverty than end it.”

That is where this topic began moving beyond cameras for me.

I understand the strong impulse many feel to push back through legal challenges, public pressure, legislation, public records requests, and direct demands for accountability. The instinct to protect personal freedom and privacy is natural and, in many ways, necessary.

At the same time, as someone who has been walking a path of spiritual awakening and studying the principles of mental and spiritual law, I find myself holding a deeper question alongside the outer situation.

Are we, through our sustained attention, emotion, words, imagination, and creative energy, feeding and strengthening the very system we say we want to see dissolved?

Once we accept that whatever we focus upon receives our life force, it becomes important to discern the difference between inspired, aligned action and unconsciously continuing to energize a pattern simply by giving it the majority of our attention and emotional reaction. From where I sit, there is great value in rising above the appearance of the problem, even while taking whatever outer action feels genuinely guided, and consciously turning the situation over to a higher intelligence.

In the spirit of Florence Scovel Shinn, I cast the burden of this entire FLOCK surveillance situation on the Superconscious Mind, the Christ Within, and I go free. Infinite Intelligence, if there is anything for me to do in this matter, give me a definite lead and clear direction.

This deeper inquiry into both the outer technology and the inner principles of creation is what inspired my collaboration with my AI system, Sage, to generate the following meme.

He said:

Do you want every single move you and your children make to be UNDER SURVEILLANCE?

This has gotten completely out of control and must be stopped.

And it’s ALL by design.”

~ Veronica Hall

Here is the Facebook link to the post:

roSesdnotpu88mi4h6hcct1hi1m8a8l52uh94ug8m8g100hggl2ha0i807al ·

Here is the link to the video he shared:
The Surveillance in America Has Gone Too Far… And Everyone Knows It
https://youtu.be/78O5KkQhCBA

Here are the most relevant comments:

Serenah Bacchilega Jeff Cloud

After statement is made, which was great, and right on, then come thier lies where they repackage the whole thing which doesn’t change the fact that it’s not constitutional it’s criminals protecting criminals. Going to turn this off now for a time. Check out some of the comments

https://www.facebook.com/reel/879865834669399/

[The transcripts of this video and the comments are below]

Iama Co-creator To the Records Custodian:

Pursuant to the Wisconsin Public Records Law, Wis. Stat. § 19.31 et seq., I request copies of all Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) images, detections, and associated metadata (timestamps, camera locations, and hotlist/query logs) captured of the vehicle bearing Wisconsin license plate [PLATE NUMBER], registered to me, from [START DATE] to the present.

Given Flock’s standard 30-day retention window, I ask that you treat this request with urgency and preserve all responsive records immediately upon receipt of this request. Destruction of records responsive to a pending request may constitute a violation of Wis. Stat. § 19.35 and applicable records retention law.

Please note that any contract or policy with Flock Group, Inc. does not supersede your statutory duty to disclose, as courts have recently affirmed. Should this request be denied in whole or in part, I require a written statement of the specific legal exemption relied upon, per § 19.35(4)(b). Be advised that an arbitrary or capricious denial exposes the authority to mandamus, actual damages, attorney fees, and a forfeiture of up to $1,000 plus punitive damages under Wis. Stat. § 19.37. I am prepared to pursue every remedy the statute provides.

I request electronic copies. Electronic delivery should incur no reproduction cost, and I do not authorize any fees.

Please confirm receipt of this request.

[Full name] [Address] [Phone]

Fill in plate, start date, and your details. Subject line: Public Records Request — Flock Safety ALPR Data (Wis. Stat. § 19.31 et seq.). Send it to the records custodian for whichever agency runs the cameras — if you’re not sure who that is locally, the police department’s records division is the right first stop, and if they’re not the Flock contract holder, their denial has to tell you who is.

_________________________

Here is the link to the video shared by A Homestead Journey
The Surveillance in America Has Gone Too Far… And Everyone Knows It
https://youtu.be/78O5KkQhCBA

Here is the corrected verbatim transcript generated by my AI assistant Ara:

So the surveillance issue is really growing here in the United States. It’s not a laughing matter, it’s really serious, and people are really waking up to what is happening because we’re getting these cameras all over the place.

I mean, they’re showing up in everybody’s neighborhoods, they’re showing up in rural areas, they’re showing up at places of business. These, these flock cameras, you know, flock cameras. It’s crazy, it’s absolutely crazy.

I mean, check out these videos and look, the backlash is growing, okay? So if you haven’t seen what’s going on, check out some of these videos next. Americans are now declaring war on flock safety cameras.

There are videos coming out across the entire country showing people not only putting trash bags over them, but completely destroying them as well. Take a look. Here are just a couple of examples.

We can see them using power tools to cut down the poles, take the cameras off the poles, throw them on the ground, and even blow them up in some cases. Look at that. Again, this is happening all across the United States.

People are going out at night with their faces covered of course, and using battery powered angle grinders, saws, and paint to cut down or completely cover the surveillance poles.

In Virginia, one guy faced dozens of felony charges after he sliced down thirteen separate cameras. Similar events have been heavily reported by police across Michigan, Oregon, California, Connecticut, and Illinois, just to name a few.

But here’s what’s crazy: new systems are currently being developed to pull Bluetooth identifiers from inside of moving cars, since they can pair a physical vehicle with the unique Bluetooth signal of the driver’s phone. Their surveillance has moved from tracking the machine to now tracking the exact human being inside of it.

But people are fighting back. The Deflock project is a massive open source mapping website that allows people to locate exactly where all of these cameras are.

Hey, what’s up, America? I wanna show you exactly how bad Flock surveillance actually is. And I wanna show you just two city blocks of a small town and Flock cameras recording hundreds of different events of just random mundane life to be used against you, the general population, sometime in the future. Let’s take a look.

So what you’re seeing here is approximately two blocks of a small town with several Flock camera systems recording every single point of movement in the town as if it was something that might be a criminal offense and then logging it here in a database to be used later against you if the time should arise.

So this is just two city blocks, and this is the amount of data Flock cameras found in less than twenty minutes. Hundreds and hundreds of different points. Flock cameras seemed to be doing nothing more than tracking the movements of every single thing, human, car, even animals were seen being surveilled by the Flock camera systems.

This is sickening. This isn’t just license plate readers, this is an everything reader. Every point of movement is being read by a Flock camera.

Of course, here’s your heat map of Flock. Every square inch of human living in the United States is now being monitored by Flock cameras. One hundred and ten thousand four hundred and thirty-two Flock cameras as of July second, two thousand twenty-six.

But as you can see here, most of the entire living space of the United States and any habitable area is now being monitored by Flock. So you’re not just being monitored on license plates. Every single movement you do in public is being monitored and sent to a database for use against you in the future.

So let me know what you think about that.

Is this not crazy as fuck to have in a neighborhood, like just surveilling the whole neighborhood, like just overly in everybody’s business?

They put a Flock camera up near my house. I’m not okay with that, I’m not alright with that. It would be a real shame for the local crackheads to learn there’s about three hundred dollars worth of copper and metal inside of those things, and they’re not hard to get down.

What an evil thing though, like it’s named Flock, like it’s just talking about how we’re sheep, man, like that’s not cool. And they put it up on the 4th of July weekend, man, that’s just like ultimate irony, you can’t do that. Whatever, man.

I’m in the parking lot at church, and I’m gonna go in here and pray for whatever demonic entity is making those Flock cameras happen, they go away.

Look around, we’re standing in the middle of the Richland Wildlife Management Area. Miles and miles of Florida wilderness, with no neighborhoods or shopping centers, subdivisions or traffic lights around. Just woods, hunters, fishermen, families, you know, people enjoying the outdoors the way that generations of Floridians always have.

So here’s my question, why are there surveillance cameras here? Why are there license plate readers sitting at the crossroads of a wildlife management area? Who are they watching? The hunters, people exercising their Second Amendment rights, families going camping, fishermen headed to a boat ramp? Because it isn’t just here. I recently drove to a remote boat ramp in the middle of the marsh. There wasn’t a town nearby, there wasn’t a shopping center, a neighborhood, just a boat ramp and surveillance cameras recording every vehicle coming and going.

At what point did we decide that every trip in the nature should be tracked? Every hunting and fishing trip, every drive through rural Florida?

Some people will immediately say, “Those cameras help stop crime. They help stop human trafficking, and every one of us wants criminals caught.” Every one of us wants trafficking victims rescued, but here’s the question that no one seems willing to ask. How much surveillance are we willing to accept?

For decades, law enforcement investigated crimes without building massive networks of cameras that record the movements of millions of law-abiding Americans. Technology can be a useful investigative tool, but it shouldn’t ever become a substitute for police work. It shouldn’t ever become a substitute for evidence, and it shouldn’t ever become a substitute for the constitutional liberties that Americans have always expected.

There’s a Flock, and there’s a flock.

Flock cameras aren’t just crime deterrents, they are watching you, they are logging you, even if you don’t commit a crime. They have systems that log your license plate, your vehicle details, the time that you were there, the location, they can catalog your make, model, color, bumper stickers, roof racks, even visible damage to your vehicle down to scratches and dents. And then they store that data in searchable databases used by police and other three letter agencies across the country.

That isn’t just crime prevention, that is mass surveillance being marketed to us as safety.

Well, don’t do crime and you’ll be okay? You are thinking way too small. You are quite literally still inside of the box. You trust the government with a permanent surveillance network? Freedom means being left alone by the state unless you have actually done something, not being tracked just in case.

And something that absolutely baffles me is the fact that the CEO of Flock Safety has already compared people exposing the camera locations and criticizing these systems to terrorists and Antifa. That should alarm everyone. That is how civil liberties get eroded, first by labeling dissent as dangerous, then by expanding surveillance in the name of security, right?

And before I show you what a Flock looks like, let’s talk about my own city.

If these cameras are just harmless crime deterrence, why is Louisville, Kentucky fighting so hard to keep their location secret?

Louisville has deployed over two hundred plus city owned Flock cameras, and police also have access to hundreds more shared cameras from businesses, HOAs, universities, other entities across Jefferson County. Around six hundred cameras total that the government can tap into.

Metro officials and LMPD have refused to publicly disclose exact camera locations. Earlier this month, Louisville Metro Council voted down a proposal that would have required the city to publish these locations.

They love to say, “If you’re not doing anything wrong, then you shouldn’t care.” Okay, uno reverse. If you’re not doing anything wrong, why do you care that we want to know where they are? Why are you hiding the cameras?

I live in the West End, so I’m actually going to walk you to the Flock closest to my neighborhood so that you can see what mass surveillance looks like right here at home.

Okay, so this is a Flock camera at the corner of Dixie Highway and Duminell Street in Louisville. Most people drive past this and never think twice, and that’s the point.

Surveillance works best when it feels normal and when it feels invisible.

We’re told not to worry about facial recognition or expanded tracking, but we have no proof that they won’t do that or that they haven’t already.

The issue isn’t just what they claim that the cameras do today, it’s what these systems can become once the infrastructure’s already everywhere.

Flock cameras reduce crime, police reduce crime, you know what else guarantees reduced crime? Paying people enough to survive instead of poverty wages, housing and rent prices that don’t keep people paycheck to paycheck, healthcare that people can actually afford, education that creates opportunity for young adults, treatment for addiction and mental health, the kind of stability that keeps people from desperation in the first place.

They would rather monitor poverty than end it.

Oh, well, there’s no expectation of privacy in public. Being seen in public isn’t the same as having your movements logged, stored, analyzed, retraced, all to be sold to a private surveillance network.

We recognize that persistent tracking can become harassment or stalking when individuals do it. So why is mass automated tracking suddenly acceptable when these corporations and the government does it? It’s weird.

Well, I’m coming to you live as a former Flock Safety camera installer, and I just wanted to educate the public on a few ways these cameras are installed all over the country, right?

The cameras are installed using these kind of clamps, right? We use two of them. Okay? They use an eight millimeter typically or a flat head eight millimeter or flat head socket that can be attached to an impact to drive or to remove this, these clamps.

We can install or remove a camera in less than fifteen seconds.

The solar panel is what powers the camera, and there’s no long cables running underground to power. There’s a battery backup and a solar panel, that’s it. The camera can last all night basically, even a little longer with this battery backup.

So when you’re removing these, you can attach an eight millimeter socket to a drill and just remove it in a couple seconds and pull the camera down. You could unclip the camera, but it takes a little longer without causing any damage, so you can remove the camera without causing any damage.

But then you leave the solar panel in the pole there, which, you know, another tech will just come and install a new camera the following day.

So if you’re gonna dismantle it, you really wanna dismantle it, or if you’re gonna build it, you wanna build it properly, vice versa, right?

They don’t just turn off as soon as you unplug them. They broadcast 5G and they obviously have a battery backup, so if you are gonna do anything with the Flock camera, if you are gonna remove them, you definitely, definitely wanna wrap it in aluminum and don’t leave any gaps in the aluminum foil. Wrap it tightly multiple times, don’t be shy with the aluminum foil.

If you plan on keeping it, if you plan on just removing them and trashing them, you don’t really have to worry about that as long as you act quickly, but they will have your location, so you make sure when you’re doing any, any harm, you know, make sure you’re not on camera, on another Flock camera, make sure you’re not seen by another Flock camera.

If you’re gonna do anything reckless, do it properly, you know, make sure you scope the scene first.

But as a former Flock Safety installer, I just wanted to educate the public on how they are installed. They are installed using these, it’s very easy to remove or install.

Yeah, there isn’t three hundred dollars worth of gold in it, there isn’t hundreds of dollars worth of copper wire, none of that.

But if you aren’t gonna remove them, don’t leave them anywhere near the scene because they’ll just be installed the next day. Dismantle the pole, dismantle the solar, break the whole system if you’re gonna do anything, but other than that, have a good day, weekend’s coming up, enjoy yourselves, be safe, and Flock Safety.

You know those Flock cameras that have been popping up all over the U.S., right? Do not! Under any circumstances, point a high powered green laser at the Flock cameras. This can permanently damage and/or disable the cameras and require them to be replaced and cost the company money.

So please, under no circumstances, do this.

You know, the thing that comes to my mind is like, if you give an inch, they take a mile. You know, so people got comfortable with a little bit of surveillance, a camera here, a camera there, and some of it is good for public safety, depending on the area or what’s going on.

But now what’s happening, I mean, it’s like, it’s getting out of control. And I’ve seen some news stories pop up and it says, you know, “Oh, they were able to find this person because they did the license plate recognition,” and, you know, they’re basically boasting in the fact that they were able to solve this crime or find this person because of this new technology, and although this technology can very well be extremely helpful for things like that, does it mean that we should have it everywhere? That people should be constantly under this surveillance state?

I mean, it’s like the United States of Surveillance at this point.

But let me know your thoughts down below. Are you noticing more surveillance in your local areas? And do you live in the city or more in the countryside? Share your thoughts, share your experiences, and I hope to catch you in the next video. Take care.

_______________________
End Transcript

What this woman said in this video really must be addressed at these meetings because it is really important: “They would rather monitor poverty than end it.”

I feel this points to something much deeper than Flock cameras or surveillance technology alone. Surveillance works best when it becomes normal, invisible, and unquestioned. But the same could be said about the way humanity has been conditioned to accept paying for the essentials of life as though that is natural, moral, or inevitable.

At some point, people were conditioned to believe it is normal to pay simply to exist. We were taught to accept that shelter, water, food, energy, access to land, healthcare, education, transportation, and the basic conditions required to live must all be bought, rented, licensed, billed, or taxed.

Then, when living men, women, and families are pressed into survival, scarcity, debt, desperation, and poverty wages, the same system turns around and monitors the symptoms instead of accounting for the conditions it helped create.

That is the sleight of hand I feel more people need to notice.

The natural world provides land, water, food, minerals, energy, and everything required for life. Yet the resources of the natural world are being used, converted into industry, monetized through contracts, and controlled through laws, courts, policies, permits, licenses, agencies, lawyers, attorneys, corporations, and government offices.

Who or what gives these people authority over the earth and its resources?

Generations later, people born into this way of life have been conditioned to believe these essentials must be bought, rented, licensed, billed, or taxed simply to exist.

Where is the full accounting to the living men, women, and families whose inheritance is the earth itself?

I have yet to see where any rightful law gives people operating courts, governments, corporations, banks, or offices the lawful authority to make a living man, woman, or family homeless by denying access to shelter on the very earth that provides what life requires.

Who is accounting for the profits made from land, water, minerals, energy, infrastructure, labor, data, and the natural resources of this world?

Who is ensuring that every living being receives what is necessary to live with dignity?

What is the point of government if the people are denied the essentials of life and then surveilled when they struggle under the conditions created around them?

This is why I feel the question must go beyond whether cameras “reduce crime.” We need to ask what conditions are producing desperation in the first place. We need to ask why public resources are used to monitor people instead of restoring remedy, shelter, clean water, food security, health, education, and true opportunity.

If the people have inherent, unalienable, and inalienable rights, then those rights must include more than the right to be watched, managed, taxed, licensed, billed, and tracked. Where do we begin asserting our right to the natural world and all that we are heirs to?

For me, this is not only a surveillance issue. It is an accounting issue. It is a consent issue. It is a remedy issue. It is a consciousness issue.

The issue is not only surveillance. The deeper issue is the mindset that monitors poverty instead of ending it, tracks people instead of restoring remedy, and treats shelter, land, water, food, energy, and the essentials of life as commodities to be controlled.

Who is monitoring the ones who claim authority to monitor the people and the resources?

The same systems that track our movements also claim authority over land, water, food, shelter, energy, and the essentials of life.

By what lawful authority?
And where is the full accounting to the living men, women, and families?

I wrote a public notice yesterday addressing this wider matter here:

https://freedomdove.net/2026/07/09/public-notice-of-inquiry-and-formal-public-objection/

_________________________
End of Comments

Here is the data from the video clip shared in the comments above:

Note: This is a verbatim transcript prepared from the audio/video. Words are preserved as spoken to the best of the transcription’s ability. Any legal references, case names, dates, or constitutional claims should be verified separately against official sources.

City Council Meeting — Palm Bay, Florida
July 2, 2026 — FLOCK Camera Public Comment
Speaker: Thomas Gaume

Thomas Gaume.

Thank you. Thomas Gaume.

And happy Independence Day.

And in the name of independence, freedom, and liberty, effective immediately, I withdraw any implied consent for the collection, storage, or querying of the location data of my personal property or myself.

I demand that the City of Palm Bay cease tracking my movements through the Flock Safety network.

I make this statement because on Monday, the legal landscape in this country changed.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in Chatrie v. United States that the government collection of digital location data is a Fourth Amendment search.

And Justice Kagan, writing for the majority, rejected the third-party doctrine, ruling that citizens do not consent to location tracking simply by operating on public roads or using digital networks.

I would add to that, or visiting city parks.

In his concurring opinion, Justice Gorsuch went further, defining digital location history records as personal property protected as an effect under the original text of the Fourth Amendment.

What that means is all the location data you’ve collected on me over the last five years with Flock cameras belongs to me.

Not the City.

Not Flock.

I want it back.

I don’t want you to have it.

Under Chatrie, the collection of data itself is the search.

The warrantless compilation of innocent citizens’ movements over thirty days is a constitutional violation from the moment the first image is taken.

You cannot cure an unconstitutional mass dragnet by requiring a warrant to search it after the fact.

The thirty days of historical location data you currently hold was gathered without warrants.

Under Chatrie, that database is a compiled record of unconstitutional searches.

Holding it is a continuing daily violation of our Fourth Amendment rights.

If this administration is unable or unwilling to comply with my personal constitutional demand to cease warrantless tracking of myself or my property, and any retention of any identifying data points, you must suspend operations of the Flock network if you cannot comply with my request.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Madam Attorney, are you tracking that? As far as I was tracking, geofencing, the Supreme Court ruling — are you tracking and able to brief a little bit regarding that?

Yes, Your Honor.

I mean, force of habit.

I know a lot of people are hearing this, but to give them some background on what the case was about, as far as the U.S. Supreme Court case and what they actually held and what the background was.

Essentially, Chatrie involved — there was a bank robbery.

So, the person robbed the bank, got away, the police had no suspects.

So what they did was they did this. It was a three-part process in which they contacted Google to find out geofence information.

So they created an area outside of the bank for a certain period of time and told Google — they did get a warrant — provide us all the numbers within that area.

Then they took that from that level. They got it down to another time frame, another search, and another.

And after they did it three times, because they were just getting numbers then, they were able to get down to three persons, one of which was Mr. Chatrie.

They were able to then arrest him: “Hey, you’re the suspect.”

And he filed a motion to suppress.

So what the Court was dealing with was whether, when the officers obtained the information from Google, was that a search?

And it was.

This information is based upon his phone.

So what the Court did, they looked at a case that they had already ruled on and they extended it.

The case was Carpenter v. United States.

And in that case, the Supreme Court held that if police were to get information about, essentially, the cell phone towers from a third party, that they needed a warrant.

And they said getting this historical information and this location are pretty much the same.

So they extended Carpenter.

And it’s important for you to realize they extended Carpenter, because after Carpenter, there were lots of people that challenged the license plate readers.

Well, they said under Carpenter, you can’t get the information about historical information from cell phones; you can’t do license plates.

And all the cases that tried to use Carpenter to invalidate the license plate readers, they were not successful.

This case has nothing to do with license plate readers.

What it has to do is geofencing, and it talks about essentially what is moving further.

It’s everybody has cell phones.

So if you’re getting information about somebody’s cell phone, you’re going to have to get a warrant.

That’s essentially what it is, further extending that the cell phones, they are everywhere.

Everybody has them.

They’re mini-computers.

You’re not going to get information about that people have about cell phones without a warrant.

That’s what the case is about.

Thank you, ma’am. I appreciate the brief and highlighting that.

Next speaker.

Here is the Facebook link to the video:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/879865834669399

I’ve preserved the comments attached to the video below:

Sheridan Keber The public roads and your licenses to drive on those roads are not private. The Flock surveillance cameras have been a proven, valued tool in solving crimes, bringing back kidnapped kids & adults, tracking those who chose to break the law and drive away without the need of a police chase which would endanger innocent folks. If the Flock Cameras looked into your back yard, house, inside your car… then yup that would be an invasion of privacy. I prefer being open to the watchful eyes, like back in the days when small communities watched everything. Welcome back to being watched …. or just don’t drive on the roads. 

John Chapin Sheridan Keber you are clueless!! Better get another booster!!

Thomas Gaume That’s not what the law (NOW) says.

Sheridan Keber Thomas Gaume  See the second paragraph which means the Flock cameras are still in play … The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision on Monday that law enforcement’s use of geofence warrants — which allow investigators to indiscriminately obtain location data from cellphones within a specific area during a certain time frame — constitutes a government search requiring a warrant.

While the ruling didn’t directly address Flock, attorneys say the decision addresses several of the same privacy concerns they have raised in challenging law enforcement’s largely unrestricted use of Flock’s nationwide license plate database.

Brandon P Moore Sheridan Keber you are exactly who Franklin was talking to when he Said “if you are willing to give up some liberty for security you deserve neither”

Scott Lees Sheridan Keber I saw an unrelated program the other day, they made the point that folks say …why do I worry if I have nothing to hide, I’ve done nothing wrong… But then the program asked what gives you the right to decide you’ve done nothing wrong? I agree with much of what you say, these cameras can be extremely helpful to the police in solving crimes. But there is already ample evidence they are being used for much, much more than just that. And SCOTUS ruled as they did per same.

Robbie Triebell Sheridan Keber It is always so wild to me.

If you are a true protector of the constitution, you would know, it doesnt bend.

These people saying Flock Cams are unconstitutional, are bending……

They need to say “They should be deemed unconstitutional”

If you believe in government and the process of America, you would have to agree with our Supreme Court, and they have yet to declare the use of Flock Cams “unconstitutional..

Not in even a single case….

Actually its literally the opposite..

I hate, and I mean hate, people who “bend” the American Constitution to fit their own personal narrative..

Sean Bancroft Sheridan Keber makes me wonder what you have to gain by advocating for Flock cameras??? Makes one wonder???? You need to read or re-read “1984”

Blake Caudle Sheridan Keber Ben Franklin said those that would trade freedom for a little safety deserve neither freedom or safety. I wish everyone could see what in all this mass surveilance entails, including all the data centers, which all we can do is tell people. And she thinks its funny he doesnt wanna be surveiled. I guess we will trade clean water and affordable electric and water, and the environment for safety.

You might not be a believer, but it blows my mind people claim to believe yet dont believe what is happened when the bible says all this will happen. Well knowing truly is half the battle bc soo many are willing to forfeit freedom soo easily.

Paul Lyczek Sheridan Keber “Driving” is not the same thing as “traveling”. Please do not confuse terminology since you do not know the difference in these clearly defined and adjudicated terms (by SCOTUS).

Terra Nullius Sheridan Keber – The problem is that flock is now using what they call or marketed as signal trace. The front cameras aren’t just reading license plate. They can now read your cell phone. Any connections to the Internet even your credit card information.

The problem is the government is allowing a private corporation to permanently install their equipment on public property so they can track you.

Under that scenario, I should be allowed to install my own privately owned camera in front of City Hall and track the comings and goings of everyone. I’m sure the city would find that acceptable.

Claire Baillargeon Sheridan Keber Your statement is true and if that was ALL they were doing I would be fine with that. They are SELLING your info to 3rd parties!

Guy Joudrey Sheridan Keber that’s not what the supreme Court said… Right?

Aidan Tharington Sheridan Keber bootlicker

Nottoday Buddy Sheridan Keber actually if your in your car it is private. People live in their cars which makes it their private domain. And since you can’t use curtains while driving to keep it private. The flock cameras are in fact a violation of your 4th amendment right. To unlawful search and seizures. You know crimes were committed and solved before flock cameras. This is nothing more than an easy way for cops to not do their job

Amelia Doolittle Sheridan Keber The problem is that it’s not just the police departments or Government that can gain all of the Flock information which goes way beyond a license plate number- your name and SS# and a heck of a lot of information on your phone ( even if turned off) is collected and they are very easy to hack. They even have sunglasses sold that you can actually see the information. So it’s not only the Police that get this information. Criminals can collect it. Do you want that? They aren’t safe for anyone who passes by them. And it’s easier than putting malware on your phone or hacking into your computer which actually happens when you decide to click on certain emails or messages or allow people into your computer or phone not aware that you’re doing it. Or you’re keeping your personal credit cards and bank information on your phone all of the time and someone gets close enough to you to use a device to quickly get access to it. You can stop clicking on weird stuff or allowing people into your computer and take your financial data out of your phone and put it into certain apps at the last minute if necessary but if a Flock camera can get it all just by passing by- and you don’t understand that this is happening I guess you need to decide if you’re OK with all of your information being collected but often compromised simply by driving past one.

Danny Eaton Keep giving up your freedoms and you won’t have any freedom !

Jamie Carpenter Sheridan Keber they can be easily hacked and evidence planted on them. We shouldnt use our tax dollars to pay the justice system for hiring expensive data forensics scientists to defend whether or not the evidence is actual or planted. People can be framed and innocent people end up in jail. Thats not justice. It will bog down our justice system n waste tax dollars. Its not secure, it doesn’t have 2 factor authentication when logging in and now its collecting ip addresses and signal traces that we are going to just pin on who ever was around a crime scene? And its privately owned and linked to data they do sell. If they are allowed it should be a stand alone server owned and used by the public with the highest security and only shared after obtaining a warrant and accessible through gramma requests by local public, and never sold period.

Nancy Nunke Sheridan Keber they do look inside your car. In 2027 all new cars will have microphones in them aimed at YOU, and microphones listening to YOU and your passengers, and tracking you wherever you go. Some will have four or more cameras in them.

Martin Mayden Sheridan Keber solid definition of coward, I’m certain that you would’ve helped the Germans in 1933 locate the Jews for transport.

John Kokavec Sheridan Keber you are full of it buddy it is an invasion of privacy and it does break the 4th amendment without a doubt we the people will stop this sooner or later guaranteed

John Kokavec Robbie Triebell there is no if ands or buts or maybe this is unconstitutiona

RJ Johnson Sheridan Keber  what a moron!

Netta Wright Just because you are brainwashed doesn’t give anyone the right to steal freedom from everyone else. I think all of you people who love enslavement should be forced into Fema camps where you can be monitored at all times and kept safe.

Bŕuce Hunt Sheridan Keber they’re owned by a third party corporation. Read the\nPeople have not given them any permission to record us. Even under government on the road, as they say, checking your license plate\nThe state’s postThey’re not responsible for any damage that may occur to your vehicles or your personal being. Therefore , they have no right to track us. Apparently , you are working 41 of these municipalities , as you put up your comment.

Greg McCormick Sheridan Keber oh shut the F up Boomer. Those wiiling to sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither liberty or security.

Paul Kirkpatrick Sheridan Keber PUBLIC ROADS MEANS THEY DO NOT BELOING TO THE CITY OR COUNTY THEY BELONG TO THE CITIZENS THAT LIVE THERE. CITIES DO NOT REALY OWN ANYTHING.

James Oneal Sheridan Keber mmm… those boots taste good huh ?

John Frank Bodnar Sheridan Keber first of all, police can look inside your car, all they want, that’s perfectly legal. It’s the open view doctrine, second of all, if you want to live like that and be under constant scrutiny while the politicians and the government hide everything that they do illegally under National security or some other BS like that.Then maybe you should go live in China or North Korea.We don’t want it here in america…

Aaron Gwinn Sheridan Keber red coat

Kyle Grasso Sheridan Keber please turn off the TV  programming 

Bert Proulx Sheridan Keber nothing you are saying matters. It doesn’t matter if those cameras Could be used for good. The cameras are violating the Constitutional Rights of every American Citizen they record.

They ALL need to come down. My Constitutional Rights are NOT up for debate.

Dustin Hayes Sounds like something a bit would say

Harold Long Sheridan Keber they have also been used by male enforcement to stalk women… Im not sure if you’ve seen where the cameras have been used for all kinds of nefarious behavior…. including children and women being watched for evil reasons…I haven’t seen any proven cases where men were targeted but that doesn’t mean anything…..also did you see where the lady was arrested from her home in another city from r the crime, but her husband was working in that area…they ran his tags along with other people and seen his wife was a slender blonde…..same as the woman in the crime video…..sorbet went and arrested his wife saying they knew it was her…..later her neighbor came forward with video showing she was at home in her yard that afternoon……she would have been in prison if her neighbor hadn’t had a camera…..that level of control and surveillance belongs to no one .. it’s flawed.

Kenneth Wayland Sheridan Keber you seam to be a sheep. You do know the cameras do a lot more that what you just said. You do know the reason data centers are being built. The day is coming that you will be judged by AI. You are guilty and you will have to prove your innocence. Know most will say so what’s wrong with that. Corruption is what will determine your innocence or guilty. These cameras are just a stepping stone to what is coming

Melissa Koenig Sheridan Keber in this country it is against the law to track you!

Rex Murphy Sheridan Keber its also been proven that they’ve been used by fucked off cops tracking their exes and shit, fuck all the way off

Joseph Tito I think you should just get in line and follow all the rules like the lemming that you seem to be. No spine.

Alfie Hopkins Sheridan Keber you’re clueless

Michael N Randie Mingus Sheridan Keber location tracking is invasion of privacy. My data is mine and not for sale. If the Democrats would stop releasing criminals back out on the streets life would be better for all of us.

Charley Clus Man Nancy Nunke don’t forget the “safety features” like kill switches.

Jiminy Cricket Sheridan Keber just go get your microchip already it’s people like you after 9/11 that said oh just take your shoes off let them pat your balls it’s for security and how’d that work? it’s people like you that insisted everybody wear a mask and probably agreed people get fired from their job for refusing a experimental and in all reality poison weaponized injection. You are aware what this country is supposed to stand for and represent? If you want to roll over and bend over and give up all your rights do it quietly You see where attitudes like yours has brought this country too. These things have already been used to stalk exes and their family members in multiple different jurisdictions it’s proven fact police cannot be trusted

Allen Speed Sheridan Keber that’s all good and fine but we all know it’s already being mismanaged and it’s also not 100 percent not to mention if they can’t do the job they were hired to do and instead relying on systems with a large margin of error why do we even need them. They need to realize that the budget isn’t going to support both so, do they even know that the need for them is diminishing by the minute while they feel so good about the very technology that’s about to make them obsolete I wonder. They are almost past the point of no return in terms of the job they so love. As far as the mismanagement, nobody is concerning to their data which is their property being sold to third parties and elsewhere without their consent and notice information that’s the problem The selling of a person’s information is the same thing as selling off their property without their consent it’s illegal

Allen Speed Sheridan Keber And furthermore they are looking into your car and issuing tickets if your cell phone is sitting on your lap so what do you say to that

Allen Speed Blake Caudle because they are too lazy to want to participate in actively changing it. And if that’s not the case then just know when the Communist take over, these are the idiots that will be the 1st to go. They always are.

Allen Speed Terra Nullius maybe we should. Time to drive the point home. Sweet one up outside the mayor or governor house and see if they didn’t start pitching a huge bitch

Grant Sage So you are a comunist

Janet Stonier-Klingman Jamie Carpenter 5 or 6 police officers were just fired for using the flock for personal reasons. So, who is kidding who, we don’t want them!

Dustin D. Wind Sheridan Keber The good old “If you have nothing to hide” Right? Tell me your address then. See what I mean? Its about data collection and historical storage of my movements regardless of intent.

Med Ty Sheridan Keber booooooot licker

Ben Hewer Sheridan Keber total 4th amendment violation, Adolf

Ben Hewer Sheridan Keber are you tye same idiot I saw following arrows on the floor to stay safe?

James Dugger Sheridan Keber fluck flock u wanna use it fine put it in ur home

Bobcat Ryan Owens Sheridan Keber yea they’s been a few good things. But also alot of pred@tor police preying on women victims through it flock is ushering in the style n status of being north Korea. If you would trade your liberties for safety you deserve neither Benjamin Franklin and he was absolutely right ! Wayyyyy too many domesticated docile city folk and unfortunately spreading country wide !!!!!!

James Faggart Sheridan Keber must be a commie lover to accept oppression so easily.

Stephen Chabot So, you work for Flock right. It’s that or you are a full-on retard.

Pissed Off Sheridan Keber wow, the Nazis would have LOVED you

Orion Freeman Sheridan Keber Greetings. With Respect: And some regret, I find it necessary to notify you of your error, in-total.

F.lock, is NOT, a safe and secure system, by ANY means. Nor, is it safe to attempt to say that the ones using it, upon everyone, in-tow, are using these tools of War, under the guise of solely crime-prevention measures, as just. Regrettably, you are uninformed, as to the absolute genesis, and methodologies of how and why these systems are both implemented, and utilized. Also to note, there are numerous cases now surfacing, as to a.i. software errors, resulting in wasted resources as well as unlawful arrests which have been made. Across the board. I implore you, to actually dig much deeper into research, versus surface-level approaches to yours and Our rights being shredded, right under us. I wish, I would be able to detail you, additional facts, thru True data, yet this is not a current possibility, via this platform.

Allen Holtzclaw Sheridan Keber how would you feel if there was a flock camera pointed at your driveway and the front of your house and every time you opened your front door you are being recorded

Charles David Long Sheridan Keber unfortunately for you, your just plain stupid!!! That’s not what the cameras are for!! Wtfu

Randy Mack Sheridan Keber Those who would give up liberty for safety will find they have neither liberty or safety.

Joanne Cooley Sheridan Keber Who pays for these public roads? Not the gov3rnm3nt.

Billy Bob Sheridan Keber they actually do look into your car etc, they track your phone and your cars blue tooth not just your license plates

Ken Lynn Sheridan Keber so you give in to government overreach as no problem? Like the mailing of tickets for speeding or other traffic violations without due process which has been challenged many times and most states have removed those cameras for many reasons but the Supreme Court has not got any of those cases yet but it’s coming and I’m totally against it.

Sheridan Keber Ken Lynn There it is … Mindless accusations without any actual proof. Actually, my friend, I appeared on TV speaking against the school zone cameras.

Chris Blanton Sheridan Keber Sheridan, Flock defrauds its customers. Their biggest critics are former law enforcement agencies that were former customers. Look up Benn Jordan‘s Youtube for the facts. Peace!

James W Everson Jr. Sheridan Keber 

Dustin Whitaker Sheridan Keber yet everyone in the ep files roam free. Because the quote economy would collapse if they were all put behind bars…they are not for justice the encroachment is about curbing a rebellions from the ppl who are fed up with tje lackthereof accountability from our elected officials the ppl have noticed an are increasingly becoming agitated. Through out the u.s ppl are deflocking an a.i datta center semi trailer loads have been stolen…ppls water miles away from them are contaminated e.t.c when the elected officials have taken everything from the ppl an have backed everyone into a corner you have created a reason for law abiding ppl to push back against the crimes perpetrated against them. They are creating their own recipe for resistance they know what they are doing is wrong otherwise why put restrictions on the 2nd tall tail signs for whats to come. when across the country bills are proposed in the name of protecting children yet in the name of protecting children no one in the ep files got put behind bars make that make sense…all for entertainment purposes only.

James Smith 4th amendment says your person and your effects. Car, phone, bluetooth identifiers, wifi identifiers that are also being collected with Flock(not just license plate) are all part of a person’s “effects”. Additionally, assembling a pattern of travel is also warrantless tracking. Just because people are ‘in the public’ does not mean the government is allowed to perform or sanction unconstitutional behavior and methods.

Jerry Neeley 2 words green laser

Joe Jax Jerry Neeley that doesn’t work

Ian Moxley Jerry Neeley that’s just a bandaid.

John Dos Joe Jax You tested it?

Shane Knight Joe Jax it 100% works it has to be over 5w and if they are they will burn the lens sensor inside the camera and a 1-5w can burn black spots into the lens sensor so yes green lasers 100% work and have been proven to work lmfao do some research before yo… 

See more

Allen Speed Jerry Neeley no! 2 words 2 green lasers. 2 hands 2 green lasers! Mmmyea yea.

Allen Speed Shane Knight I second that and yes they do

Adam Smith Joe Jax blue lasers work, they are 5W.

Joe Jax Shane Knight it’s better to just cut them down

Shane Knight Joe Jax if you cut them down they can just rewire them you have to destroy the internals then tear them down

Paula Coyle Shane Knight why tear them down so they can replace them sooner?

Shane Knight Paula Coyle if we cmkeep taking them down they will end up continuing to put them up because they cost about 2k or more a piece to replace

Rachel Ortiz Carpenter They said it doesn’t work.

You need a strong green laser.

Regular cat  and Walmart lasers won’t work.

Sheridan Keber Interesting… When in open discussion and one person turns to sarcasm and taints … they have lost their position.

Jane Downs Sheridan Keber do you think we the people should be able to livestream all police and for that matter all politicians, since history shows they have mass crime? We would have short terms. Nobody would be a career politician.

Melissa Koenig Jane Downs they are elected so they should be tracked

Jane Downs Melissa Koenig that’s my point. But they’re not tracked and we are.

Melissa Koenig Jane Downs I know I was agreeing with you 

James Kay Sheridan Keber this dumb cunt most likely has some tyrant as a relative that needs a lead helmet!!!!

William Mastrocola They couldn’t figure out that google provide SEARCHES huh?

David Fantauzzo When I looked more into what flock cameras actually do they are not just license plate readers they keep track of every single license plate and every single plate that license plate goes furthermore they attached to Bluetooth devices inside your phone to find exactly who you are and then they give the police access to all of this information without a warrant from a judge

Debrah Ables David Fantauzzo that sounds like an illegal search then doesn’t it?

KelLiz McHerne David Fantauzzo It is so much more than that. They track every vehicle based on appearance, bumper stickers, dents, rust, even parking stickers in your windshield. They record audio in the general area as well, occasionally mistaking backfires as gunshots and other such mishaps.

It’s not even a question if searches right away, it is illegal surveillance without a warrant.

Dara Shahrokhshahi David Fantauzzo and Google is their batman. We’ll keep quiet, wink wink, they say. Black mailing god knows who.

Rick Holstein These questions we should all be asking:

1. Is there a warrant?

2. Is there unbiased 3rd party oversight, to

A. What data is being collected?

B. How the data is being stored /sold?

C.Who can access.?

3. Do these systems violate individuals 4th Amendment rights?

I have a camera pointed towards my home. I feel like I’m watched everytime I take out garbage, get the mail, just step outside, or leave. I am curious about the systems zoom capabilities thru windows and privacy in my home and vehicle.

Karen R Foye She’s incorrect as Flock has increased to using our phones, watch and cars to track us

Sean Pruitt Karen R Foye it’s going to track anything that uses Bluetooth even if it’s turned off. The only way to avoid being tracked by them is to use a faraday bag or a faraday cage.

Michael Domagala She said “its just numbers” as FlLOCK cameras see faces. Thats not just numbers so…

Eric Schofield Michael Domagala also are capable to listen in and read lips, Ford just started putting that tech in their new cars starting with the 2027 models

Michael Domagala Eric Schofield I seen that, older less tech cars are going to be desired for vastly different reasons then we are used to I think.

Kelly Yetter They always go to the lawyer to answer a constitutionally protected right. The lawyers aren’t the ones who put their hand on a bible and swore an oath to uphold the contract they swore to. Luke 11:52 Woe unto you lawyers !

4th amendment tells us we have a right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers and effects. Driving our vehicles falls under the effects part of the 4th amendment. It would be wise for Palm Bay council to do the right thing as We The People know they’re acting outside of granted powers.

John Cockrell Just because of that incident, there’s no Claire voyance to this flock camera being used. The detectives have their due diligence to do their job. Not overall surveillance cameras because they do in fringe.I’m people’s right to privacy.

Debrah Ables John Cockrell and you believe that? Not used shit since we have the national guard and ice constantly breaking the law..the entire administration are law breakers and convinced or accused criminals..I don’t believe they aren’t using what ever they want despite the laws or what they say..

Dale Naffziger I’m real conflicted on all of this. If you’re not committing a crime then it’s it’s not harming you. But it really is harming you. I don’t want to live in a police state where I’ve watched all the time. Will they put cameras in our homes in the future to make sure we’re not doing something illegal inside our houses? The woman’s argument isn’t really correct. The Supreme Court ruled that this data gathering violates the fourth amendment. Period.

Nottoday Buddy Dale Naffziger you should be concerned. There have been more and more cases of mistaken identity. Where someone in another state commits a crime. But by using flock cameras and AI facial recognition. The AI got it wrong 90%of the time. Would you want a picture taken of you by a flock camera then used with AI to identify you for a crime you never committed?

Dale Naffziger Yes, all of that is true. I think about it quite often but I think, I’m not doing anything wrong. I see what you’re talking about but then I see when they rescue an abducted child or a bank robber. I’m very conflicted about this.

Bob Ochoa Dale Naffziger ring is already in most houses. If not there’s the tv, appliances, vehicles (there was no chip shortage, there was a shortage of sevielence chips)and many other way to watch us

RJ Johnson Dale Naffziger  and we wonder why we are up shit creek without a paddle!

Jason Henderson Dale Naffziger news flash lol they already have cameras in your house if you have a cell phone are a smart TV.

Melissa Taylor Tell them Tommy

Tom Piotrowski What WE do and where WE go is OUR business and NOBODIES else!

Jason Mills Geofencimg for cell phones and flock cameras for license plates. Tracking is tracking.

Dustin D. Wind That attorney Didn’t invalidate his 4th amendment right though, she poo pooed his use of a supreme court case as support.

Chris Driscoll “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”

Cindy Falco DiCorrado I know him personally

Cindy Falco DiCorrado I concur

David Waite said nothing, even with that smirk. we as free people, should be able to travel anywhere without the government having a complete record they can search at anytime. this government wants to be able to track us just like China does, control EVERYTHING all the time.

Jimmy Prater He’s correct  I concur 

Todd Sutherland Thank you Tom.

John Kokavec Anybody agreeing with a flock camera either works for the company or has some kind of doings with this company and that would be the only reason they would defend it anyone else in their right mind would not defend this surveillance

Laura Allen Can we hire lawyers to sue the city that put up the cameras?

Laura Allen Probably not, isn’t that what the nda’s are for? Immunity?

Jeffrey T Watkins Using surveillance tools to catch actual criminals and those who do harm to others in any way shape or form is okay. But using surveillance technology to entrap citizens who haven’t broken the law or harass citizens that haven’t broken the law is abuse of surveillance technology. Along with this kind of technology needs to be new laws put in place to prevent abuse of the technology tools.

Powder Burn So the fourth amendment that allows you to record in public and also guarantees that you don’t have right to privacy in public also covers those flock cameras.

David Cody Knerr What about probable cause and reasonable suspicion they’re turning everybody with an automobile into a suspect. No probable cause no reasonable suspicion.

Nottoday Buddy The issue with the whole geofencing. Is they do a random search without a warrant. Someone who didn’t commit the crime is now implicated in the crime. Simply by being in that area. They can’t get a person less warrant. The warrant has to be specific and include the person’s name. They can’t get a warrant for Jane or John doe’s. They also can’t hide behind the no warrant rule by using a 3rd party. They have to get a warrant

Chris Bradford Doesn’t matter how many people bring this in front of meetings..These cameras will continue to go up as well as data centers.. Our cellphones are the “data points” these things feed on

Sammy Cos Gov works for us not the other way around

Jennifer Luff Well actually I don’t know why they ruled in the Court rule that it was okay for the license plate readers because from what I was told in court was that the officer that pulled me over read my tag and pulled me over and he was told in court that it was illegal for him to just read my license plate look up my information without first being suspected of some type of crime or something being wrong with my vehicle like say you know a light out or a tag with the wrong date on it first had to be suspected of a crime first for them to just read my tag so I don’t understand why reading tags automatically is now all the sudden acceptable just like a lot of illegal stuff being acceptable now

Don Lee Lawyers lie

Thomas Gaume Don Lee Actually she’s doing her job. Current city policy is to allow flock, she must defend that policy… No matter how wrong she is, she’s allowed to be wong.

Danny Lee Actually, that’s not true whatsoever. Go do your homework then come back here and apologize.

Lynn Barlass Meyer Fisa, the patriot act, our phones! So why flock? Flock is a geo fencing! Hello……… she said it herself!!

Jiminy Cricket You better believe it’s longer than 30 days of data

Torrance Davis And okay to be Independence Day when we drive more Independence cuz we’re being watched

Sean Hamilton AMEN, WE THE PEOLPE.

Dave Hernandez Right in Tom! Sadly the Bozo’s could care less…

Kimberly San Or our beaches

Vyna Clasher That Aunt Tom just did a tap dance for her massa like her life depended on it.

Kenny Keel You mean the collection of the kangaroo courts. I know they and alot fooled but not me.

Derek Rome And the other two were innocent and you had no right tracking them that’s what they said which means all the innocent people you’re tracking on our daily basis it’s unconstitutional

Joe Jax Everyone in America should be pushing back on these surveillance systems, judges included.

Dianna Ware I feel the same! Totally unconstitutional

Chad Rapp So she said the case was over a bank robbery. Dont banks have plenty of security cameras. They would have that persons face, the car he used, ECT. Should even know what way he left and posibly the license plate number. So then the police asked the geo fencing info for 300 suspects. They then narrowed it down to 3. They knew the time and day it happened. They knew what he looked like and what he drove. Input that in and geo fencing only needed to look for one vehicle and track it not 300. But they got 299 peoples information without a warrent. Crazy

Mindy Linney I don’t know how they did this in the first place. Because it is illegal. It basically is stealing because your information is YOUR information without your permission to give it to somebody else. They are stealing it.

Darrell Marshall They have them damn things out on forest roads . And no one lives out there .

John Drinkard A-Man Bro. It’s corruption.

Karla Burrows Make them pay for your data

Lena West I agree totally they don’t have any right to our data

Andrew Orlando Surveillance by the government is about presumed guilt. It’s just a matter of time before the discover a charge to bring against its citizens. This is completely the opposite of our constitution.

Every inch of your rights you allow to be taken will add up until a point of no return.

The problem is most Americans are poorly educated and ignorant in life, history, technology and our institutions. They are not critical thinkers.

Robin Mize NSA has been recording and storing every call, every text, every email, plus listening to you through your cellphone, and even watching you through the camera.

Edward Snowden told everyone years ago.

Karen Okuley Knopp It’s a broader matter than this attorney’s response.

Citizens do not agree to surveillance, collection of data is a constitutional violation.

Please do not disregard this man’s request.

Donnie Turner Terre Haute Vice News

Dennis Jarrells The bullshit of we the people being tracked by any means needs to stop only way to do it is with a warrant people let’s take our country back

Mitzi McClain Heck yeah

Phil Baumgartner Don’t try to read words that you don’t understand.

Kevin Baumbach Illegally obtained information.

You can’t use video illegally obtained with out probable cause

Karen Citrowske Connell We need to do this in Colorado!!!

Justin Miller  it doesn’t matter about a bank robber or whatever you’re talking about!

 and say, we are canceling any and all contracts or other deals with Flock and our municipal maintenance department is being dispatched immediately to remove any and all currently existing Flock Cameras located within our municipal boundaries, and we are serving the Flock Company with Official Notice to Immediately Delete any and all records, files and data caches of any and all location data or information, any and all license plate information and any and all images or audio files of any persons, vehicles or any other thing that originated from any Flock Cameras, Raven Audio Sensors and License Plate Reader that are or that were located within the boundaries of this Municipality, Immediately!! Any failure to comply with this demand will result in Federal Criminal Prosecution and Massive amounts of Civil Lawsuits Being Filed Against Flock seeing compensation for each citizen to repair liquidated and punitive damages, personal and mental health injuries, deprivation of constitutional rights and protections etc etc

Bo Phillips Hell yeah I agree with him  so what you’re saying it’s legal to check on everybody ain’t that called harassment or stalking? You know I mean don’t that fall into it and tracking people for no personal calls but your own. This is God’s country ma’am, this is Jesus Jesus Christ country you don’t have really a leg to stand on. You just blowing s*** up your ass sir. Let me know what’s going on. I’m following you because they don’t have the right to check on nobody. Those cameras should not be up. The government don’t own us. We own the government. We say what goes American people. God Christian people. So it’s time to react. The I don’t even want to say it. Boston tea party. Let’s go in and shut it all down and we’ll start new again. It’s time to show American people. We are the people God’s here fearing people. This is b******* and what’s coming up the next couple years is b******* too. Does not have nothing to friends on our rights. That is what they’re getting ready to do vehicles. It’s not right face recognition on any camera that is government control is not right because that’s what they want to do. Think we’re going to bow down to this. B******* and let them rule us. Haven’t they done enough already to where they need to go all of them? How long we going to put up with this? God fearing people, American people. It’s time it’s time

William Malott Me too

Michael David What’s the point in going tho these conferences and telling these “leaders” about themselves. It does no thing

Ruslan Fernandez Pravilenko Snowden was and still is right.

Sammy Kirk Durham  flocking data centers

Elijah Sean Lance Flock takes cell phone identifiers too though so it DOES apply.

Eric Demaris yeah damn skippy every American does in every city and state and so do the US Federal citizens but they’re in one of our states are in one of the US Federal territories that’s including Hawaii in Alaska you know like Puerto Rico you know

Karl Fletcher It’s not surveillance, it’s stalking.

Tracy Guerrero Ie dragnet surveillance. Flock cameras

Liana Pratt Get em!!! 

Susan Joyce Brito Does anybody really remember a time when you could take the battery out of your phone and when that ended I think there was an agenda. It was a long one and we’re here now so I have phones that I can take the battery out of still I’m thinking about switching back. You think that’s bad. What about your cars? The car can decide if it thinks() you’re safe to drive. gonna stop giving you ability to press the gas. If it can’t see your eyes. Please look up, etc. what are you gonna do? That’s not sarcasm. That’s an open discussion question

Smith Valerie The Supreme Court does NOT have authority higher than our constitution so NONE of their rulings matter if they go against our constitution

Robin Deree Myers I don’t. care what they used them for its against are rights in every way

Andrew Ray God bless you sir 

Melinda Warren Sounds equivalent to all fb info, and text, call, voice info as well.

Mike Caswell Yes you have too get a warrant.

Aaron Hess How about just honor the constitution and not make excuses for ignoring the 4th amendment. Flock cameras are flat out unconstitutional, period.

Janedoe Jane Please don’t buy green lasers that are readily available and ruin these cameras.

Ray Gonzales He’s rite flock the goverment

Val Mikesell Hey shipmate. Proud of you.

Shaune James John Grove Private citizens are private

William Glaser I just want to point out that no matter what Flock will keep doing what ever it wants because it can just move all of those cameras to private property. Which they do all the time. There are so many companies and people willing to take the check to have it on their property. Flock also buys land too.

Even if Flock moves all cameras to private land the local agency will still use flock or any company like it to gain the knowledge that they need. As sad as it is, it does sucks.

Also you insurance agency will also pay and install flock cameras because if a car gets stolen they will be able to track it down and then report those findings to the police to shut down those theft rings which pads the shareholders pockets with more profit.

In the end this lowers crime. Yet people do not see these things from every angle.

Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver William Glaser, I see what you are describing about the cameras being moved to private property, insurance companies using them, and local agencies still gaining access through another door.

But from my perspective, that is still looking at the issue from inside the same manufactured framework we were conditioned to accept.

The deeper issue is not only where the cameras are placed or whether they can reduce certain crimes. The deeper issue is that the people operating through legal systems, corporate structures, contracts, agencies, courts, insurance, banking, taxation, licensing, and technology have helped create the very environment they now claim authority to monitor.

They create the structure. They define the terms. They control access to land, shelter, water, energy, transportation, commerce, money, remedy, and education. Then, when people are pressed into survival, scarcity, debt, desperation, homelessness, addiction, and crime, the same system turns around and sells surveillance as the solution.

That is not true remedy. That is managing the symptoms of an artificial way of life.

I say this because I have had numerous experiences that showed me nothing is as it first appears. During my life review and other moments of direct inner revelation, I was shown how deeply I had been conditioned by the world I was born into. I also saw how I had participated in systems through the profession I was trained in, believing I was helping, while later realizing there were deeper layers of harm, conditioning, and unconscious agreement I had not yet been able to see.

That was not easy to face. It required me to become honest with myself and to ask where my actions, beliefs, training, and assumptions were truly coming from. Was I acting from the soul’s truth, or was I acting from a system that had trained me to see life through a narrow and artificial lens?

This is why I feel the issue goes far beyond cameras. I see how living men and women are being conditioned into a specific way of life that is not in alignment with who and what we truly are. We are being trained to accept being tracked, billed, licensed, insured, taxed, categorized, monitored, and managed as though that is simply the natural order of life.

But why are we here experiencing life in the first place?

Are we here to be manipulated by technology, contracts, policies, debt, fear, and artificial authority?

Or are we here to remember the truth of the soul, the nature of creation, and our direct relationship with life itself?

From what I have observed and written about in previous articles, this is a war against man’s way of life, but it is not fought only with obvious weapons. It is fought through language, legal fiction, contracts, scarcity, debt, fear, surveillance, and the normalization of an artificial world. It imprints the subconscious and hijacks our creative capacity by training us to accept a reality that was never aligned with the truth of who and what we are.

This is why it is up to me to know the human design in relation to creation. I am no longer willing to accept the status quo.

So yes, if people only focus on removing cameras, the same structure may continue through another doorway. That is why the consciousness behind the system must be questioned too.

Who benefits from keeping humanity monitored and distracted?

Who profits when people are kept in survival?

Who gave anyone authority to turn life into something that must be tracked, licensed, billed, and controlled?

And when do we stop consenting to a reality that was never aligned with who and what we truly are?

Lisa Swain Hmm so they contacted a criminal to get criminals. Some people have no idea what they’re doing.

Tammy Thompson They already are miss using this technology

Shannon Paul Protection of privacy 

Myke Tunnell Intresting how she did not really answer the question as to how Flock cameras are excempt from filming everyone? She went off on cell phone shit.

Loyd Wilson Bounty for every camera. Pay those guys their money

Tim Headley What about satellites, drones, Google earth, door cameras, our phones etc….., they illegally track us no matter where we are.

Elise Majur It’s still unlawful search and seizure!!

John Wilde Just look what has happened in Great Britain and the removal of their cameras by the citizens …..Take notice Council members. We don’t like this!

Judy Land And this also goes for cameras in autos, homes etc. period! These criminals working in government positions play on the fact they can control, lie & push illegal laws on the people to control freedoms, because the public does not know their rights, Constitution & Amendments! People learn your Constitution & Amenedments- we have power! They work for us!

Rex Deal The government is not to spy on the people, the vehicle is my personal space,. if you allow this,then you will eventually allow it every where including your house and let them put tracking devices on you personally

Chris Hoover She is not correct,

William Garramone It’s more than just a “camera”. Time to wake up.

The connection between modern data centers and Flock Safety cameras forms a powerful, cloud-based mass surveillance infrastructure. Instead of relying on localized, on-premise servers, Flock Safety uses a heavily decentralized, cloud-connected hardware-as-a-service model to process information across the United States.

Here is exactly how the cameras and data centers are connected and how data moves between them:

### 1. Edge Processing and Wireless Transmission

Flock cameras (which are typically solar-powered and mounted on utility poles) do not just passively record video; they use “edge computing.”

* **Initial Capture:** When a vehicle passes, the camera’s internal AI quickly captures the license plate and vehicle characteristics (color, make, model, and distinct features like roof racks or bumper stickers).

* **Cellular Connection:** The camera packages this captured data and immediately transmits it wirelessly via built-in cellular LTE networks (similar to how a smartphone sends data).

### 2. Centralized Cloud Data Centers

The data sent from the cameras is transmitted directly to high-security, centralized cloud data centers (primarily built on **Amazon Web Services (AWS)** infrastructure).

* **The Database:** Once the data reaches these data centers, it is logged into a massive, centralized database. Flock’s network processes upwards of 20 billion vehicle scans every month.

* **Encryption:** The data is encrypted both while it is traveling over the air (in transit) and while it is being stored in the data center (at rest).

### 3. Integration with National “Hotlists”

The data centers act as the bridge between local cameras and federal/state law enforcement databases. When a camera uploads a plate scan to the data center, the data center instantly compares that plate against national databases, such as:

* The FBI’s **National Crime Information Center (NCIC)** hotlists.

* State police watchlists.

* Local, custom-created watchlists (e.g., stolen vehicles or missing persons).

If there is a match, the data center pushes a real-time alert out to local police officers’ laptops or smartphones in less than ten seconds.

### 4. Interconnected Data Sharing (The National Network)

Because all these cameras funnel data into centralized cloud data centers, Flock is able to offer a **nationwide search capacity**.

While individual town or neighborhood cameras are physically miles apart, they are virtually connected in the cloud. If an agency opts into data sharing, a police department in one state can log into the cloud interface and search for a vehicle’s historical movements across cameras located in entirely different states. By default, the data centers automatically purge unflagged footage after a set period (usually 30 days), though the data ownership and sharing permissions remain in the hands of the purchasing agency.

Sandi Hockley Those cases regarding license plate readers were unsuccessful simply because the judges were corrupt and the defendants didn’t challenge the rulings. The cameras are still UNCONSTITUTIONAL. (As is any & all “geofencing” infrastructure.)

Blake Fischer Don’t reword it to your scope of position

Michael Demeter But that would mean that they need a warrant on each any every person in this nation! We now have no privacy. No they will track your video, voice in your car and anything you say will be recorded illegally. Ford now has a patient on this technology! If it thinks your eyes are strange it will turn off your car. What if your diving to the hospital and the car turns off?

Ivan Bebeszko Starr Bebeszko

Edward Haberthur Thomas the only way to stop them in their tracks is to become a private national.

You can do that by learning what true freedom is.

You fought for our freedom in the navy.

Now let us we the people help you.

Come join the community where were taken back our country.

I don’t post links on other peoples profiles as that is rude. So please comment and I will share with you.

Thank you again for your service.

Justin Moore Leslie Cook

Patrick Doherty Palm Bay Crime News

Steve Broadbridge

Earl Frigg’n Weaver

Blake Fischer They rule the cameras are illegally in place

Kyle Lingerfelt We should file a class action law suit all you need is 3 or more to file!!!!!

Chris Buchanan This is all a diversion, …

Gov’t already knows where you are at thru your phone as your phone constantly records everything and where does it send that Information to?

You speak, the phone records keywords, algorithms adjust your searches and advertisements etc to the words it identifies.

Your phone data is also being sold to God knows who etc etc.

Yes, the cameras need to come down before we end up like China and start using social credit system or something worse.

Tim Williamson If you use a phone you are already being violated! Truth. They are tracking every single thing you do

Aram Stein Open 8-Banner’s closet. Thank you.

Roy Young I feel the same way

Denzel Anderson Fact remains it’s illegal to surveil people period

Bob Clevenger Criminals hate Flock cameras. Why would non-criminals want to get rid of them.

Michael Gebhart Like the government CARES if they violate the constitution! Its all a show folks!

Eric Demaris yeah they they’ve done this before with the 14th amendment saying that it didn’t go against our freedom and our constitution in the highest laws of the land are we the people are all power drive froms and then we literally created the Constitution so they claim that they can take our birthright from us and turn us into a slave by saying that the people that were freed in the civil war weren’t covered under our constitution which that’s the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard why do you think we fought to free them against you because you were wrong we were right and Justice prevailed yeah we Americans fought the most bloodiest war in American history to this day and it was ourselves we were fighting against ourselves that were the older Southern Democratic slave owning party you know the ones that created the ku Klux Klan and still are the ku Klux Klan socialistic communist Democratic party you know there were no Republicans here the Republicans were created to fight off them cuz it been always a try to enslave us these people keep saying oh it’s not like the Democrats of the past the fuck it isn’t I was alive when the whole time that Biden was sitting in a Congress seat back in the 90s through all that shit he’s holding me all the unjust bills with the crack in the Coke or whatever it is being unjust as it was different fine for the same type of fee or whatever is listed at the same type of drug but it was people were getting more of a sentence for what they call the black drug then a white one that was the Democratic party no different there see the Republicans they’re indoctrination of what they think things should be because somehow judges think they can reinterpret our Constitution and to pertaining to what it means which is literally disregarding our Constitution and making up whatever they make up that they are reinterpretating the parts of the Constitution to fit their needs that’s exactly what that is you don’t hurt something that’s the law that you’re supposed to follow to the key there’s no reinterpretation you obey it they were supposed to obey it and their traders just like they are today I can’t remember if you did or not but if you did or anybody else that does that the same fucking way no matter who you are Judges don’t make laws here they’re supposed to hold our fundamental freedom to follow the law that we laid for them without over surfing they’re supposed to be our part of our eyes to watch the government to make sure that they’re not trying to do some weird shit because these institutions we created so and so that way we could pursue our happiness instead of having to deal with all these foreign entities and shit we can’t pursue our happiness if we’re all always have to be ready and be doing shit everywhere so that’s why we created the state and federal institutions that serve we the people that’s why they are public servants the president of the United States of America is a public servant to The Republic which is we the people we stand one nation under God in the pledge of allegiance to the flag we are the nation the land is not the nation some place around around it’s we the people that stand one nation and we stand because we got legs the pledge allegiance to freedom and the Republic which is We the people that is pledging allegiance to us to uphold our fundamental freedom above all that’s what the pledge of allegiance is it’s the swearing that they swore their life their Liberty their property and much more when they all went in that room if you don’t know it go look it up it’s Barney and Clyde 100% 10 times fold and it’s actually real and it’s more than one it’s up there not like lovers and shit who knows maybe one of them might have been but we don’t know

Ruslan Fernandez Pravilenko Cool story lady, but it makes no difference. Flock is an illegal search. They are looking for evidence to create a case. It also gives that “proprietary” captured data to anyone who wants to pay for it. That does not follow CJIS protocols. The data is been sold to foreign users. It is not “in house data” as what a DOT camera would be.

Ben Ganner Welcome to America A stands for A camp. Look it up, research what an A camp is.

Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver Ben Ganner, can you clarify what you mean by “A camp”? Are you referring to detention camps, internment camps, or the broader idea that America is being turned into a monitored containment system through surveillance and control?

William Mastrocola You should not HAVE the informatoin without a warrant. Not oh don’t worry we won’t look at it.

Darin Cripe They are using the flock way farther than tag readers. its tracking everyone and they can munipulate footage to keep us under their thumb.

KelLiz McHerne But what they fail to understand is that you NEED a warrant to surveil anybody or any place and that person, persons, or location must be named in that warrant.

In order to get that warrant, Law Enforcement MUST show probable cause for said action…

Mass surveillance in and of itself is inherently unconditional!

Marcia Winters This is Florida?

Dustin Whitaker Keep in mind there quote geofencing is largely dependant on electronic devices what happens when ppl start putting them inside a lead box when traveling? For those who don’t know lead blocks signal…all for entertainment purposes only

Darin Cripe Hes correct

William Garramone

Manuel Victoria Severino She’s lying

Manuel Victoria Severino She’s stuttering

Manuel Victoria Severino There’s a lo of human and child trafficking why can’t they track them

Manuel Victoria Severino With our consent

Manuel Victoria Severino That’s right

Tammy L Billings-Reed damn right!

Shannon Paul You may feel safe and free. All intrusive collection without consent is always open up for unethical uses. Have we open the pandora box of the Patriot Act that will be used against its own citizens.

Michelle Ingham stop spying on us

Steve Cox Class Action, talking nice will get you nowhere

David Richman Yes it was

Jamie Steinkamp Foshee Yessssss

Donny Hargis Thank you sir .

Wayne Knapp I agree  

Karla Burrows It doesn’t matter ,CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ,PERIOD

Eric Demaris yeah they get our information all the time from all kinds of sources without a warrant they run our license plates for no reason just because to see if they can pull us they literally pull us over for some reason or another that it’s not even a crime we’ve committed cuz nobody’s a victim of our actions therefore they’re in the wrong and they’re in the unjust the standing armies shouldn’t have been created in the first place if they are set out amongst their military trained armed with lethal weapons and set out to enforce unjust laws rules the policies penal codes that violate the will of the people thus not in the best interest of the people that’s not following the laws and upholding our freedom and telling us we have to have some type of requirement and bill has been passed into law that’s under the color of law which is unconstitutional as well but everything is corrupted people I’m telling you

Lee Houston I agree Master valence is unconstitutional and that’s exactly flock does mass surveillance this program should never been allowed to happen it’s unconstitutional they need to do away with it we the people need to do away with it we need a band together and we need to get rid of it

Cynthia Raines I Put This On Truth Social!

Mandm Wynn Those Cameras are infringing upon our rights as Citizens, and altho the Constitution was ammended to include the word Person to incude all persons, instead of Citizens. See how words matter?

Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver Mandm Wynn Yes, words matter. That is exactly why I feel we need to look even deeper at the words being used.

Have you looked into the origin and meaning of the word “citizen”? It is not simply another word for a living man or woman. It carries the idea of membership, status, classification, and relationship to a political or legal structure.

So when we say, “our rights as citizens,” are we speaking from the truth of the living being, or are we speaking from a title and status created within the same system that claims authority over us?

To me, this is where the deception becomes subtle. Words like “citizen,” “person,” “driver,” “taxpayer,” and “resident” can quietly train us to accept being tagged, labeled, titled, registered, and classified before we even question who and what we truly are.

So yes, I agree: words matter. And that is why I am learning to become much more careful with them.

James W Everson Jr. WHAT THE FLOCK 

David Quintana See how the criminals use a third person excuse… it is still unconstitutional..

Robert Fulco THEY ARE GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY IF NOT BY FLOCK CAMERAS THEY HAVE SATELLITES ALL OVER THE WORLD THAT CAN DO THE SAME THING THE FLOCK CAMERAS DO THEY WILL JUST FIND ANOTHER WAY TO DO IT

THE GOVERNMENT DONT CARE ABOUT ALL THAT OR THE CONSTITUTION

Brant Lewis WE DON’T NEED A FCKING “AMENDMENT” DO WTF WE’VE BEEN DOING HERE IN FLORIDA AND LITERALLY RIP THEM THE FCK DOWN YOU PUSSIES.

AND………. For you slow motherfckers, these are PURPOSELY designed to be EASILY torn down. Hence, cheap flimsy painted black PVC poles. This is all just another BIG TEST for us just like the COVIDsaga was to see how WE THE PUSSY ASS PEOPLE OF TODAY REACT.

WAKE THE FCK UP

Wait for an “AMENDMENT”

G T F O H with that amendment 

Shannon M Meadows So if they can do this why aren’t you using this to find kids. But use it to spy on citizens. Smfh

Jay Swendris KILL FLOCK !!

Gary Roberts All those assholes up there believe they are our gods and we must obey and pay homage. The problem is there are places that let these assholes shop in their stores and eat at their restaurants. Stop being nice to them…trespass them because you can and stop letting these fucktards think they own you.

Scott Boden Defending their police state…

Casey Holloman It started with the laughing than came the smoke up your a*s. That says it all. Talking does nothing bc they will just laugh you off and talk about the ice cream truck that just hit you. Oh but you bought a cone. Take care of yourself. Enjoy your loved ones and your life until it ends. No matter what goes on in the world life has always ended and we all will take our last breath someday. Make the best of it while we can. Personally I won’t waste my valuable time on people who don’t deserve it. They’re just not worth it.

Michael Demeter You are saying nonsense you don’t need all those cameras this is big brother spying on us! I call bullshit!

Michael Demeter If cameras would have worked then why didn’t you use them when you had the evidence against all those involved with Epstein.

Zaven Lee Mcpherson Everyone tracked should sue for damages and invasion of privacy.

Rockhard Ridefree The woman spouting spit and dribble

Scott Michael So she explained that location data on your phone is not equivalent to location data of flock cameras? That’s stupid. She is stupid.

David Russell That city attorney needs to tossed out of office. This she is twisting the new ruling of supreme court.

John Ringer List b****** is lying

Dan Andersen So then you are saying that they have a precedent that they can go back to ANYTIME they want!! Back peddling is lies!!!!!

Frank Byus Flock cameras, that doesn’t represent FREEDOM Folks. Under surveillance 24-7. Is bullshit.

Bradley Bourn That “attorney” dude just showed why every DEI hire ever made must be fired.

Jeffrey Forsberg It is Government overreacting again and it’s been too much lately there is a limit

David Shane Ply Omg a DEI hire

David Shane Ply DEI lawyer hire

Christine DeGarmo Constitution? What constitution?! That thing means nothing, they show this over and over again! We have no rights, we live in a prison, 24/7 365 days a year surveillance.

Derrick Washington SURE DO NOT AT ALL CROOKS!

Brian M Steger Chop down and smash every single one of those FKn things!

Paul Standley Flock cameras get all of the cell phone data from your cell phone they go against the 4th amendment and they need to go

Dan Lay Tear them down

Emmett Arvin Fuck your cameras I want my freedom back!!! I hope you all burn in hell for letting this continue

David Pathfinder People are Totally FKiN Retarded ; Public access is Public DOMAIN ! The Gov CAN WATCH YOU on PUBLIC and PRIVATE cameras ALL FUKin DAY LONG Every DAY ! You stepped OUT Of your Private Fox hole and Unto a Public Battelfield ! Privacy is NO MORE you Idiots ! Not until you GO HOME , GO HOME ! and cry your citizen Boo $hit !

Heath Wallace It’s time to start hanging every fucking criminal that violates the Constitution

Missing Link And she didnt answer the question, suspend flock indefinitely

Charlie Paul I wanna see class actions against each and every gov officials who allowed flock

Karen Marlane So when will “we the people” start our own drones and our own TMZ to follow every single moment of the politicians that rubber stamp this BS? Guarantee they dont want their affairs, SAs, d*ug use, gÀy trysts, etc documented.

Rexx Ogle Burn the flock cameras

Brett Slocum Flock em’

Karen Morrill Bull crap

Karen Morrill Sue the town ! Take them to court

Timber Wolfe Since they are not willing to pull them out and cancel their contracts.We have no choice but to remove them ourselves.Thank you for nothing..

John Frank Bodnar PEOPLE BETTER WAKE UP TO THIS KIND OF SURVEILLANCE ON THEM BECAUSE , FOR YOU KNOW IT , THEY ARE GOING TO WANT TO HAVE CAMERAS IN YOUR HOUSE…

IT’S ABSOLUTE HYPOCRISY , BECAUSE WHEN YOU RECORD THEM , THEY WANT TO PUT YOU IN JAIL AND THEY THINK OF EVERY LITTLE EXCUSE TO DO SO , BUT IF THEY WANT TO RECORD YOU , THEN THEY THINK IT’S PERFECTLY FINE….

PEOPLE BETTER WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver John Frank Bodnar They already do. If people have smart appliances and or a cell phone, laptop, computer they have a camera in the home. Have you read the agreement with your cell phone provider?

Marlea Dutcher Do you know they are saving images an voices an. Manipulated evidence an have admitted it taking innocent lives to cover there crimes an there doing the same in court houses

Thomas Taylor I agree 100% flock is pure demonic by this govt.

Dennis Swatsell Remove them We the people have spoken

David Buckley Tyrants

Tom Hart All those that are responsible for the flock cameras, speed cameras, red light cameras, all need to be arrested, cause it goes against our constitutional right and when I say arrested, put in jail for ever living breathing life never to get out no good behavior no nothing they will rot inside their prison cell and that includes tracking of any electronic device, whether there be cell phone medical device satellite cameras whatever if you haven’t committed a crime then there’s no reason to be tracked searched invasion of privacy

Netta Wright SHE’S USING LANGUAGE FRAUD AGAINST THE PEOPLE. THEY THINK THIS IS FUNNY. IT WON’T STOP UNLESS WE ALL STAND AND STOP THEM.

Walter Pilos Tear them down Talk doesn’t work

Tammy Arguijo WHY ARE THEY FLOCK FACING ALL THE SCHOOL YARD HERE…FEELS LIKE PEDO

Mike Luttrell Bullshit remove all flock cameras! They are not operated by state or pd the operate through a private corporation who admits in interview that it gathers cell phone data, face recognition, tracks your movements throughout city etc! That is in definition goes against our 4th amendment rights!

Brandon Salois Lasers and tell your local crackhead there is metals in the flock cameras

Neil Hooten FLOCK? AS IN SHEEP?

J. R. McGowan In addition, using tax dollars to purchase such unconstitutional systems.

Chris Hinds Flock is a private corporation owned by the owners of Isreal, and collect money and tip the mayor and city council! Your city government loves them!!!

Rob Taylor Do you think you’re free, don’t pay your taxes and you’ll see who owns your land.!

Henry Davis The supreme court’s operates UNDER the Constitutional law of the land NOT above it !!! They interpret what is written not what they think was written. Honor your FKing oath !!!

Deanna Slatton They are stealing your water and leaving this for you to drink. It is my observation that Data Center water poisoning is getting no attention on social media after thousands of post from public to social media heads and none are addressing the elephant in the room not tic tac nit Twitter not YouTube not Fake book none of them. The enemy has all platforms social media and MSM. Its obvious at this point. They are stealing your water folks . They dont need water for data centers if they would spend the money on alternative and they are poisoning your water for you to drink through data centers waste water. Research this . The law is do no harm. This is what they are not telling you. Im Pretty sure many were diabetic and they died because the c19 vax had graphene oxide which is now coming out. Diabetics take venom peptides and when you mix venom peptides with graphene in the body you can die from it. Oh and when you put venom peptides graphene and corona in search bar you will be surprised what you find. They use glyphosate as a pesticide and then coat the weeds with green nano gels with graphene oxide to seal the weed and kill it and this graphene enters the gut gets in blood stream and if you are diabetic it can make you toxic and they are now GMO ing our nicotine vegs that fight spike protein with venom peptide dna alterations. Now imagine what can happen. Graphene oxide and nanoparticles can cause prions disease a wasting disease of sorts. Imagine that seeing how the data centers use graphene submersible pads that can degrade causing graphene oxide to leach into our sewer drinking water rivers lakes and streams. Do you see the situation that needs situation awareness. Also imagine what happens if we or the animals eat venom peptide gmo altered crops and drink graphene oxide leached from data centers waste water or new so called smart graphene pipes or take meds with graphene in it . They are using these green nanogels on many meds and injections. In surgery with heparin, in dental anesthesia and other anesthesia. In pill popping drugs. To much graphene in the body clumps and causes blood clots, this is why the jabs were kept cold because when they heat up they clump. Also does the same when heated up in the body. If the graphene gets higher than glutathione in the body you get respitory failure and if you have venom peptides in the body the graphene makes your body more toxic and 5G can heat it and move it around. Pulse beams can cause clotting. Oh and they have you going through scanners everywhere which will help clot you even more. We have bio weapons being put out on we the people from many avenues. The venom peptide in dna alteration is patented not sure if they have made it in the fields to be put out into the market but we have alot of issues to be cleaned up in this country. Data centers can leach graphene oxide into our water its hard to remove from waste water and now this. Data centers could be mass producing graphene oxide . This is the possibility. They use sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate in their cooling systems and combine these two things to graphene you can get graphene oxide. This needs some serious looking into. You might also like to know that data centers can emit decibels of infrasound to the level of the mosquito military infrsound weapon but worse if it continues with the infrasound. Also Datacenters can contribute to Radon in your homes. The 55 undisclosed chemicals found in c19 jabs cam be found in data center waste water almost all of them. These can get in your body through the graphene oxide that can’t be filtered out of the drinking water and many of these chemicals are hard to remove as well. Not good folks. The graphene oxide gets in the blood through your gut and carries these agents into you. Maybe they just want to force you in those smart cities where you will have water. They are installing graphene pipes in smart cities which can leach into your drinking water as well. Let’s take out bad lead and give you something even more dangerous because graphene pipes degrade when water is pushed through them and it will get into the gut and go into your blood and clot you. They will push you into their smart cities but they will have theur designated clean water where they will use copper pipes. But they will give poison for you to drink.

Daryl Hokanson Love government splaining. Blah blah blah blah blah blah

Shane Gooden Davis These BAR working POS people don’t give a shit about your Constitutional Rights! The States, Counties, and Cities have all committed Treason against We The People and our Constitution!! They all work for a foreign entity The British Accredited Registry which has no Jurisdiction or power over We The People!! As they continue to do so they are all Unconstitutional and committing an Act of War against We The People!! Since they have committed Treason against We The People they all deserve to hang!! They have already been put on notice, yet they continue their Treasonist actions!! They will be held accountable for these actions!!

Travis Meeks FACEBOOK, fix my account, why am i following this MFer and 1000s of others. Commy fcks, probably because i know the truth? Why can i not put the word meteor or 911 in any comment?

Facebook is evil

Sean Pruitt How do you figure that? The Supreme Court ruled that while you don’t have the same expectation of privacy as a home you do have a lesser expectation of privacy in your vehicle driving on a road. And those cameras have not been proven to do anything but surveillance on people. Yeah you go ahead and give up your rights for safety, see how that goes? Only perverts and psychopaths want to watch what everyone does at every second of every day

Patrick Doherty That lady is lying her a** off.

Patrick Doherty TAKE THEM DOWN you are part of the problem

Patrick DohertyThat’s not what he’s stating at all. You are not our parents, stop babysitting us and stop surveilling us

Blake Fischer Class action 10k per person you owe for theft of information and violations of oath to office

Don Lee She’s lying

_________________________
End of Comments

Here is the official City of Palm Bay meeting source for the July 2, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting 2026-17. The City’s own website directs the public to its Agendas .

The City’s official Agendas / Minutes page says City Council agendas and minutes are available through PrimeGov, and that City Council meetings are held first and third Thursdays at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 120 Malabar Road SE. It also says meetings are available online through the City’s Listen / Watch Meetings page.
https://www.palmbayfl.gov/government/listen-watch-meetings

City Council Regular Meeting 2026-17
Thursday, July 2, 2026 – 6:00 PM
Council Chambers, 120 Malabar Road SE, Palm Bay FL 32907
https://youtu.be/ar1TXW-8zlE

__________________________

After listening to the videos and reading many of the comments, it is clear that people are viewing this situation from very different levels of comprehension. Some see FLOCK cameras as a public-safety tool. Some see them as a privacy concern. Some see a Fourth Amendment issue. Some see private contractors and public agencies building a surveillance network. Some are beginning to ask deeper questions about poverty, crime, control, consent, and the manufactured conditions that made this way of life appear normal.

For me, the inquiry cannot stop with the technology.

It has come to my attention how often the people who created and operate legal systems, businesses, agencies, and technologies have us speaking in a way that makes it appear as though a fiction is performing the action. We say, “the company did this,” “the city did that,” “the technology decided,” or “the court moved,” when in truth it is living men and women in official positions, acting through offices, titles, contracts, policies, and agencies, who are making decisions, signing agreements, authorizing systems, enforcing policies, issuing orders, and performing the actions.

The name “FLOCK” is not the living actor. A company name, software platform, vendor label, municipal contract, or AI system does not have conscience, oath, intent, or moral accountability. The accountability belongs to the living men and women operating behind the names, titles, offices, agencies, councils, policies, vendor agreements, and contracts.

The living fact is simple: this technology is being used to collect vehicle images, license plate data, vehicle characteristics, date and time stamps, and camera-location identifiers, then store that information in a way that can create searchable historical movement records. Calling it “public safety,” “data,” “license plate reading,” or “retention policy” does not change the substance of what is happening. Movement is being recorded, stored, searched, and potentially shared.

The Fourth Amendment secures the right of the people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the people, through the constitutional instrument, established that the Constitution and laws made pursuant to it stand as the supreme Law of the Land. Therefore, no city policy, private contract, software platform, AI system, or public-safety slogan can lawfully override constitutionally protected rights.

The legal question may be more nuanced than saying every ALPR use is automatically criminal. The recent Supreme Court ruling in Chatrie dealt with Google geofence and cell-phone location data, not license plate readers directly. Yet it still gives serious constitutional reasoning for questioning mass location tracking and the warrantless collection of historical movement data.

So the issue is not merely the technology. The deeper issue is whether public officers and private contractors are using technology as an instrument to do what they could not lawfully do directly: create a warrantless movement history of living men and women who have done nothing wrong.

If violations are occurring, the people hiding behind offices, policies, titles, contracts, corporate names, and software systems need to be held accountable. The technology may be the instrument, but the responsibility belongs to the ones authorizing, funding, operating, concealing, defending, or continuing the system after constitutional objections have been raised.

This is why jargon matters. Words like “data,” “retention,” “querying,” “geofencing,” “public safety,” and “license plate reader” can make the matter sound technical and harmless. But conscious language brings us back to the living facts.

Who authorized this?

Where is the warrant?

Where is the consent?

Who owns the data?

Who has access?

Who profits?

Who is harmed when the system is wrong or abused?

Who is accountable when constitutionally protected rights are violated?

And beyond all of that, who benefits when humanity is kept monitored, distracted, afraid, divided, and focused on managing the symptoms of a manufactured way of life instead of questioning the structure itself?

For me, this is not only a surveillance issue. It is a consent issue. It is an accountability issue. It is an accounting issue. It is a consciousness issue.

I am no longer willing to look only at the camera while ignoring the system of thought that installed it, normalized it, funded it, contracted with it, defended it, and called it safety.

May truth be revealed.

May every lawful remedy be restored.

May every living man, woman, and family remember who and what they are beyond the titles, labels, records, roles, and systems that taught them to consent without knowing they were consenting.

May every man and woman awaken to their true nature and align with the Infinite Intelligence flowing through their body, life, and affairs.

May we remember that we all have the inherent right to experience life free from unlawful intrusion, coercion, manipulation, surveillance, or trespass upon the will, the spirit, and the physical body.

May every system, contract, policy, technology, and office being used to violate the natural world, the human design, and the sacredness of life be exposed, corrected, dismantled, and removed from operation.

May those using technology to harm, control, exploit, or unlawfully monitor living beings be removed from any position, contract, access, or authority that allows such harm to continue.

I do not condone abuse, coercion, manipulation, or violation of the will in any form, on any dimension of mind or matter.

I stand for truth, lawful remedy, conscious creation, reverence for life, and the restoration of man and woman to the truth of who and what we are.

Note: FLOCK’s own materials describe its license plate reader systems as collecting and searching vehicle-related data such as license plates, vehicle make, model, color, time, and location, with default license plate reader retention generally described as 30 days unless otherwise configured by law or customer policy. The Supreme Court’s June 29, 2026 decision in Chatrie v. United States addressed Google geofence and cell-phone Location History data, not ALPR cameras directly, but it is relevant to the broader constitutional discussion around digital location tracking.

_________________________

The flow feels meaningful:

🌊 River / flow of life
🕊️ Peace / Freedom Dove — Divine Oneness Vitality Enlightenment
💙 Sacred masculine
💜 Spiritual transmutation / divine union
💛 Heart / Divine light
⚖️ Lawful remedy / justice
🌎 Earth / living inheritance
🌹 Love & grace / sacred feminine / restoration

#WhoIsMonitoringTheMonitors #FLOCKSurveillance #MassSurveillance #PrivacyRights #FourthAmendment #ConsentMatters #ManufacturedWayOfLife #NaturalRights #LawfulRemedy #ConsciousCreation #FreedomDove