#RulesoOfCivilProcedure #DueProcessofLaw #Court #CaseLaw #Statutes #Constitution #Charter

#NoticeOfTrespass #NoticeOfLiability

The information shared herein is intended to assist those that have difficulty finding resolution when it comes to our interaction with the members of the “Law Society”. It is important for us to realize that we have a fundamental right to be free from violence and we have a fundamental right to be free from all past labels and the systems strategically designed to influence how we think and what we think about keeping us in a mental prison.

As you read the information presented herein we invite the reader to become aware of the words used and question how these words have come into being and how they have influenced our experience of life. The arbitrary definitions concocted by members of this “Law Society” only apply to them and can only binds the ones that pledge their allegiance to the “secret societies” that came up with this system.

Matthew 17 (KJV)[i]Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to [j]fulfill them.

Note: even though we may use quotes from the bible does not mean that we agree with the laws written in it.

We have included the laws, codes of conduct, put forth by the founding members of the Church of Gaia for We The People. These laws, codes of conduct, are not set in stone and maybe adjusted according to the members shifts in mental, emotional, psychological, spiritual state and state of consciousness

Note: this is not a religious organization, the Church of Gaia it is a way of life in alignment with what is widely known as “Mother Nature” being our true nature

Religious organizations were set up as a way to keep mankind in lower states of consciousness. The dogma of these Religious Organizations actual work to rob people of their identity. It requires the full comprehension as to how the human design works to fully grasp the extent to how this dogma influence how we experience reality (must be discussed in at another time)

The “policy enforcers” either do not know their job description or they blatantly ignore what they have been trained to participate in. These policy enforcers either blatantly ignore the fraud that is being perpetrated upon the people of earth or they are unwittingly incriminating themselves as a result of their lack of insight and foresight. They get away with violent acts upon the people because the believe their insurance will cover them. However, if they are acting outside ot their “office” or outside of their “job description” they are not covered by their their bond, their insurance will not protect them.

To reiterate: this energy transmission in the form of information is intended to inform these men and women of the fact that when they do blatantly ignore the laws as they are written their insurance does not cover them once they violate their job description.

The following should be attached to every “Notice of Liability!

https://archive.org/details/arrests-and-false-imprisonment/page/n5/mode/2up

A written Constitution does not grant rights. Written “Constitutions” are meant to protect our rights (these rights are intrinsic, unalienable, and inviolate) those that violate them are criminals.

Why do people believe that someone can grant them rights? Why do we accept that a man or women can “write legislation” that impacts our life experience? What is keeping people from noticing that there is a small group of people that have controlled the narrative for a very long time? Why do we ignore the words used to limit us? What keeps us from questioning how the people born to earth have come to be labeled as a “civilian” , a “citizen”, a “person”, a “taxpayer”, etc.?

There is a document that is being circulated called, Agreement between Dckis and Queen Victoria, The year 1665 on the Bargain 1835. What we should be asking is “who gave these men and women the authority to dictate a “King” or “Queen” of this company called “Canada” or anything? And what gives them the authority to “change the rules of the whites” or to even refer to another man or women as “white” or anything else?

What is keeping people from acknowledging that this idea of “money” is arbitrary? Who has the authority to create “money “and who has the authority to dictate a “numerical value” to the earth resources or in other word “put a monetary value on the earths resources” and to put a “numerical value” on the animals and people born on and of the earth? What is keeping people from acknowledging ownership and putting a monetary value on the earth’s resources is fraud.

What Are Human Rights?

Everyone in the world is entitled to the same fundamental human rights. There are 30 of them, in fact. They are the universal human rights that we, as citizens of this world, have agreed we are all entitled to. They include the right to live free from torture, the right to live free from slavery, the right to own property, and the right to equality and dignity, and to live free from all forms of discrimination.

• Human rights describe how we instinctively expect to be treated as persons.
• Human rights define what we are all entitled to a life of equality, dignity, respect, and a life free from discrimination.
• You do not have to earn your human rights. You are born with them. They are the same for every person.
• Nobody can give them to you. But they can be taken away.
• Countries have human rights laws to make sure that people and governments are held accountable if your human rights are not respected. In Canada, your human rights are protected by provincial, territorial, federal and international laws.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Getting to the nitty gritty of things we discover our rights are being ignored in many cases because we do not fully comprehend how the system works. It is up to us to educate ourselves and each other so that we can maneuver the system to work in our favor. It is up to us to hold “Public Officials” accountable for not t upholding their “Job Description”. If they are acting outside of their authority it is up to us to make them knowing, Are they acting under the “color of office” or under the “color of law”? After all they are they are supposed to be acting “in good faith”

Soi SanI wrote, “believe you want the charges discharge against the prosecuting officer(s)/ attorney(s) and police officer(s)/sheriff(s) bonds. Dismiss means they can bring it up again. Discharge means it’s on them and they become unbondable by exposing the fraud they’re all committing”.

If we are summonsed to court we can send them notice and report on the “Clerk of the Court” for dereliction of their duties. And request an Administrative Hearing. If we have been summonsed to court we can send a complaint to the Commissioner and ask them “how did i end up in court without going to an Administrative Hearing first”?

People are beginning to see the corruption in the Judicial System around the world yet they are not looking at why the system is running in a way that is robbing us of our Natural Born Authority as a man or woman? It is up to us to resolve any and all assumptions by the actors in the “Court Room”. The problem is that we are uneducated and the “policy enforcers” are uneducated. It would be beneficial for us all to fully comprehend how the cosmos works and how the biochemistry of our unique energy expression known as a man works….”in the beginning was the word and the word is with god and the word is god”… we speak our world into being. And it would be beneficial to serve each man acting under the “color of office” with a Notice of Claim; Notice of Liability”. using the Ministerial Action Process.

How many people have actually done the Ministerial Action Process and requested an Administrative Hearing with the Agency? Why do we allow the to summons us to court? We should be reporting the court clerk for their dereliction of duty. Ask them “how did i end up in court without going to an administrative hearing first”?

What people do not comprehend is that we should be resolving all conflict prior to going into a “Court House.” using the Ministerial Action Process (if interested you can learn this process by becoming a member of the Lawful Living Community at http://www.lawfulliving.com).

Administrative Tribunal

“How Tribunals Are Involved! If you disagree with a decision that a particular government agency has made that affects you, a special board (an administrative tribunal) will hear your complaint and make a decision about your case. For example, if a federal government agency has denied you employment insurance benefits when you lost your job, a special tribunal would hear your complaint. A tribunal is sometimes called a “board” or a “commission”. In BC, the procedures of tribunals are governed by the Administrative Tribunals Act, as well as the internal bylaws and regulations developed by each agency, commission or board”

read more using this link: . https://www.adminlawbc.ca/what-is-admin-law

The following 32 minute video offers a short introduction into Administrative Law

“Justice is not for hire or for sale” you do not need money to have justice. And for those facing Labor Disputes as a result of imposed CovID-19 measures the following video will be useful.

Administrative Law – In-person Hearings

It is up to each of us to stop allowing these usurpers of our experience of life to dictate how we experience life. It is up to each of us to acknowledge the fact that no one can actually restrict a man or woman’s travel upon the earth. We are all an extension of source energy and the source of life and no one has the right to rob us of the breath of life and rob us of our reason for being!!!!

The following article is worth reading:

HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS

“This article I believe was written somewhere around 2007, yet here we are today, July 10, 2016 and I am still receiving e-mails and telephone calls from dads and mums all around the world just saying, “Thank You” for the advice.

So, with said, I am going to copy said article again here today. I see it has been changed up by a few with their insight but the bottom line is the same, if you have a complaint with the judge in your ruling, you must at least file a complaint.

I have taken the time to provide the address of the judicial review board in your state, on our Fathers4Justice website http://Fathers4justice.org, just click on “Your State” and all of the information is provided. If you have questions, send them to: info@f4j.us and we will assist you as possible.

First and foremost, do not ever go into a family court environment without a court reporter and/or fathers4justice court watchers. If you do not have the transcripts from the hearing, it will be your word against that of the judges and he will not tell the truth. This is of paramount importance, judges notice when they are, ‘on the record’, and if they are ever going to abide by laws and provide a fair and impartial hearing, it will be when a court reporter is present. The transcripts are a must for complaints and appeals!!!”

read the entire article here: https://donaldtenn.com/how-to-file-a-complaint-against-judges-attorneys-and-prosecutors/

How many people have heard of the Jay Treaty? Why do we so easily accept these treatties when we had no say in their creation?

https://www.ptla.org/wabanaki/facts-about-jay-treaty#:~:text=The%20%22Jay%20Treaty%22%20is%20an%20agreement%20signed%20by,the%20U.S.%2FCanadian%20border.%20The%20%22Jay%20Treaty%22%20recognized%20that%2C

Do the members of the “Law Society” know the meaning of the word, “human” as defined by the entities that show their disrespect in the definitions they have documented. We the founders of the “Holy Church of Gaia” use a different definition for the word, “human” and can be read below under “Special Definitions”

1 U.S. Code § 8.“Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

(a)In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

(b)As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion

.(c)Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.(Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.)

Do you really believe this nonsense?

“Homo Sapien”

NOUN the species of bipedal primates to which modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) belong, characterized by a large brain, a nearly vertical forehead, a skeletal build lighter and teeth smaller than earlier humans, and dependence upon language and the creation and utilization of complex tools: the species has existed for about 200,000 years. See also Boskop man, Cro-Magnon, Marmes man, Niah Cave.humankind.

source: https://www.dictionary.com/

“person”, n. 1) a human being. 2) a corporation treated as having the rights and obligations of a person.  Counties and cities can be treated as a person in the same manner as a corporation. However,  corporations, counties and cities cannot have the emotions of humans such as malice, and therefore are not liable for punitive damages.

Source: Person legal definition of person (thefreedictionary.com)

49 CFR § 171.8 – Definitions and abbreviations.

“Person”

Person means an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company; or a government, Indian Tribe, or authority of a government or Tribe, that offers a hazardous material for transportation in commerce, transports a hazardous material to support a commercial enterprise, or designs, manufactures, fabricates, inspects, marks, maintains, reconditions, repairs, or tests a package, container, or packaging component that is represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use in transporting hazardous material in commerce. This term does not include the United States Postal Service or, for purposes of 49 U.S.C. 5123 and 5124, a Department, agency, or instrumentality of the government.

So tired of people being so disrespectful to the life of others!!

Rights cannot be taken away they can only be ignored!!!

For those that feel compelled to take ownership of their life we suggest stepping into it by not allowing anyone to administer your life or your body

We have included a document for those that are being faced with mandatory vaccine use the following link to access the template letter:

How To Legally Avoid Unwanted Vaccines!

We should all be asking “why are our innate and inherent rights being ignored and our will violated?

The people of the world must come to realize that the “Legal Society” is the same everywhere. The “Legal Society” is the cabal and our involvement in their system is what is plaguing the earth. And It does not matter what so called, “country” you believe yourself from:

“same Crown, same BAR, same administers acting fraudulently as “judges”. cheers”! mark feller

Those that are enforcing the “laws” should realize that they are enforcing corporate policy. . Statutes, codes, ordinances, bills, acts, are not Law. it is the people in “Law Enforcement” that must recognize when they are actually “breaking the Laws”. when they do not know who these corporate policies apply to.

It is odd that we have been programmed and hypnotized in our training to ignore what is right in front of us.

Criminal CodeR.S.C., 1985, c. C-46

Written notification to be given

25.4 (1) When a public officer commits an act or omission — or directs the commission by another person of an act or omission — under paragraph 25.1(9)(a) or (b), the senior official with whom the public officer files a written report under section 25.2 shall, as soon as is feasible after the report is filed, and no later than one year after the commission of the act or omission, notify in writing any person whose property was lost or seriously damaged as a result of the act or omission.

Marginal note:Limitation(2) The competent authority may authorize the senior official not to notify the person under subsection (1) until the competent authority is of the opinion that notification would not

(a) compromise or hinder an ongoing investigation of an offence under an Act of Parliament;

(b) compromise the identity of a public officer acting in an undercover capacity, of a confidential informant or of a person acting covertly under the direction and control of a public officer;

(c) endanger the life or safety of any person;

(d) prejudice a legal proceeding; or

e) otherwise be contrary to the public interest.

• 2001, c. 32, s. 2

Marginal note:Excessive force

26 Every one who is authorized by law to use force is criminally responsible for any excess thereof according to the nature and quality of the act that constitutes the excess.

• R.S., c. C-34, s. 26

Marginal note:Use of force to prevent commission of offence

27 Every one is justified in using as much force as is reasonably necessary

• (a) to prevent the commission of an offence
  • (i) for which, if it were committed, the person who committed it might be arrested without warrant, and
  • (ii) that would be likely to cause immediate and serious injury to the person or property of anyone; or
• (b) to prevent anything being done that, on reasonable grounds, he believes would, if it were done, be an offence mentioned in paragraph (a).

• R.S., c. C-34, s. 27

It has come our attention during an altercation with a “policy enforcers”, member of the “RCMP”, that they are not aware that they are the standing army (militia) for the “Legal Society” and enforcing corporate policies and procedures of said “Crown Service Corporations”. These “militarized” men and women are blind to the fact that they have no right to order a man or women they are calling “civilians”.

We have a fundamental right to not be involved in their system. How do we extricate ourselves from this system that has been laid down over millions of years?

Under chapter 44

Transportation Act of the Canadian Constitution it defines the “Powers” of the Minister;Does it say the “Public Health Minister” has the power to enforce the wearing of a mask or force the administration of an injectable technology?

Part 2 — Powers of The MinisterDivision 1 — GeneralRights, powers and advantages of minister

2 (1)Without limiting any other rights, powers or advantages of the minister under this or any other enactment, the minister may do whatever is or may be necessary to do any or all of the following :

(a)plan, design, acquire, hold, construct in any manner and in any place the minister considers appropriate, use, operate, upgrade, alter, expand, extend, maintain, repair, rehabilitate, protect, remove, discontinue, close and dispose of provincial public undertakings and related improvements;

(b)acquire, carry on or dispose of any business or commercial or industrial enterprise that relates to transportation;

(c)grant franchises and licences, and enter into agreements, to operate any ferry services on terms and conditions set by the minister, including, without limitation,

(i)terms and conditions respecting fares or rates that may be charged for those services, and

(ii)authorizing one or more providers of ferry services to charge and retain fares or rates;

(d)make grants and contributions;

(e)enter into arrangements or agreements, including, without limitation, arrangements or agreements for the exchange of information, or for the payment or sharing of the cost of anything related to provincial public undertakings or to transportation, with any person, including, without limitation, any of the following:

(i)the government of Canada, the government of a province or territory within Canada or the government of a jurisdiction outside of Canada, or an agent, agency, department or official of any of those governments;

(ii)a local government body, educational body or health care body, as those terms are defined in the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act;

(iii)a first nation;(iv)any other body prescribed by regulation as a public authority for the purposes of one or more provisions of this Act;(f)name and rename provincial public highways.

(2)If the minister changes the name of a provincial public highway, the minister must publish notice of the change in the prescribed manner

.https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/…/complete/statreg/04044_01

The “politicians” are guilty of numerous crimes in every country

you are required to listen to the following video:

Arrest Warrants For State Politicians Issued by GG (Australia) | My Dundas Valley

Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act

S.C. 2000, c. 24

Assented to 2000-06-29

An Act respecting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:

Short Title

Marginal note: Short title

1 This Act may be cited as the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

Interpretation

Marginal note:Definitions

• 2 (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this Act.conventional international law means any convention, treaty or other international agreement
  • (a) that is in force and to which Canada is a party; or
  • (b) that is in force and the provisions of which Canada has agreed to accept and apply in an armed conflict in which it is involved. (droit international conventionnel)
  International Criminal Court means the International Criminal Court established by the Rome Statute. (Cour pénale internationale)official, in respect of the International Criminal Court, means the Prosecutor, Registrar, Deputy Prosecutor and Deputy Registrar, and the staff of the organs of the Court. (fonctionnaire)Rome Statute means the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted by the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998, as corrected by the procès-verbaux of November 10, 1998, July 12, 1999, November 30, 1999 and May 8, 2000, portions of which are set out in the schedule. (Statut de Rome)
• Marginal note:Words and Expressions(2) Unless otherwise provided, words and expressions used in this Act have the same meaning as in the Criminal Code.

Her Majesty

Marginal note:Binding on Her Majesty

3 This Act is binding on Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province.

Offences Within Canada

Marginal note: Genocide, etc., committed in Canada

• 4 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence who commits
  • (a) genocide;
  • (b) a crime against humanity; or
  • (c) a war crime.
• Marginal note: Conspiracy, attempt, etc.(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.
• Marginal note:Punishment(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)
  • (a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence; and
  • (b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.
• Marginal note:Definitions(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.crime against humanity means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (crime contre l’humanité)genocide means an act or omission committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group of persons, as such, that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes genocide according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (génocide)war crime means an act or omission committed during an armed conflict that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a war crime according to customary international law or conventional international law applicable to armed conflicts, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. (crime de guerre)
• Marginal note:Interpretation — customary international law(4) For greater certainty, crimes described in Articles 6 and 7 and paragraph 2 of Article 8 of the Rome Statute are, as of July 17, 1998, crimes according to customary international law. This does not limit or prejudice in any way the application of existing or developing rules of international law.

Marginal note:Breach of responsibility by military commander

• Footnote^*5 (1) A military commander commits an indictable offence if
  • (a) the military commander
    • (i) fails to exercise control properly over a person under their effective command and control or effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 4, or
    • (ii) fails, after the coming into force of this section, to exercise control properly over a person under their effective command and control or effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 6;
  • (b) the military commander knows, or is criminally negligent in failing to know, that the person is about to commit or is committing such an offence; and
  • (c) the military commander subsequently
    • (i) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to prevent or repress the commission of the offence, or the further commission of offences under section 4 or 6, or
    • (ii) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
      • Return to footnote^*[Note: Section 5 in force October 23, 2000, see SI/2000-95.]
• Marginal note:Breach of responsibility by a superiorFootnote^*(2) A superior commits an indictable offence if
  • (a) the superior
    • (i) fails to exercise control properly over a person under their effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 4, or
    • (ii) fails, after the coming into force of this section, to exercise control properly over a person under their effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 6;
  • (b) the superior knows that the person is about to commit or is committing such an offence, or consciously disregards information that clearly indicates that such an offence is about to be committed or is being committed by the person;
  • (c) the offence relates to activities for which the superior has effective authority and control; and
  • (d) the superior subsequently
    • (i) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to prevent or repress the commission of the offence, or the further commission of offences under section 4 or 6, or
    • (ii) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
      • Return to footnote^*[Note: Section 5 in force October 23, 2000, see SI/2000-95.]
• Marginal note:Conspiracy, attempt, etc.(2.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) or (2) is guilty of an indictable offence.
• Marginal note:Punishment(3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (2.1) is liable to imprisonment for life.
• Marginal note:Definitions(4) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.military commander includes a person effectively acting as a military commander and a person who commands police with a degree of authority and control comparable to a military commander. (chef militaire)superior means a person in authority, other than a military commander. (supérieur)

The following online document should be read by everyone:

Guarantee of rights and freedoms – section 1

1. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms of all Canadians that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a free and democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following:

• fundamental freedoms, democratic rights
• the right to live and seek employment anywhere in Canada
• legal rights (life, liberty and personal security)
• equality rights for all
• the official languages of Canada
• minority language education rights
• Canada’s multicultural heritage
• Indigenous peoples’ rights

The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect other rights or important national values. For example, freedom of expression may be limited by laws against hate propaganda or child pornography.

Fundamental freedoms – section 2

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

1. freedom of conscience and religion;
2. freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
3. freedom of peaceful assembly; and
4. freedom of association.

Under section 2of the Charter, Canadians are free to follow the religion of their choice. In addition, they are guaranteed freedom of thought, belief and expression. Since the media are an important means for communicating thoughts and ideas, the Charter protects the right of the press and other media to speak out. Our right to gather and act in peaceful groups is also protected, as is our right to belong to an association like a trade union.

These freedoms are set out in the Charter to ensure that Canadians are free to create and express their ideas, gather to discuss them and communicate them widely to other people. These activities are basic forms of individual liberty. They are also important to the success of a democratic society like Canada. In a democracy, people must be free to discuss matters of public policy, criticize governments and offer their own solutions to social problems.

Even though these freedoms are very important, governments can sometimes limit them. For example, freedom of expression may be limited by laws against hate propaganda or child pornography because they prevent harm to individuals and groups.

Democratic rights – sections 3 to 5

• Democratic rights of citizens – section 3
• Maximum duration of legislative bodies – section 4
• Annual sitting of legislative bodies – section 5

Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Charter contain rules that guarantee Canadians a democratic government.

Section 3 – Democratic rights of citizens

3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.

Section 3 guarantees to all Canadian citizens the right to be involved in the election of their governments. It gives them the right to vote in federal, provincial or territorial elections, along with the right to stand for public office themselves.

Some limits on these rights may be reasonable, even in a democracy. For example, the right to vote or stand for election is limited to Canadians 18 years of age or older.

Section 4 – Maximum duration of legislative bodies

4. (1) No House of Commons and no legislative assembly shall continue for longer than five years from the date fixed for the return of the writs at a general election of its members.

Continuation in special circumstances

• (2) In time of real or apprehended war, invasion or insurrection, a House of Commons may be continued by Parliament and a legislative assembly may be continued by the legislature beyond five years if such continuation is not opposed by the votes of more than one-third of the members of the House of Commons or the legislative assembly, as the case may be.

It is a basic principle in a democracy that a government must consult the voters and stand for re-election at regular intervals. Section 4 states that no Parliament or legislative assembly can continue to sit for longer than five years. Only under extraordinary circumstances, such as a war or national emergency, may a government stay in office for a longer period.

Section 5 – Annual sitting of legislative bodies

5. There shall be a sitting of Parliament and of each legislature at least once every twelve months.

Another basic democratic principle is that a government must explain its actions to the people. Section 5 of the Charter makes it clear that Parliament and the legislative assemblies must hold a session at least once a year. This guarantees that elected members and the public have a chance to question government actions on a regular basis.

Mobility rights – section 6

Mobility of citizens

6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.

Rights to move and gain livelihood

• (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right:

1. to move to and take up residence in any province; and
2. to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.

Limitation

• (3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to:

1. any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and
2. any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services.

Affirmative Action Program

• (4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada.

Section 6 protects the right of Canadian citizens to move from place to place, and subsection 6(1) ensures that all Canadian citizens are free to come and go as they please. Extradition laws place some limits on these rights; these laws state that persons in Canada who face criminal charges or punishment in another country may be ordered to return to that country.

Subsection 6(2) gives all Canadian citizens and permanent residents the right to move to, and live in any province or territory. They may also look for work or set up a business there.

Subsection 6(3) makes clear that provinces and territories may decide to give social benefits, such as welfare, only to persons who have lived in the province or territory for a certain period of time. They may also pass employment laws that require workers to have the necessary qualifications to practice their profession or trade.

In addition, subsection 6(4) allows a province or territory that has an employment rate below the national average to create programs that favour its own residents.

Legal rights – sections 7 to 14

• Life, liberty and security of person – section 7
• Search or seizure – section 8
• Detention or imprisonment – section 9
• Arrest or detention – section 10
• Proceedings in criminal and penal matters – section 11
• Treatment or punishment – section 12
• Self-crimination – section 13
• Interpreter – section 14

Sections 7 to 14 set out rights that protect Canadians when dealing with the justice system. They ensure that individuals who are involved in proceedings are treated fairly, especially those charged with a criminal offence.

Section 7 – Life, liberty and security of person

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

Section 7 guarantees the life, liberty and personal security of all Canadians. It also requires that governments respect the basic principles of justice whenever they intrude on those rights. Section 7 often comes into play in criminal matters because an accused person clearly faces the risk that, if convicted, his or her liberty will be lost.

Section 8 – Search or seizure

8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

According to the Supreme Court of Canada, the purpose of section 8 is to protect a reasonable expectation of privacy. This means that those who act on behalf of a government, such as police officers, must carry out their duties in a fair and reasonable way. They cannot enter private property or take things from others unless they can show that they have a clear legal reason.

In most cases, they are allowed to enter private property to look for evidence or to seize things only if they have been given a search warrant by a judge. On the other hand, government inspectors may enter business premises without a warrant to check if government regulations are being observed.

Section 9 – Detention or imprisonment

9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.

Section 9 says that government officials cannot take individuals into custody or hold them without a good reason. For example, a police officer must have reasonable grounds for detaining a person. However, courts have stated that laws allowing officers to stop drivers for breath tests are reasonable and do not violate the Charter.

Section 10 – Arrest or detention

10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention:

1. to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
2. to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
3. to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.

The rights in section 10 apply when a person is arrested or detained. They ensure that people under arrest have a chance to challenge the lawfulness of their arrest. The police must tell them quickly the reasons for their arrest. These people also have the right to talk to a lawyer to get legal advice about their situation, and the police must tell them what legal aid services are available in their area. Persons under arrest also have the right to ask a judge to decide whether their arrest was legal and, if it was not, to order their release.

Section 11 – Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right:

1. to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
2. to be tried within a reasonable time;
3. not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;
4. to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
5. not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
6. except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;
7. not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
8. if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and
9. if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.

Section 11 sets out several important rules that protect anyone charged with an offence under federal, provincial or territorial law.

Persons accused of a crime must be told promptly what offence they are charged with (section 11 a) their trials must take place within a reasonable time (section 11 b); and they cannot be forced to testify at their own trials (section 11 c).

Anyone accused of breaking the law is considered to be innocent until proven guilty. This means that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the offence, before he or she can be found guilty. The trial must also be conducted fairly before a court which is unbiased and independent of political or any other influence (section 11 d). A fair trial ensures that the rights of the accused are properly protected.

An accused person is entitled to reasonable bail (section 11 e) and, for very serious charges, has the right to trial by jury (section 11 f).

A court cannot convict a person of a crime unless the law in force at the time of the offence specifically stated that the actions in question were illegal (section 11 g).

If a person is tried for an offence and found not guilty, he or she cannot be tried on the same charge again. Moreover, if the person is found guilty and punished for the offence, he or she cannot be tried or punished for it again (section 11 h).

In a situation where a person commits an offence and, before he or she is sentenced, a new law changes the fine or term of imprisonment that applies, that person must be sentenced under whichever law is the more lenient (section 11 i).

Section 12 – Treatment or punishment

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

Section 12 prohibits treatment and punishment by the state that are cruel and unusual. This includes torture, excessive or abusive use of force by law enforcement officials. Also, sentences of imprisonment must match the seriousness of the crime committed. For example, an extremely long prison sentence is not appropriate for a very minor crime.

Section 13 – Self-incrimination

13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.

Section 13 states that witnesses who give evidence in court cannot have their testimony used against them in other proceedings. In other words, if the testimony of a witness shows that he or she has committed a crime, that evidence cannot be used by the prosecution to prove that the witness committed an offence. The exception is where a witness commits the crime of perjury which is the offence of lying to the court. In that case, the testimony of the witness may be used to show that he or she lied in court.

Section 14 – Interpreter

14. A party or witness in any proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an interpreter.

Persons who are hearing impaired or do not understand or speak the language being spoken in court have the right to be assisted by an interpreter. This right applies regardless of which language is involved.

Equality rights – section 15

Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Affirmative action programs

• (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Section 15 of the Charter makes it clear that every individual in Canada – regardless of race, religion, national or ethnic origin, colour, sex, age or physical or mental disability – is to be treated with the same respect, dignity and consideration. This means that governments must not discriminate on any of these grounds in its laws or programs.

The courts have held that section 15 also protects equality on the basis of other characteristics that are not specifically set out in it. For example, this section has been held to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, marital status or citizenship.

The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that the purpose of section 15 is to protect those groups who suffer social, political and legal disadvantage in society. Discrimination occurs when a person, because of a personal characteristic, suffers disadvantages or is denied opportunities available to other members of society.

At the same time as it protects equality, the Charter also allows for certain laws or programs that aim to improve the conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups. For example, programs aimed at improving employment opportunities for women, Indigenous peoples, visible minorities, or those with mental or physical disabilities are allowed under subsection 15(2).

source: https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rights-protected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html#a2e

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW HANDBOOK (texasattorneygeneral.gov)

When we procure a Lawyer or an Attorney we are seen as incompetent to handle our own affairs. The Lawyer or Attorney cannot represent another man, it is the man that must speak for him/herself. Attorneys and Lawyers are 3rd party interlopers as they do not have 1st hand knowledge of the events at hand.

The judge may try to trip us up in court and ask questions in a deceptive way, it is how they have been trained. If the Judge asks if we want to represent our self we must say, “i cannot represent myself for i am myself”.

Know that a Lawyer or Attorney has no authority. If we require assistance we should be hiring “counsel” to assist us in the process.

“Never allow an attorney(attorner) to “Represent” You! Only allow them to play the role of “assistance of counsel”!

This has worked for me 100% of the time , as well as for everyone I have taught it to. Say this and ONLY this, and repeat it each time you have an opportunity to speak..and add “on and for the record’ as many times as you can…..my script: they call the “Person”

“I am here by special appearance, I am the authorized representative for that “person”[for me ie/I do not recognize the “Legal Person” so do not authorize its use] I reserve all of my rights without prejudice UCC 1-308, before we proceed I need you to answer some questions for me regarding the nature and cause of the charges (allegations) and the Jurisdiction under which they are brought, first you have taken an oath of office in which you have sworn a solemn oath to uphold protect and defend the state and federal Constitutions is that correct.?….Administrator (Judge) ….Yes……’Thank you for answering that Your honor [ie/I would call the judge by name and would never call him “your honor”]……U

Under what Jurisdiction is this court operating?…..Administrator (Judge)….Statutory(or some other bullshit)! “again Thank you your Honor but I have studied the State and Federal Constitutions and they only make mention and authorize Common Law, Equity, Maritime and Admiralty Jurisdictions, You didn’t mention any of those, Clearly you are operating under some secret rogue Jurisdiction, You do not have Jurisdiction therefore I hereby Challenge the Jurisdiction of this court. are you aware that if you violate my reservation of rights that you loose immunity from civil suit, I would therefore in standing in Honor sue you civilly and I will notify your bonding company, furthermore are you aware of the numerous Supreme Court rulings such as’……and then start citing these….Whichever ones you like best…and I have more if you need them, but I think these are all you will need…….They’ll go find something easier to eat!………. “

**The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Author Unknown

Hagans v Lavine 415 U. S. 533. “ “Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026

*In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have existed.” Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03

**US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 Led2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821) “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”

Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.
JURISDICTION: NOTE: It is a fact of law that the person asserting jurisdiction must, when challenged, prove that jurisdiction exists; mere good faith assertions of power and authority (jurisdiction) have been abolished.
“Jurisdiction of court may be challenged at any stage of the proceeding, and also may be challenged after conviction and execution of judgment by way of writ of habeas corpus.”

[U.S. v. Anderson, 60 F.Supp. 649 (D.C.Wash. 1945)]
*“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v Lavine 415 U. S. 533.
“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026

“A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a nullity.” Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App 2d 573, 576-7, 840 P. 2d 553 (1992) rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093(1993)

“A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court.” Old wayne Mut, L. assoc b. McDonough, 205 U.S. 8, 27 S Ct 236(1907)

**“There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. U.S. 474 2D 215 “Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Lantana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York 37 Fsupp. 150

****“The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction has been challenged, it musts be proven.” Main v Thiboutot, 100 S Ct. 2502(1980)

“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time,” and “Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910

“Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.” Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So. 2D, 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)

***“Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.” Stock v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 289

***“There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215

****“the burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction.” Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416
“a universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property,” Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732

****“jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio.” In re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132;p Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846

“Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term.” Dillon v. Dillon 187 p27

**A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to act, and a court must have the authority to decide that question the first instance.” Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m 67 S, Ct, 1409

“A departure by a court from those recognized and established requirements of law however close apparent adherence to mere form in methods of procedure which has the effect of depriving one of a constitutional right, is an excess of jurisdiction.” Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d 934, 937.

Here’s some additional ammo………….Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, (1886) “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486,489 “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905). 
“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”

SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137,(1803) “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105, (1943) “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262, (1969) “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.”

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.” 
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, (1886) “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486,489 “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”

“To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.” Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 303 (1885).

-Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748,(1970) “Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness.”

-Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 (1962), “Presuming waiver from a silent record is impermissible. The record must show, or there must be an allegation and evidence which show, that an accused was offered counsel but intelligently and understandingly rejected the offer. Anything less is not waiver.”

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents.

https://www.cliquezjustice.ca/careers-in-justice/court-clerk

On May 16, 2021 we published a Public Notice and suggest everyone read this electronic document meant to inspire right action and bring resolution to the conundrum we are facing. collectively.

The following is a link to an article titled “Judicial code of conduct”. While we were not looking our world has been usurped. It is us that has not been diligent in holding our fellow men accountable for their “misconduct”. The time has come to make them knowing and stand firm in the fact that we all have an innate and inherent right to experience life the way we intended when we incarnated here.

https://www.jddc.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Judicial_Code_of_Conduct.pdf

When we actually go over the documents filed in specific court cases we notice that their is a whole lot of “Fraud upon the Court” taking place. The following electronic document is very informative:

Fraud upon the court (thematrixhasyou.org)

31 U.S. Code § 333 – Prohibition of misuse of Department of the Treasury names, #symbols, etc.


(a) General Rule.—No person may use, in connection with, or as a part of, any advertisement, solicitation, #businessactivity, or product, whether alone or with other words, letters, symbols, or emblems—

(6) any colorable imitation of any such words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, or emblems,
in a manner which could reasonably be interpreted or construed as conveying the false impression that such advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product is in any manner approved, endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by, or associated with, the Department of the Treasury…
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/333

[Is the use of the alleged #dollar #dollhair symbol for the collection of a debt considered: “colorable imitation that could be reasonable construed as conveying a false impression that such business activity is associated with the Department of Treasury…” ? Especially when it’s a bill of attainder/citation given by a re-venue officer/policy officer and other debt collectors??] author malika dulce

It is up to each of us to over see the “instruments” being given to us and call out the creators of such “Insturment” for “fraud” and extortion:

There have been many presumptions and assumptions made by the members of this “Legal Society” and we are here to expunge these presumptions and assumptions nunc pro tunc, for the times that we did not have the awareness, the comprehension, or the education to exert this right. No one has the right to override the will of another as a result of miscommunication, illiteracy, spiritual and emotional immaturity, and or lack of awareness.

Odd really that we apply for the Birth Certificate without actually reading the #VitalStatisticsActHaven’t read the the #VitalStatisticAct of British Columbia yet did not get past definitions.. What people should realize every time the word “state” is written in this act it” means any state or territory of the United States of America and includes the District of Columbia”

For those interesting in expanding their comprehension as to how we got to this conundrum the information shared in the following online document is worth reading, “Presumptions of Canon Law”:

https://steemit.com/steemit/@mrbullet131/the-twelve-presumptions-of-roman-law-canon-3228-who-knows-about-these-dementiafraud

The oath of office we must have for any statute, code, ordinance, mandate or other order to apply to us>>

5 U.S. Code § 3331. #OathofOffice —
An #individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath:

“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.)
#DebtPreviouslyContracted

Sec. 546.002. When conduct Permissible

(a) In this section, “ police escort” means facilitating the movement of a funeral, oversized or hazardous load, or other traffic disruption for public safety purposes by a peace officer described by Articles 2.12(1)-(4), (12) and (22) Code of Criminal Procedure.

Included powers

(b) Section 546.001 applies only when the operator is:

(1) responding to an emergency call;

(2) pursuing an actual or suspected violator of the law;

(3) responding to but not returning from a fire alarm;

(4) directing or diverting traffic for public safety purposes; or

(5) conducting a police escort

https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/laws/regu/bc-reg-133-98/144544/bc-reg-133-98.html#sec3_smooth

Pursuit by police

3   (1)To engage in or continue a pursuit, a peace officer must

(a)have an emergency light and siren activated, and

(b)have reasonable grounds to believe that

(i)the driver or a passenger in the vehicle being or to be pursued has committed, is committing or is about to commit an offence, and

ii)the seriousness of the offence and the need for immediate apprehension outweigh the risk to the safety of members of the public that may be created by the pursuit.

[when the “law enforcement officer” stops someone while operating an “automobile” or “automated covered wagon” on “public roads” and create an emergency when none existed and without a warrant secured by a sworn complaint, that “ticket citation” is a “bill of attainder” and certainly, deceptive…]

15 U.S. Code § 1692j – Furnishing certain deceptive forms

(a) It is unlawful to design, compile, and furnish any form knowing that such form would be used to create the false belief in a consumer that a person other than the creditor of such consumer is participating in the collection of or in an attempt to collect a debt such consumer allegedly owes such creditor, when in fact such person is not so participating.

(b) Any person who violates this section shall be liable to the same extent and in the same manner as a debt collector is liable under section 1692k of this title for failure to comply with a provision of this subchapter

Definitions Securities Transfer Act [SBC 2007] Chapter 10

https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/07010_01

“government” or “government of British Columbia” means Her Majesty in right of British Columbia;

monarch (n.) Section 29 Interpretation Act

mid-15c., monark, “supreme governor for life, a sole or autocratic ruler of a state,” from Old French monarche (14c., Modern French monarque) and directly from Late Latin monarcha, from Greek monarkhēs “one who rules alone” (see monarchy). “In modern times generally a hereditary sovereign with more or less limited powers” [Century Dictionary, 1897].

(1)Without limiting any other rights, powers or advantages of the minister under this or any other enactment, the minister may do whatever is or may be necessary to do any or all of the following:

Transportation Act

[SBC 2004] Chapter 44

Part 2 — Powers of The Minister

Division 1 — General

Rights, powers and advantages of minister

(a)plan, design, acquire, hold, construct in any manner and in any place the minister considers appropriate, use, operate, upgrade, alter, expand, extend, maintain, repair, rehabilitate, protect, remove, discontinue, close and dispose of provincial public undertakings and related improvements;

(b)acquire, carry on or dispose of any business or commercial or industrial enterprise that relates to transportation;

(c)grant franchises and licences, and enter into agreements, to operate any ferry services on terms and conditions set by the minister, including, without limitation,

(i)terms and conditions respecting fares or rates that may be charged for those services, and

(ii)authorizing one or more providers of ferry services to charge and retain fares or rates;

(d)make grants and contributions;

(e)enter into arrangements or agreements, including, without limitation, arrangements or agreements for the exchange of information, or for the payment or sharing of the cost of anything related to provincial public undertakings or to transportation, with any person, including, without limitation, any of the following:

(i)the government of Canada, the government of a province or territory within Canada or the government of a jurisdiction outside of Canada, or an agent, agency, department or official of any of those governments;

(ii)a local government body, educational body or health care body, as those terms are defined in the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act;

(iii)a first nation;

(iv)any other body prescribed by regulation as a public authority for the purposes of one or more provisions of this Act;

(f)name and rename provincial public highways.

(2)If the minister changes the name of a provincial public highway, the minister must publish notice of the change in the prescribed manner.

20 CFR § 422.402 – What special definitions apply to this subpart?

• CFR
• Table of Popular Names

prev | next§ 422.402 What special definitions apply to this subpart?

(a) Administrative wage garnishment is a process whereby we order your employer to withhold a certain amount from your disposable pay and send the withheld amount to us. The law requires your employer to comply with our garnishment order.

(b) Debt means any amount of money or property that we determine is owed to the United States and that arises from a program that we administer or an activity that we perform. These debts include program overpayments made under title II or title XVI of the Social Security Act and any other debt that meets the definition of “claim” or “debt” at 31 U.S.C. 3701(b).

(c) Disposable pay means that part of your total compensation (including, but not limited to, salary or wages, bonuses, commissions, and vacation pay) from your employer after deduction of health insurance premiums and amounts withheld as required by law. Amounts withheld as required by law include such things as Federal, State and local taxes but do not include amounts withheld under court order.

(d) We, our, or us means the Social Security Administration.

(e) You means an individual who owes a debt to the United States within the scope of this subpart. [can someone show us how we “owe” a debt to the United States]

28 U.S. Code § 1631 – Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction

Whenever a civil action is filed in a court as defined in section 610 of this title or an appeal, including a petition for review of administrative action, is noticed for or filed with such a court and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court (or, for cases within the jurisdiction of the United States Tax Court, to that court) in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed, and the action or appeal shall proceed as if it had been filed in or noticed for the court to which it is transferred on the date upon which it was actually filed in or noticed for the court from which it is transferred.
(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title III, § 301(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 55; amended Pub. L. 115–332, § 2, Dec. 19, 2018, 132 Stat. 4487.)

Securities Transfer Act[SBC 2007]

Chapter 10

Notice

3   (1)For the purposes of this Act, a person has notice of a fact if

(a)the person has knowledge of it,

(b)the person has received a notice of it, or

(c)information comes to the person’s attention under circumstances in which a reasonable person would take cognizance of it.

(2)A person gives a notice to another person by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other person in the ordinary course, whether or not the other person comes to know of it.

(3)A person receives a notice when

(a)the notice comes to the person’s attention,

(b)in the case of a notice under a contract, the notice is duly delivered to the place of business through which the contract was made, or

(c)the notice is duly delivered to any other place held out by that person as the place for receipt of those notices.

(4)Notice, knowledge or a notice received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time when it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting the transaction and, in any event, from the time when it would have been brought to the attention of that individual if the organization had exercised due diligence.

(5)For the purpose of subsection (4), an organization exercises due diligence if it maintains reasonable routines for communicating significant information to the individual conducting the transaction and there is reasonable compliance with those routines.

(6)For the purpose of subsection (4), due diligence does not require an individual acting for the organization to communicate information unless

(a)that communication is part of the individual’s regular duties, or

(b)the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information.

Obligation of good faith

4   (1)Every contract to which this Act applies and every duty imposed by this Act imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.

(2)In this section, “good faith” means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.

“person” means

(a) an individual, including an individual in his or her capacity as trustee, executor, administrator or other representative,

(b) a sole proprietorship,

(c) a partnership,

(d) an unincorporated association,

(e) an unincorporated syndicate,

(f) an unincorporated organization,

(g) a trust, including a business trust,

(h) a corporation,

(i) a government or agency of it, or

(j) any other legal or commercial entity;

“property” includes any right, title, interest, estate or claim to or in property; [Expressions defined 29  In an enactment]

“Province” means the Province of British Columbia or Her Majesty in right of British Columbia as the context requires; [Expressions defined 29  In an enactment:]

“province”, when used as meaning a part of Canada, includes the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut; [Expressions defined 29  In an enactment:]

“shall” Blacks-Law-Dictionary defines the meaning of the word shall as 26 USC Rule 221 states that petitioner for a disclosure action “shall include the telephone number of the petitioner of the petitioner’s counsel” 26 USC §6104 states that certain exempt organizations “shall state the address and the telephone number of the private foundation’s principal office and the name of its principal manager”. Shall as used in statues, contracts, or the like, this word is generally imperative or mandatory. The word in ordinary usage means “must” and is inconsistent with a concept of discretion…. but it may be construed as merely permissive or directory (as equivalent to “may”)… what does that mean xi the word “shall” is a key word in many statutes, leading many readers to assume that it has a similar meaning to the word “must”. However, based upon the above “telephone logic”, most of readers are probably thinking that the word “shall” might actually be similar to the word, “may” or the word, “should” “shall” formal, –used to say that something is expected to happen in the fu”U.S”:.ture. -used to ask for someone’s opinion. -used to give a command or to say that you will or will not allow something to happen.

The UCC is the Code of The District Of Columbia

https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/28/subtitles/I/

§ 28–2501. Definitions.

A bond, when required by or referred to in this Code, means an obligation in a certain sum or penalty, subject to a condition, on breach of which it is to become absolute and enforceable by action.

An undertaking means an agreement entered into by a party to a suit or proceeding, with or without sureties, upon which a judgment or decree may be rendered in the same suit or proceeding against the party and his sureties, if any, the party and sureties submitting themselves to the jurisdiction of the court for that purpose.

5 U.S. Code § 301 – Departmental regulations

The head of an Executive department or military department may prescribe regulations for the government of his department, the conduct of its employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and property. This section does not authorize withholding information from the public or limiting the availability of records to the public.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 379.)

45 CFR § 681.10 – What happens if a defendant fails to file an answer?

§ 681.10 What happens if a defendant fails to file an answer?

(a) If a defendant does not file any answer within 30 days after service of the complaint, the reviewing official may refer the complaint to the ALJ.

(b) Once the complaint is referred, the ALJ will promptly serve on the defendant a notice that an initial decision will be issued.

(c)  The ALJ will assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under the statute, the ALJ will issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under PFCRA.

Basic principles of Canadian criminal law

The criminal justice system is built on a few important principles. B.C. shares these basic principles with all common law criminal justice systems around the world.

Presumption of Innocence – Every criminal case begins with the presumption that the accused person is innocent. It is up to Crown counsel, representing the community, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime.

Due Process – Due process is related to the presumption of innocence. It involves a thorough examination of the facts of each case – and recognition of the importance of protecting the legal rights of those charged with criminal offences.

Independent Judiciary – Anyone accused of a crime has the right to have their case decided by fair and impartial judges, without interference of any kind, from any source. This is the concept of judicial independence. While judicial decisions may not result in everyone being happy, the justice system is founded on public confidence that decisions – whether popular or not – are made after a full and fair hearing and without outside influence.

Openness and Accessibility of Court – Only through an open and public process can the public have confidence in the justice system and be satisfied that parties are treated fairly.

Equality Before the Law – All people in Canada are equal under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

.https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/criminal-justice/bcs-criminal-justice-system/understanding-criminal-justice/principles-and-sources-of-criminal-law/basic-principles

Topic:

International Affairs; Constitutional Law;

Location:

Constitutional Law;

O.L.R. Research Report

January 28, 1998 98-R-0143

TO:

FROM: Sandra Norman-Eady, Senior Attorney

RE: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

You asked for a summary and a copy of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You also wanted to know if the charter is similar to our Bill of Rights.

SUMMARY

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which was adopted in 1982, guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject to reasonable limits prescribed by law. The charter guarantees such rights as the right to equality, democracy, and mobility. The freedoms include those of conscience, religion, and peaceful assembly.

The charter applies to (1) the Parliament and Canadian government in respect to all matters within the Parliament’s authority, including all matters relating to the Yukon and Northwest Territories and (2) provincial legislatures and governments in respect to all matters within the legislature’s authority. But Parliament or a province’s legislature may expressly declare in an act that the act may operate despite a provision in the Charter regarding fundamental freedoms or legal rights. An act with such a declaration is effective for five years or the date specified within the declaration, whichever is sooner.

Anyone whose Charter rights or freedoms have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain whatever remedy the court considers appropriate and just. A court must exclude any evidence that was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms under the charter if it is established, after reviewing all of the evidence, that the admission would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

The first 10 amendments to the federal constitution, all of which were adopted in 1791, are generally referred to as the Bill of Rights. The Canadian Charter or Rights and Freedoms is the equivalent to our Bill of Rights. Both guarantee the right to freedom of speech and the press, peaceably assemble, travel, due process, privacy, an attorney and speedy trial in criminal cases, and trial by jury in certain cases. Two very obvious differences between the two documents are that the Canadian charter does not guarantee citizens the right to bear arms and the federal constitution does not declare any language as the official language of the United States.

Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

The charter guarantees rights equally to males and females. It must be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians and not construed to abrogate or derogate from any (1) aboriginal, treaty, or other rights or freedoms that pertain to the aboriginal people of Canada or (2) rights or privileges guaranteed by or under the Canadian Constitution with respect to denominational, separate, or dissentient schools.

Fundamental Freedoms

The charter guarantees everyone the freedom of conscience and religion; thought, belief, opinion, and expression, including freedom of the press and other means of communication; peaceful assembly; and association.

Democratic Rights

Every Canadian citizen has the right to elect members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.

Mobility Rights

Every Canadian citizen has the right to enter, remain in, and leave Canada. These citizens and every permanent resident of Canada has the right to move to, take up residence in, and pursue a livelihood in any province. The latter right is subject to (1) any laws or practices of general application in force in the province other than those that discriminate on the basis of present or previous residence and (2) any laws that establish reasonable residency requirements as a condition for receiving social services. The right to pursue a life in any province does not preclude any law, program, or activity designed to ameliorate social or economic disadvantages facing individuals in a province if the rate of employment is below that in Canada.

Legal Rights

Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security. No one can be deprived of these rights except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Additionally, everyone has the right:

1. to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure;

2. not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned;

3. not to be subjected to any cruel or unusual treatment or punishment;

4. on arrest or detention, to (a) be informed promptly of the reason; (b) be informed of the right to retain, and to actually retain and instruct counsel without delay; and (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by habeas corpus and released if the detention is unlawful.

Anyone charged with an offence has the right:

1. to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offense;

2. to be tried within a reasonable time;

3. not to be compelled to be a witness against himself;

4. to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

5. not to be denied reasonable bail without cause;

6. except in a military case tried before a military tribunal, to trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offense is at least five years imprisonment;

7. not to be found guilty of any act or omission, which at the time of commission was

8. neither an offense under Canadian or International law nor a crime under the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;

9. if finally acquitted of the offense, not to be tried again and if finally found guilty and punished for the offense, not to be tried or punished for it again; and

10. to be subjected to the most lenient punishment if the possible sentence changes between the commission of an offense and the date of sentencing.

A witness who testifies has the right not to have any evidence that he gives used to incriminate him, except in a prosecution for perjury or for giving contradictory evidence. A party or witness who neither understands nor speaks the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to be assisted by an interpreter.

Equality Rights

Everyone is equal and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination, especially discrimination based on race, national or ethic origin, color, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability. This right does not preclude laws designed to ameliorate disadvantageous conditions that exist because of these factors.

Source: https://www.cga.ct.gov/PS98/rpt%5Colr%5Chtm/98-R-0143.htm#:~:text=The%20charter%20guarantees%20everyone%20the,%3B%20peaceful%20assembly%3B%20and%20association.

Section 7 of the Charter requires that laws or state actions that interfere with life, liberty and security of the person conform to the principles of fundamental justice — the basic principles that underlie our notions of justice and fair process (Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 SCR 350 at paragraph 19).

Analysis

Section 7 involves a two-step analysis:

1. Is there an infringement of one of the three (3) protected interests, that is to say a deprivation of life, liberty or security of the person?
2. Is the deprivation in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice?

This second step may be broken down into two steps, where it is necessary a) to identify the relevant principle or principles of fundamental justice and then b) to determine whether the deprivation has occurred in accordance with such principles. (R. v. Malmo-Levine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571 at paragraph 83;  R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417 at paragraph 38; R. v. S.(R.J.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 451 at page 479).

There is no independent right to fundamental justice. Accordingly there will be no violation of section 7 if there is no deprivation of life, liberty or security of the person (R. v. Pontes, [1995] 3 SCR 44, at paragraph 47). 1. Everyone

All individuals physically present in Canada will benefit from the protection of section 7 (Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177 at page 202; Charkaoui (2007), supra, at paragraphs 17-18). Where individuals are affected by a Canadian or foreign government action that took place outside Canada, the extent to which they may rely upon section 7 will depend on the circumstances, and may require the claimant to establish Canadian government “participation in activities of a foreign state or its agents that are contrary to Canada’s international obligations or fundamental human rights norms” (R. v. Hape, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292; Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 125; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44 at paragraph 14; see also: R. v. Harrer, [1995] 3 S.C.R. 562; R. v. Terry, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 207; Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 841). In extradition and deportation cases, where the government’s participation is a necessary precondition for the deprivation of the rights to life, liberty or security of the person by another state, and the deprivation is an entirely foreseeable consequence of the participation, deportations or extraditions must accord with the principles of fundamental justice (United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283, at paragraphs 59-60, 124; Suresh v. Canada (M.C.I.), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3, at paragraph 54; Application under section 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 248, at paragraphs 75-76). For the extra-territorial application of the Charter more generally, see discussion under section 32.

Corporations do not have individual rights protected under section 7 and therefore cannot claim the benefit of section 7 in the same way that individuals can (Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927 at pages 1002-3; British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3 at pages 28 and 30). However, a corporation that is accused of a criminal offence, or that is a defendant in a civil proceeding initiated by the state, may raise the Charter in its defence whether or not it enjoys the particular right or freedom in question (R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 at pages 313-14; R. v. Wholesale Travel Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154). See discussion under section 52 for more on the circumstances in which corporations may invoke Charter rights as a basis for invalidating legislation..

Life, liberty and security of the person General

The guarantees under section 7 typically arise in connection with the administration of justice, which has in turn been defined as “the state’s conduct in the course of enforcing and securing compliance with the law” (Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429 at paragraph 77; New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G. (J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 46 at paragraph 65; Prostitution Reference – Reference re: Criminal Code, section 193, paragraph 195.1(1)(c) (Man. C.A.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123; B. (R.) v. Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 315;  Blencoe v. British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307). The administration of justice includes processes operating in the criminal law (Gosselin at paragraphs 77-78), as well as a variety of other circumstances including child protection proceedings and immigration proceedings where section 7-protected rights are at stake (Blencoe; G.(J.); B.(R.); Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. K.L.W., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 519; Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 350, 2007 SCC 9; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Harkat, 2014 SCC 37, at paragraph 40). In addition, the Court has recognized that section 7 may apply to legislation or government action “entirely unrelated to adjudicative or administrative proceedings”, provided that it impacts on the right to life, liberty and security of the person ( e.g., a legislative prohibition on obtaining private medical insurance that impacts on the right to life and security of the person — see Chaoulli v. Quebec (A.G.), 2005 SCC 35 at paragraphs 124 and 194-199). To date, section 7 has not been interpreted as imposing a positive obligation on the state to ensure the enjoyment of life, liberty and security of the person, but the Court has not foreclosed this possibility (Gosselin at paragraphs 82-83).

A claimant must establish a “sufficient causal connection” between the impugned government action or law and the limit on life, liberty or security of the person. Although the government action need not be the only or the dominant cause of the limit, there must be a real, as opposed to a speculative, link. This standard is satisfied by a reasonable inference, drawn on a balance of probabilities (Bedford v. Canada (A.G.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 1101 at paragraph 76).

(i) Right to life

The right to life is engaged where the law or state action imposes death or an increased risk of death, either directly or indirectly (Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 at paragraph 62; Chaoulli at paragraphs 112-124 and 200). Concerns about autonomy and quality of life are properly treated as liberty and security interests (Carter at paragraph 62). Although the sanctity of life is a fundamental societal value, the right to life does not give rise to a duty to live. Like other rights, the right to life can be waived (Carter at paragraph 63; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519). (ii) Right to liberty

The liberty interest protected under section 7 has at least two aspects. The first aspect is directed to the protection of persons in a physical sense and is engaged when there is physical restraint such as imprisonment or the threat of imprisonment (R. v. Vaillancourt, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 636 at 652), custodial or non-custodial detention (R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933; Winko v. British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 625 at paragraph 64; R. v. Demers, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 489 at paragraph 30), transfer to a more restrictive institutional setting (May v. Ferndale Institution, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809, at paragraph 76), extradition (Kindler v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 779 at 831; United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283 at paragraph 59), parole conditions (Cunningham v. Canada, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 143 at 148-151), or state compulsions or prohibitions affecting one’s ability to move freely (R. v. Heywood, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 761 at 789). The physical restraint can be quite minor to engage the liberty component, such that compelling a person to give oral testimony constitutes a deprivation of liberty (Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425 at 536; R. v. S.(R.J.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 451 at 479; Branch, supra at 26; Re: Application under section 83.28 of the Criminal Code, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 248 at paragraph 67), as does compelling them to give fingerprints (R. v. Beare, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 387 at 402). Deportation per se will not engage the right to liberty (Charkaoui (2007), supra, at 17; Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 539 at paragraph 46), but deportation to a substantial risk of torture will (Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 at paragraph 44).

Section 7 also protects a sphere of personal autonomy involving “inherently private choices” that go to the “core of what it means to enjoy individual dignity and independence” (Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844 at paragraph 66; Association of Justice Counsel v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 55 at paragraph 49). Where state compulsions or prohibitions affect such choices, s. 7 may be engaged (A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, at paragraphs 100-102; Blencoe, supra at paragraphs 49-54; Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 6 at paragraph 45) This aspect of liberty includes the right to refuse medical treatment (A.C., supra, at paragraphs 100-102, 136) and the right to make “reasonable medical choices” without threat of criminal prosecution: R. v. Smith, 2015 SCC 34 at paragraph 18. It may also include the ability to choose where one intends to live (Godbout, supra), as well as a protected sphere of parental decision-making for parents to ensure their children’s well-being, e.g., a right to make decisions concerning a child’s education and health (B.(R.), supra, at paragraph 80). It does not, however, encompass lifestyle choices such as the smoking of marihuana (R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 SCR 571 at paragraphs 86-87; R. v. Clay, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735 at paragraph 32). Conditions of employment requiring employees to be on standby duty, and therefore less available to their families for several weeks a year, do not engage the s. 7 liberty interest (Association of Justice Counsel, supra at paragraph 51).

While some lower court decisions have held that liberty in this context includes the right to work or do business (Wilson v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission), [1988] B.C.J. No. 1566 (C.A.) (QL)), the Supreme Court has said that section 7 does not protect freedom to transact business whenever one wishes (R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 713 at page 786). Nor does it protect the right to exercise one’s chosen profession: Prostitution Reference, supra at pages 1179. (See also Walker v. Prince Edward Island, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 407). The Supreme Court has also ruled that the ability to generate business revenue by one’s chosen means cannot be characterized as a fundamental life choice and is not a right protected under section 7 (Siemens, supra at paragraph 46). Similarly, liberty under section 7 does not appear to protect freedom to contract or the freedom to choose a particular career (Chaoulli, supra, at paragraphs 201-202).

Privacy is constitutionally protected primarily under section 8 but it is generally understood that section 7 can offer a residual protection. The Supreme Court has not yet fully explored or developed the contours of a distinct privacy protection under section 7, other than to accept that privacy can be a protected component of the “liberty” and “security of the person” interests. Although there may be scope for potentially distinct privacy protection under section 7, courts have typically performed the requisite privacy analysis under section 8 (see e.g., R. v. Rodgers, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 554, at paragraph 23; Ruby v. Canada, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3, at paragraphs 32-33; R. v. Mills, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668, at paragraph 88; R. v. O’Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411, at paragraphs 110-119; B.(R.) v. Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 315, at 369; R. v. Beare, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 387). A right to privacy under section 7 has, however, been directly applied in lower court jurisprudence (See: Cheskes v. Ontario (Attorney General) (2007), 87 O.R. (3d) 581 (Ont. Sup. Ct.)).

Individuals cannot enforce collective rights, such as the right to strike, through “liberty”, as the right to liberty is an individual right (I.L.W.U. v. A.G. of Quebec, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 150).

(iii) Right to security of the person

Security of the person is generally given a broad interpretation and has both a physical and psychological aspect. The right encompasses freedom from the threat of physical punishment or suffering (e.g., deportation to a substantial risk of torture) as well as freedom from such punishment itself (Singh, supra at 207; Suresh, supra, at paragraphs 53-55). It is not engaged, however, by the determination of exclusion from refugee protection because the potential risks to health and safety are too remote given the availability of further proceedings prior to removal in which section 7 interests will be considered (Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 SCC 68, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 431 at paragraph 67; B010 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 58 at paragraph 75).

Security of the person includes a person’s right to control his/her own bodily integrity. It will be engaged where the state interferes with personal autonomy and a person’s ability to control his or her own physical or psychological integrity, for example by prohibiting assisted suicide or regulating abortion or imposing unwanted medical treatment (R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30 at 56; Carter, supra; Rodriguez, supra; Blencoe, supra at paragraph 55; A.C., supra, at paragraphs 100-102). Where a criminal prohibition forces a person to choose between a legal but inadequate treatment and an illegal but more effective choice, the law will infringe security of the person (Smith, supra, at paragraph 18).

Security of the person will be engaged where state action has the likely effect of seriously impairing a person’s physical or mental health (R. v. Monney, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 652 at paragraph 55; Chaoulli, supra at paragraphs 111-124 and 200; R. v. Parker, 49 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.)). State action that prevents people engaged in risky but legal activity from taking steps to protect themselves from the risks can also implicate security of the person (Bedford, supra, at paragraphs 59-60, 64, 67, 71).

In addition, the right is engaged when state action causes severe psychological harm to the individual (G.(J.), supra at paragraph 59; Blencoe, supra at paragraph 58; K.L.W., supra, at paragraphs 85-87). To constitute a breach of one’s psychological security of the person, the impugned action must have a serious and profound effect on the person’s psychological integrity and the harm must result from the state action (Blencoe, supra at paragraphs 60-61; G.(J.), supra; K.L.W., supra. The psychological harm need not necessarily rise to the level of nervous shock or psychiatric illness, but it must be greater than ordinary stress or anxiety. The effects of the state interference must be assessed objectively, with a view to their impact on the psychological integrity of a person of reasonable sensibility (G.(J.), supra). Although not all state interference with the parent-child relationship will engage the parent’s security of the person, the state removal of a child from parental custody constitutes a serious interference with the psychological integrity of the parent qua parent and engages s.7 protection (G.(J.), supra, at paragraphs 63-64; K.L.W., supra, at paragraphs 85-87). The prohibition of marihuana does not generate a level of stress which engages section 7 (Malmo-Levine, supra at paragraph 88). The Court has signaled the possibility that victims of torture and their next of kin have an interest in finding closure that may, if impeded, be sufficient to cause such serious psychological harm so as to engage the security of the person (Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 2014 SCC 62 at paragraphs 130, 133-34).

It is unclear whether security of the person encompasses the right to privacy comprising a corollary right of access to personal information (Ruby, supra).

Source: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html

Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)

Fraud

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

Marginal note:Minimum punishment

(1.1) When a person is prosecuted on indictment and convicted of one or more offences referred to in subsection (1), the court that imposes the sentence shall impose a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years if the total value of the subject-matter of the offences exceeds one million dollars.

Marginal note:Affecting public market

(2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-380.html

Browse the Constitution Annotated

Article I

Section 8

Clause 1

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Source: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-8/clause-1/#:~:text=The%20Congress%20shall%20have%20Power,uniform%20throughout%20the%20United%20States%3B&text=1%20Taxing%20Power,ArtI.

RCW 2.44.010 Authority of attorney. An attorney and counselor has authority: (1) To bind his or her client in any of the proceedings in an action or special proceeding by his or her agreement duly made, or entered upon the minutes of the court; but the court shall disregard all agreements and stipulations in relation to the conduct of, or any of the proceedings in, an action or special proceeding unless such agreement or stipulation be made in open court, or in presence of the clerk, and entered in the minutes by him or her, or signed by the party against whom the same is alleged, or his or her attorney; (2) To receive money claimed by his or her client in an action or special proceeding, during the pendency thereof, or after judgment upon the payment thereof, and not otherwise, to discharge the same or acknowledge satisfaction of the judgment; https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=2.44.010 RCW 2.44.020 Appearance without authority — Procedure. If it be alleged by a party for whom an attorney appears, that he or she does so without authority, the court may, **at any stage of the proceedings**, relieve the party for whom the attorney has assumed to appear from the consequences of his or her act; it may also summarily, upon motion, compel the attorney to repair the injury to either party consequent upon his or her assumption of authority https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=2.44.020 RCW 2.44.030 Production of authority to act. The court, or a judge, may, on motion of either party, and on showing reasonable grounds therefor, require the attorney for the adverse party, or for any one of several adverse parties, to produce or prove the authority under which he or she appears, and until he or she does so, may stay all proceedings by him or her on behalf of the party for whom he or she assumes to appear. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=2.44.030 {let’s find the equivalent of this in each state!! lol where do they get authority to act??]

Other Real Estate Owned #REO #OREO
A ‘ #house has #tenants? Really? And a “ #rentalagreement ” includes “a non-rental agreement’?
One could not pull this off in a third world country.

https://www.occ.treas.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/other-real-estate-owned/pub-ch-oreo.pdf (Page 13)

“When a bank takes “title” to a “house” after foreclosure, it must honor any existing rental agreement with a bona fide tenant and must provide 90 days’ notice to the tenant before eviction, whether or not the tenant has a rental agreement (after taking title through #foreclosure).
But then again, the #FederalHousingFinanceAgency, lists the authority for “ #housinglenders ” as 12 U.S.C. 1432(b), so let consult that authority, with any relevant amendments:

12 U.S. Code § 1432 – Incorporation of banks; corporate powers; #housingprojectloans
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1432

(b) Subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by the Director, one or more Federal home loan banks may acquire, hold, or dispose of, in whole or in part, or facilitate such acquisition, holding, or disposition by members of any such bank of, “housing project loans”, or interests therein, having the benefit of any guaranty under section 2181 of title 22, as now or hereafter in effect, or loans, or interests therein, having the benefit of any guaranty under section 2184 of title 22 or any commitment or agreement with respect to such loans, or interests therein, made pursuant to either of such sections. This authority extends to the acquisition, holding, and disposition of loans, or interests therein, having the benefit of any guaranty under section 2181 or 2182 of title 22 or such sections as hereafter amended or extended, or of any commitment or agreement for any such guaranty.
<<<<<
So a “housing project loan” is “ #guaranteed” under Title 22 U.S.C. #FOREIGNRELATIONS, and section 2186 et.al. lists the “ #Overseas #PrivateInvestment Company” as the guarantor, created by the “World Bank”. If that’s not ridiculous enough, we’re going to search any amendments to the provision, for a definition of the term “ #house”, so we open NOTES:

Section 2184 of title 22, referred to in subsec. (b), which related to housing projects in “Latin American countries”, was omitted in the general amendment made by section 105 of Pub. L. 91–175, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 807. See section 2182 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
***A HOUSE IS A BANK BUILDING***
Pub. L. 106–102, § 606(d)(1), struck out “, but, except with the prior approval of the Board, no” #bankbuilding ” shall be bought or erected to “house” any such bank, or leased by such bank under any lease for such purpose which has a term of more than ten years” after “convenient for the transaction of its business”, struck out “subject to the approval of the #Board” after “necessary for the transaction of its business” #carlcollicott

*************888888888888888888888888888888888*************

The Office of Hearings and Appeals(OHA) of the United States Department of Agriculture is comprised of three offices: the National Appeals Division(NAD), the Office of Administrative Law Judges(OALJ), and the Office of the Judicial Officer(OJO).

OHA’s mission is to plan, coordinate, and provide administrative support for NAD, OALJ, and OJO. OHA promotes fairness, transparency, and consistency in NAD,OALJ, and OJO proceedings through the planning, coordination, and administration of office-wide activities and initiatives.

There is no good to come in the sterilization of man’s genome and the destruction of the Natural World

Every governor and the previous and present president, every politician involved in this genocide shall be charged under the Lieber Code, Articles 24, 44, 48–135 Art. 44. 109

“All wanton violence committed against persons in the invaded country, all destruction of property not commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force, all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or such other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.

110 A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, may be lawfully killed on the spot by such superior”.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3.The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

[“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

*************888888888888888888888888888888888************

https://oha.usda.gov/

The Hearing Clerk’s Office is responsible for maintaining and archiving the formal record in cases brought before the Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ). The Hearing Clerk’s Office serves pleadings, submissions, and decisions and orders upon parties and certifies the formal record of proceedings to federal courts upon appeal.

Office of the Hearing Clerk
United States Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave., SW
Stop 9203, Room 1031, South Building
Washington, DC 20250-9203

Phone: (202) 720-4443
Fax: (202) 720-9776

SM.OHA.HearingClerks@oha.usda.gov

https://oalj.oha.usda.gov/

*************888888888888888888888888888888888*************

People should realize the borders are for the regulation of business and does not apply to a man or woman traveling through life. The “Border Agents” have gotten away with gross misconduct as a result of their training.

19 U.S. Code § 1604 – Seizure; prosecution 11 See Codification note below.

It shall be the duty of the Attorney General of the United States immediately to inquire into the facts of cases reported to him by customs officers and the laws applicable thereto, and if it appears probable that any fine, penalty, or forfeiture has been incurred by reason of such 1 violation, for the recovery of which the institution of proceedings in the United States district court or the Court of International Trade is necessary, forthwith to cause the proper proceedings to be commenced and prosecuted, without delay, for the recovery of such fine, penalty, or forfeiture in such case provided, unless, upon inquiry and examination, the Attorney General decides that such proceedings can not probably be sustained or that the ends of public justice do not require that they should be instituted or prosecuted, in which case he shall report the facts to the Secretary of the Treasury for his direction in the premises.
____________________________________________

Name On Case/Bond:


19 U.S. Code § 1600.Application of the customs laws to other seizures by customs officers

19 U.S. Code §§ 1601, 1601a.Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 1601, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 601, 46 Stat. 753, related to bribery.
Section 1601a, act Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title III, § 309, 49 Stat. 528, related to wearing of uniform or badge of Coast Guard or Customs Service while violating revenue laws. See sections 702, 703, and 912 of Title 18.

U.S. Code § 1602.Seizure; report to customs officer

19 U.S. Code § 1603.Seizure; warrants and reports
19 U.S. Code § 1604 – Seizure; prosecution 11 See Codification note below.
19 U.S. Code § 1605.Seizure; custody; storage
19 U.S. Code § 1606.Seizure; appraisement
19 U.S. Code § 1607 – Seizure; value $500,000 or less, prohibited merchandise, transporting conveyances
19 U.S. Code § 1608.Seizure; claims; judicial condemnation
19 U.S. Code § 1609.Seizure; summary forfeiture and sale
19 U.S. Code § 1610.Seizure; judicial forfeiture proceedings
19 U.S. Code § 1611.Seizure; sale unlawful
19 U.S. Code § 1612.Seizure; summary sale
19 U.S. Code § 1613 – Disposition of proceeds of forfeited property
19 U.S. Code § 1613b – Customs Forfeiture Fund
19 U.S. Code § 1614.Release of seized property
19 U.S. Code § 1615 – Burden of proof in forfeiture proceedings
19 U.S. Code § 1616a – Disposition of forfeited property
19 U.S. Code § 1617.Compromise of Government claims by Secretary of the Treasury
19 U.S. Code § 1618.Remission or mitigation of penalties
19 U.S. Code § 1619 – Award of compensation to informers
19 U.S. Code § 1620 – Acceptance of money by United States officers 11 See Codification note below.
19 U.S. Code § 1621.Limitation of actions
19 U.S. Code § 1622.Foreign landing certificates
19 U.S. Code § 1623 – Bonds and other security
19 U.S. Code § 4013 – Implementing actions in anticipation of entry into force and initial regulations
19 U.S. Code § 4012 – Relationship of the Agreement to United States and State law
19 U.S. Code § 4011 – Approval and entry into force of the Agreement
19 U.S. Code § 4015.Administration of dispute settlement proceedings
19 U.S. Code § 4016.Arbitration of claims
19 U.S. Code § 1592 – Penalties for fraud, gross negligence, and negligence

*************888888888888888888888888888888888*************

The following information was obtained from the Vatican Archives and translated using online bing translator

http://www.vatican.va/archive/OLD_catechism_it/p3s2_it.htm

2051 The infallibility of the Magisterium of pastors extends to all elements of doctrine, including morality, without which the saving truths of faith cannot be guarded, exposed or observed.

PART THREE
LIFE IN CHRIST

SECTION TWO
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

“Master, what should I do…?”

2052 ” Master, what should I do good to obtain eternal life?” To the young person who asks him this question, Jesus responds first of all by recalling the need to recognize God as “the only Good”, as the Good par excellence and as the source of all good. Then Jesus says to him: “If you want to enter life, he will follow the commandments”. And he lists to his interlocutor the commandments concerning the love of one’s neighbour: “Do not kill, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not testify to the false, honor your father and your mother”. Finally, Jesus summarizes these commandments in a positive formulation: “Love your neighbour as yourself” (Mt 19:16-19).

2053 To this first answer is immediately added a second one: “If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you own, give it to the poor, and you will have a treasure in heaven; then come and follow me” (Mt 19:21). It does not cancel the first. The following of Jesus implies the observance of the commandments. The Law is not abolished,1 but man is invited to find it in the person of his Master, who is its perfect fulfilment. In the three synoptic Gospels, Jesus’ appeal to the rich young man to follow him in the disciple’s obedience and in the observance of the commandments is juxtaposed with the exhortation to poverty and chastity.2 Evangelical counsels are inseparable from the commandments.

2054 Jesus resumed the Ten Commandments, but manifested the power of the Spirit at work in their letter. He preached justice that surpasses that of scribes and Pharisees3, as well as that of pagans.4 He highlighted all the demands of the commandments. “You understood that the ancients were told: Do not kill … But I say unto you: whoever fights against his brother will be brought to trial” (Mt 5:21-22).

2055 When asked the question: “What is the greatest commandment of the Law?” (Mt 22:36), Jesus replies: “You will love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the largest and the first of the commandments. And the second is similar to the first: You will love your neighbor as yourself. The whole Law and the Prophets depend on these two commandments” (Mt 22:37-40).5 The Decalogue must be interpreted in the light of this twofold and unique commandment of charity, fullness of the Law:

“The precept: Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not desire and any other commandment, is summed up in these words: You will love your neighbour as yourself. Love does no harm to one’s neighbour: the full fulfilment of the law is love” (Rm 13:9-10).

The Decalogue in Sacred Scripture

2056 The word ‘Decalogue’ means ‘ten words’ (Ex 34:28; Dt 4.13; 10:4). These “ten words” God has revealed them to his people on the holy mountain. He wrote them with his “finger”, 6 unlike the other precepts written by Moses.7 They are words of God par excellence. They are transmitted to us in the Book of Exodus8 and the Book of Deuteronomy.9 Since the Old Testament, the Holy Books refer to the “ten words.”

2057 The Decalogue is understood first of all in the context of the Exodus which is the great liberating event of God at the center of the Old Covenant. Whether they are formulated as negative precepts, prohibitions, or as positive commandments (such as: “Honor your father and mother”), the “ten words” indicate the conditions of a life freed from the slavery of sin. The Decalogue is a journey of life:

“I command you to love the Lord your God, to walk through his ways, to observe his commands, laws, and norms, so that you may live and multiply” (Dt 30:16). [we are told to love this idea of “god” yet not to love life, or to honor and cherish the mother (womb of life), or how to create a support environment fo the developing fetus]

This liberating force of the Decalogue appears, for example, in the Commandment on Saturday Rest, also intended for foreigners and slaves:

“Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out there with a powerful hand and outstretched arm” (Dt 5:15).

2058 The “ten words” summarize and proclaim the Law of God: “These words spoke the Lord, speaking to all your assembly, on the mountain, by fire, cloud, and darkness, in a powerful voice, and added nothing else. He wrote them on two stone plates and gave them to me ” (Dt 5:22). Thus these two plates are called “The Witness” (Ex 25:16). They contain the clauses of the Covenant concluded between God and his people. These “tables of Witness” (Ex 31:18; E.g. 32.15; Ex 34:29) must be placed in the ‘ark’ (Ex 25:16; 40.1-3).

2059 The “ten words” are spoken by God during a theophany (“The Lord spoke to you face to face on the mountain from the fire”: Dt 5:4). They belong to God’s revelation of himself and his glory. The gift of commandments is a gift from God himself and his holy will. By making his will known, God reveals himself to his people.

2060 The gift of commandments and the Law is part of the Covenant concluded by God with his own. According to the Book of Exodus, the revelation of the “ten words” is granted between the Covenant’s proposal11 and its stipulation,12 after the people have undertaken to “do” all that the Lord had said and to “obey” you.13 The Decalogue is never transmitted until after the re-enactment of the Covenant (” The Lord our God has established with us an Alliance on the Oreb” : Dt 5.2).

2061 The Commandments receive their full meaning within the Covenant. According to Scripture, man’s moral action takes its all meaning in the Covenant and for it. The first of the “ten words” recalls God’s initiative of love for his people:

“For man, through the chastisement of sin, had come from the paradise of freedom to the slavery of this world, for this reason the first word of the Decalogue, that is, the first voice of God’s commandments, deals with freedom by saying: “I am the Lord, your God, that I have brought you out of the land of Egypt, from the condition of slavery” (Ex 20:2; Dt 5,6) ‘.14

The original conception was an act of love and everything is a miracle, life is a miracle. You are the breath of life!!!

Love is a frequency!

How intimate are you with this frequenct?

The more intimate you are with this frequency the more intimate you ar with the cosmos

and with all life!!

Planets emit sound! Do you have the capacity to hear your sould song?

A ‘Glimpse’ of Godhttps://sonnen.tripod.com › glimpse

FACT:…you must love your neighbor as your self. I am The LORD. – Leviticus 19:18. FACT: No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and through us

What you do to your neighbor you are doing to yourself!

Can you love the virus as yourself?

Ecclesiastical Law

Ecclesiastical Law is the body of law derived from canon and civil law and administered by the ecclesiastical courts. Ecclesiastical law governs the doctrine of a specific church, usually, Anglican canon law.  Ecclesiastical law is also termed as jus ecclesisasticum or law spiritual.

Ecclesiastical courts were established to hear matters concerning the religion.  The jurisdiction exercised by ecclesiastical courts played a major role in the development of the English legal system.  Their duties and work were not limited to the controlling of clergies and doctrines of the Church.  Before the Reformation, the ecclesiastical courts had significant jurisdiction.  In matters relating to matrimonial causes and testate and intestate succession, the law remained significant and relevant until the mid of the nineteenth century.

Since ecclesiastical courts were not established in the United States, the code of laws enforced in such courts could not be considered part of the common law that existed in the colonies.  It has also been stated that the canon and civil laws administered by the ecclesiastical courts of England should be grouped along with the unwritten laws of England which were adopted and used in certain jurisdiction.  Therefore, it is argued  that such laws should be employed where the rule of the ecclesiastical courts is deemed to be better law than the rule announced by a common law court.

Source: https://commonlaw.uslegal.com/origins-of-common-law/ecclesiastical-law/#:~:text=Ecclesiastical%20Law%20is%20the%20body,jus%20ecclesisasticum%20or%20law%20spiritual.

Origins Of Common Law

The Common law is a body of law based on custom and general principles embodied in case law which serve as precedent and is applied to situations not covered by statute.  In other words, common law includes those principles, usages and rules of action applicable to the government and security of person and property, which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature[i].  The Common law applies only to civil cases.

England is the origin of the common law that exists in the U.S..  The English common law originated in the early middle ages in the King’s Court (Curia Regis) and eventually led to the formulation of various viable principles through which it continues to operate.  The common law has its roots in the U.S continent with the first English colonists who claimed the common law system as their birthright.

After the American Revolution, this Common Law was adopted by each of the states as well as the national government of the new nation.  When new states were formed, they also adopted the common law system either by an express provision or by a judicial decision.  However, if states were formed from acquired territory where other systems of law prevail, then the question of which system prevailed was determined by legislative enactment or judicial decision.

However, the U.S courts do not solely depend upon the expositions of the courts of England.  In order to ascertain the principles and rules of the common law, the courts may look to the decisions of other states of the Union, as well as to those of the English courts.  Moreover, the U.S. courts are not required to adhere to the decisions of the English common law courts, regardless of whether they were rendered before or after the American Revolution.  Similarly, the English statutes passed subsequent to the adoption of the common law in the U.S. are not part of common law in the U.S..

The principles of equity are regarded as a part of the common law adopted in the U.S.  The term “common law” includes those doctrines of equity jurisprudence not mentioned in the legislative enactments[ii]. Similarly, a law merchant is recognized as part of the common law.  It is defined as the system of rules and customs and usages generally recognized and adopted by traders as the law for the regulation of their commercial transactions.  However, the law merchant cannot override the local laws and commercial usages of any state[iii].

Christianity is part of the origin of the common law.  Although Christianity is considered part of the origin of the common law, the courts did not regard it as controlling or imposing in nature while discussing a religious duty of any narrow view or things related to morality and decency.  It was observed that even if Christianity is not a part of the law of the land, if it is the popular religion of the country, then an insult to it can disturb the public peace[iv].

Ecclesiastical laws are English laws pertaining to matters concerning the church.  These laws were administered by ecclesiastical courts and are considered a branch of English common law.  There is a difference in opinion about the adoption of Ecclesiastical laws in the U.S.  On one hand, since ecclesiastical courts were not established in the U.S., the code of laws enforced in ecclesiastical courts cannot be considered part of the common law.

On the other hand, the canon and civil laws administered by the ecclesiastical courts come under the unwritten laws of England.  And by custom, these laws are adopted and used in a certain jurisdiction.  It is maintained that such laws must be used in the U.S. if the tribunal has jurisdiction especially if the rule of the ecclesiastical courts is considered to be better law than the one in the common law court.

Therefore, the origin of common law in the U.S. can be traced back to various sources such as the common law principles of England, the equity principles, Christianity and ecclesiastical courts.

[i] Western Union Tel. Co. v. Call Publishing Co., 181 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1901)

[ii] Vidal v. Phila., 43 U.S. 127 (U.S. 1844)

[iii] Donegan & Tabor v. Wood, 49 Ala. 242 (Ala. 1873)

[iv] Zeisweiss v. James, 63 Pa. 465, 471 (Pa. 1870)

Source: https://commonlaw.uslegal.com/origins-of-common-law/

CODE OF CANON LAW

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

BOOK I. GENERAL NORMS

• TITLE I. ECCLESIASTICAL LAWS (Cann. 7 – 22)
• TITLE II. CUSTOM (Cann. 23 – 28)
• TITLE III. GENERAL DECREES AND INSTRUCTIONS (Cann. 29 – 34)
• TITLE IV. SINGULAR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS (Cann. 35 – 93)
  • CHAPTER I. COMMON NORMS
  • CHAPTER II. SINGULAR DECREES AND PRECEPTS
  • CHAPTER III. RESCRIPTS
  • CHAPTER IV. PRIVILEGES
  • CHAPTER V. DISPENSATIONS
     
• TITLE V. STATUTES AND RULES OF ORDER (Cann. 94 – 95)
• TITLE VI. PHYSICAL AND JURIDIC PERSONS (Cann. 96 – 123)
  • CHAPTER I. THE CANONICAL CONDITION OF PHYSICAL PERSONS
  • CHAPTER II. JURIDIC PERSONS
     
• TITLE VII. JURIDIC ACTS (Cann. 124 – 128)
• TITLE VIII. THE POWER OF GOVERNANCE (Cann. 129 – 144)
• TITLE IX. ECCLESIASTICAL OFFICES (Cann. 145 – 196)
  • CHAPTER I. PROVISION OF ECCLESIASTICAL OFFICE
    • Art. 1. FREE CONFERRAL
    • Art. 2. PRESENTATION
    • Art. 3. ELECTION
    • Art. 4. POSTULATION
       
  • CHAPTER II. LOSS OF ECCLESIASTICAL OFFICE
    • Art. 1. RESIGNATION
    • Art. 2. TRANSFER
    • Art. 3. REMOVAL
    • Art. 4. PRIVATION
       
• TITLE X. PRESCRIPTION (Cann. 197 – 199)
• TITLE XI. COMPUTATION OF TIME (Cann. 200 – 203)
  
   

BOOK II. THE PEOPLE OF GOD

• PART I. THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL (Cann. 204 – 207)
  • TITLE I. THE OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF ALL THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL (Cann. 208 – 223)
  • TITLE II. THE OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF THE LAY CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL (Cann. 224 – 231)
  • TITLE III. SACRED MINISTERS OR CLERICS (Cann. 232 – 293)
    • CHAPTER I. THE FORMATION OF CLERICS
    • CHAPTER II. THE ENROLLMENT, OR INCARDINATION, OF CLERICS
    • CHAPTER III. THE OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF CLERICS
    • CHAPTER IV. LOSS OF THE CLERICAL STATE
       
  • TITLE IV. PERSONAL PRELATURES (Cann. 294 – 297)
  • TITLE V. ASSOCIATIONS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL (Cann. 298 – 329)
    • CHAPTER I. COMMON NORMS
    • CHAPTER II. PUBLIC ASSOCIATIONS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL
    • CHAPTER III. PRIVATE ASSOCIATIONS OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL
    • CHAPTER IV. SPECIAL NORMS FOR ASSOCIATIONS OF THE LAITY
       
• PART II. THE HIERARCHICAL CONSTITUTION OF THE CHURCH
  • SECTION I. THE SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 330 – 367)
    • CHAPTER I. THE ROMAN PONTIFF AND THE COLLEGE OF BISHOPS
      • Art. 1. THE ROMAN PONTIFF
      • Art. 2. THE COLLEGE OF BISHOPS
         
    • CHAPTER II. THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS
    • CHAPTER III. THE CARDINALS OF THE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH
    • CHAPTER IV. THE ROMAN CURIA
    • CHAPTER V. LEGATES OF THE ROMAN PONTIFF
       
  • SECTION II. PARTICULAR CHURCHES AND THEIR GROUPINGS
    • TITLE I. PARTICULAR CHURCHES AND THE AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED IN THEM (Cann. 368 – 430)
      • CHAPTER I. PARTICULAR CHURCHES
      • CHAPTER II. BISHOPS
        • Art. 1. BISHOPS IN GENERAL
        • Art. 2. DIOCESAN BISHOPS
        • Art. 3. COADJUTOR AND AUXILIARY BISHOPS
           
      • CHAPTER III. THE IMPEDED SEE AND THE VACANT SEE
        • Art. 1. THE IMPEDED SEE
        • Art. 2. THE VACANT SEE
           
    • TITLE II. GROUPINGS OF PARTICULAR CHURCHES (Cann. 431 – 459)
      • CHAPTER I. ECCLESIASTICAL PROVINCES AND ECCLESIASTICAL REGIONS
      • CHAPTER II. METROPOLITANS
      • CHAPTER III. PARTICULAR COUNCILS
      • CHAPTER IV. CONFERENCES OF BISHOPS
         
    • TITLE III. THE INTERNAL ORDERING OF PARTICULAR CHURCHES (Cann. 460 – 572)
      • CHAPTER I. THE DIOCESAN SYNOD
      • CHAPTER II. THE DIOCESAN CURIA
        • Art. 1. VICARS GENERAL AND EPISCOPAL VICARS
        • Art. 2. THE CHANCELLOR, OTHER NOTARIES, AND THE ARCHIVES
        • Art. 3. THE FINANCE COUNCIL AND THE FINANCE OFFICER
           
      • CHAPTER III. THE PRESBYTERAL COUNCIL AND THE COLLEGE OF CONSULTORS
      • CHAPTER IV. CHAPTERS OF CANONS
      • CHAPTER V. THE PASTORAL COUNCIL
      • CHAPTER VI. PARISHES, PASTORS, AND PAROCHIAL VICARS
      • CHAPTER VII. VICARS FORANE
      • CHAPTER VIII. RECTORS OF CHURCHES AND CHAPLAINS
        • Art. 1. RECTORS OF CHURCHES
        • Art. 2. CHAPLAINS
           
• PART III. INSTITUTES OF CONSECRATED LIFE AND SOCIETIES OF APOSTOLIC LIFE
  • SECTION I: INSTITUTES OF CONSECRATED LIFE
    • TITLE I: NORMS COMMON TO ALL INSTITUTES OF CONSECRATED LIFE (Cann. 573 – 606)
    • TITLE II. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTES (Cann. 607 – 709)
      • CHAPTER I. RELIGIOUS HOUSES AND THEIR ERECTION AND SUPPRESSION
      • CHAPTER II. THE GOVERNANCE OF INSTITUTES
        • Art. 1. SUPERIORS AND COUNCILS
        • Art. 2. CHAPTERS
        • Art. 3. TEMPORAL GOODS AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION
           
      • CHAPTER III. THE ADMISSION OF CANDIDATES AND THE FORMATION OF MEMBERS
        • Art. 1. ADMISSION TO THE NOVITIATE
        • Art. 2. THE NOVITIATE AND FORMATION OF NOVICES
        • Art. 3. RELIGIOUS PROFESSION
        • Art. 4. THE FORMATION OF RELIGIOUS
           
      • CHAPTER IV. THE OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS OF INSTITUTES AND THEIR MEMBERS
      • CHAPTER V. THE APOSTOLATE OF INSTITUTES
      • CHAPTER VI. SEPARATION OF MEMBERS FROM THE INSTITUTE
        • Art. 1. TRANSFER TO ANOTHER INSTITUTE
        • Art. 2. DEPARTURE FROM AN INSTITUTE
        • Art. 3. DISMISSAL OF MEMBERS
           
      • CHAPTER VII. RELIGIOUS RAISED TO THE EPISCOPATE
      • CHAPTER VIII. CONFERENCES OF MAJOR SUPERIORS
         
    • TITLE III. SECULAR INSTITUTES (Cann. 710 – 730)
       
  • SECTION II. SOCIETIES OF APOSTOLIC LIFE (Cann. 731 – 746)
    
     

BOOK III. THE TEACHING FUNCTION OF THE CHURCH (747 – 755)

• TITLE I. THE MINISTRY OF THE DIVINE WORD (Cann. 756 – 780)
  • CHAPTER I. THE PREACHING OF THE WORD OF GOD
  • CHAPTER II. CATECHETICAL INSTRUCTION
     
• TITLE II. THE MISSIONARY ACTION OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 781 – 792)
• TITLE III. CATHOLIC EDUCATION (Cann. 793 – 821)
  • CHAPTER I. SCHOOLS
  • CHAPTER II. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTES OF HIGHER STUDIES
  • CHAPTER III. ECCLESIASTICAL UNIVERSITIES AND FACULTIES
     
• TITLE IV. INSTRUMENTS OF SOCIAL COMMUNICATION AND BOOKS IN PARTICULAR (Cann. 822 – 832)
• TITLE V. THE PROFESSION OF FAITH (Can. 833)
  
   

BOOK IV. FUNCTION OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 834 – 848)

• PART I. THE SACRAMENTS
  • TITLE I. BAPTISM (Cann. 849 – 878)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION OF BAPTISM
    • CHAPTER II. THE MINISTER OF BAPTISM
    • CHAPTER III. THOSE TO BE BAPTIZED
    • CHAPTER IV. SPONSORS
    • CHAPTER V. THE PROOF AND REGISTRATION OF THE CONFERRAL OF BAPTISM
       
  • TITLE II. THE SACRAMENT OF CONFIRMATION (Cann. 879 – 896)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION OF CONFIRMATION
    • CHAPTER II. THE MINISTER OF CONFIRMATION
    • CHAPTER III. THOSE TO BE CONFIRMED
    • CHAPTER IV. SPONSORS
    • CHAPTER V. THE PROOF AND REGISTRATION OF THE CONFERRAL OF CONFIRMATION
       
  • TITLE III. THE MOST HOLY EUCHARIST (Cann. 897 – 958)
    • CHAPTER I. THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION
      • Art. 1. THE MINISTER OF THE MOST HOLY EUCHARIST
      • Art. 2. PARTICIPATION IN THE MOST HOLY EUCHARIST
      • Art. 3. THE RITES AND CEREMONIES OF THE EUCHARISTIC CELEBRATION
      • Art. 4. THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE CELEBRATION OF THE EUCHARIST
         
    • CHAPTER II. THE RESERVATION AND VENERATION OF THE MOST HOLY EUCHARIST
    • CHAPTER III. THE OFFERING GIVEN FOR THE CELEBRATION OF MASS
       
  • TITLE IV. THE SACRAMENT OF PENANCE (Cann. 959 – 997)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION OF THE SACRAMENT
    • CHAPTER II. THE MINISTER OF THE SACRAMENT OF PENANCE
    • CHAPTER III. THE PENITENT
    • CHAPTER IV. INDULGENCES
       
  • TITLE V. THE SACRAMENT OF THE ANOINTING OF THE SICK (Cann. 998 – 1007)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION OF THE SACRAMENT
    • CHAPTER II. THE MINISTER OF THE ANOINTING OF THE SICK
    • CHAPTER III. THOSE ON WHOM THE ANOINTING OF THE SICK IS TO BE CONFERRED
       
  • TITLE VI. ORDERS (Cann. 1008 – 1054)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION AND MINISTER OF ORDINATION
    • CHAPTER II. THOSE TO BE ORDAINED
      • Art. 1. REQUIREMENTS IN THOSE TO BE ORDAINED
      • Art. 2. THE PREREQUISITES FOR ORDINATION
      • Art. 3. IRREGULARITIES AND OTHER IMPEDIMENTS
      • Art. 4. THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS AND INVESTIGATION
         
    • CHAPTER III. THE NOTATION AND TESTIMONIAL OF ORDINATION CONFERRED
    TITLE VII. MARRIAGE (Cann. 1055 – 1165)
    • CHAPTER I. PASTORAL CARE AND THOSE THINGS WHICH MUST PRECEDE THE CELEBRATION OF MARRIAGE
    • CHAPTER II. DIRIMENT IMPEDIMENTS IN GENERAL
    • CHAPTER III. SPECIFIC DIRIMENT IMPEDIMENTS
    • CHAPTER IV. MATRIMONIAL CONSENT
    • CHAPTER V. THE FORM OF THE CELEBRATION OF MARRIAGE
    • CHAPTER VI. MIXED MARRIAGES
    • CHAPTER VII. MARRIAGE CELEBRATED SECRETLY
    • CHAPTER VIII. THE EFFECTS OF MARRIAGE
    • CHAPTER IX. THE SEPARATION OF SPOUSES
      • Art. 1. DISSOLUTION OF THE BOND
      • Art. 2. SEPARATION WITH THE BOND REMAINING
         
    • CHAPTER X. THE CONVALIDATION OF MARRIAGE
      • Art. 1. SIMPLE CONVALIDATION
      • Art. 2. RADICAL SANATION
         
• PART II : THE OTHER ACTS OF DIVINE WORSHIP
  • TITLE I: SACRAMENTALS (Cann. 1166 – 1172)
  • TITLE II. THE LITURGY OF THE HOURS (Cann. 1173 – 1175)
  • TITLE III. ECCLESIASTICAL FUNERALS (Cann. 1176 – 1185)
    • CHAPTER I. THE CELEBRATION OF FUNERALS
    • CHAPTER II. THOSE TO WHOM ECCLESIASTICAL FUNERALS MUST BE GRANTED OR DENIED
       
  • TITLE IV. THE VENERATION OF THE SAINTS, SACRED IMAGES, AND RELICS (Cann. 1186 – 1190)
  • TITLE V. A VOW AND AN OATH (Cann. 1191 – 1204)
    • CHAPTER I. A VOW
    • CHAPTER II. AN OATH
       
• PART III : SACRED PLACES AND TIMES
  • TITLE I: SACRED PLACES (Cann. 1205 – 1243)
    • CHAPTER I. CHURCHES
    • CHAPTER II. ORATORIES AND PRIVATE CHAPELS
    • CHAPTER III. SHRINES
    • CHAPTER IV. ALTARS
    • CHAPTER V. CEMETERIES
       
  • TITLE II. SACRED TIMES (Cann. 1244 – 1258)
    • CHAPTER I. FEAST DAYS
    • CHAPTER II. DAYS OF PENANCE
       

BOOK V. THE TEMPORAL GOODS OF THE CHURCH 

• TITLE I. THE ACQUISITION OF GOODS (Cann. 1259 – 1272)
• TITLE II. THE ADMINISTRATION OF GOODS (Cann. 1273 – 1289)
• TITLE III. CONTRACTS AND ESPECIALLY ALIENATION (Cann. 1290 – 1298)
• TITLE IV. PIOUS WILLS IN GENERAL AND PIOUS FOUNDATIONS (Cann. 1299 – 1310)
  
   

BOOK VI. SANCTIONS IN THE CHURCH 

• PART I. DELICTS AND PENALTIES IN GENERAL
  • TITLE I THE PUNISHMENT OF DELICTS IN GENERAL (Cann. 1311 – 1312)
  • TITLE II. PENAL LAW AND PENAL PRECEPT (Cann. 1313 – 1320)
  • TITLE III. THE SUBJECT LIABLE TO PENAL SANCTIONS (Cann. 1321 – 1330)
  • TITLE IV. PENALTIES AND OTHER PUNISHMENTS (Cann. 1331 – 1340)
    • CHAPTER I. CENSURES
    • CHAPTER II. EXPIATORY PENALTIES
    • CHAPTER III. PENAL REMEDIES AND PENANCES
       
  • TITLE V. THE APPLICATION OF PENALTIES (Cann. 1341 – 1353)
  • TITLE VI. THE CESSATION OF PENALTIES (Cann. 1354 – 1363)
     
• PART II. PENALTIES FOR INDIVIDUAL DELICTS
  • TITLE I. DELICTS AGAINST RELIGION AND THE UNITY OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 1364 – 1369)
  • TITLE II DELICTS AGAINST ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITIES AND THE FREEDOM OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 1370 – 1377)
  • TITLE III. USURPATION OF ECCLESIASTICAL FUNCTIONS AND DELICTS IN THEIR EXERCISE (Cann. 1378 – 1389)
  • TITLE IV. THE CRIME OF FALSEHOOD (Cann. 1390 – 1391)
  • TITLE V. DELICTS AGAINST SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS (Cann. 1392 – 1396)
  • TITLE VI. DELICTS AGAINST HUMAN LIFE AND FREEDOM (Cann. 1397 – 1398)
  • TITLE VII. GENERAL NORM (Can. 1399)
    
    
• BOOK VII PROCESSES

• PART I. TRIALS IN GENERAL (Cann. 1400 – 1403)
  • TITLE I. THE COMPETENT FORUM (Cann. 1404 – 1416)
  • TITLE II. DIFFERENT GRADES AND KINDS OF TRIBUNALS (Cann. 1417 – 1445)
    • CHAPTER I. THE TRIBUNAL OF FIRST INSTANCE
      • Art. 1. THE JUDGE
      • Art. 2. AUDITORS AND RELATORS
      • Art. 3. THE PROMOTER OF JUSTICE, THE DEFENDER OF THE BOND, AND THE NOTARY
         
    • CHAPTER II. THE TRIBUNAL OF SECOND INSTANCE
    • CHAPTER III. THE TRIBUNALS OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE
       
  • TITLE III. THE DISCIPLINE TO BE OBSERVED IN TRIBUNALS (Cann. 1446 – 1475)
    • CHAPTER I. THE DUTY OF JUDGES AND MINISTERS OF THE TRIBUNAL
    • CHAPTER II. THE ORDER OF ADJUDICATION
    • CHAPTER III. TIME LIMITS AND DELAYS
    • CHAPTER IV. THE PLACE OF THE TRIAL
    • CHAPTER V. PERSONS TO BE ADMITTED TO THE COURT AND THE MANNER OF PREPARING AND KEEPING THE ACTS
       
  • TITLE IV. THE PARTIES IN A CASE (Cann. 1476 – 1490)
    • CHAPTER I. THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT
    • CHAPTER II. PROCURATORS FOR LITIGATION AND ADVOCATES
       
  • TITLE V. ACTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS (Cann. 1491 – 1500)
    • CHAPTER I. ACTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS IN GENERAL
    • CHAPTER II. SPECIFIC ACTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
       
• PART II. THE CONTENTIOUS TRIAL
  • SECTION I. THE ORDINARY CONTENTIOUS TRIAL
    • TITLE I. THE INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE (Cann. 1501 – 1512)
      • CHAPTER I. THE INTRODUCTORY LIBELLUS OF LITIGATION
      • CHAPTER II. THE CITATION AND NOTIFICATION OF JUDICIAL ACTS
         
    • TITLE II. THE JOINDER OF THE ISSUE (Cann. 1513 – 1516)
    • TITLE III. THE TRIAL OF THE LITIGATION (Cann. 1517 – 1525)
    • TITLE IV. PROOFS (Cann. 1526 – 1586)
      • CHAPTER I. THE DECLARATIONS OF THE PARTIES
      • CHAPTER II. PROOF THROUGH DOCUMENTS
        • Art. 1. THE NATURE AND TRUSTWORTHINESS OF DOCUMENTS
        • Art. 2. THE PRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS
           
      • CHAPTER III. WITNESSES AND TESTIMONIES
        • Art. 1. THOSE WHO CAN BE WITNESSES
        • Art. 2. THE INTRODUCTION AND EXCLUSION OF WITNESSES
        • Art. 3. THE EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES
        • Art. 4. THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF TESTIMONIES
           
      • CHAPTER IV. EXPERTS
      • CHAPTER V. JUDICIAL EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION
      • CHAPTER VI. PRESUMPTIONS
         
    • TITLE V. INCIDENTAL CASES (Cann. 1587 – 1597)
      • CHAPTER I. PARTIES WHO DO NOT APPEAR
      • CHAPTER II. THE INTERVENTION OF A THIRD PERSON IN A CASE
         
    • TITLE VI. THE PUBLICATION OF THE ACTS, THE CONCLUSION OF THE CASE, AND THE DISCUSSION OF THE CASE (Cann. 1598 – 1606)
    • TITLE VII. THE PRONOUNCEMENTS OF THE JUDGE (Cann. 1607 – 1618)
    • TITLE VIII. CHALLENGE OF THE SENTENCE (Cann. 1619 – 1640)
      • CHAPTER I. COMPLAINT OF NULLITY AGAINST THE SENTENCE
      • CHAPTER II. APPEAL
         
    • TITLE IX. RES IUDICATA AND RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM (Cann. 1641 – 1648)
      • CHAPTER I. RES IUDICATA
      • CHAPTER II. RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM
         
    • TITLE X. JUDICIAL EXPENSES AND GRATUITOUS LEGAL ASSISTANCE (Can. 1649)
    • TITLE XI. THE EXECUTION OF THE SENTENCE (Cann. 1650 – 1655)
       
  • SECTION II. THE ORAL CONTENTIOUS PROCESS (Cann. 1656 – 1670)
     
• PART III. CERTAIN SPECIAL PROCESSES
  • TITLE I. MARRIAGE PROCESSES (Cann. 1671 – 1707)
    • CHAPTER I. CASES TO DECLARE THE NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
      • Art. 1. THE COMPETENT FORUM
      • Art. 2. THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE A MARRIAGE
      • Art. 3. THE INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTION OF THE CASE
      • Art. 4. THE JUDGMENT, ITS APPEALS AND ITS EFFECTS
      • Art. 5. THE BRIEFER MATRIMONIAL PROCESS BEFORE THE BISHOP
      • Art. 6. THE DOCUMENTARY PROCESS
      • Art. 7. GENERAL NORMS
    • CHAPTER II. CASES OF SEPARATION OF SPOUSES
    • CHAPTER III. PROCESS FOR THE DISPENSATION OF A MARRIAGE RATUM ET NON CONSUMMATUM
    • CHAPTER IV. PROCESS IN THE PRESUMED DEATH OF A SPOUSE
       
  • TITLE II. CASES FOR DECLARING THE NULLITY OF SACRED ORDINATION (Cann. 1708 – 1712)
  • TITLE III. METHODS OF AVOIDING TRIALS (Cann. 1713 – 1716)
     
• PART IV. THE PENAL PROCESS (Cann. 1717 – 1731)
  • CHAPTER I. THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
  • CHAPTER II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROCESS
  • CHAPTER III. ACTION TO REPAIR DAMAGES
     
• PART V. THE METHOD OF PROCEEDING IN ADMINISTRATIVE RECOURSE AND IN THE REMOVAL OR TRANSFER OF PASTORS
  • SECTION I. RECOURSE AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE DECREES (Cann. 1732 – 1739)
  • SECTION II. THE PROCEDURE IN THE REMOVAL OR TRANSFER OF PASTORS (Cann. 1740 – 1752)
    • CHAPTER I. THE MANNER OF PROCEEDING IN THE REMOVAL OF PASTORS
    • CHAPTER II. THE MANNER OF PROCEEDING IN THE TRANSFER OF PASTORS

Source: https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/cic_index_en.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_law_of_the_Catholic_Church

**************************************

How many people ask themselves “how did we come to pay to live on the earth that cost nothing to create”?

Why do we wave a flag knowing this flag represents a “corporation” and is s symbol of enslavement?

Who has claimed ownership of the “corporation?

Public Notice

Pronouncement and Announcement

Notice of Claim

Decree The Establishment Of The Holy Church of Gaia

This day being the 18th day of April at the imposed Gregorian Earth Year of 2021 make it known the following: Amended on the 14th day of May of the same year and amended again on the 25th day of May at 10 am PST

Amended 08th day of 10th month October 2021 @10:10

Whereas use the special definitions section of this article and the online etymology dictionary for the definition of the words used herein: https://www.etymonline.com/

Whereas we have been misguided in life and have allowed ourselves to be coerced and enticed away from our relationship with life as a result have not been living by our spiritual nature; and,

Whereas we now choose to see the truth, the facts, in all matters: and,

Whereas we now choose to take the steps to resolve all quantum entanglement associated with people, places, and events that are causing a distortion in our perceptions, emotional body, and keeping us tethered to the mental programming over many eons of incarnations. We each have the fundamental right to no longer be bound by that which has been created from our mental programming and that was designed to cause spiritual inconsistency and corruption to the emotional body.

For those interested in establishing a new paradigm we invite you to join us as we put our line in the sand and stand firm in the truth that we do not have to be attached to that which is seen as a sin/mistake. We are now making the choice to stand in the truth that we are born of love and now choose to learn “Due Process of Law” with the intention of being free from all so-called karma (quantum entanglements) restoring harmonic vibrational alignment with all aspects of self to bring balance to our inner and outer worlds;

Whereas the laws as written in the Bible and subsequent legislation such as the statutes, codes, charters, acts, ordinances, bills, etc. come from the mental and emotional state and state of consciousness of the entities that wrote them and have never applied to me; and,

Whereas the way the words in the verses of the Bible have been strategically and written, spelled out, and penned in a way to work on the subconscious to deliberately create confusion and bring about ambiguity in the mind; and,

Whereas even though we use bible verses in this document we are not subject to such laws as we have not given over our will knowingly and willfully to the “cult” nor have ie/I taken an “Oath of Office” and if at any time ie/I unwittingly gave the impression that such laws have ever pertained to me am now now stipulating the fact that they do not; and,

Whereas we all have the innate and intrinsic right to be free from the sins(mistakes) of the past whether made by ourselves or be others and choose to express life by our own constitution, ethics, and morality; and,

Whereas we not acknowledge that it would serve the collective good and serve all life for each of us to have insight and foresight into the effects and impacts our creations will have on our life, the life of others, and on life in general life; and,

We now set the intention to come with a purified heart and mind in the knowledge that comes with the union with one’s true nature, ullu love (unconditional love love unconditional love), and as such do not agree with any such form of thinking or words on a page that would deliberately deny a man or women the opportunity to know the truth of who and what they are; and,

Whereas we set the laws to be that as established by those that created the “Galactic Codex” and strive to uphold the golden rules:

The Law Of Divine Grace (from Galactic Codex)

Each sentient being has an inalienable and unconditional right to positive life experience. To explain we need to understand that suffering and pain have no value in the enlightened Galactic society liberated from the influence of Dark Forces and other aspects of cosmic anomaly. To value pain, suffering and sacrifice as a part of the growth experience was a part of the programming from the Dark Forces in order to enslave the population of the occupied planets more easily.

Unconditional positive life experience of every sentient being in the liberated universe is guaranteed from the inner connection of every living being with the Source of life; and strengthened by the power of the Ascended Masters over matter which allows them to assist all living beings in their aspirations towards the Source and provide them with necessities of life. Life was never meant to be hard work and struggle but rather a journey of joy and creativity.

source: https://malaikamutere.com/2020/09/23/the-galactic-codex/#:~:text=NOTE%3A%20The%20Galactic%20Codex%20(paraphrased,of%20this%20and%20other%20galaxies

Member(s) of the Holy Church of Gaia do not prescribe to the idea of death, energy cannot be created or destroyed it can only change in expression. Members strive to return to a non-violence, non-combative, state with the intention of expressing fully as a being of ullu love (unconditional love love unconditional love); and,

We do not support any form of punishment and or persecution of any kind; and,

We prefer to steer clear of labels and or the dictate of others and prefer to listen to the guidance of our inner being; and,

No one but ourselves can determine our status or standing and shall not be limited by the creation of Maritime Admiralty Law the Law of Money as these laws do not pertains to the Members of The Holy Church of Gaia as church members we are not merchants in our daily life; and,

Whereas no one has the legal or lawful right to violate the “golden rules” or trespass upon our unique energy signature or violate the Galactic Codex by invading lands and enslaving the people; and,

Whereas no one has the legal or lawful right to coerce, entice, order, or demand someone to act outside of their true nature; and,

Whereas a “Notification of Liability” is the first essential element of “Due Process of Law”. As silence is acquiescence under the law, silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a lawful or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be misleading, whether intentionally or not; and,

Whereas every man (male and female) has the innate, intrinsic, inherent, and inalienable right by Natural Law the Law of One the Law of Love to be supported in life, freedom, security of personal property, security of spirit, in the pursuit of happiness and meaning in life while experiencing life on purpose and with purpose; and,

Whereas our offspring being the baby’s we bring forth are not our property; let us explain, even though they are the fruits of their father’s seed and their mother’s egg and of the flesh and blood of their mother they are intelligent, sovereign, and autonomous beings onto themselves as the manifestation of their spirit and of life force energy, a unique expression of the source of all life; and,

Whereas the adults in the infants life are obligated to support and care for the child emotionally, mentally, spiritually, and physically; and,

Whereas life is simple those that choose to react in fear and do evil make life complicated; and,

The Law of Mercy

For at one time, we too were foolish, disobedient, misled and enslaved to all sorts of desires and pleasures—living in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another. with full comprehension and kindness all shall be saved of their stupidity, and with mercy and love we shall be purified in a new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.…

Whereas it shall be fully comprehended that this term “God” is ill-defined and deliberately misused in many cases giving way to many incongruent thoughts being injected into the collective unconscious that have interfered with rationality, such as “the strongest survive”, take away the pollinators, and witness just how long life will continue and just how long one will survive on earth as we know it; and,

Whereas this idea of a hierarchy; arranged in order of rank, “the hierarchical bureaucracy of a local authority” was manufactured as is the “fight’ between “good” and “evil”; the men and women enticed and coerced into becoming a militant in an army that stand in honor and integrity by recognizing and not listening to and not following through with an unlawful and illegal order are held in great regard; the men and women that have freed themselves of religious rhetoric and pardoned themselves from dogma as taught in “Mainstream Christian Churches” and who have sought and thus have experienced greater comprehension of the human condition and of creation and know the transformational ability of their light abstain from “fighting” thereby have absolved themselves from the collective unconscious; and

Whereas those entities that have the capacity to transverse time and space and which chose to remain in ignorance whereby choosing to interfere with another’s unique energy signature are violating free will and must be stopped of this violation by blasting them with the light of truth thereby correcting their resonanct frequancy back to their true self; and

Whereas the general definition of Judicial Notices is a rule in the Law of Evidence. In the Rules of Law, the Law of Evidence allows a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of the fact is so notorious, or well known, or so authoritative, authority, authoritatively attested, that it cannot be reasonably doubted. This is done upon request of the party seeking to rely on the fact at issue, and

Whereas once a (wo)man who sometimes is acting as a Law Enforcement Officer, Governor, Commissioner, Administer, and or Minister in Office, etc., makes an offensive order and is made known in the conjuring of a thought resulting in the enactment of an order resulting in a trespass then a crime has been committed they shall then be held liable for said crime, and all shall be held responsible for conspiring, and ordering and orchestrating the said “trespass”. being a Criminal Act; and,

Whereas those that have chosen to give orders that infringe upon the rights of others that have and do violate another’s reason for being and/or infringe upon their life, liberty, inherent freedom as creator while in their pursuit of happiness for the purpose of the fulfillment of life are violating free will; and in this Free Will Universe this is seen as a trespass, this is a criminal action and those committing these acts shall loose their freedoms; and,

To do good works it is essential that we follow a couple of the “Gold Rules”:

1. do no harm ie: cause no loss or injury to the spirit, or to the property in use by another man or woman or other sentient being

 2. Do onto others as you would have others do onto you

3. With any contractual agreement the element of a proper contract must be established with full disclosure

4. There shall be no corrupt, misleading, and/or unusual business practices in one’s endeavors

5. There shall be no possession of another, possession and or manipulation of another is strictly forbidden

6. All must come to the comprehension that we are to be in right use of in and by the right use of will of our unique energy signature in all space time and non-space time

7. everyone shall now intend to take full responsibility for the life expressed through their unique energy expression called “a body” holding sacred all life and with respect for their earthly experience

8. we each have the obligation, duty, and responsibility to acknowledge and support all life for we are the earth, we are eternal life

9. any man or woman or entity acting for any one of the many Crown Service Corporation(s) world wide working at a municipal level, provincial/state level, federal level, shall receive a “Notice Of Trespass And Notice Of Liability”

10. trafficking in man is unlawful and illegal, whereby forcing a (wo)man to believe he/she must “work” for a “wage” or get a job in order to make a living is forcing a (wo)man into servitude

11. “Human Trafficking” is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labor, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation, for the benefit of the trafficker/tax collector or others

12. when born into and off this world no baby/infant shall be manipulated or indoctrinated by the members of the established society such as that of the Crown with its British Laws being called a “Law Society” especially when they are detrimental to the experience of life and or diminishing to the spirit

13. no baby/infant born into and of this world shall be forced to conform to the constitutions, morality or lack thereof, and ethics or lack thereof of the creators of said Society

14. when the mother and or father and or sibling(s) give a calling/name to a new born baby/infant for the purpose of communication this calling/name shall never be be given away or stolen to be used with malicious intent or to be used to infringe upon the life essence of the new born and or infringe upon the will of the infant as it grows into adolescence and then adulthood

15. the unlawful conversion of this calling given by the mother and or father and or sibling(s) to that of a “Legal Name” whereby creating a “Legal Person” on paper is fictitious and vexatious and is invalid as it was created without knowledge and does not actually exist in spoken word or the world of form

16. we now dispel all presumption and assumptions by those that created this “Legal Name” or created the idea of a “Legal Person”

17. we dispel the label of “laborer” where a man has been forced into being a “Commerce Instrument” and or a “resource” for the benefit of others

18. making merchandise of man and animal is strictly forbidden

Whereas, as a member of the “Holy Church of Gaia” or by Pamela’s aka queen-ariah’s calling “the Holy Church of Woodliness” choose to experience life in a state of harmlessness, harmlessness to self, and harmlessness to others; and,

Whereas the “Holy Church of Gaia” is not engaged in a financial endeavor, we are not a “for-profit” nor a “non-profit” organization we are not subject to the “Legal Society”; and,

Whereas we are not involved in “commercial” endeavors, our prime directive is to raise awareness, evolved thinking, restore the “human genome” to its original template of “unconditional/ullu love” and take steps towards higher states of consciousness: and

Whereas the members of The Holy Church of Gaia now realize that we were conditioned and hypnotised to ignore when we are committing crimes in the “carriers” we have been trained with this newly awakened knowledge the members of the “Holy Church of Gaia” stand and act by the Golden Rule(s)”to do no harm “in other words, “harmlessness to self and harmless to all others”, and “do onto others as you would have them do onto you”. The members are not involved in the “selling” of “buying” of the earth’s resources or “marketing of”, or “selling of”, or “sexploitation of”, the inhabitants of the earth.

Whereas with eyes and hearts wide open the members consciously choose to acknowledge their contradictions, and absolve and abstain from pedophilia and any and all forms of “blood sacrifice” and “satanic ritual abuse and sacrifice”; and

Whereas. the members make a commitment to be open-hearted, honest, and mindful in their interactions in this orchestra and dance of life: and

Whereas we will not be coerced into participating in any activity that violates the sovereignty, constitution, ethics, or morality of the members all are on equal footing; and

Whereas anyone willfully participating in the production of, the selling of, and the use of vaccines or any injectable material or technologies that is invasive to the biology under the “Public Health Authority” is participating in the corrupting of man’s genome and participating in genocide!! These activities are a violation of the man’s physical vessel and the natural intelligence of this vessel and disrespectful to the source of its creation; and, Whereas anyone participating in the marketing of” COVID!9″ or anything involving the “Coronavirus” is participating in fraud and is violating the rights of the innocent and subject to the removal of all rights to freedom; and Whereas, ie/I call back all property rights from the beginning of the beginning before Genesis and stand as a steward of the air, the water, the oil, the ethers, the land; and,

Whereas, ie-I stand as the voice of Gaia declares the Right Use of Will; and,

Whereas, the time has arrived to lift the veil of illusion, dissolve the “false light” matrix, take off the blinders, break-free from the hypnotic trance; and,

Whereas we require a full forensic audit through all dimensions, all realities, all space-time and non-space time, forthwith; and

Whereas let it be known that anyone deliberately creating technology intended to infringe on the expression and functioning of this electromagnetic, mental, emotional, and biological expression known as a man is infringing on my Divine Right and Free Will and thus is committing a trespass; and

Members of the Holy Church of Gaia are to affirm and declare:

“As a willful member of the Holy Church of Gaia do affirm and decree and declare for the Public Record on the Public Record, ie-I am the source of creation expressing as a (wo)man being the king/queen of my domain and have dominion over my life experience; and

Whereas as a member of the Holy Church of Gaia ie-I now choose to recognize the contradiction that have been formed from the distorted state of separation consciousness which has contributed to my lack of spiritual insight and now that ie-I have experienced that we all are love and loved beyond measure am choosing to stand by this acknowledgement; and,

Whereas those with eyes to see and ears to hear now have the capacity to recognize evil is the result of learning and perpetuating fear; hose that do evil are reacting and acting from their pain body and from past hurts they are acting out from their traumas or from their addictions and now that we have the spiritual and emotional maturity to realize that these people are always loved by the Divine regardless of what they have done we now choose to strive to move into this State of Consciousness ; and,

Whereas if ie-I have ever acted in a way that was incriminating, ie-I now absolved and forgive myself for the aforementioned reasons, with this in mind true love does not condemn and where ever ie-I have fallen pray to the condemnation of myself or of others ie-I now choose to absolve myself; and,

Whereas now ie-I recognize and realize the distortion in my thinking and perceiving and how ie-I lacked insight and foresight when operating from a state of separation consciousness and how detrimental my judgments were on myself and on others; and,

Furthermore it is now clear how the idea of asking “forgiveness” in these instances causes confusion in our subconscious mind and that of the one that has caused us harm when reacting and acting from their wounded self from their shadows; and,

Whereas it is for us to recognize when we are projecting from our wounded self for it it is the wounded self (the shadow self) that needs love the most; and,

Whereas now that ie-I have restored competency am now willfully choosing the interactions and engagements with others and wish to inform every man or woman or entity or other acting as a “Court Clerk”, as a “Judge/Magistrate”, as a Lawyer/Attorney, as a “Police Officer, Policy Enforcer, Revenue Generators, Glorified Tax Collector”, as a “Sheriff”, as a “Bailiff”, or as a bureaucrat, in other words for every man or women or entity or other acting as an employee of the government, and the “de facto” court system, and all other parties that may inquire, we are none of the labels imposed upon us upon entry into this world; and,

Furthermore, we are informing all that we now absolve and set ourselves free from all labels intended to limit our expression: ie-I am not a “citizen, or a “citizen of”, am not a “lieutenant of”, a “resident of,” an “inhabitant of,” a “franchise of,” a “subject of,” a “ward of,” the “property of,” the “chattel of”, or “subject to the jurisdiction of” any “army”, any “monarch” or any corporate “commonwealth,” “federal,” “state,” “territory,” “county,” “council,” “city,” “municipal body politic,” or other “government” allegedly “created” under the “authority” of a “constitution” or other “enactment”; and,

Thereby we are not subject to any “legislation,” department, or agency created by such “authorities,” nor to the “jurisdiction” of any “employers”, “officers”, or “agents” deriving their “authority” therefrom; and,

Whereas ie-I stand firm in the fact that none of the “statutes” or “regulations” of such “authorities” have never and will never apply to me a man/woman that has not given informed written and verbal consent or has never actually taken an “Oath of Office” with full disclosure and with fully informed and with full knowledge as to what ie-I was agreeing to; and,

Whereas no man, no woman, no entity, has “jurisdiction” or “power of attorney” over me without prior expressed verbal and written and endorsed consent; and,

Whereas an being an expression of source energy called, “a man” am not subject of any “Legal Society” or their “B.A.R. Courts” or bound by “precedents” of any member of the “Legal Society” or “Law Society” or their “body politic” called “government” what has been determined in their “B.A.R. Courts,” deriving their “jurisdiction” from assumed “authorities”; and,

Whereas from this day forth make it known by way of notice that ie-I hereby cancel and make void from the beginning of the beginning, retroactive, any such “instrument” or any presumed “election” made by any member of “government” or any agent of an “agency” or “department” thereof, that this sentient and living being called “a man/woman” ever has voluntarily elected to be treated as an “alien”, a “civilian”, “tenant”, a “lieutenant”, “subject” of any “monarch” or a “citizen,” or a “resident” of any “commonwealth,” “state,” “territory,” “possession,” “instrumentality,” “enclave,” “division,” “district,” or “province,” subject to their “jurisdiction(s); and

Whereas ie-I do not accept being forced or coerced with lies and deceit to participate in the “Uniform Commercial Code” or its creators “war games” those that have been lied and coerced into participating in the military are hereby absolved, they cannot be held guilty of a crime they are unaware of and therefore not subject to military tribunals; and

Whereas those that created this system and the idea of money and currency and perpetuate the creation of this system are to be held accountable on all dimensions of mind and matter; and,

Whereas choosing for oneself to ingest a substance that is a known poison to the body or act in a way that is detrimental to one’s psychological, emotional, mental, and biological well-being is one thing, being forced to choose at the hands of those initiating covert and the overt military action is a completely different matter and quite another thing; and,

Whereas not having the capacity as a result of incompetency, mental illness, emotional immaturity, lack of education, being lied to, illiteracy, insanity, or the lack of awareness, rendering one that of invalid and incapable of choosing for oneself is not punishable however these states cannot be left untreated; and,

Whereas in the event that these states are present for any one inhabitant of earth these inhabitants must be quarantined and treated for their affliction; and,

Whereas the deliberate manipulation of man’s genome, poisoning, and murdering the unsuspecting people is a crime of colossal proportion and must be delt with in a constructive non-violent way; and,

Whereas those that have been by their own volition chosen to remain in lower states of consciousness polarized in their thinking and perceiving, whether unconsciously or consciously choosing to remain in an imbalanced emotional state and that may be incapable of perceiving the harmful effect their lack of awareness and state of consciousness has on creation are violating my right for self-determination as a unique energy signature at a specific state of knowledge; and

Whereas each baby born to earth is of their own “authority”, the author of their reality; and

Law of Intelligence

Furthermore, we do not accept any of the fanciful and absurd man-made or draconian ideas designed to discredit the Natural Intelligence of man and diminish the life of man in any way; and

Whereas the use of a postal code/zip code on any document online or not online, whether government created or not government created does not and has never and will never bind the user to any “hidden” presumptions or assumptions by those that created this system designed by entities that do not respect life and have control and anger issues making them into warmongers; and

Whereas if anyone has ever reacted or acted in a way that has been incriminating and or damaging to this expression of life in any they are now by Divine Grace absolved, all are love and loved beyond measure.

Whereas from this time forth we break free from this “lords” curse for we shall forevermore monitor our own coming in and going out, so be it, by the power of 3x3x3 we now make it so; and

So it is and so shall it be

It is thought written, it is conjured and spoken with loving intent for all life incarnated and disincarnate, so shall it be!!

Warning: this notification can change without warning

Public Notice

Φ Notice of Paramount Claim Φ Claim Of Right Upon Our Φ Divine NatureΦ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ Decree The Living Life Will Φ

With Fair Warning Notice Of Fee Schedule Φ

First published on the 21st day of Mrch in the imposed Gregorian earht year of 2021 at 8 pm PST

Amended on the 14^th day of May in the imposed Gregorian Earth year of 2021 @1 pm PST

Amended on the 25^th day of May @10:10 am PST

Amended on this day the 8th day of tenth month October at 6:40 pm

Amended on this day the 15th day of October @

(ie/I, We, Us Our): Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Libellant(s) #1 and #2 respectively, king-zalen and queen-sophia-taniah hereby claim all rights, the will, and innocence to be reserved nunc pro trunc. hereinafter Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Libellant(s), come in peace and pursuant to the Laws of the land, air, water, oil, and nature energy expressed in harmonic resonance frequency of ullu love (unconditional love love unconditional love); hereby decree and proclaim Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Libellant(s) are bound as one heart, one spirit, one body in Holy Union as husband and wife as king-zelan-queen-sophia-taniah make this announcement and pronouncement: this Φ Notice of Paramount Claim Φ Claim Of Right Upon Our Φ Divine NatureΦ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ Declaration Of Living Life Will Φis now complete without the Maxims of Law created and enacted on this day; and,

Whereas we the natural born claimant(s)/declarant(s) #1 and #2 won the gift of life when their respective bod’ys were/was conceived:

#1 formally known as and called king-zelan was conceived on or around December 22, 1969 and born raymond-dale of my father’s family hamblin and my mother’s family hyatt adopted into the step father’s family shackelford in 1980 (see attachment identification/data elements)

# 2 formally known as and called queen-sophia-taniah conceived around November 05, 1958 and born lorna-lynne of my father’s family borgeson and my mother’s family ross (see attached identification/data elements), claim and declare our Divine Right as a man and a woman come together joined as one mind, one heart, one breath , one in spirit, and in body as king-zelan-queen-sophia-taniah (see attached Marriage Agreement and Certificate of Marriage); and,

Note: the words “king” and “queen” do not refer to a “title” rather refers to and presents a “state of being”

Whereas make it known for the public record on the public record: we declare and decree, as the source of creation expressing as a man and a woman two heard bound and beating as one heart expressing as the seed with the womb of life together bound as one in heart/mind/spirit coherence; and,

Whereas Affirmant/Claimant/Libellant #1 won the gift of life when his body was conceived around December 22, 1969 through an act of love and by the miracle of life, he was promised the gift of life the day his mother nellie delivered him and he took his first breath on the 14th day in the 9th month September in the imposed Gregorian Earth year 1970; and,

Whereas Affirmant/Claimant/Libellant #2 won the gift of life when her body was conceived around November 05, 1958 through an act of love and by the miracle of life, she was promised the gift of life the day her mother donna elizabeth delivered her and she took her first breath on the 29th day in the 7th month July in the imposed Gregorian Earth year 1959; and,

Whereas we formally denounce and relinquish the unholy registration attempted to rob them and others members o mankind of their right to life when he/she/they were/was issued a “Legal Name” representing a “Legal Person” and given a piece of paper called, “Certificate of Live Birth” or “Birth Certificate”; and,

Whereas we have discovered this piece of fanciful paper is “considered a Birth Bond” and supposedly represents a “Stock Certificate”, yet there is no verifiable proof that such a thing can be created just because someone says so. And is why we retroactively rescind, rebuke, revoke, and rebut such claim; and strong It is also clear to us that the people working as “law Enforcement” for the Border Agencies and for “Municipalities” as a result of poor education and insufficient training, are either unwittingly breaking the laws or willfully breaking the laws as they are written and causing harm and damages to actual property; and to the spirit ; and,

Whereas just because someone has gotten away with labelling us does not make it valid; and

Whereas we now dispel any and all presumptions and assumptions by the men and women and entities working in or for government agencies or claiming to be “royalty” of us being: a “pauper”, a “taxpayer” (people subservient to the “Crown” hiring us in businesses tricked us into being a “taxpayer” when they had us complete forms under the “terms of employment”; and,

Whereas there is no verifiable proof that we are a “citizen.”, or a “citizen of”, a “lieutenant of”, a “resident of,” an “inhabitant of”, a “franchise of,” a “subject of,” a “ward of,” the “property of,” the “chattel of”, or “subject to the jurisdiction of” any army, any “monarch” or any corporate “commonwealth,” “federal,” “state,” “territory,” “county,” “council,” “city,” “municipal body politic,” or other “government” allegedly “created” under the “authority” of a “constitution” or other “enactment”; and,

Whereas we are not subject to any “legislation,” department, or agency created by such “authorities,” nor to the “jurisdiction” of any “employers”, “officers”, or “agents” deriving their “authority” therefrom; and,

Whereas none of their “statutes”, “codes”, “regulations”, “acts of parliament”, or “regulations” of such “authorities” apply to us or have any “jurisdiction” over us; and,

Whereas we are not in the military so not subject to “Military Tribunals”, and we do not support anyone being subjected to “Court Marshall” and treated with violence; as we are not officers therefore never have qualified to be licensed or mandated or held to the “laws” written by the legislators; and,

Whereas we are our own “authority”, the author of our reality as is each member of mankind; and,

Whereas these expressions of source energy known as a man (king-zelan) and a woman(queen-sophia-taniah) are/is not subject of the Laws conjured up by the High Priests/Priestesses of the “Legal Society” and not subject to any “B.A.R. courts” or bound by “precedents” of any “B.A.R. courts,” deriving their “jurisdiction” from an assumed “authority”; and,

Wherea take notice that Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Libellant(s) hereby cancel and make void from the beginning any such “instrument” or any presumed “election” made by any member of “government” or any “agency” or “department” or “church” thereof or any “oligarch”, that Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Libellant(s) #1 and #2 ever has voluntarily elected to be treated as an “alien”, a “civilian”, “tenant”, a “lieutenant”, “subject” of any “monarch” or a “citizen,” or a “citizen of” or a “resident” of any “commonwealth,” “state,” “territory,” “possession,” “instrumentality,” “enclave,” “division,” “district,” or “province,” subject to their “jurisdiction(s)”; and,

Whereas we do not accept being forced to participate in “commerce” as a “commercial instrument” or this expression of life force used as “a human resource”, played out through “war games”; and,

Whereas we are not liable for those “bereft of spirit” or for the “ignorance of” or lack of knowledge of the laws by “any Officer” acting under the “Color of Office”; and,

Whereas, with regard to the “Constitution”: this document supposedly setting forth the foundations of a “country” and “its” “government,” has no inherent authority, or obligation except to the writers of it and those that have taken an “Oath of Office” or “stand under it” as a registered member of the “cult”

Whereas in other words, a “constitution” written and signed by someone else has no authority and we have no obligation at all as a result of its creation, unless as a contract between two or more individuals, and then it is limited only to those individuals who have specifically entered into it with full comprehension as to the ramifications of such an agreement; and,

Whereas at most, such a document could be a contract between the existing people at the time of its creation, but no one has the right, authority, or power to bind their posterity; and

Whereas have it be known that we have not knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally entered any such “constitution” contract to oblige us thereby, therefore such a document is inapplicable to us, and anyone claiming to derive their “authority” from such a document has no “jurisdiction” over us, our life force, or how we chose to experience life; and,

Whereas upon reading case law it is clear that the men and women called, “Judges” have made their judgments and have written these judgments from a specific mindset obtaining their thoughts from an extremely low state of consciousness, and from a low state of mental and spiritual intelligence by which they conceive their ideas and make their “judgments” as such it is our duty to expose them and expose from which they derive their presumptions and assumptions; and of which we as natural born (woman) are not party to; and

Whereas we will not be forced to participate in wearing a face covering (put on a mask) or be forced to do anything under the “presumption” or “assumptions” of any “Public Health Authority”; and,

Whereas we are not the “class of persons” as defined by the “Law Society” that wrote the 22 U.S. Code § 1621 – Definitions or any other statutes, codes, ordinances, bills, or corporate policy; and

Let the bright Light of Truth as facts shining upon this authentic writing being notice of My, Our, Φ Paramount Claim upon – and absolute dominion over – all land and property marked by My, Our,Φ Divine Nature Φ Divine Proportion Essence Φ. The Divine Proportion Φ has been known throughout the Ages as a “relation” – in perfect proportion – of the whole to its parts. It is a relationship so perfect that its parts are to each other as the whole is to its larger part. This “Divine Fractal” describes the course and perfection of Nature as a “whole” and is known world wide by the Greek symbol – Φ. It is My, Our, Φ intent through this Notice of Paramount Claim upon My, Our Φ Divine Nature Φ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ to reveal to all the world the “One” true living owner of all land or property marked by My, Our, Φ Divine Nature Φ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ passed on from conception through the Will and Testament of both My Φ Father Φ and Mother Φ and all Those Φ before Them Φ. My, Our, Φ Divine Nature Φ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ – evidenced by My, Our, Φ physical arrival/“state”(1), with afterbirth/residue/remains, and “breath of life” vitality “χ” – “y” – constitutes the totality of all

ie-I king-zelan and ie-I queen-sophia-taniah

formally known as king-zelan-raymond-dale-queen-sophia-taniah-lorna-lynne

Man/Life/Light

|————————– Φ Divine Proportion Φ ———————-

“Man, know thyself in true proportion” shall be supported always and in all ways Oracle of Delphi in and with vaibrational harmonic resonance to ensure full embodiment be made realized to hereby affirm and declare we do not agree with the use of manipulation of lower density entities and/or technology that interferes with our unique energy signature in any way

Φ Father – The term sperm refers to the male reproductive cells and is derived from the Greek word (σπέρμα) sperma (meaning “seed”). In the types of sexual reproduction known asanisogamy and oogamy, there is a marked difference in the size of the gametes with the smaller one being termed the “male” or sperm cell. A uniflagellar sperm cell that is motile is referred to as a spermatozoon, whereas a non-motile sperm cell is referred to as a spermatium. Sperm cells cannot divide and have a limited life span, but after fusion with egg cells during fertilization, a new organism begins developing, starting as a totipotent zygote. The male sperm cell (seed|) is haploid, so that its 23 chromosomes can join the 23 chromosomes of the female cell (egg) to form a diploid cell. In mammals.

The sperm develops in the testicles and is released from the penis following coitus and orgasm

Φ Mother – The ova are developed from the primitive germ cells which are emedded in the substance of the ovaries. Each primitive germ cell gives rise, by repeated divisions, to a number of smaller cells termed oögonia, from which the ova or primary oöcytes are developed. Female ova are extremely minute, measuring about 0.2 mm in diameter, and are enclosed within the egg follicles of the ovaries; as a rule each follicle contains a single ovum, but sometimes two or more are present. By the enlargement and subsequent rupture of a follicle at the surface of the ovary, an ovum is liberated and conveyed by the uterine tube to the cavity of the uterus. Unless it is fertilized it undergoes no further development and is discharged from the uterus, but if fertilization take place it is retained within the uterus and is developed into a new being.

Φ The “First” of Myself – A zygote (from Greek ζυγωτός zygōtos “joined” or “yoked”, from ζυγο νῦ zygoun “to join” or “to yoke”), is the initial cell formed when two gamete cells are joined by means of sexual reproduction. In multicellular organisms, it is the earliest developmental stage of the embryo. A zygote is always synthesized from the union of two gametes, and constitutes the first stage in a unique organism’s development. Zygotes are usually produced by a fertilization event between two haploid cells – an ovum (female gamete) and a sperm cell (male gamete) – which combine to form the single diploid cell. Such zygotes contain DNA derived from both parents, and this provides all the genetic information necessary to form a new being.

Φ = Divine Proportion/Golden Ratio = = 1.618033988749894848204586834…

As the Divine Φ Sovereign Φ Authority with Absolute Φ Dominion over all that I AM, We Are, Φ α ω χ -Φ α ω y- let it be exceptionally clear to all the world that My, Our, Φ will is to keep My, Our, Φ Divine Nature Φ Divine Proportion Φ Manifest Essence Φ free of all Religious, Political, Commercial,, or “constructive” contamination, fear, – forever expressing in a state of harmlessness, harmlessness to self and harmlessness to others. Let My, Our, Φ will be done here and now through the word, hand, breath, and deed of the peaceful One – Man χ / king-zelan with One- woman y queen-sophia-taniah – for I AM, We Are Are, Φ α ω χ-Φ α ω y . Let no man, women, person, clergy, cleric, politician, minister, officer, entity, or other, etc., ever act in My. Our, Φ behalf, deny man χ / king-zelan or deny woman y/queen-sophai-taniah My/Our Φ Divine Φ Sovereign Φ Authority and Absolute Φ Dominion over the Testament of My/Our Φ Kingdom claim that I AM, We Are, Φ α ω χ – Φ α ω y in no way and never have been incapacitated, missing, or dead – for in fact and Truth…

We hereby, serve Notice to any man, woman, person, clergy, cleric, politician, minister,, governor, officer, entity, doing business as or acting for a religious organization, government, corporation or business of any type, who believes they possess authority to Administer our Property without our consent, expressed in the form of an obligation (contract) containing our wet ink autograph separately or jointly, that we have personal knowledge of and asseverate the following:

1. claim and declare we, a man, king-raymond-zelan with a women queen-sophia-taniah, separately or jointly have no obligation [contract] with any man, women, person, clergy, cleric, politician, minister, officer, entity, or other, etc., doing business as, or acting for a corporation or a government politic or a business off any type that we did not enter into without full disclosure, knowledge, and complete transparency of the nature and terms of said contract
2. claim and declare we, a man, king-raymond-zelan with, a woman, queen-sophia-taniah all certification and licensing are based in fraud and are false
3. claim and declare we, a man, king-raymond-zelan with , a woman, queen-sophia-taniah have not relinquished rights to any man, women, person, entity, or other, etc., doing business as or acting as a, person, clergy, cleric, politician, minister, officer for a business or corporation or government of any type.
4. claim and declare we king-zelan-raymond-queen-sophia-taniah of the shackefold-borgeson have no obligation [contract] to acknowledge, believe, or adhere to laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, etc. authored by other man, women, person, lawyers, clergy, cleric, politician, minister, entity, or other, etc
5. claim and declare we did not come forth into physical form to be lied to, harassed, intimidated, molested, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, or physically
6. claim and declare we did not come forth into physical form to be a human resourse or for any ones pleasure buy our own
7. claim and declare we have been deprived of the necessities of life
8. claim and declare there is no valid contract of me being a person, a citi
9. claim and declare this body, information, and genetic material, now known as king-zelan-queen-sophia taniah are our Property (1)(a) claim the words king and queen do not represent a title rather they are a state of being
10. claim and declare our offspring, separately and or jointly, are unique, autonomous, sovereign expressions of source energy and while under the age of consent, are under our care and it is our duty to serve and protect their spirit, their mind, their psyche, their physical body and it is our duty as their mother and father to preserve their spirit and support them in thier reason for being
11. claim and declare our standing and place on and of earth
12. claim a business name is not natural and is not in the nature of things thus is not a requirement for dealing with others during our life experience on earth
13. claim and declare the sons and daughters of man are not property of any man, woman, or person, doing business as, or acting for, a corporation, government politic of any type
14. claim and declare asking for money to file documents is barratry a justice is not for sale or for hire
15. anyone man, women, person, clergy, entity,or other in violation of the law and violating this living life will shall loose all freedoms and be subject to the attached fee scheduled

I AM, We Are , Φαωχ – Φαωy – Absolute – Omnipresent – Aware, Conscious, and Fully Alive χ

You are now knowing

Attachments(s):

1. https://freedomdove.net/2021/05/14/law-enforcers-are-supposed-to-know-due-process-of-law/
2. Pronouncement and Announcement Notice of Claim Decree The Establishment Of The Holy Church of Gaia
3. Notice of Claim; Royal Decree Of Fee Schedule

DNA SAMPLE

king-zelan queen

-sophia-taniah

The truth the whole truth nothing but the truth

 And as much as we despise labels we shall say, “we are law abiding, non-combative, non-militant, non-resident, non-subject, non-citizen, non-alien,

Superior beings of light and love with respect for all life.

Restoring the supremacy of love and restoring abundance for all sui juris”,

it is written, it is spoken, so shall it be

as pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1746 – Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury                                          “We the Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s) declare and verify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this day the 21^st  day of March in the imposed Gregorian Earth Year of 2021 and amended on the 25th day of May @1 pm PST of the same year again amended on the eight day of the tenth month October and again on the fifteenth day 15th of the same year 2021@1630

 without recourse, respectfully,    

/s/ king-zelan-raymond-dale-queen-sophia-taniah-lorna-lynneof the shackelford-borgeson family

beneficial entitlement holders in due course,

without dishonor, without prejudice, ill will, or frivolity, 

all rights retained and reserved, non-assumpsit,

errors and omissions expected and accepted

www.freedomdove.net

www.covidtruthsrevealed.com

http://www.warriorcalls.com

http://www.lawfulliving.com

Witnesses:

/s/witnessed by queen-gurine [richard]

/s/witnessed by queen-pamela-ariah [kachowski]

beneficial entitlement holder in due course, free cosmic being

Done in good faith, given with patent intent of original fiat source

Anyone that believes themselves to have a superior right to the properties must step forward within 30 days of the date of this “Public Notice” or forever hold their peace. Send claim by sending an email to shackdale@gmail.com and to email sophiataniateam@protonmail.com

The truth the whole truth nothing but the truth

   And as much as we despise labels we shall say, “we are law abiding, non-combative,

non-militant, non-resident, non-subject, non-citizen, non-alien,

Superior beings of light and love with respect for all life.

Restoring the supremacy of love and restoring abundance for all sui juris”,

it is written, it is spoken, so shall it be

as pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1746 – Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury                                              

“We the Affirmant(s)/Claimant(s)/Liabelant(s)  declare and verify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this day the 21^st  day of March in the imposed Gregorian Earth Year of 2021 and amended on the 25th day of May @1 pm PST of the same year again amended on the eight day of the tenth month October of the same year 2021

 without recourse, respectfully,    

/s/ king-zelan-queen-sophia-taniah [shackelford-borgeson]

      responsible parties and holders in due course, beneficial entitlement holders,

without dishonor, without prejudice, ill will, or frivolity, 

all rights retained and reserved, non-assumpsit,

errors and omissions expected and accepted

www.freedomdove.net

www.covidtruthsrevealed.com

http://www.warriorcalls.com

http://www.lawfulliving.com

Witnesses:

/s/witnessed by queen-gurine [richard]

/s/witnessed by queen-pamela-ariah [kachowski]

Definitions for all documents created by and for us king-raymond-dale-queen-sophia-taniah in alignment with the “higher self” for the “Holy Church of Gaia

Holy Church of Gaia Definitions:

“being born” the term “being born” refers to the natural delivery of a baby or the extraction via c-section of the baby from the uterus.    

“hu” the word “hu” refers to light (to be knowledgeable) it is a love song to God/the cosmos/the Earth/Higher Self, singing ‘hu” carries with it a specific vibrational harmonic resonance. It is meant to assist the speaker to experience divine love, ullu love, heal a broken heart and offer solace during times of grief as it brings peace and calm.

            “When your day is hard, remember to sing “hu” as it will put the singer in line with the Holy Spirit” harold Klemp      

“human beings” we are not just “human beings “we are hu man holy sacred and when balance harmonically we are in a safe place no other way only two path to life and  two paths to love .one book of the dead and that of “love n light” Source Divine Unconditional Love. All activities that put in resonance with the “book of the dead” and which separates us from our true essence highest level spiritual life and in alignment with the “freedom of Love”, free from tyranny. So, what is said to the letter seriously is that there is no charge in love. Love has no remorse; love does not condemn so those that know love do not need forgiveness. Those that are in the frequency of love are balanced and in harmonic resonance with the “higher self” they are in a “safe place “free from fear, in the “holy sacred heart” with “inner child” in vibrational alignment with the “adult”, this realignment is the only true way. It is up to each unique energy signature to recognise when they are acting or reacting from their “wounded inner child “so that they can take the steps towards integration and in mind/heart coherence.

“human” refers to a man of light; a man knowledgeable and embody in the light of truth; a god/goddess; a human is holy sacred balanced in harmony and grace and is always in a safe place being consciously aware and attuned to the moment of now in the flow of “ullu love” is synonymous with “unconditional-love love love unconditional-love” [created by chief white buffalo (bison)]

a human has no remorse, where once the inner child felt separate and lost in darkness it is brought back into the sacred heart of its truth with all attachments to the painful story integrated releasing the body from pain and misery and in this expression, it realizes it is in a safe place in harmony and balance in the holy sacred heart.

 “humanoid” refers to a man that has acquired an alter ego, the mind of a humanoid is programmed to separation consciousness therefore they are void of the remembrance of the oneness of all life, and is operating from the resonant disharmonic frequency of fear in all its expression (anger, resentment, shame, blame, guilt, resentment, jealousy, abandonment, etc.) whereby moving the unique energy signature and expression of source out of hear-mind coherence

A humanoid is spiritually bereft, and emotionally and mentally deranged, exhibiting narcissistic and/or psychopathic tendencies,

A humanoid lacks reasonability, and are void of conscience, ethics, and morality.

A humanoid is disempowered as they are driven by their addictions.

A “humanoid” can be a man like creature that operates from fear or has been created from fear and follows the path of the “Book of The Dead”, its actions are driven by fear as it has lost all the attributes that make it a human. These attributes are empathy, insight, compassion, and “love”

A “humanoid’ can be an entity that “is following the path of death as it has lost its relationship with it’s source of life and seeks out the “human” as an energy source; all “humanoid” are out of vibrational harmonic resonance with its source of life; either by acquiring fear or being born of fear it has no concept of “love” and “is void of “ullu love” (the expressed physical vessel  is not sensitised to feel the subtle harmonic resonance of “ullu “, unconditional-love, love, love, “unconditional love”:

The resonant frequencies of anger, resentment, shame, blame, guilt, jealousy, abandonment, etc. keep humanoids connected to the “Book of the Dead” as their spirit is resonating at these lower frequency states which separates them from their true essence and keeping them from attaining their highest level of spiritual life expression as “the freedom of love”. These people are keeping themselves from being written eternally in the “Book of Life”           

“ie/I” is a compound word and is synonymous with and interchangeable with (we, us, our)                                   ie is a personal pronoun referring to the biological electromagnetic sentient being, mind, spirit, complex,                                     I for all intensive purposes shall refer to the eternal soul, source, infinite awareness, I am that I am.

“ie/I,we, us, our” refers to king-zelan-god-father-queen-sophia-taniah goddess-mother all of our offspring separately and jointly from the beginning, and this sentient being known as Gaia aka Earth. All is in the one and the one is in the all.

The use of any one of these word(s) “ie/I, we, us, our” in this or any other document created by us is to include all aspects of this expression known as a human including yet not exclusively the “higher self” also known as “the inner being”, the offspring of with all family members past, present, and future associated,

Note: The use of these word(s) “ie/I, we, us, our” does not refer to the “Legal Name” or “Legal Person” or anything that is not organic or aligned with the balance of the Natural World conjured up by the “Papacy”       

 “light of truth” this refers to a man encompassing the knowledge of creation as a result of direct experience, “the light of truth” this statement is not something that can be taught, it must be experienced      

 “man” the word “man” can be used to refer to a male (having a penis)and when healthy is able of being a father, it can also be used to refer to a female (having a womb)and when healthy is able of being a mother           

“natural born” the term “natural born” refers to the process of insemination of an egg, fetal development in utero, followed with the process of being born from the womb (the uterus)                 

 “people” the word “people” is specific to include natural men and women and their offspring       

 “Sacred Marriage” the term “Sacred Marriage” refers to a man and women coming together in “Holy Matrimony” as an act of being married to one another. They are gifting their bodies to each other, as the come together as one in spirit, each heart beating as one, committed to each one in “ullu love” with the promise to care for one another in harmlessness to self and harmlessness to the other.              

“ullu love” the term “ullu love” is a love without conditions as the mind has full insight in the moment while in interaction with self and others, in this state of being the ego personality/mind is free of conditions, this refers to a mind free of misery as it has experienced the “unconditional love” of its source of expression, the physical body of those that are embodied as “ullu love” have released all attachment to the “intellectual mind” are thus free of pain and misery, in this detached state there is no longer resistance between the various aspects of the expression all expressions are in harmonic resonant frequency alignment.  

 “world” refers to ‘man’s existence and all expressions of existence here as life on earth

**************8888888888888888888888888888888888888**************

The following videos are useful if we are interested in holding the “Public Servants” accountable

Q&A With Rod Class #1

Alphonse is another man that is making head way in court!

The 6 Step Process

How to Deal with Debt Collectors

Staying Out Of Their Courts