There are rallies and people marching world wide wide today, November 20, 2021, apparently in man’s quest for freedom.
Food for thought;
Freedom “fighters” we ask you:
What exactly does freedom mean to you?
In order to experience life in freedom do we first have to free our mind of incongruent thinking and recognize inconstant actions based on past programming?
Do you know that we are in fact involved in fraud by going to work and collecting a pay-check and depositing it in a “charter bank”? Are you interested in learning more about this? [more about this later]
Have you ever wondered why Supreme Court Rulings do not actually result in policy changes in legislation supporting what “We The People” are wanting?
Are the Legislators acting in the best interest of the people? These “freedom rallies clearly indicate that “We The People” have lost “trust” in the people in government and in the “judicial process? Again, why are the legislators blind and deaf to what “We The People” are wanting? Why are “We The People” not being heard? Are there inconsistencies in the record that needing to be corrected to see actual freedom?
Us. Supreme Court Decision – “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
Us. Supreme Court Decision – “Under our system of government upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him/her, except as his/her conduct to others, (injured party) leaving him/her the sole judge as to all that affects himself/herself.” Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60.
It is imperative that we fully comprehend the situation playing out in order to bring resolution in a peaceful way to affect real change. It is imperative that we recognize how we are being coerced by our own programming and be willing to educate ourselves prior to taking action. We can be manipulated to the agenda when we cannot see how we are playing into the “slavery system” because we have not stepped forward to correct the errors in the record. “Most people want to go along to get along”, because is it easier then confronting a wrong than living the truth.
When we recognize that this is a spiritual awaking and not a battle, then we really have no enemies. Could it be that we have conflict within ourselves, we have our own convictions or contradiction in not standing in our truth of Universal Laws bogging us down? When we are in tune with ourselves we know what is inherently right action, the universal Law of “do no harm”.
We, raymond, sophia and pamela, are looking to collaborate with a group of people interested in effecting real change. We are writing a “Freedom Petition” titled “Public Notice of Claim and Claim of Right to Life with Freedom of Transit; Notice Of Dereliction Of Duties With Liability; Protection Order; By Way Of Request For Admissions”. We are looking for like minded people that can assist in the finalization of this “Freedom Petition”.
Once the document is perfected we will need 33 people (with paralegal support) that can come together in Convention and by the Unanimous Consent sign it ASAP with as many witnesses world wide as possible (thinking perhaps contacting groups around the world and broadcasting this meeting of the minds by way of a zoom meeting). If interested send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org write in the subject line, “Freedom Petition“. Our home is at penticton, british columbia, canada.
We have included some information below with the intention of bringing clarity to how we are all being duped and once you have finished reading this information, it would be helpful if you could be interested in becoming involved with creating a better world for ourselves, our children, grandchildren and send us an email with your feedback to email@example.com with “Freedom Petition” written in the subject line so that we can get this petition finalized and endorsed as soon as possible:
Luke 11:52 52“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering.”
We will still keep your spirit and wish with all our might for its return to your hearts as it is in our best interest to do so.
Whereas notification of liability is the first essential element of “due process of law”, as silence is acquiescence under the law, silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a lawful or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be misleading, whether intentionally or not; and,
Why is it when valid claims are presented proper action is not forthcoming and resolved?
U.S. Constitution Amendment V:
No person shall.., be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of Law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV:
No State shall.., deprive any person of life, liberty,or property, without due process of law….
Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects every individual’s right to “life liberty and security of the person, and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Does creating legislation to give oneself absolute immunity in order to grant yourself the power to selectively murder people, fall under “fundamental justice”? Circle one yes or no
Section 7 of the Charter is a constitutional provision that protects an individual’s autonomy and personal legal rights from actions of the government.
According to the Supreme Court in Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 1998-11-10 File numbers DES-3-95, this provision provides both substantive and procedural rights. In other words, the right in s. 7 applies to action taken or laws made by the government (substantive) and also governs judicial proceedings, such as criminal proceedings (procedural).
At its most basic procedural interpretation, s. 7 protects “due process” – the idea that no Canadian should be deprived of their liberty unless by the lawful judgment of his or her peers he or she is found to have breached the laws of Canada.
We are not a resident, an employer or employee, a citizen. etc.. How about you?
As those that wish to retain the freedoms we are born with by our true nature It is our duty to our offspring and to our fellowman to educate ourselves , to self examine how we are doing life, and to recognize our own insanity in allowing ourselves to be blind to the manipulated of the system of things. To be ignorant is to ignore, is to refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.. It is up to each of us to recognize when our thoughts, what we utter, and the actions we take are in contradiction ?
Are you educated with regard to “Due Process of Law“?
Do you know that statutes do not apply to a man or woman?
Have those taking steps toward true freedom done anything to correct the errors in the record by correcting their “classification”?
Constitution of the United States
Article 37 The United States acknowledge and protect, in hostile countries occupied by them, religion and morality; strictly private property; the persons of the inhabitants, especially those of women; and the sacredness of domestic relations. Offences to the contrary shall be rigorously punished.[is this applied in all cases?]
Article 70 170 The use of poison in any manner, be it to poison wells, or food, or arms, is wholly excluded from modern warfare. He that uses it puts himself out of the pale of the law and usages of war. [is this applied in all cases?]
Did you know that the men and women that are not registered officers or agents of the “Law Society” are not qualified to go into their courts? This means you and me as we are not officers of the military!!
Proof: Rule 17 Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity; Public Officers
https://www.law.corn. It is a fact that the beneficiary is not obligated to act or perform in any capacity. “We The People” are the beneficiary!!!!!
Why have we been delegated as “a ward of the state”?
Who has claimed to be:
- The Power of Attorney
- The Guardian++
- The Custodian
- The Trustee”
of the “Private” Trust?
Are the people running the judiciary classifying each of us, the people of earth, as a “servant to the public”, or an “officer”, or “registered agent” in order to enact these ill conceived and torturous measures on us? If we have accepted this assignment then why are we not getting paid as such?
If we are “classified” as such then how did they come up with these classifications? We need to see the contract that stipulates it and were we actually agreed to being such.
Apparently when we register with the “Law Society” we become a ward of the state and subject to all their malarkey.
The fact is this “Legal Person” is put into the public domain without us being aware of its existence and those that created it are benefitting from it.
We are going through life thinking we are acting for our selves but apparently according to the “Law Society” we are registered agents for the “Legal Person”.
Where are the contractual agreements between “We The People” and the men and women acting on behalf of the Public Health Agency stating as such?
How did they come up with the conclusion that we give over our body autonomy and its health and well-being over to the agency? Could it be the presumptions and assumption regarding the creation and issuance of the Birth Certificate, the capitalized Legal Name, and Social Insurance Number?
Did you know that in the creation of these contracts above the creators believe and act as though they have “Power OF Attorney”? It is up to us to “Correct The Record” and is why we are looking to find people to join us in this petition.
When a contract is given to us it can only be considered given in “good faith” if the people giving the contract inform the recipient of all parts of it, including yet not exclusively the implication therein. When arbitrary definitions of the words used in said contract are not known we have no idea what we are signing and we are trained to not ask questions as to not seem stupid. When in fact asking questions is a sign of intelligence.
Robert Menard in the following video titled “The Magnificent Deception” explains just how importing language is to us. Go to minute 23:23.
When “We The People” are operating on an assumption and presumption we are not going to get what we want.
“You might use the exact same language as someone else but if you don’t understand you are operating upon a assumption or presumption you are not going to get what you want. These words mean things and you are going to be getting soggy fries when you want virgin fries with a side of gravy. And the Law Society loves doing this. They want you to be eating the soggiest fries imaginable.
Let’s ask ourselves: “why are we here”? Look a room full of people from young, old, all sorts from across the entire community spectrum. Why are we all here? i think we are all here because we know at a fundamental level in our hearts that we have a right to peace and abundance. And we are not getting this. It is like there is a big stink in the room everyone can smell it. Everyone is saying “who cut that one”? And there is a group of lawyers in the corner with nose plugs on saying “smells like roses to me”.
We know there is a big stink in the room. We know that they use words they will claim are our laws that have the force of law over us and yet at the same time they will claim that we cannot possibly understand these words because we are are not a lawyer.
There is a guy by the name of David E. Sherman. He is one of the premier tax accountants and if you look in that snafu and google David E. Sherman he is on the record for stating “these de-taxers don’t know what they are talking about they read something that looks like English but it’s not. It is law and they can’t understand it”.
i called him on that. i said “if they can’t understand it then how is it constitutional to use this to create liability on them”. Never heard back from him”.
Equal consideration must be given in order to have equity.
‘Fraud in the inducement‘ is a term used for contract fraud and occurs when one party involved in the contract used deceit or trickery to get the other party or signer to act for their advantage. For ‘fraud in the inducement‘ to have occurred:
- One of the parties had been misled by the facts
- The wrong facts were used for the party to make their decision
Operating under presumptions and assumptions negates a meeting of the minds thus creates confusion and has been detrimental to the meaning of life for those of us that come forth into physical form for the enjoyment of it and do not expect or wish to be abused the moment we arrive.
We shouldn’t be made to dig through the malarkey created by the Papal Bloodline to find the diamonds of our freedom.
Fraud carries a penalty of 7 to 10 years’ incarceration and the latter, where there are multiple instances. Millions of people are subject to this crime every day on a multitude level, as it is now commonplace and is carried out by the largest and most ruthless criminal master minds that created “Government(s)”and control the politicians, specifically legislators, around the world.
These companies are also a Public office with the enforcement to execute these crimes, which is inclusive of but not limited to: – The office of the Police, The office of the Sherriff, The office of the Judiciary, Local Government, and Central Government. Independent Bailiff and Debt Collection, companies are also ‘licensed’ by the same company members.
When laws are being ignored and “Due Process of Law” is not followed the men and women acting as officers and agents of the state/province/country are therefore indistinguishable from a criminal cartel.
Malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance are also very severe crimes with a period of incarceration of life in prison.
Malfeasance is a deliberate act, with criminal intent to defraud or cause harm and ignorance is no defense. Malfeasance that has been defined by appellate courts in other jurisdictions as: A wrongful act which the actor has no legal right to do. An act for which there is no authority or warrant of law. An act which a person ought not to do, An act which is wholly wrongful and unlawful; as that which an officer has no authority to do and is positively wrong or unlawful; and as the unjust performance of some act which the party performing it has no legal right.
It is fundamentally impossible to revoke being represented thus governed when we never actually gave anyone the “Power of Attorney” in the first place. And it is fundamentally impossible to revoke consent to something we never consented to in the first place. Where there is fraud and coercion there is no lawful consent negating all immunity.
The Seven Principles of Public Life 1. The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services.
Do the actual “Public Officers”, you know the ones that have “sworn an oath of office” all get a big fat fail in all categories?
It is also substantiated
5 CFR § 2635.101 – Basic obligation of public service.
It is our observation that judges when they offer an opinion and make a ruling they aways rely on the intent of one party and never take into consideration the intent of the secondary party. Admit or Deny
All contracts come with intent and the constitutional agreements have two parties the people and the government and the three branches there of. When ever a judge offers an opinion and make rulings relying only one the intent of the government to analyze the scenario or to determine if the terms of the contract have been violated they are in fact biased. Why does “the Judge” never ever looks at what the peoples intent is? The people in government made very important submissions inside the Declaration of Independence ‘ a good government is the only kind of government where the people will consent to be governed. Consent being the key word. If they obtain our consent to be governed under the Constitutional Principles would that consent to be governed specific of specially outside those principles still be required? If they don’t obtain proper consent from you to govern different areas of your life under “Specialty Law” did they actually leverage our consent in a meaningful way that gave them permission to exercise a power over or authority otherwise not listed in constitution?
There are plenty of things that they do that is totally outside the scope of the constitution. Admit or Deny
If we consider the constitution to be an agreement not a contract , it is an agreement between the people and those in government consenting to government specific areas of their so-called country their state. What is not in the agreement is the consent to goven my private life.
We have the right to maintain privacy in all contracts and the right to associate freely or not associate with people we do not want to. When our right to privacy are deprived it is because we have voluntarily register apply or get some sort of permission license. When we do this it is our waver to enter into private contract under Article 1 Section 10 of the constitution. By surrendering our right to privacy it becomes public and this is what the court uses to deprive us of rights.
It is our right to not apply for a drivers license so as not to be harassed by the officers of the court. Admit or Deny.
When looking at a legislative order we should seek out the purpose and scope of the legislative act to ensure the act reflects its intended use.
The legislator is known to be the voice of and representative of “We The People” and is known as the “the Peoples Branch”.
What ever the legislator says it should reflect “the will of the people” and agree with what the people want, by putting it in writing.
When the legislator writes legislation against what the people want they are acting in a “Personal Capacity”.
When they make laws, rules, regulations, statutes, bills, acts, etc., without knowing what the people want, and without consulting “We The People” first then they are acting in their “Personal Capacity” and for their own agenda and for their own enrichment and not with the power of “We The People” as delegated to them.
As an agency principle exists, an agent cannot do what the principle would not do itself if it was in said shoes.
When we instruct the legislator to construct laws designed to protect us, the question now becomes, “Did the legislator presume this is what we wanted or did they get information from some other source in order to conclude it is what we wanted”?
And if not can they come to court and evidence the fact that they are acting in our best interest to our benefit based on our instruction or did they act on their own accord in their “Personal Capacity” to create laws, statutes, ordinances, bills, acts, etc., they specifically wanted for themselves?
Was power exercised by the legislators that was not authorized by the people?
The legislators regarding the use of the jab [for you know what] made a “Personal Capacity” decision not a “professional” or “official” one that would otherwise have immunity.
What is the “authority of the legislature” of each province and were do they get their “legislative powers”?
Have the men and women and other acting as Ministers and Law Enforcers stepped outside of the scope of their legislated authority with regard to the implementation of the “Weather Modification Act”,”Cern” & “HAARP” Technologies, vaccines, etc., without fully disclosing to the people said technology and how it would impact the quality of our life experience?
The people in Health Care around the world have used vaccines since they were conceived, believing them to be “safe and effective” and people have been getting flu shots. Why is this different? The current virus is suspected to be bio-engineered. (see Dr David Martin in the German inquiry; Nobel Prize Prof Tasuku Honjo. Bill H.R. 748 which then became the CARES act was evidence that the US government knew about the virus one year before the incident in Wuhan). It appears that the vaccine was purportedly planned before the virus, resulting in the measures relating to the current virus. Then the mRNA vaccine was rolled out as an experimental vaccine with “emergency application” without a thorough investigation if there an “emergency”. Announcing an emergency without an investigation equates to “Criminal Negligence”.
There is no clear evidence that there was cause for concern regarding a “deadly” virus.
The information provided clearly establishes a “criminal conspiracy”.
Criminal Conspiracy-Criminal conspiracy is a far-reaching concept and is one of the most widely prosecuted federal criminal offences. A criminal conspiracy is loosely defined as “anytime two or more individuals agree to commit an unlawful act and then take some step toward completion of that act.” Federal conspiracy charges are broad and can apply to any individual who conspires with another individual to perpetuate a crime
Criminal Code of Canada – section 465(1) – Conspiracy
Days after the rules were published, the U.S. court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, considered one of the most conservative appellate courts in the country, agreed with the Republican AGs to freeze Biden’s vaccine mandate pending a review.
There are numerous reports being made world wide regarding the damaging effect and even deaths related to the jab and said ” bio-weapon” yet we are still hearing that the Public Health Officers of Canada have advocated for the use of them on children. Why is that?
If we collectively wish to make real and lasting change it is up to us to dig to the root of the problem to eradicate the the undesirable weeds, those pesky invasive weeds that take over the garden, this includes yet is not limited to the weeds that are growing in our own mind and heart.
For those truly interested in “freedom” we invite you to equip yourself with knowledge you can do this by joining the Lawful Living Community. Join this growing group of intelligent and highly motivated people using this link: http://www.lawfulliving.com
There are people getting actualized results, free rent/mortgage, free utilities, free food, etc..
To get the most out of being a member of this community first read the information published on the electronic document link below: It is recommended that everyone wishing to break-free by claiming their mind thus claiming their freedom start by taking the “Money Talk” class……
The information shared in the following on line article titled “Proof of Claim Against Government Greed and Corruption” is worth reading however one should ask oneself, “why do we argue” why is it we try to convince someone of our point of view instead of sharing our point of view and expanding our perspective? “Two intelligent heads” is better then one. A belief in something is indoctrination!!
Are you absolutely sure you have all the facts in the matter at hand? And if you make a “Legal Determination” without having all the facts is this creating a “Lability for Oneself”? When you share information and this information leads to harm or damage or death is this “Criminal Negligence”?
“Let Their Be Peace On Earth”
We reiterate, we are looking for people interested in colaborating with us to create the “Freedom Petition” and we (raymond, sophia, and pamela) are looking forward to hearing from you.
We wish you love, joy, peace, radiant, health and wellbeing for you and all your loved ones in every moment! ❤