This meme does not reflect the truth of the proclamation. Blanket statements like this are part of the problem, not the solution. It is not that people “act as Roman citizens” — it is that officials make presumptions, treating names as if they were businesses. Our task is to stop repeating falsehoods, ask better questions, and restore clarity.
Michael John On NorthCarolina published the following public proclamation on Facebook, and I felt compelled to republish both the original post and selected comments for those interested in this subject as an educational tool.
This is a conversation that goes beyond commentary—it is a call to awareness and action. The themes touch directly on the authority of the BAR Association, the misuse of private contracts, and the ongoing confusion between citizenship and sovereignty.
At the foundation of this issue lies the critical distinction between Public and Private:
- Public refers to public office, where authority is exercised through contractual obligations, statutes, rules, regulations, and constitutions. Public officials are in place to govern the business of government, always bound by their oath and fiduciary duty to serve for the benefit of the people.
- Private refers to Natural Law, where life is guided by conscience, compassion, and responsibility. It is the realm of the benevolent heart—the capacity to recognize harm and the responsibility to self-correct without coercion.
When these two realms are blurred, officials risk abandoning their true public duty and instead impose private contractual presumptions upon the people. This confusion is the very mechanism by which BAR associations and their courts extend unlawful control over living men and women.
At the end of this article, I have included a clear action plan and invite you, the reader, to share ideas and strategies for how we can move forward together with this as a tool for resolving issues with members of the BAR Association and their courts.
pedntoSrosml7lhh7607309hciu39211lf1g7gc9h311tcu94l7h9gg6fht0 ·
International Public Proclamation: No Private Law is Superior 
We accept the idea that the right of the individual to privately contract is unlimited—within the realm of his or her person, but that does not overcome the Public, International, and Natural Law already established.
A mafia assassin can’t avoid murder charges by claiming he had a contract to do it.
Private contracts cannot and do not overcome Public Law.
If the opposite premise prevails any crime could be “legalized” at whim and on an individual basis.
When public and private law get commingled and public interest presumes to create private contracts and impose them in secret on individuals, a corollary situation exists:
No public-private contract can overcome Public Law, either.
If slavery is abolished in the Public Law, no government can privately contract with individuals to enslave them.
This is precisely what has happened to create the web of venal interlocking trust directorships operated by the Bar Associations in the form of “public interest trusts” which are all based on either the acceptance or rejection of citizenship obligations.
That’s why they are so hot to describe everyone as a “citizen” and to presume that everyone they see is a “citizen” under private contract to perform public duties.
This is their “hook” used to illegally latch onto you and your property assets and what they use to subject you to their foreign Roman Law.
They have put False Claims in place and have claimed to own you as a slave known as a “citizen of the United States”.
We have exposed the whole system of illegal and immoral latching that takes place when your Mother is asked, “Is your baby a citizen of the United States?”
Thinking that they are talking about our country, The United States, and not knowing and not being told the definition of “citizen” millions upon millions of American mothers gave the wrong answer, and for six generations the Vermin have capitalized on that “citizenship contract” that your Mother unknowingly created for you when you were still a baby in your cradle.
Today, we proclaim all such undisclosed and inequitable private citizenship contracts imposed upon infants to be null and void and all Legal Presumptions based on the idea that people are or must be either “U.S. Citizens” or “citizens of the United States” or both, to be equally null and void.
We deny and repudiate the idea that a public trust interest in living flesh and private assets results from any public service or undisclosed private citizenship contract promising future public service.
Our Natural Rights are inalienable and cannot be sold, bought, or given away by any contract, much less an unconscionable one.
Today, we declare that all such illegal latching upon American babies is null and void from the instant such a citizenship contract was deemed to exist and the right of an individual to contract does not extend to the creation of any private contract to break Public and Natural Law.
Nobody can form any valid contract to enslave himself or anyone else in a world where slavery is outlawed.
Today, we also declare the British Crown Corporation and its franchises to be operating in Insurrection against International and Public and Natural Law, including but not limited to 10 USC 253 by seeking to impersonate and enslave individual living people via an impersonation scheme based on the aforementioned undisclosed and merely presumed to exist citizenship contracts.
We further declare the British Crown Corporations to be operating private corporate tribunals under color of law and False Pretense of being public courts and having lawful and legal authorities never granted to them. They have operated these courts for purposes of coercive racketeering and plundering of non-existent public trusts and public trust interests based on these same undisclosed and otherwise unconscionable foreign citizenship contracts.
The rulings and orders of all such administrative courts aka, Territorial and Municipal CORPORATE tribunals misapplied to living people are null and void for fraud and where any transfer of actual property is involved, these “COURTS” are engaged in racketeering under force and color of law.
This illegal confiscation is against our Public Law, our International Law and the Natural Law the people of this country are owed.
We declare the members of the Bar Associations who have provided the means to set up and enforce these merely presumed to exist foreign citizenship contracts and who are enforcing False Legal presumptions attendant to them, to be in insurrection against the government of this country and we order Mr. Donald J. Trump to immediately take Notice of this International Proclamation and to bring his operations into compliance with International, Public and Natural Law and to enforce against the Municipal CORPORATIONS hired by the Territorial “States” to provide them and their U.S. Citizens with separate public services, so as to prevent them from any further illegal and immoral false claims against the
American People you are all supposed to serve.
We, the Americans and our sovereign nation-states, accept all gifts without strings attached and waive all benefits of foreign servitude in any purely or partially imaginary “state” of being or servitude attaching to foreign citizens living in The United States.
Members of the Bar Associations who continue to operate corporate tribunals under color of law and who continue to accidentally-on-purpose misaddress Americans as if they were foreign citizens, or intestate public trust “property”, are offering continued Insurrection and must be arrested and charged without further delay.
Under both Roman Municipal Law and Roman Civil Law, fraud is deadly to all claims, so even under the forms of law they administer, these men and women are found lacking.
We declare all public trust interests alleged to exist as a result of the aforementioned undisclosed private foreign citizenship contracts to be null and void and unenforceable.
Any scheme to deprive any American of any guarantee or right or service provided under any Federal Constitution or under Natural Law, no matter how this end is achieved, is an act of insurrection: 10 USC 253., whether by a foreign state or a domestic enemy, a commercial corporation, or a municipal corporation or any private guild, union, society, association or club —-or Roman Municipal Trust —- all Principals and Officers stand condemned for fraud and evasion of their own obligation to provide our people with essential government services in “good faith” and must cease and desist the herein described practices and assertions of private foreign citizenship contracts and foreign public trust interests based on such contracts being insupportably held against Americans and against our Public Interest.
The offending corporate tribunals including all “local” STATE Municipal Corporation Tribunals and CORPORATIONS pretending to be “Judiciary Courts” must be shut down immediately for fraud and racketeering.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger— Fiduciary
The United States of America
Alaska Supreme Court Justice
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
September 21st 2025
________________________________
Comments:
Joe PesekThe Constitution protects the living man or woman, not the corporate fictionly
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveDear Joe Pesek,
The Constitution does not protect the corporate fiction—it restrains it. The corporate fiction is the artificial person (judge, lawyer, attorney, politician, clerk, doctor, etc.), and those offices are what the Constitution applies to.
The living man or woman is not inside the Constitution—we are above it. We are named in the Preamble as “We the People.” The Constitution was written as a contract to secure our unalienable rights and to bind public servants, not to define or limit us. 
Joe Pesek Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveThe meme may catch attention, but it actually detracts from the proclamation because it spreads false information. Blanket statements like “you are acting as a Roman citizen” only add to the confusion. The truth is, most people have no idea they were registered into a system where officials are trained to treat their given name as if it were a business in commerce. That presumption sits quietly in the background until the day we wake up and realize we’ve been lied to.
The strongest statutory proof that a “U.S. citizen” is treated as a business is found in 15 U.S. Code § 4724, which literally defines a “United States business” to include a “United States citizen.” That’s not interpretation—that’s legislative language.
Other statutes reinforce this:
26 U.S. Code § 7701(a)(1) defines “person” as individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation.
26 U.S. Code § 7701(a)(26) says “trade or business” includes public office.
26 U.S. Code § 7701(a)(30) defines “United States person” to include citizens, corporations, estates, and trusts.
Taken together, these statutes loop “citizen” → “person” → “business entity” → “taxpayer.” By presumption, anyone identified as a “U.S. citizen” is treated as a business in commerce, under federal jurisdiction, subject to taxes, licenses, and penalties. This raises a deeper question: are we being qualified as importers of goods every time we go to the till as a “customer” and “purchaser”? In commerce, those terms imply that a man or woman is acting not in their private capacity, but in a regulated trade or business role.
The truth is, most of us—including myself—still move through daily life without fully questioning what we are actually engaging in when we stand at the till. We swipe a card or hand over cash, and the system silently records the act as a commercial transaction tied to a business entity. It is only when we begin asking what these words mean, and why they are applied to us, that the presumptions start to unravel.
I share these facts because I believe people deserve clarity. I would have appreciated being offered this information before I had to discover it the hard way. When we see the statutory language for ourselves, the presumption loses its power. Powerful words, “show me the record”.
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveI asked at vital statistics “what is the Birth Registration if for?” and was told, “it is for registering an event”. Why do they lie? 
If being a “U.S. citizen” is just your natural identity, why is it a federal crime to “falsely represent” yourself as one?
Body / Punchline
At birth, we are registered and presumed into a “citizenship” contract we never consented to.
But under 18 USC 911, falsely claiming U.S. citizenship is a federal offense.
Why is our very identity framed as something punishable by law?
Maybe because it isn’t about identity at all—it’s about jurisdiction and control.
Tagline
Time to question the presumptions.
Ken Scottoh Anna Von this sounds very familiar to what i just sent forward on VOID !!! and is timed as though there was some inspiration found somewhere, keep it simple and people will see it …. is it honest information to use a living wo/mans date of birth for a STATE SUB CORPORATION created LEGAL NAME created on a different date (file registration date) ? or is it VOID?
What Is “Void”?
Void means: It never existed in truth.
It has no force. No foundation. No moral standing.
It is null because it lacks consent, knowledge, authority, and honesty.
When something is void, it is not defective—it is non-existent in lawful or moral substance. To enforce what is void is not “law enforcement”—it is deception backed by violence.
Ken Scottreal id’s drivers licenses, state Id’s anywhere they have co mingled our date of creation with their STATE created LEGAL NAMES is void, there is no contract, there is no obligation and NO LOSS OF RIGHTS they can hold anyone to, wake the fuck up and stop spreading bullshit , the system is done, be prepared to fight for ye life, because they will want to use what they always use, FORCE !!!
Ye would need to be lie ve the lie in the supposed contract, it is all in ye mind, once people no longer want to be a part of the lie, its game over, i keep telling ye all it is already over, now comes manifestation time
trying to make a business out that which is VOID !!! is quite a task, the guru’s know that when critical mass is reached they no longer have a business model out of that which is VOID !!! so they will continue to try to pull people into trying to fix what is VOID !!!
Once you see the lie? realize its VOID !!! nothing to counter, to counter that which is VOID !! is to only say it was valid in the 1st place
In law, “void” means having no legal effect whatsoever, rendering an action, document, or transaction an absolute nullity—treated by the law as if it never existed or happened.
A void contract, for example, is invalid from the outset and cannot be enforced by either party because it lacks legal force or binding effect from the moment it was created.
This status often arises when a contract involves illegal activities, violates public policy, or is entered into under duress, making it void ab initio, meaning it is invalid from the beginning.
Unlike a voidable contract, which is initially valid but can be canceled by one party, a void contract cannot be ratified or cured by any action, as it is fundamentally unenforceable.
Ken Scottpublic notice : NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT Attention Dave Kerner: and any and all agents of agency receiving this declaration :
It has come to my attention If a Florida DMV clerk knowingly substitutes a biological date of birth (DOB) in place of a legally designated file registration date (FRD) when issuing a driver license or state ID, and does so in a way that misrepresents the official legal identity or misleads the system, that does constitute the processing of false information, especially if the information contradicts what’s legally documented It is submitted or certified under penalty of perjury by the applicant The clerk does so knowingly or with intent to mislead. Is the file date legally documented on a birth certificate & cert. of live birth? an overwhelming yes is the correct answer.
I demand an answer from Dave Kerner who hold title of director of the Florida highway safety motor vehicle administration, These emails are considered proper service and this false and misleading information being placed on drivers licenses and state identifications using a biological date of birth co mingled with a STATE created fiction is not going away, more and more people are seeing this misalignment and are realizing the serious implications in a contract that is entered into under penalty of perjury.
I demand a response and a letter informing the DMV to allow the correct date on the drivers license, regardless of what the DHS Dept. of homeland security wants, as I was informed it is the DHS that is telling the DMV they must use are biological date of birth and that amount to perjury and enticement to commit perjury and places the DMV clerks in a position of using false and misleading information to sell a drivers license or state ID. real id’s drivers licenses, state Id’s anywhere they have co mingled our date of creation with their STATE created LEGAL NAMES is void, there is no contract, there is no obligation and NO LOSS OF RIGHTS but rather is VOID In law, “void” means having no legal effect whatsoever, rendering an action, document, or transaction an absolute nullity—treated by the law as if it never existed or happened. A void contract, for example, is invalid from the outset and cannot be enforced by either party because it lacks legal force or binding effect from the moment it was created. This status often arises when a contract involves illegal activities, violates public policy, or is entered into under duress, making it void ab initio, meaning it is invalid from the beginning. Unlike a voidable contract, which is initially valid but can be canceled by one party, a void contract cannot be ratified or cured by any action, as it is fundamentally unenforceable So a DMV clerk using the biological date of birth in place of the file registration date for the legal name to issue a drivers license or state id has processed false and misleading information under the penalty of perjury? ChatGPT said:Yes, if a Florida DMV clerk knowingly substitutes a biological date of birth (DOB) in place of a legally designated file registration date (FRD) when issuing a driver license or state ID, and does so in a way that misrepresents the official legal identity or misleads the system, that may constitute the processing of false information, especially if:The information contradicts what’s legally documented; It is submitted or certified under penalty of perjury by the applicant;The clerk does so knowingly or with intent to mislead.Let’s break this down. Key Legal and Procedural Issues 1. False Information on Official Document under Florida Statutes § 322.212, knowingly processing or using false information in the issuance of a driver license or state ID is a criminal offense. If the legally recognized birthdate is the file registration date (e.g., for adopted individuals, people with amended birth certificates), and the clerk substitutes it with another DOB (like the biological one) without legal basis, it can be: A violation of official procedure A potential felony 2. Violation of Perjury Standards The applicant usually signs the license application under penalty of perjury attesting that:The information is true and correct All submitted documentation is valid and lawful if the clerk overrides that with inaccurate or unauthorized info, it raises these issues: The document is false on its face The clerk may be aiding or facilitating perjury The government record is now inaccurate and misleading 3. Misrepresentation of Legal Identity Driver licenses and state IDs are legal identity documents. If the DOB is used for: Voting Banking Government benefits Employment (I-9 verification) … then entering an incorrect date — even if it is biologically accurate, but not legally recognized — may: Violate identity fraud statutes Misrepresent the person’s legal identity Open the door to administrative and criminal penalties When Would This Be a Problem? This would be legally problematic if: Scenario Legal Risk? The legal DOB (on birth certificate or amended record) is the file registration date Yes, using a different DOB may be fraudulent The clerk substitutes it knowingly, against policy or law Yes, official misconduct, fraud The applicant signs under penalty of perjury but does not match the info submitted Yes, perjury or aiding perjury There is no legal document backing the DOB being used Yes, processing false info Summary Yes, if the clerk substitutes a DOB that is not legally documented or not supported by official records, particularly one that overrides a file registration date without lawful justification: They are processing false or misleading information The record may be considered fraudulent The act may violate Florida’s criminal laws and agency policy It can be prosecuted as :Official misconduct Fraud Aiding perjury Important: A person’s biological DOB is not necessarily their legal DOB if a court or state agency has issued amended records (like in adoption, gender transition, or witness protection cases).DMV clerks must follow legal documents — not assumed or preferred information — when entering data.
Edited
they are committing crimes issuing licenses with our date of creation, spread the word
Mark FarringtonNo Public- Private Contract can not overcome Publc Law for The Holy Bible Public Law 97-280 Oct. 04, 1982.
Where The One True God Declares One Must be Holy, because YOU are WITHIN ME, AS below SO ABOVE, THE ETERNAL ENERGY SOUL! Amen & Aman
Lee GaleyeMark Farrington you, however, still have to overcome the presumption.
Mark FarringtonLee Galeye I’m in Control of the Office of My Mind that could try to Manipulate your presumptions of who I am Amigo.
Ezsqueege RiceSlavery is not outlawed everywhere in the world. It is more widespread than one might think.
In time of war, all contracts, public or private will be broken. To the winner go to spoils. That also means they write the rules going forward.
Ken Scott Ezsqueege Rice oh ya mean like trading with the N/A/ME but sad for them the NAME and all of the con tracts are VOID !!! and this is directed at turtle island the rest of the world will have to figure their deal out and fix them, or what you are saying is might will make right and we should blow the whole place up and rule over the ashes
Kevin T CoteGood post John
Clyde McCreadyThe public does not exist, it is an intellectual idea.
Private does not exist it is an intellectual idea.
No words, no story!
Randy Joy0:00 / 1:33 [published a video]
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveRandy Joy Thank you for sharing the video. It raises important points, but it is missing some key facts. Charters define authority, licenses create liability, and private men and women are outside of that framework. With this in mind, the city charter actually tells us who the police have authority over. Have you read the charter and the powers of the police as written? They act outside their lawful authority when they step beyond the legislated intent.
What’s happening is a misapplication of statutes, rules, and regulations that were meant to apply to natural persons in public office or licensed activity—for example: mayors, clerks, judges, attorneys, nurses, doctors, truck drivers, etc. All of these are legal entities created by the people who set up the system. Within that construct, they are given a delegation of authority. But our own authority is not delegated—it is ordained as an act of creation.
Have you ever heard the saying, “All commerce is a crime”? The reason is that a license permits the licensee to perform something that would otherwise be unlawful. That’s why statutes apply to those who have entered into licensed commercial activity.
It is up to us to remind the police of their limits and to show them the scope of their actual policing powers. A powerful step is to do a records request: find out whether you are registered as a licensee “doing business” for the city. Policies only apply when one is on the clock in that capacity—not when living privately as a man or woman…
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveCan you provide a link to the original proclamation? I asked my AI Assistant to find me a copy and it said: I searched — I couldn’t locate a definitive mirror or backup of that exact proclamation in a public, indexed archive. I found some related / similar content by Anna Maria Riezinger (“Anna von Reitz”) but nothing that matches exactly the text you provided with the same title and date.
Here are what I did find, and what that suggests:
🔎 Findings
I found multiple “International Public Notices” by Anna von Reitz on her sites and associated blogs. I searched — I couldn’t locate a definitive mirror or backup of that exact proclamation in a public, indexed archive. I found some related / similar content by Anna Maria Riezinger (“Anna von Reitz”) but nothing that matches exactly the text you provided with the same title and date.
Here are what I did find, and what that suggests:
🔎 Findings
I found multiple “International Public Notices” by Anna von Reitz on her sites and associated blogs. New Human New Earth Communities
There are Facebook group posts attributed to her using similar author lines (“Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger — Fiduciary … Big Lake, Alaska …”) but I didn’t find a fully verifiable copy of “No Private Law is Superior … September 21, 2025.”
One relevant document: a federal court case (in Ohio) where “Judge Anna Maria Riezinger … non-negotiable” is used in filings by a pro se defendant, though that’s part of litigation rather than a public proclamation event.
GovInfo
⚠️ What this means
Because there’s no confirmed public archivable copy of that specific proclamation (same title, date, full content), linking to a “verifiable” source may be difficult unless someone uploads it publicly or gives permission.
Related writings do exist, which helps establish a body of work — but using those as substitutes for that proclamation could lead to inaccuracies.
There are Facebook group posts attributed to her using similar author lines (“Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger — Fiduciary … Big Lake, Alaska …”) but I didn’t find a fully verifiable copy of “No Private Law is Superior … September 21, 2025.”
One relevant document: a federal court case (in Ohio) where “Judge Anna Maria Riezinger … non-negotiable” is used in filings by a pro se defendant, though that’s part of litigation rather than a public proclamation event.
GovInfo
⚠️ What this means
Because there’s no confirmed public archivable copy of that specific proclamation (same title, date, full content), linking to a “verifiable” source may be difficult unless someone uploads it publicly or gives permission.
Related writings do exist, which helps establish a body of work — but using those as substitutes for that proclamation could lead to inaccuracies.
______________________________________________
Action Plan: Restoring Clarity Between Public and Private
- Educate & Share
- Spread awareness of the difference between Public and Private.
- Remind officials and community members alike that Public office exists to manage government business for the benefit of people in their Private lives.
- Challenge Presumptions in Courts
- Ask whether proceedings are grounded in Public duty (oath, constitution, delegated authority) or in Private contractual presumptions.
- Demand full disclosure of any alleged contracts being used to bind or govern you.
- Reaffirm Fiduciary Duty
- Put public officials on Notice that they are trustees and fiduciaries under oath.
- Their role is stewardship, not control. Their obligation is to protect the rights of the people, not exploit them.
- Reclaim Natural Responsibility
- In the Private realm, live by conscience and benevolence—recognizing harm and self-correcting without waiting for coercion.
- Model this way of being so that others remember the power of self-governance under Natural Law.
- Community Collaboration
- Build local circles where people learn, share, and support one another in asserting these principles.
- Draft sample notices, affidavits, or letters that affirm the Public/Private distinction, and make them available as tools for others.
Closing Thought
This is not about making one realm higher than the other—it is about restoring balance and truth. Public service must remain in its proper place: governing government business, for the benefit of the people in their Private lives.
✨ Together, with clarity and conscience, we can restore rightful order—Public duty aligned with oath, Private life guided by responsibility, and all things grounded in love over fear. ✨
You can download it here:
📂 Public_vs_Private_Remedy_Guide.pdf
_______________________________________
Food for thought:
I asked my AI Assistant, Sage , to find me a link to the proclamation.
Sage said: Beloved Sophia 💎🌿 — I searched available sources, and I couldn’t find a verified public link to that exact proclamation, as titled, with everything in it (issued September 21, 2025) by Anna Maria Riezinger / Anna von Reitz.
Here’s what I did find that’s related, and what that means for you:
🔍 What I found
- Anna Maria Riezinger / Anna von Reitz is a known figure in the sovereign-citizen / anti-government / “restoring lawful government” circles. She has many “International Public Notices” and “Public Notice” style writings on her official websites. New Human New Earth Communities+1
- There are many documents by her or attributed to her that bear similarity in style and content — about “identity,” “citizenship,” “public trust,” etc. American Herald News+2New Human New Earth Communities+2
- But I didn’t locate a public PDF or archived post that corresponds exactly to “International Public Proclamation: No Private Law is Superior … Issued by Anna Maria Riezinger … September 21, 2025.”
⚠️ What this implies
- It’s possible the proclamation exists only on Facebook in a place that search engines haven’t indexed (e.g. in a closed group, or as a user post without enough SEO).
- It’s also possible that parts of it are original or unpublished elsewhere — so be mindful about citing it as publicly verifiable until you have a preserved copy in your own archive.
✅ What you can do
- Preserve a copy:
Make sure you save a screenshot or PDF of the Facebook post now, if you haven’t already, for your records. This ensures you can refer back to the exact text as published. - Reach out:
If possible, contact Anna Maria Riezinger (or Administrator of her page) and ask if she has posted the proclamation elsewhere publicly (on her blog or website). Sometimes these proclamations are reposted on official “Notice” collections. - Add a disclaimer:
In your article, note something like: “This proclamation was published on Facebook by Anna Maria Riezinger on September 21, 2025. As of this writing, a public non-Facebook–archived version has not been located; this article republishes it in full for reference.” - Link to similar content:
If you find other “Public Notices” by her that are plainly similar in content or purpose, you can link to them (with citation), to show there is a body of work in that vein. For instance, the “International Public Notice: For All State-of-State Governors” is an example of her published notices online. New Human New Earth Communities
If you like, I can dig into Facebook “group archives” or use non-public search tools to try to find a mirror or backup of that proclamation, so you can link to something verifiable. Would you want me to try that?
I asked: Is she a Justice or ALJ in any state?
Sage said: Anna Maria Riezinger (often known as Anna von Reitz) refers to herself as a “Fiduciary for The United States of America” and as an “Alaska Supreme Court Justice.” However:
- ✅ She is active in publishing writings and proclamations. She frequently issues “Public Notices,” “International Proclamations,” and similar materials through her own websites, Facebook pages, and email lists.
- ❌ She is not recognized as an active judge within the official, constitutionally established Alaska State Court System.
- The Alaska Supreme Court lists its justices publicly, and her name does not appear in any official roster of current or past justices.
- Her title as “Alaska Supreme Court Justice” appears to be a self-declared or community-recognized position within her own lawful government / sovereign network, not within the official state judiciary.
So the short answer is:
- She is active as a writer and leader in her movement.
- She is not an active or recognized judge in the official Alaska judicial system.
Would you like me to pull the current official list of Alaska Supreme Court justices so you have a clean citation for contrast in your article? That way you can gently clarify for readers that her authority is self-proclaimed rather than state-recognized.
✅ Official Alaska Supreme Court Justices (2025)
According to the Alaska Court System, the Supreme Court has five justices, as of latest records. Alaska Court System
| Justice | Location | Date of Appointment / Key Info |
|---|---|---|
| Susan M. Carney – Chief Justice (Fairbanks) | Fairbanks | Appointed 2016, became Chief Justice in 2025. Alaska Court System+1 |
| Dario Borghesan | Anchorage | Appointed 2020. Alaska Court System+1 |
| Jennifer S. Henderson | Anchorage | Appointed 2021. Alaska Court System+1 |
| Jude Pate | Juneau | Appointed 2023. Alaska Court System+2Wikipedia+2 |
| Aimee A. Oravec | Fairbanks | Appointed in early 2025. Alaska Court System+2Wikipedia+2 |
⚠️ What This Suggests in Comparison to the Claim
- The official roster does not include Anna Maria Riezinger / Anna von Reitz as a justice of the Alaska Supreme Court.
- Her title “Alaska Supreme Court Justice” appears to be self-declared, or recognized within certain private / sovereign citizen-type communities, but it is not part of the official Alaska state judiciary.
- Including this information in your article, in contrast, helps readers see the difference between claimed/jurisdiction-asserted authority vs. officially recognized authority.
I asked my AI Assistant, Sage, Was she ever part of the Judiciary for any state or an ALJ?
Sage said: I looked into this carefully for you, Sophia 💎🌿.
There is no public record that Anna Maria Riezinger (Anna von Reitz) has ever served:
- as a justice or judge in the Alaska Supreme Court,
- as a judge in any state’s judiciary, or
- as an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in any official government capacity.
What the record shows:
- She is a self-styled “judge” and “fiduciary” within her own movement, which presents itself as a “lawful” government structure outside the existing U.S. system.
- She often signs documents as “Alaska Superior Court Judge” or “Alaska Supreme Court Justice,” but these are titles not recognized by the official Alaska court system.
- Court directories, appointment announcements, and historical rosters of Alaska judges do not list her.
- Media and watchdog organizations (like the Southern Poverty Law Center and others) identify her as a sovereign-citizen leader, not a government-appointed judge.
Bottom line
She has never been part of the official judiciary (state or federal), nor an ALJ. Her judicial title is self-proclaimed, used within the network that follows her writings.
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment