#CourtWatch #DueProcess #JudicialNotice #LegalResearch #KnowYourRights #TrafficCourt #CourtProcedure #CivicEducation #PublicRecord #Accountability
Editor’s note: This is a verbatim-style transcript of a short video clip shared on social media. It reflects the speaker’s claims and terminology. Readers are encouraged to verify legal assertions using primary sources (statutes, court rules, case law, and official records).
This article is subject to change when new information comes in!
Nisi Prius Court System “Codified in 1935” | Matt Schneider (Reel Transcript)
Source: Matt Schneider (Reels)
Date captured: February 21, 2026 (9:23 PM)
Length: 3:36
[Transcript — edited for clarity and obvious spelling/punctuation]
“Box in a judge in any type of case you’re involved in. U.S. citizens, state citizens — it makes no difference. This is a general judicial notice that affects everybody.
Okay. This is ‘Demand for Judicial Notice of Rule Nisi within a Nisi Prius Court.’ I’ll read this, and I’ll explain how it operates.
‘Notice is hereby given on [blank day] of [blank], 1996, at 1330 hours, or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard in courtroom [blank] of the above-entitled court. We move the court to take judicial notice of the following paragraph:
This court is part of the Nisi Prius Court System, codified in 1935.
The Nisi Prius Courts are — quote — “such as held for the trial of issues of fact before a jury and one presiding judge.” That comes from Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, page 1197.
This court, by being part of the Nisi Prius Court System, must follow Rule Nisi, which is — quote — “a rule which will become imperative and final unless cause be shown against it.”
This rule commands the party to show cause why it should not be compelled to do the act required, or why the object of the rule should not be enforced.’ That comes from Black’s Law Dictionary, page 1497.
Paragraph.
Since this court can require compelled performance — which is only allowed in a court which is enforcing some type of contract — it is hornbook law that all contracts are either in equity or admiralty for enforcement purposes.
Contract law forbids unjust enrichment to either party. Thus, based upon the foregoing, this court must take judicial notice that this court is merely enforcing some type of contract that would allow Rule Nisi to apply.
Therefore, the court should dismiss this matter if the prosecution does not produce a contract, or prove with admissible evidence that the accused was involved in the activity being regulated — with admissible evidence that invokes authority of the court.
Hearsay or presumptions will not be permitted, since this is a criminal trial where an accused justly demands due process secured to him by the state constitution.’
We filed this notice on a traffic ‘no driver’s license’ case in Santa Barbara.
And the judge says, ‘Yep, I’m accepting this.’ He says, ‘All the courts in the nation are Nisi Prius courts. They’re all contract courts.’
When you get a traffic summons, that’s a Nisi Prius summons. It’s an order to show cause. So you have to take the rocks out of your wheelbarrow and put it in the government’s wheelbarrow.
You make them prove you’re involved in the activity being regulated.
And the judge up in Superior Court there in Santa Barbara told the prosecutor, ‘Mr. Prosecutor, you know what you have to prove. If you don’t prove it, I’m dismissing this case.’
So what do they have to prove in a traffic case?
First: you’re a person — a legal entity.
Second: you’re involved in commercial activity.
Two: you’re an alien.
Three: you’re not entitled to any rights or privileges.
Four: that you’re a second-class citizen.
Five: that you don’t have the right to own property.
Six… I can go on and on. I can give you about 20 different things they’ve got to prove.”
Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1170134145308806
Comments verbatim as of February 21, 2026{
My question, what are they hiding behind the curtains while this whole scheme is happening? Everyone’s eyes are on this mess, so tell me what else is happening elsewhere that the main populations attention is being diverted away from seeing?
Subscriber
Javy Mcdees Rachelle Lofgran your job to prove it
Christie Ricker Javy Mcdees could you post the whole paper ?
Subscriber
Javy Mcdees Christie Ricker 3949a
Iowa Chapman Rachelle Lofgran stealing wealth
Christie Ricker Rachelle Lofgran thank you
Tracywillnot Bsilenced Rachelle Lofgran they’re not publicizing when citizens are thrown in jail for fighting for their rights. They’ve jailed folks for refusing to plea and challenging jurisdiction.
Dennis Andrew Rachelle Lofgran
Of course there are scripted orchestrations happening behind closed doors.
Joel Bob Rachelle it’s how they get paid, unjust enrichment.
How does it work for criminal? Anyone know? Thanks.
Shannon Hill didn’t work for me I went to the penitentiary. The person filing the charges drop the case. The state picked it up and prosecuted me.
Harrison Winston Shannon Hill look up Winston Harrison Jr in case search for Maryland 1972
Harrison Winston Shannon Hill once you see I have done it for over ten years in court I can help
Can this be used well after the fact??? And can it be used on other cases they are not traffic related??
Nisi prius courts.
Can we get a copy of that
This is what I’m fighting now 
I need to see this entire video. Where can I find it?
It’s urgent
Kris Boldenow Kim Fry Richard McDonald YouTube he’s got like three of them
Kris Boldenow Thank you. 
I do believe this applies in Canada 
as well.
Sébastien LoyerJim Davis ucc and or ccc.
What is this gentleman’s name again?
Good Ol. Richard James McDonald
Subscriber
This is in my case file as well
I missed something! Can someone give me the cliff notes as to what this is about?
It works
Exactly.
Non Assumpsit
Without Recourse, I’ve just added that to my AUTOGRAPH 
Tim Robinson DeJure Sui Juris alograph
Harrison Winston DeJure Sui Juris my signature is without prejudice ucc 1-308 Nisi Prius works look up Winston Harrison Jr case search 1972 Marryland
Beautiful 
I didn’t know that we have certainly rights
I made a Facebook group called C.A.N. State Citizen it has a template for you to make your document so you can file it into your case. I appear through my Instrument because 1 Fact people overlook is … How can a living man appear within a Fiction? Now you see why people get judged as incompetent
Can’t find it is it public or private?
Sophia-Taniah Love Mike School please provide the link to this group
Does this wk for a divorce and they’re taking everything I own n wkd for? Including my land my ranch my horses and my right to see the kids
Curious if could apply anybody that has a drivers license….
As we Sheeple are conditioned to do….
it don’t work today it just don’t
WE NEED THIS CASE GUYS!!!!! WHERE IS IT!!! What’s THE CITATION!!??? RETIRED PARALEGAL
Does this apply to family/ juvenile court?
HOLD THESE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ONCE!!! THEY SCAMMED US ALL!!! THE WHOLE SYSTEM NEEDS TO GO!!!!! 
Can we get a copy ?
______________________
1) What these terms actually mean
“Nisi prius”
In modern U.S. usage, “nisi prius” basically means a trial court / court of original jurisdiction (as contrasted with an appellate court). It’s a historical Latin label, not a secret “system.”
“Rule nisi” / “order nisi”
A rule nisi is a conditional order “to show cause”—it becomes final unless someone shows a reason why it shouldn’t.
There’s even a federal statute (All Writs Act) that uses the phrase “rule nisi,” but it’s about writs and court power in aid of jurisdiction—not a doctrine that turns every case into “contract enforcement.”
2) The “codified in 1935” claim
I could not find any authoritative statute/case that creates a “nisi prius court system codified in 1935” the way the clip states it.
What I did find is that exact phrase repeated in templates and social posts (including the exact “Demand for Judicial Notice…” language), which suggests this “1935 codified system” line is part of a circulating script/template—not a recognized legal classification.
3) Where the clip goes off the rails
These are the big leaps:
“Because it’s nisi prius, the court must follow rule nisi”
No. “Nisi prius” is just a label for trial-level courts. It doesn’t impose a universal procedural “rule nisi” requirement in every case. Judicial notice rules also have limits: courts can only notice certain kinds of facts/laws and generally not disputed factual theories.
“Compelled performance = contract enforcement, therefore prosecution must produce a contract”
That’s not how criminal/traffic enforcement works in U.S. law. Traffic and licensing cases are ordinarily statutory enforcement, not contract suits.
For example, Indiana law expressly requires a valid driver’s license/permit to operate upon a highway. That’s a statute-based requirement, not a contract.
“They must prove you’re a legal entity, in commerce, an alien, second-class citizen…”
That list isn’t the legal elements of a typical traffic charge. It reads like an ideological checklist, not a charging-element checklist.
4) Real-world court reaction to this “Rule Nisi / Nisi Prius” filing style
Courts regularly treat these kinds of filings as non-meritorious when they’re not grounded in facts and recognized causes of action. For example, one federal order (S.D.W. Va.) referencing a “Demand for Judicial Notice of Rule Nisi in a Nisi Prius Court” criticized the lack of factual support and legal adequacy.
That doesn’t mean a person can’t win a case—but it’s a warning that this exact template approach often backfires.
5) About the comments: “3949a”
Someone replying “3949a” is almost certainly referencing IRS Form 3949-A (Information Referral), used to report alleged tax law violations.
(That’s separate from the nisi prius topic—it’s just a commenter pivoting into tax-reporting.)
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment