Regarding Taxation, Presumed Obligation, Birth Registration, Contract, Deceptive Forms, Silence, Consent, Signatures, Leases, Mortgages, Banking, and Lawful Authority
Let it be known that this notice is made as a public inquiry, formal public objection, reservation of position, and statement of concern by a living woman, with breath in the body as evidence of life.
This notice was sparked by a video circulating on Facebook addressed to the Prime Minister of Canada regarding taxation, banking, savings, retirement funds, the cost of living, and the question of where Canadians are supposed to place their money so it remains safe and protected.
A link to the video, the transcript, and the comments visible on the thread as of July 9, 2026, at approximately 3:33 p.m. Pacific Time, are included below.
The video raises important questions. However, in my view, it also carries certain assumptions I have been examining for years.
The author, Dr. Julie Ponesse, speaks from the title of “Doctor.” I see this as an important distinction because titles, offices, roles, and professional designations are man-made constructs. They may carry rules, regulations, duties, classifications, and presumptions that do not necessarily apply to the living woman or man in their proper capacity.
A woman or man, to me, is first a living spark and expression of Source energy, which some call God. That distinction matters because life is not created by a certificate, registration, title, office, number, account, or administrative record. The living presence exists before the delivery is recorded, before the name is entered, before the certificate is issued, and before any man-made classification is attached. The record may document an event, but it does not create the life. Life does not begin at delivery; it begins at conception. And even before sperm and egg meet to form the body, there is the deeper mystery of spiritual conception, the soul’s presence before embodiment.
In the video, Dr. Ponesse states:
“Dear Prime Minister Carney, I’m writing this because I’m tired of asking these questions into the void and getting silence back. When you add it all up, income tax, sales tax, property tax, carbon tax, CPP, EI, the tax is baked into everything I buy. I’m handing over close to 70 cents of every dollar I earn before I’ve bought groceries, before I’ve paid the mortgage, before I’ve done anything I want with the money I worked for. So I want to know why. Why does the government keep backing the banks, propping them up while the rest of us are told to just tighten our belts? Why do you keep pushing RSPs, locking our money away, tied to the very system you control when there are other ways to save that don’t hand you decades of control over our future? And why does our money keep ending up overseas, funding things we didn’t vote for while our own people can’t afford housing, can’t afford food, can’t get ahead? I’m not against paying my share. I’m against paying it into a system that doesn’t work for the average Canadian. So here’s my question, plain and simple. Where are we supposed to put our money so it’s actually safe and actually has a chance of keeping up with what you’re doing to our dollar? Because right now it feels like the system isn’t built to protect us, it’s built to control us. Yours truly, your actual boss, in case you forgot.”
While the video asks where the money goes and where Canadians are supposed to put their money, my inquiry is even more foundational.
I do not accept the underlying assumptions about money, what it is, who can create it, who controls it, or why any living woman or man should be presumed to need it for the essentials of life.
I do not accept the assumption that any living woman or man has already been lawfully determined to owe payment.
I do not accept presumption as proof.
I require the production of the positive law, lawful determination, and verified record establishing my status as a “taxpayer,” and I affirm that no such determination has been shown to me. I also ask where such lawful determination exists for any living woman or man upon whom that status has been presumed.
I declare that no classification, number, account, record, certificate, notice, assessment, or administrative presumption can stand as proof of lawful obligation absent positive law, full disclosure, lawful determination, and verified evidence.
I declare that it is unlawful for a living woman or man, born with inherent, unalienable and inalienable rights to the essentials of life, to be presumed into a status of debt, servitude, taxation, or compelled payment without full disclosure, conscious agreement, lawful proof, and a valid contract.
To me, any compelled payment for the essentials of life raises serious questions of rights, remedy, trust, and lawful authority.
I have already made claim to my life and my life experience through my conscious acceptance of the spiritualization of this body.
I hereby give formal public notice of this event, which is forever recorded upon the Akashic Record and cannot be diminished, displaced, altered, or overridden by any external record, whether electronic, administrative, paper-based, or otherwise.
I have the right to ask who defined the status, who applied the classification, who created the account attached to the delivery of this body into the earth realm, who claims authority over that record, who benefits from the presumption, and where the lawful proof of authority exists.
I formally and publicly object to any and all records, accounts, classifications, files, instruments, certificates, registrations, numbers, assessments, obligations, trusts, estates, or administrative presumptions created, attached, assigned, opened, maintained, transferred, monetized, managed, administered, or used in my name, or in relation to the delivery of this body into this realm, without my full knowledge, conscious consent, and lawful disclosure.
I require full disclosure, verified accounting, lawful proof of authority, disclosure of administration, identification of any office-holder or party claiming authority to administer such records or accounts, and correction of any record, account, classification, or presumption created, maintained, administered, or used without my knowing and conscious consent.
I require full disclosure, verified accounting, lawful proof of authority, disclosure of administration, and correction of any record, account, classification, or presumption created, maintained, administered, or used without my knowing and conscious consent.
Therefore, I formally and publicly object to any presumption that an obligation to make payment exists or has been lawfully proven, absent full disclosure, verified accounting, positive law, lawful determination, and lawful proof.
I object to the presumption that calling someone a “taxpayer” proves that a lawful obligation exists.
I object to the presumption that the creation or existence of any account with the Canada Revenue Agency is, by itself, proof of lawful authority, lawful obligation, proper classification, verified accounting, or valid “taxpayer” status.
I object to the presumption that a record is a contract.
I object to the presumption that silence equals consent.
I object to the presumption that participation under necessity, coercion, confusion, fear, lack of remedy, or lack of full disclosure equals a knowing and lawful agreement.
In probate and trust administration, silence is not the same as full disclosure, written consent, acceptance, approval, or agreement. Where a beneficiary or intestate successor is concerned, the law recognizes the importance of notice, disclosure, accounting, objection, written consent, and the ability to require the fiduciary to account.
A beneficiary may be named in a will or identified through an estate process, but that does not mean silence creates consent to every act, presumption, account, classification, duty, obligation, or administration that follows.
Notice is not consent.
Silence is not consent.
Receipt of a document is not consent.
Failure to object without full disclosure is not knowing consent.
An administrative presumption is not lawful proof.
Where a trustee, executor, administrator, personal representative, registrar, or other office-holder claims authority over a record, estate, account, trust, classification, or beneficial interest, I require full disclosure, verified accounting, and lawful proof of the authority being claimed.
I do not accept silence as agreement, waiver, acquiescence, or consent.
Many people say, “It started when the parents signed the birth certificate.” From what I have studied, that statement is not accurate.
The mother and/or father do not create the birth certificate itself. They complete a registration of live birth, or birth registration form. A certificate is then issued afterward by the proper Vital Statistics authority or Registrar General. In other words, the certificate is not the original living event. It is a later document created from the record.
That distinction matters.
The birth registration, in my estimation, is just a record. It is not a valid contract. A contract requires specific elements, including mutual assent, consideration, capacity, and lawful purpose. If those elements are absent, then I do not see how a lawful contract was ever formed.
For something to operate as a lawful agreement, there would need to be full disclosure, conscious assent, competent parties, lawful purpose, and an actual meeting of the minds. A mother or father recording the live birth of a newborn is not the same as knowingly creating a contract that binds the breathing newborn to a lifetime of presumed status, debt, taxation, obligation, or public administration.
This is why I keep returning to the distinction between what is recorded, what is presumed, and what has actually been knowingly and lawfully agreed to.
A label is not the same as proof.
A record is not the same as living authority.
An assumption is not the same as lawful consent.
From what I have studied, when the elements of a contract are absent, every so-called contract is void — not voidable, just void.
I also see serious questions around deceptive forms. In the United States, 15 U.S. Code § 1692j is titled “Furnishing certain deceptive forms.” It addresses the furnishing of a form that creates a false belief in a consumer debt collection matter. I am not claiming this statute automatically governs birth registration or taxation in Canada. I am pointing to the principle: forms can be used to create false beliefs, false appearances, and false presumptions.
That principle matters.
If any form, record, certificate, classification, notice, bill, receipt, demand, assessment, statement, account, or administrative process causes a living woman or man to accept as true what is not true, or hides the truth of what is being created, presumed, transferred, converted, assessed, charged, credited, debited, or administered, then the issue is not merely paperwork. It becomes a matter of truth, disclosure, authority, verified accounting, and lawful proof.
I also raise serious questions regarding signatures on leases, mortgages, banking documents, tax forms, applications, registrations, and other instruments of alleged obligation.
How many living women and men are ever fully told what these documents are, what capacity they are signing in, what entity, account, estate, trust, or obligation is being created or charged, what value is being generated by the signature, how the signature will be used, who will benefit from it, and whether the signed instrument will be monetized, transferred, securitized, registered, taxed, or administered in ways never fully disclosed?
A signature is not merely ink on paper. A signature is evidence of life, intent, identity, capacity, and assent — if full disclosure is present. Without full disclosure, conscious agreement, lawful capacity, and a true meeting of the minds, I question whether any alleged obligation arising from such a signature can stand as lawful proof.
I also question the lack of transparent accountability between the banks, treasury or finance authorities, taxation authorities, land title offices, registries, and any department, agency, or office claiming authority over debts, accounts, property, assessments, payments, instruments, signatures, or public records.
Where is the verified accounting?
Where is the full disclosure?
Where is the proof of who funded the alleged loan?
Where is the proof of what value was exchanged?
Where is the proof of how the signature was used?
Where is the proof that the living woman or man was fully informed of the nature, effect, and use of the instrument being signed?
Where is the lawful proof that a lease, mortgage, note, application, registration, tax form, banking document, or other instrument created a valid obligation rather than an undisclosed presumption?
Therefore, I publicly ask:
What exactly is created by the registration of live birth?
What presumptions arise from that record?
Who has custody of the original record?
Who controls access to it?
What authority is being claimed from it?
What status, title, obligation, debt, or classification is being presumed from it?
Who made the lawful determination that I am a “taxpayer”?
Where is the full disclosure showing how that classification was applied?
Where is the verified accounting of the alleged obligation?
Where is the lawful proof that I knowingly agreed to be bound by any such status, title, obligation, debt, assessment, or classification?
Where is the contract?
Where is the meeting of the minds?
Where is the consideration?
Where is the lawful proof?
This inquiry is not made lightly. It is made because words, records, titles, classifications, presumptions, demands, signatures, instruments, and forms matter.
My inquiry is no longer only about the birth certificate, taxation, banking, leases, mortgages, or public administration. It is about lawful authority, conscious consent, inherited assumptions, public trust, full disclosure, verified accounting, and the classifications humanity continues to accept without asking who defined them, who applied them, who benefits from them, and whether they are aligned with truth, life, and lawful proof.
I acknowledge the commentary that sparked this notice.
And I formally object to any presumption that acknowledging concern over taxation, banking, money, public administration, housing, mortgages, leases, or the cost of living is also an admission that any alleged obligation has been lawfully proven.
I reserve all rights, waive none, and ask for full disclosure, correction, verified accounting, and lawful proof where any presumption has been made without my knowing and conscious consent.
With reverence for life, resolve, grace, and love,
/electronic endorsement/ sophia
Sophia-Taniah — The One Who Flows With The River
🌊💛💜💙🌹🕊️
◇═◎═◇ Team Freedom Forever ◇═◎═◇
✧ ✦ △ ◇ Aeterna Reconcilio ◇ △ ✦ ✧
Attachment(s)/Enclosure(s)
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver My intent is not to feed fear, resentment, helplessness, or hatred toward anyone.
My intent is to withdraw my creative power from the image of corruption, lack, delay, and injustice, and to place my attention upon truth revealed, lawful proof produced, remedy restored, full disclosure given, records corrected, and all offices and office-holders peacefully held to account where presumptions have been made without knowing and conscious consent.
I also recognize that part of the difficulty is having to deal with people occupying official positions who may be emotionally, mentally, or spiritually conditioned by the very systems they serve. I am not writing this to condemn them as souls. I am naming the programming.
When an office-holder has been trained to protect the system, follow policy, enforce procedure, and preserve authority without questioning the truth, the record, the accounting, the living impact, or the harm caused to the body, mind, heart, and living expression of the soul, then the one seeking remedy is often met with silence, avoidance, dismissal, or obstruction.
The deeper question remains:
What happens when we stop feeding the old image and begin giving our undivided attention to truth, remedy, lawful proof, Divine Justice, and life restored under grace?
I am here to claim my life and my right to experience life in accordance with the Divine Design, in alignment with the intelligent life-force energy flowing through my body, my life, and my affairs.
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver @ScottQuitley, I noticed your comment regarding the birth certificate was removed, and my response disappeared with it. I was curious about the point you were making. Are you speaking from personal research, lived experience, or a specific source you recommend looking into?
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver It appears that @ScottQuitley’s comment was hidden since it has now mysteriously emerged.
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver I found myself sitting with some deeper questions:
What is a “taxpayer”?
Who made the legal determination that I am a taxpayer?
How did I become classified as a taxpayer?
If, as a living woman, I have inherent, unalienable and inalienable rights to the essentials of life, why am I being required to pay for the essentials of life?
What is trustee malfeasance?
What is trustee misfeasance?
Do I have a lawful share in the resources of the earth?
And who is truly auditing the resources of the earth, the public trust, and the systems claiming authority over them?
I am not asking these questions lightly. I am asking because words, classifications, titles, and assumptions matter. Before I accept any label placed upon me, I believe it is wise to ask where that label came from, who defined it, who applied it, and whether it aligns with truth, lawful authority, and the inherent rights given by life itself.
Quitley Scott Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver started when you parents signed the birth certificate. Go down that rabbit hole.
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver Quitley Scott, I’m aware of what you are pointing to, and yes, the birth certificate issue is one of the places many begin looking.
For me, though, it requires more than going down the proverbial rabbit hole. It requires separating law from inherited assumption, examining whether the elements of a lawful contract are actually present, and knowing who and what we are beyond the classifications placed upon us.
I have been down that path, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a label is not the same as proof, a record is not the same as living authority, and an assumption is not the same as lawful consent.
I know you do not know me or what I have experienced, and I am not here to convince anyone of anything. I am asking these questions because words, titles, classifications, and presumed agreements matter.
In the illusion of man’s laws, I have found that it is up to me to know what is acceptable, what is not, what has been presumed, and what has actually been proven. From what I have studied, a contract requires specific elements. When those elements are absent, every so-called contract is void — not voidable, just void.
So yes, I have looked into that rabbit hole. Now I am more interested in truth, lawful authority, conscious creation, and the assumptions humanity continues to accept without questioning. …
Quitley Scott Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver terms are not negotiated at the time more of force so yes the contract would be null and void. Getting everyone else to see it is the challenge. I was not away you knew and the way your post sounded I was offering somewhere to see for yourself.
Words have meanings
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver I noticed a comment was removed, and because my response was attached to that thread, my response disappeared with it.
I still feel the substance of the inquiry is valuable, so I am going to repost the reflection in a standalone way. These questions are not about arguing with anyone. They are about examining records, assumptions, classifications, consent, authority, and what has actually been proven. The comment was made by Quitley Scott. Sophia-Taniah “Theonewhoflowswiththeriver started when you parents signed the birth certificate. Go down that rabbit hole.” I responded by saying, “Quitley Scott, I’m aware of what you are pointing to, and yes, the birth certificate issue is one of the places many begin looking.
For me, though, it requires more than going down the proverbial rabbit hole. It requires separating law from inherited assumption, examining whether the elements of a lawful contract are actually present, and knowing who and what we are beyond the classifications placed upon us.
I have been down that path, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a label is not the same as proof, a record is not the same as living authority, and an assumption is not the same as lawful consent.
I know you do not know me or what I have experienced, and I am not here to convince anyone of anything. I am asking these questions because words, titles, classifications, and presumed agreements matter.
In the illusion of man’s laws, I have found that it is up to me to know what is acceptable, what is not, what has been presumed, and what has actually been proven. From what I have studied, a contract requires specific elements. When those elements are absent, every so-called contract is void — not voidable, just void.
So yes, I have looked into that rabbit hole. Now I am more interested in truth, lawful authority, conscious creation, and the assumptions humanity continues to accept without questioning.”
Sophia-Taniah Theonewhoflowswiththeriver This conversation brought forward something I believe is worth sitting with more deeply.
Many people say, “It started when the parents signed the birth certificate.” From what I have studied, that statement is not quite accurate.
The mother and/or father do not create the birth certificate itself. They complete a birth registration, or registration of live birth, and that registration is used to create a permanent record. The birth certificate is then issued afterward by the proper vital statistics authority or Registrar General. In other words, the certificate is not the original living event; it is a later document created from the record.
That distinction matters.
A certified copy or extract of the birth registration can usually be requested, with a fee attached, which raises more questions for me about what the original record is, where it is stored, who controls access to it, and what presumptions of status, obligation, or authority may be created from it.
To me, the birth registration is not a valid contract. It is a record. A contract requires specific elements, including mutual assent, consideration, capacity, and lawful purpose. If those elements are absent, then I do not see how a lawful contract was ever formed.
This is why I keep returning to the distinction between what is recorded, what is presumed, and what has actually been knowingly and lawfully agreed to.
A label is not the same as proof.
A record is not the same as living authority.
An assumption is not the same as lawful consent.
From what I have studied, when the elements of a contract are absent, every so-called contract is void — not voidable, just void.
I also see serious questions around deception. Cornell’s Wex describes deception as causing someone to accept something as true that is not true, or hiding the truth. In my estimation, any form that creates presumptions without full, clear, conscious disclosure deserves to be examined very carefully.
So my inquiry is no longer only about the birth certificate. It is about lawful authority, conscious consent, inherited assumptions, public trust, and the classifications humanity continues to accept without asking who defined them, who applied them, and whether they are aligned with truth, life, and lawful proof.
Joanne Tipler Thank you Dr. Julie. I watched as you shared what happened at Western University, cried with your video, bought and read your book, was shocked at our new Canadian laws and how you and so many others were treated.
Natalie Sweet Becuz his signature is on the money … who works for The Crown!
Donna Ringham …I would like an answer to these questions myself…
Kim Hardy Martelle The P.O.G.G. Primer and the P.O.G.G. Protocol is a good resource for just this problem. The problem is the solution.
Fema Jacob Agreed. I’m not against progressive taxes if our taxes were held to account for Canada and Canadians and the media also helped hold whichever party was in power accountable for our tax dollars. Great questions Julie
Carol Bowman And now the CRA gets to decide if your TFSA remains tax free https://youtu.be/n6P3sxqSskg?si=ogr98EYvxJO9p5u5
Caroline Richard Bitcoin. Sovereign money. Limited supply. Can not be manipulated.
Eric Holtz Ask difficult questions
GL Chaps You are an amazing woman. Thank you for speaking up….I remember the first video you did….I cried with you……
Ba Macastack GL Chaps I remember also. She was a huge part for me of bringing together what I’ve felt was wrong for decades.
God bless Julie and protect her 
Eileen Sampson Rmt I love your tenacity! I have been watching you for a years now and am proud of how you show up on the world. I hope that you continue to have great success and bring many others along with you.
Jack Nancy We’re not talking to someone who cares if you suffer or not. Its a game to him and you’re just the calculated in acceptable and expected collateral damage. He is “the banker”, and he has this all worked out. He recognised a vulnerable resource rich entity in canada that was ripe for exploitation in his capable hands. You’re just one of those resources that is going to be exploited. You just didn’t see yourself that way, but he did. And now hes put his strategy in action and there is not a single mechanism or law in canada that can stop him. You will witness, in your lifetime, the physical and economic destruction of what you thought was your nation, for as long as you remain here.
Pat Drebit Jack Nancy Unfortunately, very true
Mary Smith Jack Nancy I may pinch this Jack!! or, should I say may I pinch this Jack?
River Matt Norway has it , they gave the oil proceeds to the people, they have 2 trillion in reserves that are the people’s money, in Canada we have close to 1.4 trillion in debt
Lorraine Martin Well expressed
Mel Joy There are a few things I would like to ask him too!!
Glen Jng Love the head nod at the end 
Donna Mayer Dear Dr Julie..its all intentional… to break us. So we will be at the mercy of the government and easier to control. Time to wake up people . If each and every single person said no said no! to paying taxes that’s when change happens
Sylvia Herchen I tried looking that up on X
no luck
Julie Could you post a more specific link? thank you
Satya Wild That’s the goal.
Sheri Weldon Exactly!!!
Kim Iles Thank you Julie. You are a bright star that shines from the dark of the past .
Sylvie Lorraine can you share more?
Gary Justice What where how, please?
Prosad Freeman So good
Judy Nicklom Thank you for your post.
Izzy Gilmore Well said
Liz Reuber lol. This is so good. Love this so much h.
Barb Hazen Love this video , so true !
Wendy Heard Matthews well done. 
Angela Ramos Yes!! 
Leanne Clarke #truth #government #highlights #canada…
Porgi Amor He’s forgotten 
Ornella Burns They are our servants as well paid ones at that and they are forgetting this!
Barb Hazen I believe you Jack !
Teresa Flanagan Finlayson I would love to know how to protect investments that my husband and I worked hard to contribute to, while raising and educating four children. My husband is now deceased; I am afraid I am too late.
Concetta Andriani The only way things will change in this current enslavement system is when people stop complying and stop living in fear. The government works for us and we need to stop asking for permission and start taking our freedom back.
Richard Lamer Recall what they do to ppl who speak out.
Dan Vk Xrp
Daniel Murphy Stop paying taxes…
Roman Watters Mark Carney works for the Agenda.
Patrik Jandak Well said
Roman Watters This is the truth about Mark Carney.
Paul Hogendoorn Bingo. It’s built to control us.
Jeanette McAuliffe Exactly!!
Ten Fold Bitcoin looks better every day. Many people are too lazy to look onto Bitoin.
It could be life changing.
Hear Jeff Booth on youtube
Mark Smith Agreed.
Tracy Luciani Price Brilliant!
Ten Fold Where do you suggest we put our money Julie?
Debbie Macgillivray Ten Fold 70 cents of every dollar should not go to the government that can’t even run a lemonade stand. They are completely incompetent and irresponsible with our tax dollars.
Christine Harper Ten Fold Never should our tax dollars go to other countries of our PM’s choice. Canadian taxes for Canadians’ benefit. Anything else makes no sense.
G Rico Rogers Ten Fold I say we just keep storing it either in Ukraine or in a vault in Davos where Brookfield Asset Management will give it back to us as Carney sees fit …..
Jonathan Depatie ??????
Kenneth McAree We are being run by a criminal organization and Canadians are so miserable and fed up
Alison AF It’s built to enslave us and exploit us is the answer.
Dyck Edward You’re lying
Dyck Edward You seem desperate for attention
Roman Watters You are far too kind.
This corrupt government is not going to save us from this corrupt government.
It’s just going to get worse and worse until we force them like they are forcing us.
Still a very good post though.
Amanda Dean The elites are taking a large chunk of our taxes through Ukraine money laundering and blatant corruption in the Liberal party. Diversity your money. Gold, silver, crypto and investments in independent living. Set up as much as possible to be independent even if it means solar off grid, seeds….. build a set of skills your great grandparents possessed. And of course always keep your faith in the Lord Jesus Christ because we are being intentionally dismantled and looted by Carney and friends.
Pat Drebit That will fall on deaf ears, carney is not here for Canadians. Period.
David Moore Big fan of yours ! Since 2022 or so. Very well said ! What has happened to Canada ? ( thats a question for the liberals, ndp and greeens or any moron that thinks this is ok )
Brad Hansen Because you’re money can be hidden and washed around the world and Brookfield! Mark will never pay taxes in the former country called canada so he destroys the lives of canadian people to pay terrorists, illegals and himself!
Dale Christina Hauk Carney & WEF & have this plan to financially destroy Canada & Carney & friends will be the grim reapers
Steph Ferl It’s terrible to see what is happening to Canadians.
Giuliana Ferro They show treason, as everything is swept under the rug, no accountabilities and no recovery of this country, as laws that punish opinions and not criminals is not democracy, no justice and no service
Bill Sime Canada is broken
____________________
End of Comments
#PublicNotice #FormalObjection #LawfulAuthority #FullDisclosure #LawfulProof #VerifiedAccounting #PresumedObligation #TaxpayerStatus #BirthRegistration #ConsciousConsent #SilenceIsNotConsent #PublicTrust #DivineJustice #TruthRevealed #RemedyRestored #UnderGrace #FreedomDove
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment