While getting caught up with posts on Facebook, I came across a post by David Jose that had been republished by my friend Derrick Gonzalez. It caught my attention, and as I began reading through the post, the attached court documents, and the discussion in the comments, I felt the information was worth examining and preserving here for further study.
That principle became the foundation of this inquiry: do not simply believe a claim, and do not simply dismiss it. Follow the record and allow the evidence to show us what can presently be established.
This is what David wrote in the post, preserved here as it appeared:
David Jose 
Attorney Fight l! that he had all this to say about what won’t work, he said that he could use resources to see what happened in the cases!
This case was freaking closed, gentleman found guilty then a freaking notice sent and it was reopen and turned over lol! evidence and what the gentleman said in comments! God has done a new thing baby! i posted the notice i wrote for Americans to assemble and see real law and taught the concepts! that’s why he can’t freaking tell what happened l! By God the gov is talking about how we learned all this massive knowledge that is finally correct! I had a high level judge personally reveal to me that all I was saying is correct and that he didn’t speak about it as most people are stupid and won’t seek truth! God has given us the keys to the kingdom and he gets the praise! God teaches us by his word to study to show ourselves approved…….. most want to copy and paste and don’t have diligence to learn and grow to make massive change, but by God, we trust his ways! God wants the oppression gone!
The screenshot below were attached to the message.
My Personal Reflection
Every man and woman has the right to speak to what they know and experience as true. I find this notice compelling and worthy of examination. At the same time, there are aspects of its framing that, for me, would conflict with what I have come to know within my own Soul through direct experience.
I recognize that I am still navigating a world whose institutions, language, and structures do not necessarily reflect what I personally know to be true about life, consciousness, and the nature of our being. That creates an interesting question for me: How do I move through the structures that presently exist without abandoning what I know within myself?
For me, that means I can examine this notice, the legal principles it invokes, and what may have happened after it was presented without having to adopt every premise upon which it is written. I can remain open, ask questions, follow the record, and at the same time remain faithful to my own direct knowing.
As I continued following the discussion, I later discovered that David Jose had published a Facebook Live in which he spoke at considerably greater length about this case and the principles he believes are involved. Because the Live directly addressed many of the questions that had arisen while I was examining the Facebook discussion and court documents, I decided to preserve it as well. I had the recording transcribed, and the cleaned transcript appears below.
My purpose in preserving this material is not to prove David right or wrong. I am interested in separating what is being claimed from what can presently be established through the record. I have learned that when examining legal claims, the most useful question is often not, “Who do I believe?” but, “What does the record actually show?”
Where the record answers that question, I will say so. Where it does not, I am comfortable leaving the question open.
As I listened to David Jose’s Facebook Live, one particular example immediately caught my attention because it was the same case I had already begun examining through a Facebook discussion involving Derrick Gonzalez and Bruce Speirs.
David refers to the Washington case involving Brandon James Hoeve as evidence that a notice David wrote was placed into a case that had already been closed and caused the matter to be reopened.
In the Live, David says:
“The case was all the way closed. The gentleman was already prosecuted and said to be guilty of having drugs. Case is done and over with. And then we showed the notice that we sent after the fact.”
He continues:
“I wrote the document for the people in America. Nothing was changed on the document. The document was written by me. A gentleman signed the notice and just dropped it in his cases. The case was already closed. The judge opened everything back up and said, give him his money back, erase all this garbage.”
This is an important claim because David is not merely saying that his notice was filed. He is presenting a causal sequence:
The case was closed → the notice was filed → the case was reopened → the conviction was vacated → the money was ordered returned.
That caused me to ask a different question:
What does the court record itself establish?
What Happened to Brandon Hoeve’s Conviction?
The court documents we presently have concern:
State of Washington v. Hoeve, Brandon James
Mason County District Court
Case No. PA0003095
The motion bears a received date of October 31, 2024.
What immediately caught my attention is that this was not simply a document filed by Brandon asking the court to act upon David Jose’s notice.
The document before us is a joint motion brought by the Mason County Prosecutor and the Mason County Office of Public Defense.
They jointly asked the court to vacate and dismiss with prejudice a possession of a controlled substance count and to refund qualifying legal financial obligations that had been paid.
The authorities expressly identified in that motion are:
CrRLJ 7.8
State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170 (2021)
Nelson v. Colorado, 581 U.S. 128 (2017)
and
State v. A.L.R.H., 20 Wn. App. 2d 384 (2021)
Those authorities are significant.
State v. Blake
On February 25, 2021, the Washington Supreme Court decided State v. Blake.
The case concerned Washington’s former simple possession statute. The statute did not require the State to establish that someone knowingly possessed the controlled substance.
The Washington Supreme Court held the statute unconstitutional.
That decision had consequences far beyond Shannon Blake’s own case. Convictions entered under the unconstitutional possession statute became subject to vacation.
This is important when examining Brandon’s case because Washington has had to address large numbers of older possession convictions as a consequence of Blake.
A case being closed, sometimes for years, therefore does not prevent a court from later returning to the judgment and granting relief.
What Is CrRLJ 7.8?
This brings us to another authority expressly identified in Brandon’s court papers: CrRLJ 7.8, Relief from Judgment or Order.
CrRLJ stands for Criminal Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction.
Rule 7.8 provides a procedural mechanism through which a court may grant relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding when specified grounds exist.
Those grounds include circumstances in which a judgment is void, as well as other reasons justifying relief.
CrRLJ 7.8 therefore provides an established procedural mechanism through which a final judgment affected by Blake can be revisited.
In other words, the fact that Brandon’s case had already been concluded does not, by itself, establish that something extraordinary occurred because of a private notice.
The fact that the case was closed and subsequently returned to the court is therefore important, but it does not by itself tell us what caused the process to begin in this particular case.
That remains a separate evidentiary question.
Why Was Money Returned?
The refund is also significant because David points to the return of money as part of the evidence supporting his interpretation of what happened.
But the court papers identify another legal authority for that result: Nelson v. Colorado.
In Nelson, the United States Supreme Court addressed money collected because of convictions that were subsequently invalidated.
Washington’s own Blake process now provides for reimbursement of qualifying legal financial obligations after affected convictions are vacated.
In Brandon’s case, the order provides for a refund of $250 in legal financial obligations associated with the vacated count.
Therefore, the refund itself does not establish that David’s notice produced the result. There is an established legal basis for refunding qualifying money associated with a conviction that has been invalidated.
What Does the Order Actually Say?
This is where I think it becomes especially important to distinguish between what someone says happened and what the record presently establishes happened.
The order finds that Brandon’s affected conviction is unconstitutional based upon State v. Blake and State v. A.L.R.H.
It finds that the affected portion of the previous judgment is void.
It finds that the requirements for relief under CrRLJ 7.8 have been satisfied.
It orders the affected conviction vacated and dismissed with prejudice.
It provides for the refund of qualifying legal financial obligations.
And it directs the appropriate criminal records to be updated.
What I do not presently see in the motion and order is a finding stating that David Jose’s notice caused the case to be reopened or that the court granted relief because of that notice.
That distinction matters.
Does That Mean David’s Notice Had Nothing to Do With It?
No.
I don’t believe the evidence presently before me permits that conclusion either.
This is where I want to be particularly careful.
The court papers we presently possess establish the legal basis upon which the court granted relief. They do not necessarily tell us everything that occurred before the prosecutor and public defender filed their joint motion.
It remains possible that Brandon filed David’s notice.
It remains possible that the filing brought the old conviction to someone’s attention.
It remains possible that something happened after the notice was filed that ultimately led to the joint CrRLJ 7.8 motion.
But those possibilities are not the same thing as documentary proof.
Likewise, the absence of a reference to David’s notice in the motion or final order does not, standing alone, establish that the notice was never filed or that nobody considered it.
At this point, I simply do not have the complete chain of record necessary to determine what role, if any, David’s notice played.
And that leads to the question I have been asking throughout this inquiry:
Where Is the Chain of Record?
If the notice caused this case to be reopened, there should be a way to trace what happened.
I would want to see:
When was David’s notice filed in PA0003095?
Can we obtain a copy of the notice bearing the court’s filing stamp or some other evidence establishing when the court received it?
How was it entered on the docket?
What happened immediately after it was filed?
Who initiated the CrRLJ 7.8 process?
Was there correspondence or another filing between the notice and the joint motion?
Does any prosecutor, public defender, clerk, or judicial record refer to the notice?
What is the chronological relationship between the notice and the October 31, 2024 joint motion?
Those questions are not an attempt to discredit David.
They arise directly from the evidentiary principle David himself expresses near the beginning of his Live:
“You have to be able to prove all things.”
I agree.
That principle needs to apply equally to everyone.
If someone tells me David’s notice accomplished nothing, I want to see the evidence supporting that conclusion.
If someone tells me David’s notice caused a closed case to be reopened and the conviction vacated, I want to see the evidence supporting that conclusion too.
I am interested in neither automatically accepting nor automatically dismissing the claim.
I want to follow the record.
What the Documents Presently Establish
At this stage of the inquiry, the documents support the following:
The documents before me show that *Brandon James Hoeve had a Washington possession conviction that the court subsequently determined was unconstitutional under State v. Blake and State v. A.L.R.H..*
A joint motion was filed by the Mason County Prosecutor and the Mason County Office of Public Defense seeking relief under CrRLJ 7.8 and citing Blake, Nelson v. Colorado, and State v. A.L.R.H.
The court granted relief, vacated the affected conviction, dismissed it with prejudice, and provided for a $250 refund of qualifying legal financial obligations.
What remains unresolved is David Jose’s additional claim that his notice was the event that caused the closed case to be reopened and ultimately produced that result.
The motion and order presently before me do not establish that causal connection.
Nor do they establish that the notice played no role.
That question remains open until we have the chain of record.
And for me, that is precisely why preserving the Live, the court documents, and the questions surrounding them is worthwhile.
I am not interested in choosing a conclusion first and then looking for evidence to support it.
I am interested in following the evidence wherever it leads.
If the complete court record eventually demonstrates that David’s notice initiated the process, I want that documented.
If the record demonstrates that the vacation occurred independently through Washington’s established Blake process, I want that documented too.
Either way, the record should be allowed to speak for itself.
If additional records become available after this article is published, I will add them here so that this inquiry can continue to develop as the documentary record develops.
Source Material and Preserved Facebook Live
Below is a comment left on the Facebook post that I felt worth preserving. Fundamental Law https://buy.stripe.com/eVqaEQ3EO3Ja1UKdfXdIA1i?utm_source=aweber&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-right-to-be-left-alone-is-yours
Here is the link to the Facebook post: https://www.facebook.com/david.jose.303917/videos/29037186875899504
Editorial Note and Disclaimer
The following transcript is preserved for research, educational, commentary, and documentary purposes.
The transcript has been cleaned for readability, including punctuation, paragraphing, spelling, names where reasonably identifiable, and obvious speech to text transcription errors. Informal speech, repetition, expressions, and the substance of the speakers’ statements have been retained as much as reasonably possible. Some repetitive greetings, requests to share the Live, and similar conversational asides may have been condensed.
This is not a certified or official transcript. Anyone requiring the precise wording of a statement should consult the original recording.
The views, legal interpretations, factual assertions, historical claims, conclusions, and opinions expressed in the transcript are those of the speakers. Their inclusion here does not mean that I or FreedomDove.net have independently verified or adopted those statements.
Where I have independently examined particular claims, court records, cases, statutes, rules, or other source material, I address that research separately in this article. Readers are encouraged to examine the primary sources and draw their own conclusions.
The purpose of preserving this transcript is to maintain the source material so that what was actually claimed can be considered alongside the documentary record.
Opening]
With Dave Jose. I pray that you guys are doing well today. I just wanted to do a live in order to be able to discuss some things about what’s going on in America. I believe the things are highly important, and I’m going to try to give you guys some time to be able to share this out and get on.
But the things are highly important, guys, because we are seeing some new occurrences in America. We the people are starting to win in a different way than what has been seen in our lifetime. And there are some attacks on the people psychologically, because people actually see what’s going on.
And so I want to ask you to share this live out. If the Lord wills, I want to try to get some more lives going and break down more truth and law.
Once again, please share this when you come in. Let me know what state you are from so I can give some honor to those who show up. It is super important that we fix stuff in America. So if you could let me know what state you are in, I’ll be happy to acknowledge you and see where people are hearing from and how the message is going out.
I will say once again, guys, that we have been winning in some amazing ways. We can show proof in law. This is something that people struggle with for a long time: getting remedy for the people, getting law out there, showing the people real information that they can trust because they can find it themselves. That’s how you really get remedy in the law world. You have to be able to prove all things.
I’m going to tell you, you can fake like things are happening. You can fake like you know what you’re talking about. But really, if you can’t show where things are written—
Benji, Benji from South Dakota. What’s up? What’s up? Happy to have you. Happy to have you. Denise. What’s up, Betty? What’s up? Let me know where you guys are from. Drop your state in the chat so we can welcome you in when you come in.
I’m going to ask you guys to share this all over if you could. Can you let the people on Telegram know that we are live on my Facebook? I don’t have the ability to share this all over the place once I get on the video, so it makes it a little tough. But I’m going to ask you guys to share it around.
I want to discuss some heavy and powerful things, guys. We got some good things going down that most people have never seen anything of the sorts. And so it is a beautiful thing, guys.
What up, Denise? Pennsylvania in the building. Good to see you. Good to see you, sister.
Guys, most people have never seen the types of remedy and things that we are discussing today. And so I want to be able to get that information out to the world. I want the people to be able to see how mighty God is and what he’s given to us. And just by what’s happening in the world today, guys, you can see that God has taken us to a different level. Things are moving in a way that is unbelievable.
Hold on, guys. Let me see. Things are moving in a way that is unbelievable. Hold on. I’m sorry. I’m trying to get this shared for you guys on Telegram.
Illinois, Betty. What’s up? What’s up?
I want to be able to get this shared out, guys, to discuss some of the real issues that are happening that prove how well we are doing in America.
I’m going to let you know that when attorneys and government officials think that they know more than you, they will often try to ridicule you. They’ll try to come live and tell you in front of everybody how stupid you are, how your stuff doesn’t work. But we have a beautiful occurrence happening in recent history where bad actors in government hide. They hide themselves because they know they can’t deal with what it is that we are saying.
And so I want to let you guys see that we are calling out the so-called best of the best. We are trying to call out those who say that they understand and know real law. But the problem is, they don’t want to come.
Tiffany from Michigan. What’s up? What’s up? They try to hide their faces. They come with no pictures. They want to speak as if they have knowledge and wisdom. They’re talking about how people have these grandiose theories and all this stuff.
What’s up, Doug from SD? They have these ideas and they want us to give them respect. Thank you, Denise. Thank you. I appreciate you. Please share all over Telegram too.
People as attorneys, guys, often want this respect because they’ve been to a law school. And just last night—or over a couple of days ago—we had this gentleman named Bruce Speirs, or Spears. And he wanted to come on and tell us about how affidavits can’t do this or that, notices can’t do this or that. He has the ability to pull up resources and see cases and all this stuff.
What’s up, Danny from Cali? He says that he has this ability—Big Bruce, what’s up?—he has this ability to look up cases and see what’s going on. So I said, okay, you want to see some cases to be able to prove what we say? Here, I’ll give you two.
So I gave him Tommy Trevillus in New Jersey, and I gave him the Washington case from a gentleman named Brandon. I gave him the actual court documents ordering them to return the money back to the gentleman who worked with us.
Diane, Diane. What’s up? What’s up, sister? We gave him the documents. He looked up the documents and he comes back like, I can’t affirm or deny what happened because it doesn’t exactly tell.
Dude, the case was all the way closed. The gentleman was already prosecuted and said to be guilty of having drugs. Case is done and over with. And then we showed the notice that we sent after the fact. There’s no more arguing. There’s no more complaining.
Big Matt. What’s up, boss? And then the case got flipped over. Guys, please share this all over. The case got flipped over after the fact. You can see the orders from the judge because we posted it. The orders of the judge said that the guy was unlawfully prosecuted. It said give him a full refund of everything.
I wrote the document for the people in America. Nothing was changed on the document. The document was written by me. A gentleman signed the notice and just dropped it in his cases. The case was already closed. The judge opened everything back up and said, give him his money back, erase all this garbage. He was unlawfully prosecuted and the order says it.
So see, I need you guys to understand that the attorney-minded and these so-called attorneys are running around online doing what they used to do. They run around and they say, oh, well, nothing that you guys say works. All of it is sovereign citizen stuff. I can’t tell you either way, Dave. I can’t affirm or deny that something you did made a difference.
But no, no, no, no, no. Let’s go back. You came out earlier talking about, oh, these sovereign citizen people and affidavits and stuff, that stuff doesn’t do anything. Yes, sir. It doesn’t do anything, right? But how do you say it doesn’t do anything? Now you’re talking about you can’t affirm or deny when I gave you, Mr. Attorney, the document of the case where the judge ordered to give him his money back after the fact, where the judge told you to erase the prosecution.
Now you so-called can’t get it, after you had all these resources you were bragging about that allow you to see into cases and what’s happening and you could be the real judge if something really happened. And then you get the actual document telling what happened. And you can’t deal with it.
See, this is what’s funny. I want you guys to psychologically realize what’s happening in America. In America right now, God has given us the number one law technology that exists. There’s nothing else like it. God has allowed us to come together, understand wisdom from the fundamental law, from the state constitutions, from the various trust indentures, and God has allowed us to tear foolishness down.
And then you get these attorneys with no picture. And they want to come and just say, well, I have this knowledge and I understand cases and I know the law, so let me scrutinize. First of all, you clown. Stop trying to present yourself like you need to be the one in the middle of everything and you are the standard to scrutinize everything else that’s going on. Because apparently something was done in these cases.
I showed you Tommy Trevillus. You got really silent about that one. We showed you the cases and the people giving testimony about what was happening in their cases, and then everything flipped and they got victory after we did something. So in other words, we have first-hand testimony of people sharing their experiences. And then we got an attorney who don’t know a gosh dang thing who says, okay, now I can’t confirm or deny.
Well, you clown, you came in talking about this stuff doesn’t work. So that means you need to know what’s happening. But now after we dropped that fire on you, we give you the evidence and the document is short for the whole world to see. Now you can’t figure it out. Why? Because it doesn’t fit your program.
In other words, yes, you’ve been doing this for decades. Maybe you were a fireman or something, or you were a police chief, or a police sergeant or something. I don’t know who you are. But maybe you’ve been involved with the law and courts for a long time, and y’all been doing it wrong for a long time. And the only reason you can’t explain what is happening now is because God is doing a new thing that you’re not used to.
Let me tell you, the attorneys are not the standard anymore. God has quietly slipped we the people in the midst of the fire, let us learn, gain knowledge and wisdom that has never been taught in the history of our lives. Many of the things in the history of our nation have been hidden from the people. And therefore attorneys have been doing stuff the wrong way.
And that’s why Mr. Speirs, Spires, whatever his name is, he can type a book report. He can talk about all types of stuff he studied and what he knows, post after post after post. But when I say, hey, come live, show that face, let’s get that work in, he can’t come. Because really he knows the level of law that we’re teaching is changing the whole America. And because it is changing the whole America, it’s highly likely that people will get prosecuted for trying to deceive the people, and he don’t want to show his face. Because he knows how much we are winning. He knows this whole system is on the verge of collapsing and all the power going back to the people.
Hey man, Matt Spencer, everybody please share this. Get it to everybody on Telegram, because they would definitely want to know that I’m live.
But guys, it’s crazy. God is doing a new thing, and we’re teaching law that nobody is showing in America. Now, the funny thing, guys, is the Constitution says that we have the right to be able to consult with each other about the law for our common good in every state. So people have tricked us into believing that only attorneys can talk about the law, and then they’ve been hiding the law like Jesus said.
So I’m going to tell y’all, we’ve been using some heavy, heavy fire. We’ve been bringing forth heavy fire, and God is doing a new thing. The Supreme Court is showing that this stuff that attorneys were doing is what you call adventurous legal theory. Attorneys have been tricking people because they were the ones in charge, using adventurous theory that had nothing to do with the constitutions. It was unlawful. And the Supreme Court themselves tell that they need to go back, and they’re going back, and they’re doing the work to go back to the Constitution.
I need y’all to help me understand why attorneys haven’t told us that the Supreme Court said this. Why is it that this guy comes on—look, let me help y’all see something. If what we’re saying is illusions of grandeur and crazy sovereign legal theories and stuff, how does this attorney or whatever he is know who I am? I need y’all to think about this. Out of the millions of people on Facebook, why do guys like this end up popping up to try to dissuade people from knowing what the truth is?
They come on and they’re like, look, affidavits can’t do anything. None of this stuff will work in a real court. That’s what this guy said. In so many words, he said none of this stuff will work in a real court. I’m like, well, here’s the court cases. Explicate. Show me why this judge is saying that the guy was unlawfully prosecuted after the fact and turn everything over, based on a notice that I wrote that was less than one page, maybe one and a half. Short notice. I posted it online. Short notice explaining that they were not using the law correctly, explaining how the Supreme Court threw them under the bus.
I’m going to tell y’all, the Supreme Court threw them under the bus because we gave the Supreme Court notice that they were doing it wrong. And I’m going to tell you that the state constitutions tell us that it’s our duty to tell our servants when they’re doing it wrong.
So I’ve seen so many different types of law teaching, so many different types of ideas. Shut up, just stay in the private, don’t argue with government, don’t do this, don’t do that, you gotta make sure you don’t bring any controversy. I’m going to tell you, we bring all the controversy, and the government has been listening. The government says what we say. We predicted when the ATF was going to fall after writing notice to make the Supreme Court go at them.
So a lot of these attorneys, you gotta realize, why would you come to our page? It’s because you know where the smoke is. See, if you smell the smoke, you know where the fire is. These attorneys will come on our page with no face and try to act like they know because they’ve seen a million times how the courts work. Well, that’s a testimony to how good God is and how powerful he’s made us. Because if you know the courts have dogged people in every single state and done wrong, and it always goes one way, and then we’re showing you that it’s going the opposite way now, and you didn’t know, that’s a testimony to how powerful God is.
They’re like, I’ve been doing this for decades. Yeah, you have. Wrong. Wrong. And we have the proof to show us wrong. And if you ever come live, we’re going to prove you wrong.
Now, I’m going to tell y’all, there’s a huge group of attorneys that know us. They know of the work we’re doing. They know that we’re changing America. They know that the people are seeing their powers and freedom. They know that hundreds of kids have been returned. They know that businesses stayed open during the lockdowns and nobody could stop it. They know all these things. This is why they don’t want to come out live and show their face, because none of these attorneys can argue the real law real time. They need a brief so they can study what you’re saying and come up with an argument. They need to call their legal assistant and ask for the answers to the test so that they can respond to you. They need to go check with AI.
What up, Eric? They need to go check with AI. And they know if you ever come live and have a discussion, you’re going to get run over, so don’t do it. Because they know the American people are gaining hope and faith, and there’s no attorney that can fight us. So they know the only thing that can happen if you go live with one of us is that we’re going to run you over and show proof and embarrass you, and then the people are going to know they’ve been lying, and then it’s going to give people more hope and more power and strength.
So they’re trying to hold off from that, and they’re trying to pick off weak-minded people one by one: don’t listen to that. I’ve been in the law world forever. I went to law school. And then I ask him, so why don’t you tell us about why Gorsuch and them said that y’all using adventurous theory? Quiet. He don’t want to talk about that. Hey, show me what happened in Tommy’s case. Quiet. I can’t tell neither. I can pull it up, but I can’t see.
But the government said he owed millions—1.4 million or millions of dollars or whatever—for all these fines. They sent police with guns to shut him down. We used the law to go against them, and they couldn’t shut them down. They were asking for extensions at court. Y’all know, usually people are like, Judge, can I have some more time to figure this out? But when we did it, the government was like, we need more time, because we don’t know what this is. Like, we need to study. This is real-life fire, y’all.
And we’ve been bringing some hidden knowledge. We did a webinar over the weekend. For those of you who went, please give us some feedback. Let us know what you thought about that webinar. We did a webinar over the weekend teaching how you, as one of the people, have sovereign immunity, and the government been hiding it from you. And it wasn’t just us saying it. We let one of your forefathers-in-law tell you that you got sovereign immunity.
Now, if I’m lying, I’m dying. Just like the government says we have immunity, you can’t sue us. Did you know you have immunity? Did you know you have sovereign immunity? Why is it that attorneys will jump on a page and they want you to think that the people being sovereign is trash? They never tell you that they have immunity, but they want to tell you that the state or government officials have immunity.
First of all, Chisholm versus Georgia will show you that the state is not the government workers. The state is the people. So they want you to believe that the government workers have some immunity. They want you to believe that, oh, we could pull you out your car because some statute and some court judge said it’s okay to pull people out the car. We can pull you over for anything. We can check you and pat you down if you look suspicious. We can tell you, you gonna take this breathalyzer for us. We gonna just pull you over randomly on the side of the road and say, you take a breathalyzer. You got immunity. They been lying.
I prove it in a webinar that’s like three hours plus. So anybody can tell you, I showed real law over this weekend that shows you that you have immunity and nobody can deny that. I also show you that there’s stuff in law that the government has been hiding from you and teaching backwards. And if the American people knew this, had this knowledge, wisdom, and understanding, they will shut stuff down with the quickness. And here’s the thing, we are so close.
Omar was there. Omar, am I lying? Did I show y’all we got immunity? Did I show y’all that when they tell y’all the government can force-vaccinate you, they can take your blood because they want to prove that you aren’t drunk—with no harm, they just going to pull you over and say, we think you’re drunk. We think you’re under the influence. Give us your blood so we can test to see if you broke the law.
He said, if you’re not joining the webinars, you are missing out. Benji said, Trump versus United States says trustees and servants can be held accountable for their unofficial acts. Amen. We’ve been letting these clowns go. They’ve been breaking the law, trampling people’s rights.
These people have been working as private associations dealing with the law in America and told you, the people who wrote constitutions, you can’t talk about the law. How can you write the fundamental law of a state as the people—the attorney ain’t the people—as a state you write the constitutions as regular people, and these clowns want to tell you you can’t come together and talk about the law. That is so evil. It is tortious interference with a contract. How you gonna say we can’t teach our servants the law when a state constitution says we have the duty and the power to teach the law?
Joe, they been coming around with no warrants, taking people’s bikes and cars and houses and everything else with no warrant. They never did it right. I’m telling y’all, these people have been attacking your rights, doing wrong.
Did somebody ask for a mic? Let me know if you asked for a mic, because it could be just telling me I can let you on.
The people been doing it wrong though, y’all, and they’re trying to tell us what we cannot do. Guys, the constitutions were not made to tell us what we can or cannot do. The constitutions were made to tell them what they can’t do.
Megan from Montana, what up? Notice I say a constitution. See, they want you to believe that only the federal constitution applies and it’s this mega thing. No, you got state constitutions that tell these clowns what they can and cannot do. And they’ve hid the state constitutions from you, so you don’t know how they’re supposed to work in a state. As soon as you bring them the federal constitution, they say, well, our attorneys told us that don’t all the way apply to us, because it’s the federal document.
Guys, the attorneys are purposely teaching your servants what to do, and it’s wrong. They’re teaching your servants the wrong things and making them believe they don’t have to listen to you. Some of y’all go into these meetings and they tell you, well, look, you can only speak for two minutes. You can speak for 30 seconds. We ain’t letting you speak. It’s our meeting. What do you mean our meeting? How do you have a meeting in the name of the state or the city? We own the state or the city and you tell us it’s yours.
If you want to give a ticket, you have to say it’s in the name of the people of the state or the town. How is it yours if we’re the town? Crazy talk, guys.
How did the Social Security commissioner become the CEO for the IRS at the same time? Well, first of all, when I look in the constitution, I don’t see anything called the IRS. So the IRS is an agency that has been placed under the executive branch. It ain’t a court. It’s not the executive branch, though. It is a hoax, and it’s definitely not a court.
That’s the thing, guys, is that we’ve been able to help people get thousands of remedy in different situations because we understand the fundamental law. And it hasn’t been taught in America, and most people are guessing.
I don’t know about anything called the third-party takeover. We have non-parents taking children. That’s trash. Look, I can show you in the maxims that you can’t have somebody come take what God gave to you by asking a tribunal, which is not a court. Let me tell you, the courts in Montana allowing people to come take your kids, that’s not a court.
And I’ll tell you, ask any attorney, any government official, any judge, any day of the week to come live with me and discuss this. Now, here’s the difference between me and a lot of people. I will tell you, allow your judge, your attorney, any government official you can find to come live with me any day of the week and prove this foolish junk they tell you.
I taught this in the webinar Saturday, actually. I showed in the webinar Saturday how there are certain things that belong to the people’s rights that no government, no court can actually give the right for someone to petition in order to take it over in your life, including your kids, your house, your dog, your grandma, none of it. I proved it. People witnessed. I proved with real law and let an actual high-level judge tell you in the webinar just Saturday that these courts have been taking y’all stuff by giving the court power.
So what happens is your state legislature only has certain powers. And when these legislators write a statute that says this court shall have the power to allow anyone to petition for somebody else’s kids—I can show you in two cases. The one that I did this weekend was fire. There’s another one that I put in a notice; the case was in 2000.
We got back, with me and the other people I’ve taught, over 200 kids, which there’s no attorney in America that will tell you they got 200 kids back. I’m not an attorney. So it shows you why we’re able to get kids back. We’re not following that same stuff the attorneys believe. But we got over 200 kids back as of some years ago.
I taught a guy named Jaron Jackson. Jaron either saved or got back over 20 kids. I taught a beautiful fighter named Heather. Heather went and got back over 20 kids. And then I taught a group called the Affidavit Mamas. Affidavit Mamas either saved or got back tons of kids. Me personally, by myself, as of a couple of years ago, I stopped counting: 121 kids returned by myself using the fundamental law and stuff that was hidden from the people that nobody teaches.
So we put it in the notices. We actually made Donald Trump’s trafficking-council woman, Lynn Johnson, come forth and expose with a notice we gave—or affidavit called CPS and Partner Trafficking—where 2,000 of us put them on notice. She took that notice, went out with the same title on Epoch Times and told, we know that CPS and their partners are trafficking, we want whistleblowers. A lot of parents were scared. Then after that, Trump made an executive order using the same stuff inside of that affidavit.
So I’m not guessing. I might have created that affidavit in 2018 or 19. I can show that we’ve been moving the courts and moving government officials since way back then.
Now I also had, before they took my old Facebook, a live where 25,000 people watched me go head-up in a Cindy McCain trafficking-council meeting. And Lynn Johnson in front of everybody turned to the head of DCS in Arizona and was like, sir, we’re going to deal with this guy. He’s not going to be taking no more kids. We’re going to stop this. We’re not going to allow this anymore, sir. Talking to me. Josh Barnett was next to me. Evelyn Keeling was right next to me, the one who set up the meeting with me and Josh Barnett. God bless her. Powerful woman, cancer survivor of over 10 years, fire starter.
But by God, we put her on notice before we sent her them affidavits. Within 28 days, I think it was, or 29, the head of DCS in Arizona made his resignation. In one year, they had three resignations after that from that same notice. They were just quitting like, oh, y’all didn’t tell us all this. Like, y’all didn’t give us full disclosure we’re trafficking kids.
So we got hundreds of kids back using this. And there’s tons of people get their kids back and don’t even tell me. I gave up trying to count. I don’t care. I wasn’t doing it for the clout and for the numbers. I was doing it to go against the wicked system. So we’ve got back hundreds of kids. People have seen the pictures of kids all over Facebook where people are saying, Dave got my kids back.
So God is opening the door. And I’m going to tell you, when I went through my suffering, I didn’t have this. I suffered and things went by because I didn’t know. And there was nobody to show me. I had to dig and find it.
Now when you see people getting their cases turned over, you see people, criminal cases, just dying. You see people saying, oh, I use what Dave said, went against the government. Look, the police across the country and on Indian tribal lands sit police with guns and never like close your business, close, you can’t be open. And I went against government officials. I wrote the documents and trained everybody across the country. Everybody who followed what I said stayed wide open and made more money than they likely ever made in their life. Everybody.
We even went against Indian tribal government. Indian tribal government was like, we’re sovereign. We’re shutting you down. I put them a notice to let them know, yeah, not sovereign, player. Stop. And those entities stayed open.
So I’m telling you about real law that I can prove and I challenge anybody. I don’t give a freak who you are. Try to say what I say is a lie, and I’ll bring you up live. I’ll give you that work from the dome. I won’t even go study. I will shred you apart with real law. And I don’t play with people playing with the people.
In America right now, God is doing a new thing and we are getting victory upon victory. God has shown us how to teach the government. So a lot of people will tell you the government don’t listen to us. They won’t hear you. We’re really slaves. We’re debt slaves. They got your birth certificate. All this bull. I can personally show you video with government officials on live with us doing what we say. I can show you where we order government officials to create commissions to go after CPS in their state and they do it. I can show you where we teach government to put other government officials on affidavits, attorneys, etc., to bring forth truth to them. And we can show you how we’ve been put on public record by the government in order to go after other government officials.
So when people tell you, well, look, nothing happens for us. It’s so hard. Nobody listens. That’s some bull. The problem is, nobody taught you the truth. The problem is, a lot of us feel this righteous anger, this indignation. We don’t like government dogging us. We don’t like people talking bad to us. We don’t like cops telling us that we can’t be out on the street. We can’t park. We can’t hang out at the park and just mind our business because we look suspicious. They want to come up and say, you look suspicious and tell you to get out the car. You might get shot. You’ve seen a lot of that lately. They’re coming and picking with you for no reason.
Thank you, Mrs. Lennox. They come picking with you, but I proved Saturday that you got immunity. I proved just this past Saturday that you got the right to be left alone and it’s guaranteed. I proved Saturday that the rights you have in the constitutions are guaranteed to you, not just the federal, but the state. And since they didn’t teach you, they leave you hanging, begging for mercy. But we’re not about that life anymore. We’re about we the people knowing our powers, our rights, what the government has been hiding from us, and drawing everything out and open.
See, I’m going to tell y’all, when you know the real fundamental law, the government submits. There ain’t a dang government official. Mark Elias, the number one attorney for the left—I’ve been begging this dude to come live for a long time. He’ll read past my comments. He don’t even want to talk because he realized when they tried to go after what was going on in Arizona and they said, we’re not going to get the ballots from the audit. Guys, I wrote the documents to get the first full forensic audit and the only one in American history. And I taught Karen Fan every step to beat the government officials who were trying to stop her.
This is why this is important, guys: people tell you what you can’t do. People tell you what’s not possible. Everything they say as bad government actors and attorneys is against your power. Well, you don’t have a power to be free. Once you go outside to be in the private, you don’t have a power to tell about what you’re going to do with your own health. You don’t have a power to tell about what you’re going to do in your own life. The government has to regulate it. Shut up. And you won’t come live and say that just because we don’t rip you to shreds. You know you go fall apart.
And so guys, I’m trying to tell you that the Supreme Court is seeing heavy instruction from us. And we’re telling people, hey, we’re going to write a notice to the Supreme Court, give them about two weeks to a month. This is what they’re going to do. And then everybody looks around and like, yeah, okay. And then they’re like, oh shucks. Did you see what the Supreme Court just—they’re taking cases about what? Oh my gosh. They’re saying the attorneys were lying to the people.
Look, we told Justice Gorsuch. He needs to come out and tell within a case or publicly that the people are sovereign. Guess what he did? He came out a video like you, the people are sovereign. He said it three times. We still got dumb attorneys who are not as smart as Justice Gorsuch running around talking about, if you think you’re sovereign, you’re dumb. The state is sovereign. You’re not. And y’all let these clowns talk in y’all presence. You are the bosses of America. Why do you let clowns and peons come in your presence as the king and queen and talk this stupid foolishness without checking them in front of everybody?
That’s why I’m back here on Facebook. I want all the smoke. And on top of that, I want the people here on Facebook. We got some beautiful fighters, like I see my homie, big Derek, OG Derek. OG Derek been fighting for a long time, Derek Gonzalez. And I love that super smart brainiac. This gentleman, he knows stuff that’s in cases that most people will never see. And it feels good to be able to come back and get love from people who’ve been fighting for a long time, who want to see this stuff in. And I know that God has given us stuff that’s so clear, so simple, so easy.
The problem people have a hard time breaking junk down is because nobody has made it simple. See, in the Bible, God gives us an order. The order that God gives is to write things on a table and make it plain so that he that sees it can run with it. Now, the issue is, if you can see somebody teaching law, but they can’t make it plain so you can run with it, that junk ain’t gonna do nothing. I ain’t talking about just trying to look brilliant. I’m talking about how to get remedy.
There’s a lot of people who don’t like me in the law world talking about, oh, he doesn’t have a monopoly on law. They only say that because they come steal what I got and try to put it out as theirs. So in order to feel good, they gonna say stupid stuff like that. But the problem is, if you ask them, show how to get the remedy, they ain’t gonna be able to do it. Period.
Now, I will tell you 100 percent, you can see real remedy with real people all across America. You ain’t gotta like me, you ain’t gotta love me, you ain’t even gotta say thanks. But you can use that junk and bring that fire though. And here’s the thing, it’s all about God. It ain’t about me. I want people to be free. And that’s why I want all the smoke, any government official that think that they can show that what we’re saying is wrong.
And please share this out all over, guys. I’m trying to come give some free knowledge, free wisdom, free information, build y’all up so y’all could destroy this junk. I’m telling you guys, I want the government officials to come talk stupid. I want them once coming after you to try to prove what they say. And I’m going to tell you, they can’t fight.
And I’m going to tell y’all, we get remedy when we force bad actors to talk about what they really believe. And we studied and we understand how things really work. It ain’t about violence. It ain’t about weapons. It ain’t about how tough you think you are. Simple, plain English discussion about real law.
Let me give you another bit. Stop talking about your individual case. See, when you talk about your individual case, they can pull some junk on you like, well, this person is just mad because they lost the case. Let me tell you something. You never lost a case, most likely. Most of the officials have brought y’all through different platforms or venues that are not courts and they didn’t tell you. So really they stole your stuff and never showed you the truth.
Robert, let me tell you, there’s no such thing of freedom through open knowledge. Because I’m going to tell you many people, you can give them all the pieces of knowledge and they still won’t use it. They still won’t get remedy. They still don’t care about what God said. This is why you can’t convert everybody to Christianity and you can’t convert everybody to following the law. It doesn’t matter. You can give the gospel away for free. The wicked ain’t taking it. You can give knowledge away for free. The wicked ain’t taking it.
But I’ll tell you what, when somebody has put in one or two things, they’ll take it. If somebody puts in blood, sweat and tears, they will take knowledge because of the pain. If somebody puts in money, they will take the knowledge because they feel like they paid for it. They should watch it. But most people without valuing something, they ain’t gonna use it.
Let me show you that the proof is in the pudding. Hold on one second. Hey, where’s my assistant? Can you grab me those two books, please? Let me show y’all something. So just so y’all can understand, I live a life where I seek knowledge and wisdom. I cry out for knowledge and wisdom. I wanted to know how to do certain things. So I invested in this man’s program and bought it. I invested in another one and bought it. Why? Because I want knowledge and wisdom. And guess what? Because I paid for it, I’m going to read it. I’ve bought thousands and thousands of dollars worth of books. My schooling is in psychology. I understand how the mind works.
If you got a Bentley today, we can say give out free Bentleys. You will find that most people will get that Bentley, drive it down the street. If somebody pulls up and smacks that Bentley, they won’t even care. They’ll say, well, at least I didn’t pay for it. They don’t value the knowledge. But if you get somebody who works really hard, bust their knuckles late at night, working a second job in order to get that Bentley, if they pull out and somebody smacks that Bentley, they’re going to have an emotional attachment. They’re going to say, dang it. That sucks. I worked so hard for this thing.
See, most people don’t have any attachment to the law. They don’t have any attachment to freedom, but they do have an attachment to their job. They do have an attachment to their taxes. See, if you say, hey, who wants me to show y’all how to get out of taxes? Most people will come and say, hold me, because it’s about their money. They have an emotional attachment to their money. But if you ask people, how many of y’all want to save these kids that been preyed on by Epstein partners, most of y’all going to shut up. Most people are not going to want to join into that. I’m just giving truth.
So when you put something into something, you get busy faster. And there’s two reasons that people do things in this world. One is to gain pleasure. One is to avoid pain. Usually people wait until something is about to crush them or hurt them before they move. Fear is a better motivator to them than getting a victory. If you say, hey, let’s go take back America, most people would be like, well, they got guns. And what if they don’t like that we talk about the law, and what if my friends on my Facebook page don’t like it, and what if I post something and they look at me funny and I’m not included anymore. But if they see the government is coming down the street and giving out COVID shots and you saw your friends die, then they’re like, Dave, show me the law that makes them stop from jabbing me. Right now you care.
So I’m just being real. All this free stuff, nothing is free. Nothing. Even if you’re watching this video right now to gain knowledge, wisdom, and understanding, it ain’t free. You know what you’re spending: your time. See with a lot of people, I’ll say, oh, you want to be a monster in law? They say, yeah, Dave, give me your whole thing for free. I’m like, dude, you ain’t even gonna watch it. If I give you the whole thing for free, you’re not going to be motivated to move.
But here’s the truth. Let the government come after you. So the same people who say everything should be free are the same people who come and they’re like, Dave, I need you to take all your time to personally teach me everything that I wouldn’t learn before. I just had it happen today.
So here’s the truth. Will you freely give up your time to help other people? Will you stop worrying about your life first? See, I’m going to tell you a secret. The Bible says the first shall be last and the last shall be first. You want victory in your case. Stop talking about your case. Start talking about the law that protects everybody. And guess what’s going to happen. God is going to bless everybody and you in your case. Why? Because the last shall be first and the first shall be last.
See, we’ve been taught in America this: mind your own business, live your own life, bless yourself and put money in your pocket and live a good life quietly and shut up. No, the Bible says, plead for the innocent, plead for the fatherless, plead for the widows. See, if we were really doing what we were supposed to do, God tells us to relieve the oppressed. This is why I wrote a nationwide notice to go against ATF. I wrote a nationwide notice to go against mandates and that junk stopped. I wrote a nationwide notice for the big three to go after them getting forced to take shots. And guess what happened? The government officials start calling and messaging us. Oh, we see that you’re right. We’re not supposed to force you. We won’t do it no more. It’s the Democrats. It’s the Republicans. We go fix it. Yeah, of course you go fix it because you thought we didn’t know.
I’m trying to tell y’all we are free in America if we choose, but the Bible tells you how to get that freedom. The Bible tells you the truth shall make you free. You know what happens when you get that knowledge in you? That’s the truth. It forces you to change from inside out. You can’t stay the same. You can’t stay the same because it makes you act differently because you know better. You’re going to do better because you know better. But if you don’t care, you ain’t going to value anything that is wisdom and knowledge.
So I don’t try to make everybody learn wisdom and knowledge. I ain’t going to make you do a gosh dang thing. I’m going to tell the truth. If you like the truth, you’re going to accept the truth and you’re going to study and you’re going to build and you’re going to grow and you’re going to realize like, man, it is kind of funny that government officials don’t want us talking to help each other. They don’t want us talking to show that they’re wrong. And nobody taught us about this stuff. And then as soon as somebody come out and start teaching it, we got these fake attorneys coming with no face, wanting to be in the middle of the spotlight, talking about this isn’t true. This can’t happen.
Then we drop cases on this guy, Bruce Speirs, whatever his name is. We showed the cases that he said he could look up and he came back and said, well, I saw the case, but I can’t tell and affirm, confirm or deny what really happened.
[Later portion: challenge to Robert; common law and due process]
Robert said, I attempted to mimic Dave’s notices and I am awaiting your response from the Supreme Court of Nebraska, the court of the USA. Now, let me tell you, it is not wise to mimic what I do. It is wise to learn what I know. Here’s why. If the Supreme Court sees you write something, they can also tell if you understand the words that you’re using. On top of that, this is why I don’t just hand out blanket notices when people are like, hey, give me a notice so we can see what you did. I don’t do that because what happens is people will believe something about the law and they will say certain things. And when you dig in, you’re going to find out they really don’t know it. And then they’re going to get crushed because the judges are going to say, oh, you misapplied that idea.
Robert, you asked me a couple of days ago about AI, using AI and the fundamental law. I will invite you to come live right now and discuss, as you asked, debate me. You can use AI. I want you to debate me about the maxims and fundamental principles while you’re using AI right now on the spot. So open up your one device, ask me to come live, I’ll bring you live. Open up another device, iPad, computer, and you can use ChatGPT, Grok, and every other AI tool in the world at the same time and test what I say. I bet you I’ll break what you say and AI at the same time. And I’m offering this challenge because you offered it the other day.
Would you like to come live now and take that challenge? And once again, I’m offering you the challenge because you asked. And I enjoy the smoke, so I would love for you to come live. As a matter of fact, I’ll hit the button that asks you to come live, so you ain’t even got to do it. I’m asking you to come live and be at it. I’ll wait on you to get your devices up. I’ll wait on you to fire up Grok and all the AI you can find.
Oh, you declined. Bro, you can’t decline the invitation when you asked me to come live with you and do this. Now you said the other day that you wanted to come with AI and other things. I want you to try. Why don’t you come live and bring AI so I can slay AI in your face? I will crush AI in front of your face, and I’ll make it convert to what I say in your face. I will dig in and pump the brakes on AI, or you could bring a real attorney or a real judge, and I’ll make them flip in your face by God. And I’m going to tell you it is because I spent hours and hours studying the real truth, so I know what I’m saying in every line.
Some of the people here have been into my webinars where I teach and show us doing a live notice real time and how I think and what I’m doing and how I’m blocking certain things real time, so I know what the government is going to try to say to defeat me, and I’m breaking it real time. And I’m telling you, for the love of law and everything God, I want you to come live and bring AI. It ain’t nothing personal against you.
AI can’t touch the knowledge that we have. AI is really dumb and programmed to say everything to dissuade you as an attorney would. So I know what attorneys are going to say in every situation about what I teach. Do I know what attorneys are going to say in some tribunal I don’t deal with and I don’t teach people about? Heck no, I don’t even try to act like I could. But in everything that I deal with, I will rake AI through the coals just like an attorney.
Robert, call one of your attorney friends. Get every AI thing you can get and all y’all together come at the same time live and watch it. What’s hard in the law world is people will not know the truth, don’t teach the people the real truth, don’t take the time to study the real truth, but they want to throw in subtle challenges. But it’s real strange when you say, oh, come on, get that work in. Nobody wants to come.
That Bruce Speirs guy, the attorney or whatever he is, he don’t want none of this live smoke. Dude is like, I’m in the lost ark in Cambodia. We ain’t got no power, but I’m typing to you with power. We don’t want to fight you for real right now because I’m busy in a meeting at nine o’clock at night on a Sunday. Well, I’m typing whole book reports and dissertations, but I’m just not available now. Dude, you were just here. You’ve been typing for a day.
People will passively try to test in the law world, but they’re really not about that life. And I want you to see they’re really not about that life. The attorneys, the judges and the government officials are not about that life.
When people say they can mimic what I can do, the very fact that they won’t come live and debate me and what I say shows they can’t mimic what I do. They know it. It would be the most embarrassing slashing that you’ve ever seen.
How is common law tied to due process and guaranteed as such? Come live. I’ll answer it for you right now. Come on. I’ll answer. I won’t even be rough. I’ll answer. Just come live and have the courage to come live and ask me the question.
And watch, guys, I’m going to show you even this beautiful question right here. Yes. And it’s a beautiful question. I’ll show you that he doesn’t understand what I’m saying by asking that question. And I’m not even trying to be mean. I’m just saying he doesn’t understand and I’ll explain it without coming at you. So if you would be so kind, come live right now. And I’ll answer the question for you. And I’m not going to be rough. I promise. Just ask the question. And I promise I won’t ask you nothing else or bring up nothing else to put you on the spot. Just ask the question. And I’m only going to do this so everybody can see why we got to study. And it was a very good question.
OK, he’s here, guys. He’s joining. Beautiful. All right. Can you ask me that question again, please?
[Guest] I said, how is common law tied to due process? And how is that proven through text?
OK, now we’re going to let this—we’re going to break this down real easy. I guess I said, and how is it a guarantee? Easy. Now, this is fun. See, I love you. This is what we got to do as the people. We got to come live and discuss stuff. Watch this.
So he says, how is common law tied to due process and guaranteed? So common law is the under structure of the 51 constitutions, the federal and the state. Now, you asked, how is that tied to due process and guaranteed? Here’s one thing you’re going to see. In most of your state constitution and the federal, you’re not going to see the word plain “due process.” If you look up a Black’s Law fifth edition, you’re going to see that there’s a word called due process and there’s another word called due process of law. Due process is not the same as due process of law.
Due process is where attorneys come together to say that before they take something from you or do something against you, that they have to give you a hearing, which is what most attorneys want to say today. They want to give you a hearing and the next thing they want to do is give you an opportunity to be heard and then they can take your job. But that’s very different from the word due process of law.
Due process of law is a word that says that in order for government officials to do any action, it must be sanctioned and the court must be sanctioned by what is called the settled maxims. The settled maxims are also what is called the fundamental principles of law. This is in our original constitutions and bills of rights in the nation. All people in all states have these equal rights.
For instance, in Arizona, Article 2, Section 1, it says that the people have the right to bring their government servants to a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles. Those fundamental principles are called maxims. If you look at the work by Charles A. Weisman, you look at page 5 and 6, he explains that the fundamental principles of law are the maxims of law. The maxims of law have never been taught to the American people in our generations. So from anybody my age and up that’s still alive, they didn’t learn it.
Now, when you understand the fundamental principles and the maxims, they bound government to use the common law. So for instance, it is attached to common law by due process of law, which means it’s owed to you. Now, the government officials don’t want you really knowing what’s owed to you. They want you to believe that all they have to give you is a hearing and the ability to speak.
[Closing stretch from source]
I hope you guys enjoyed this live. Robert, thank you for coming on. Thank you. And questioning. That was beautiful. I appreciate you. And guys, we get the opportunity to learn the truth in law. We get to have fun and party.
I want to thank you for coming. Let me know if this made sense for you or if it was fun. People asked me to go live after 5:15. I do have a class tonight that I might make tomorrow and then come live because we’re getting ready to do a heavy notice to challenge the next level of things in America that is wrong. And I believe that we’re going to take back America by using the fundamental law and all simplicity, all wisdom and truth is going to be fire.
Guys, the law is on our side. We have the power in America; it has just been hidden from us. If you want to get in my class, Facebook might block my messages. So under this post or one of my last posts, just ask me to share a link to the webinar and I can give you a link to get into it. It’s like over three hours, full of knowledge, wisdom, and understanding that’s never been taught in our history.
My webinars used to be one hundred twenty-five dollars. I decided to make this one seventy-five dollars and it is full of heavy teaching. And you get access to a private group where people are discussing the real stuff.
We went after the ATF. We went to the Supreme Court and made them destroy what the ATF was doing. We did it with OSHA when they tried to force them vaccine mandates. When they tried to stop us from getting the ballots in Arizona, a hundred twenty-seven of us sent affidavits and made them do the audit.
We do this thing called JotForm. So when you sign the notice with us, it automatically gets sent to the Supreme Court and other actors. One of my students, Jaron, sent a notice to the chief justice of the federal Supreme Court. The chief justice of the federal Supreme Court took the notice, brought it to the clerk and told them to send something back. So they sent a notice saying Justice Roberts told us you sent him this and we’re sending you this back.
I hope you all have fun with this. Please give me some feedback. Let me know if I should do this more. Please leave it on my comments, attach it on my Facebook. Let me know if you enjoyed the law that we have broken down for you today. I think I might move my later class and do this again at 5:15 Arizona time.
I want to take this to the next level and burn down corruption, not physically, but with the real law, tear junk apart and leave it the way it’s supposed to be. Please let me know if you enjoy this live. Let me know if you enjoy learning the law. We will drop heavy fire law that has never been seen before. If it ain’t made sense to you, when you hear all this crazy stuff all over the place, we’ll bring stuff together to make it make sense. It’ll be plain and simple for you. You will understand, you will be powerful, you will be mighty, and by God, you will tear that junk apart.
Love you guys. Y’all stay out of trouble. Thank you. Let me know what y’all think. And please, not just here, because this is going to disappear. I think the comments will. Please give me some feedback on the actual post if it goes up. Let me know if you are blessed today by real knowledge and wisdom and understanding. Let me know if you’re feeling that fire. I love y’all. Y’all stay out of trouble. Y’all be cool. Peace.
______________
End Transcript
For Further Exploration
If you found this inquiry valuable, you may also enjoy reading:
If the Swamp Is Really Being Drained, Where Is the Policy Change?
In that article, I explore another question that has become increasingly important to me: When significant claims are being made, what can we actually verify? Rather than simply accepting or rejecting what we are being told, I believe there is value in slowing down, examining original sources, following the record, separating evidence from interpretation, and remaining willing to say, “I do not yet know. Show me the record.”
Read: If the Swamp Is Really Being Drained, Where Is the Policy Change?
By:
Sophia Taniah
The One Who Flows With The River ⚖️🌎 🌊🕊️💙💜💛🌹
Written and offered with reverence for life, resolve, grace, and love.
With creative and editorial assistance from Sage and Ara, my AI assistants and co creators.
◇═◎═◇ Team Freedom Forever ◇═◎═◇
✧ ✦ △ ◇ Aeterna Reconcilio ◇ △ ✦ ✧
⛔️ FAIR USE, COMMENTARY & EDUCATIONAL NOTICE
Portions of third party material are reproduced or referenced here for purposes including criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Attribution and links to original sources are provided where available.
Fair use is determined under applicable copyright law based upon the circumstances of the particular use. The presence of this notice does not, by itself, determine whether a particular use constitutes fair use.
This article is offered for educational, commentary, research, and informational purposes and should not be taken as legal advice. Laws and procedural requirements vary by jurisdiction, claim, governmental body, and circumstance. Readers are encouraged to examine the governing legislation, court decisions, procedural rules, and original record for themselves.
We are told time and time again that the answers are within us. Perhaps, then, our first step should always be to become still and align with the intelligence within the human heart, opening ourselves to Divine intervention, inspiration, and inner guidance. From that place, we may be better able to discern what right action looks like in each moment and move forward under Grace and the Law of Love.
#FollowTheRecord #QuestionEverything #Discernment #CriticalThinking #DoYourOwnResearch #ExamineTheEvidence #PrimarySources #CourtRecords #LegalResearch #HierarchyOfLaw #DueProcess #ConstitutionalLaw #FundamentalLaw #StateVBlake #CrRLJ78 #DavidJose #BrandonHoeve #PeopleSeekingTruth #TeamFreedom #FreedomDove
Leave a comment