If everyone watched this video and began to take the steps towards ending the presumtions and assumptions of the B.A.R. members (those that have aquested to the cult of legal ease). THE OCCULT ART OF LAW
It is up to us to come together in communities and support each other.
We should stop giving out our “private” information for free!!
When a “debt collector” requests a social security number we do not have to give it to them. They are thieving our estate!!
Tell them to provide “we require you to provide me with the statute that impells me as a private man to give you my “private” information”.
Send them a “Notice of Liability” with a Request for Admissions” with an affidavit
Notice(s) by Affirmation
Maxim of Law:
Notice To The Agent(s) Is Notice To The Principal, Notice To The Principal Is Notice To The Agent(s)
Notice: This Is A Legal & Lawful Document And Not A Letter
This document is in response to the letter sent from your office dated ( month day year)
RE: (CAPITAL NAME)
Pursuant to: Revelations 13:10-18 (Mark of the beast)
Article I Section 10 Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
Article 1 section 9 clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
We require you to answer the following question: “Who has the “Authority” to grant a “Title of Nobility”?.
Article 1 section 9 clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Masons Manual of Legislative Procedure pg 17, sec. 6, #2, sec. 7 #1; pg 294 #3; pg 353 #1 Deceptive forms [15 USC §1692j] False and misleading representations [15 USC §1692e] Fictitious Obligations [18 USC §514] Unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” [15 USC §45]
“Fictitious Name”: is a counterfeit, alias, feigned, or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some essential particular from his true name (consisting of Christian name and patronymic), with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead. See also Alias. [emphasis added]
[Incidentally, Alias is not necessarily to deceive or mislead.] [Black’s 5th, page 562] “Legal Name”. under common law consists of one Christian name and one surname, and the insertion, omission or mistake in middle name or initial is immaterial. The “Legal Name” of an individual consists of a given or baptismal name, usually assumed at birth, and a surname derived from the “Common Name” of the parents.
Application of Green, 54 Misc.2d 606, 283 N.Y.S.2d 242, 245. [emphasis added, Black’s 5th, page 806] Thus, tt has been proven that people are being prosecuted using the “Legal Process” under this thing called, the “Legal Name”, the “B.A.R.” members do not use a “Christian Process” to prosecute people in “Court” using the “Christian Name”. The “Legal Name” represents the accounts created by government agents ment to represent the “man”, it is not a “Fictitious Name”, it must be noted: “Capitalization” only exists on paper.
It must be noted that the “Capitalized Name” does come with many presumptions and assumptions created by men in the position as “Pontiff” and “Head Master” of the “Cult”, many “Unsubstantiated Idea(s)” have been invented by these “Cult Menbers” such as the idea of “Capitis Diminutio”. These men have given themselves powers they have no right to procure. This information is in “Strategic Withdrawal” of these “Unsubstantiated Idea(s)”.. The truth about All Caps Names©, Common Law Copyright 2012 by Bernie Besherse 2 regarding any attempt to “reclaim control of one’s life” by some method other than rejection of all Social Security and other alleged “Government Benefits”, and complete separation out of the Corporate State, this is what Black’s Law Dictionary says about “Rescission of Contract”:
Rescission of Contract. A “rescission” amounts to an unmaking of a contract, or an undoing of it from the beginning, and not merely a termination, and it may be effected by mutual agreement of parties, or by one of the parties declaring rescission of contract without the consent of the other if a legally sufficient ground therefore exists, or by applying to courts for a “Decree of Rescission”. Aballa, Inc. v. Martin, 242 Minn 416, 65 N.W.2d 641, 644. Annulling, abrogation or unmaking of contract and the placing of the parties to it in status quo. Sessions v. Meadows, 13 Cal.App.2d 748, 57 P.2d 548, 549. It necessarily involves a repudiation of the contract and a refusal of the moving party to be further bound by it.
See also Renunciation, Repudiation. [Black’s 5th, page 1174] [emphases added] Because one is bound by the entire contract when they receive even a minimal benefit under the contract [International Shoe v. Washington; Pennoyer v. Neff] then one must refuse all benefits in order to exercise rescission of contract. A few questi
“Rescission” at common law. Rescission at common law (as distinct from rescission in equity) is a self-help remedy: historically, the common law courts simply gave effect to the rescinding party’s unequivocal election to rescind the contract. Rescission at common law is only available for fraudulent misrepresentations and duress. Rescission renders the contract void ab initio, and courts will only grant rescission under common law if the parties can be restored to their original positions prior to the formation of the contract (“restitutio in integrum”). Courts of Equity exercised a jurisdiction to effect rescission where restoring the parties to the contract to their pre-contract positions was not possible at common law.
In order to ensure unequivocal clarity, and to effect the removal of any and all assumptions and presumptions, you are hereby put on notice that this notification is not directed to the legal fictional person, “Operations Manager Accounts Management Op”, but to you, (name of corrospondant), in your private capacity as a non-fictional entity who has sworn an “Oath of Office”, and who, by virtue of that oath, has a mandate to “Serve the People”. Responses that are immaterial or irrelevant to the “Subject matter”, or that are generally non-substantive, will be treated merely as a provision of information, and lawfully as a non-response, with willful intent to defraud.
We require you to provide me with proof that ie/I the man being raymond-dale am an “employee” or has/have ever been an “employee” Whereas, this notice is also to inform you, (name of corrospondant), that a trespass has been committed against my Creator endowed rights by and through the organization of which you are an official. This goes to all other men or women or other working in an “Official Capacity” and are hereby put on notice that this notification is not directed to the “Legal Fictional Person”, a “Manager”, a Director”, a “Minister”, a “Police Officer”, a “Lawyer”, a “Judge”, an “Attorney”, and or a “Court Clerk”, etc. and;
Whereas, this man formally known as (first name-second name) of the father’s house of (family name) and the mother’s house of (mothers family name) officially rescind all prior endorsements of kind and on any “License” or “Certificate” including yet not exclusively the Application of Live Birth, Marriage Licience, Drivers License, Fishing License, etc. said, application(s) are made null and void and said Birth Certificate, Certificate of Marriage is null and void retroactive to the beginning of such licensing. ie/I do not concede to any “Presumptions of Law” with or by any State or Federal Department of Community Health, or State or Federal Department of Health and Human Services, or any County Clerk, or any other Government Agency or Agent or Officer thereof.
Respectfully,respondent, without recourse
firist-and-second name [family name]
Request For Admission
By one making such claim one admits unless expressly denied, the following:
1. Men and women born to earth are subjected to the idea of indebtedness when in fact this idea is manufactured therefore there is no legitimate reason for a man to be indebted to the privately created and privately owned “Crown Corporation(s)” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3123 Circle one: Admit or Deny.
2. The F.C.C, C.I.A, F.B.I, N.A.S.A and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the “United States Government” held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 U.S 491, Lewis v. U.S, 680 F.2d, 1239) Circle one: Admit or Deny
3. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. Circle one: Admit or Deny
4. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS
5 form and the Department of the Treasury (I.M.F.) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration.Circle one: Admit or Deny5 The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. Circle one: Admit or Deny
6. One can get a copy of the SS5 that may have been filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the Social Security Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above) Circle one: Admit or Deny
7 There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Circle one: Admit or Deny
8 Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes, it is Executive Administrators that enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178) Circle one: Admit or Deny
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789, rather there have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826) Circle one: Admit or Deny1
11. The people of earth have been restricted by a One World Government, a One World Law, and a One World Monetary System from the beginning of Genesis. Circle one: Admit or Deny
12. The creators of the United Nations claim to be the One World Super Government. Circle one: Admit or Deny
13. Everyone born to earth has been subject to the manipulation of the “extraterrestrial” off world forces. Circle one: Admit or Deny
14. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.) Circle one: Admit or Deny
15 The Social Security check comes directly from the International Monetary Fund which is an Agency of the United Nations. Circle one: Admit or Deny
16. The men and women born to earth are denied as the sole proprietor of our property. and denied dominion over our life experience as a result of Policy Enforcers, enforcing the system. Circle one: Admit or Deny
17. We have been misidentified as “slaves” as “chattel” as “stock” as we have not denied what is written in the Deed to the property that we are made to believe is ours. we have failed to read when we are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session) Circle one: Admit or Deny
[with mortgages use the following
Could it be that your brother and his wife are eligible for rescission and remuneration for their “abandoned funds?”
Shortly after the inception of the contract, the bank deposited one’s promissory note as a cash item in the ledger.
Admit___________ Deny_____________ Notes:
Said note is a liability in the bank’s payables as a payables account and identifies one as the creditor in the account.
Admit___________ Deny_____________ Notes:
In accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP), the bank ledgered the credit agreement as an asset in the bank’s receivable account and identified one as the debtor in the account.
Admit___________ Deny_____________ Notes:
One could use some help to break the following down into Requests for Admissions:
It is one’s understanding that because one failed to see through the bank’s carefully designed illusion and instruct the bank to make the financial adjustments to zero the account, in the set-off the bank posted their liability, one’s asset, in their payable accounts as an off-balance sheet entry
and after a period of time the funds were claimed as abandoned funds.]
This man (first name of the family house of ……….) being of sound mind affirms:
It is a fact:
(state facts regarding your case)
1. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52, applies in Civil and Criminal actions with equal force and effect because the criminal is always civil in nature. No civil or criminal cause ofaction can arise lest there be a contract. See Eads v. Marks, 249 P. 2d 257, 260. There is always a presumption that a contract exists and that the responding party is a Corporation. Under Rule 52, which is the same in all states as in the Federal Rules, the Texas Court of appeals (5th Cir) has ruled on the finding of fact, by the Court, that “the failure of an adverse party to deny under oath the allegation that he is incorporated dispenses with the necessity of proof of the fact”. Thus, a presumption becomes a finding of fact by the court unless rebutted before trial.
2. Dr. Pepper Co. v. Crow, 621 S. W.2d 464, 465 (Tex App.-Waco 1981, no Writ) “Plaintiff plead defendant was a corporation. Defendant did not deny by verified pleading pursuant to [TRCP] 52 and 83 … that it was not a corporation; thus, such fact was established.
3. Louisiana Revised Statutes Art. 429 Corporation existence presumed unless an affidavit of denial filed before trial.
4. Allegedly a presumption is a rule of Law, Statutory or judicial, by which the finding of a basic fact gives rise to the existence of presumed fact until presumption is rebutted. See Van Wart v. Cook, 557 P. 2d 1161. In the Commercial Law of all States, a presumption means that the trier (the Judge) of fact, must find the existence of the fact presumed per FRCP 52, unless and until the evidence is introduced which would support a finding of its non-existence. Arizona Revised Statutes: Title 47 Section 1201 (31) Presumption” or “presumed” means that the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact presumed unless and until evidence is introduced which would support a finding of its nonexistence. Thus, the Affidavit of Non-Corporate Status is for the purpose of rebutting any presumption that the Respondent is the Corporation named. .
5. US Supreme Court in Luther v Borden, 48 US1, 12 Led 581:“…The government are but trustees acting under derived authority and have no power to delegate what is not delegated to them. But the people, as the original fountain, might take away what they have delegated and entrust to whom they please. … The sovereign in every state resides in the people of the state and they may alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure.” US Supreme Court in Wilson v Omaha India Tribe 442 US 653, 667 (1979):“In common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign or make mention of a man and statutes employing the word are ordinary construed to exclude it.”
6. Rebuttable presumptions are in effect inferences that, in the absence of any controverting evidence, the jury is required to make and, in civil cases, to accept as established facts. [89. People v Wong Sang Lung, 3 CA 221, 84 P 843.]
7. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. (1990), p. 1267.Rebuttable presumption: In the law of evidence, a presumption may be rebutted by evidence. Otherwise called a “disputable” presumption. A species of legal presumption which holds good until evidence contrary to it is introduced. Beck v. Kansas City Public Service Co., Mo. App., 48 S.W. 2d 213, 215. It shifts the burden of proof. Heiner v. Donnan, 285 U.S. 312, 52 S. Ct. 358, 362, 76 L.Ed. 772. It gives a particular effect to a certain group of facts in absence of further evidence, and presumption provides a prima facie case that shifts to the defendant the burden to go forward with evidence to contradict or rebut fact presumed. Gulle v. Boggs, Fla., 174 So.2d 26, 28.
8. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. (1990), p. 1185Presumption: An inference in favor of a particular fact. Allegedly a presumption is a rule of law, statutory or judicial, by which finding of a basic fact gives rise to existing of presumed fact until presumption is rebutted. Van Wart v. Cook, Okl. App., 557 P2d 1161, 1163. A legal device that operates in the absence of other proof to require that certain inference be drawn from the available evidence. Port Terminal & Warehousing Co. v. John S. James Co., D. C. GA., 92 F.R. D. 100, 106.A presumption is an assumption of fact that the law requires to be made from another fact or group of facts found or otherwise established in the action. A presumption is not evidence. A presumption is either conclusive or rebuttable.
9. This man being [first name], declare and affirm that ie/ I am not nor have ie/I ever been a Corporation, Fiction of Law, Fictitious Entity, Corporate Persona, Non-Entity, Legal Entity or a Surety for any of the previously mentioned and that ie/ I further Declare and Affirm that as a living homo sapien sapien have natural born rights, have always been True Sovereign as stated in the original Constitution for the United States of America, of which all public servants/public officials are sworn by their Oaths of Office to protect and defend, both State and National, in which is also enumerated the type and size of bonds required by both elected and appointed positions, in order to assure the Sovereign public that their trust and faith in those public servants/public officials are well-founded and that their duties will be discharged in the most Honorable means until completion of their “Term of Office”.
10. This man is a natural creation, an act of love, a miracle of life in expression, a free-born sovereign, without subject(s).
11. This man is neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject to me, this man is not a “person” as defined in “statutes” when such definition includes “artificial entities”. and refuse to be treated as a “slave”, “federally” or “state” created entity which is only capable of exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically “granted” by “federal” or “state” “governments.
12. ie/I neither dominate anyone, nor am ie/I dominated, my authority for this statement is the same as it is for all free Sovereigns everywhere: the age-old, timeless, and universal respect for the intrinsic rights, property, freedoms, and responsibilities of the Sovereign Individual to do not harm.
13. “Assumption” and “Presumption” may prevail unless rebutted, or explicitly denied, this man plainly states that this man is in no way to be considered, termed as, referred to, or thought of as, a person, legal entity, legal fiction, fictional character, or corporation of any other man-made form; with the knowledge that all such ideas are not living, breathing, and or sentient and only exist on paper or as an idea. Therefore, this man hereby makes express and explicit claim and affirmation to the whose creation is necessary with the expressed and explicit claim that a man is not a “person” or any other man-made form such as a corporation.
14. ie/I deny being liable or responsible for the errors and omissions presumptions or assumptions of any officer, offeror, partner of the offeror, or their agents.
Certificate of Service
Respectfully,respondent, without recourse
firist-and-second name [family name
[have 3 wiitness read and sign this document]
We the undersigned withtness have read and comprehend the terms herein and do willful witness the endorcement of this document this day the ____th day of _________________in the Gregorian Year of __________
Read the information shared here:
Is It Time To Live Life Lawfully?
Leave a Reply