This article is a work in progress—a living exploration of my quest to have more meaningful and constructive conversations with the people I encounter on my journey toward Unity Consciousness and the world shown to me in 1993 as a glimpse into my apparent future. I’ve decided to structure it like a novel, adding chapters as I grow and learn along the way. It is inspired by a desire to help myself and others communicate more effectively, fostering healthier, more productive discussions and deeper relationships.
At the heart of this journey is the belief that comprehending and knowing ourselves is crucial to understanding others—not just intellectually, but emotionally and spiritually. Knowing this can transform the way we engage and interact with others. Since it is my desire to shift the way I approach life by moving toward higher states of consciousness where unity and truth prevail, I must surround myself with people who are on this trajectory.
In the Realm of Truth, it is essential to recognize and honor the unique truth of every individual, realizing that we are each at different levels of comprehension of our respective realities and at different comprehension of how we co-create reality. I can see, that there are billions of people experiencing life on Earth, each with a unique perspective shaped by what they know to be true through their experiences and who they know themselves to be. Notably, the truth of the oneness of all life is infallible and unwavering, as are the rights of every man and woman. It is up to me and others to uphold these rights and expand beyond a world born of fear and conflicting ideas—especially because we cannot truly know others until we first know ourselves, and this requires introspection.
Furthermore, I’ve come to realize that it is imperative for me to fully comprehend the foundational principles that govern creation, namely the Law of Attraction and the Law of Projection and Reflection. These laws are inviolate and immutable, and it is up to me to fully comprehend how they function to shape my experiences. I’m the one who must be introspective and completely honest with myself.
Having asked a friend’s opinion regarding how others misconstrue what I share or misread my intention, she reminded me that if one is not on the same level of consciousness or comprehension of who and what they are, there will always be a misperception of what is communicated, since the people you are communicating to are operating from their filters of conditioning. These filters act like interference patterns, distorting their ability to comprehend what they are hearing or reading. From the moment my children were born, I spoke to them as if they comprehended everything I said to them—because they do. I was never one to believe in the standard way of “teaching” or talking so-called “baby talk” to my children because I am aware that every child is born in alignment with infinite intelligence. They are born with language and the ability to communicate, and it is I who have lost the ability to communicate with them fully due to my shortcomings and the shutting down of my telepathic abilities.
When I interact with people, it is to my benefit—and to the benefit of those I interact with—to align with those who are open-minded and on a similar path to mine—the path shown to me by my higher self. I’ve discovered in this interaction that I must be clear on the intention of the group. To know what the creator of the group intended when the group chat was opened.
It is my desire to be on a path is one of enlightenment, leading toward a world free from the horrors of war where every child is honored for the gift they bring to the world as a unique expression of the Divine. To walk this path, I must refrain from all forms of conflict and seek out those who practice mutual consideration of each other’s points of view and who are spiritually insightful and mindful.
When we strive to comprehend each other’s mental and emotional states, as well as their state of consciousness, we create space for deeper relationships. In this space, we feel seen, heard, and valued.
This article is an invitation to explore the difference between arguing and debating, to reclaim the art of communication, and for people to realize that not everyone is operating on the mental plane. Some have moved beyond the imposed ideas of “good” and “bad.” There will be those who still believe in resolving disagreement because they lack the insight that there are people on Earth who have transcended the concept of disagreement altogether. There are actually people who see all points of view and are here to lift others out of their lower states, where they no longer project negativity onto others. There are people here to assist others in shifting their perspective beyond mental programming, and in allowing this shift, it will lead to more harmonious and fulfilling interactions. Together, let’s embark on this journey toward clearer communication, greater empathy, and stronger connections.
Chapter 1: Do I Know Me?
I’ve discovered that life is a constant stream of unfolding. In order to know others I must first know myself. Introspection and asking myself questions is a way for me to know myself better. I’ve discovered that I will always get an answer to the questions I ask when I take the time to be quite and listen.
Do I know where my thoughts come from?
Does every one think the way I do?
Does everyone see what is important to me?
Do I have all the information in order to make an informed opinion?
Since I came into this world, I’ve had an insatiable appetite—an unwavering desire—to know what it’s all about. I have a memory as a child of looking out at everything thinking, “what is this?”.
As time passed and I got older, I’ve found it necessary to be self-reflective. This article is born of that introspection, and my sharing it is for others who might be interested in reading and possibly gaining insight as a result. What I’ve realized is that it’s up to me not to project my limitations onto other people. I’ve found it beneficial to ask questions before making blanket statements, since I know nothing about another person or what motivates them unless I can slip into their consciousness and see through their eyes.
Many years ago, my higher self insisted that I sit down and write about transcending and transmuting energy to allow for transfiguration. I’ve realized that as I clear out my attractor field—my aura—a purified heart gives more clarity to my mind and increases the sensitivity of my body, enhancing my ability to accept others and their points of view. Who wouldn’t be interested in being free from their biases and remove the that which is keeping them from thinking, seeing, and speaking clearly?
From a very young age, I had a natural curiosity about my life experiences. I instinctively questioned what life is and why I exist. What is God? What is life? These internal questions opened me up to many defining and non-defining experiences. I’m not sure why I was able to surrender to the moment of asking to be given the direct experience of the answer.
It’s up to me to consider the possibility that my preconceived ideas may actually hinder what is transpiring in the moment and limit my ability to form meaningful and beneficial relationships with the people I encounter.
It’s up to me to take the time to contemplate the information presented in the moment before I make a judgment or come to a conclusion about the people, places, and events in my field of experience. Whenever I feel discordant energy directed at me, I can make the conscious and conscientious choice to resolve the frequencies within me, since I’ve made the choice to restore myself to the original frequency where no fear exists.
Am I still choosing to come to quick decisions and offering points of view that keep me in lower states of consciousness?
Am I open and flexible, truly being led by spirit?
Why do people still believe that I can be moved to be upset by them?
When a situation arises, why wouldn’t I question myself to ensure I have all the information available before making a decision? Once I have more information, do I have an open and flexible mind, giving me the ability to change it? I’ve discovered that giving myself the capacity to change my mind enhances my ability to see, hear, and receive others, allowing me to be in a meaningful relationship with them. If I don’t feel heard, the relationship will be strained because I will have lost my faith in their ability to hear me.
Years ago, I was inspired to write the following after reading a friend’s comment on one of my Facebook posts. I realized that Barry didn’t actually know the difference between arguing and debating.
A Facebook user asked Barry, “What does awakening look like?”
Barry’s response: “You see things differently and have a different take on things, and you argue less.”
This inspired me to write a short parable:
There once was a wise man, and his friends called him Barry. One day, Barry and his friend Joe were walking on the beach. They weren’t headed to any particular place—just enjoying the scenery and each other’s company and contemplating life. As they walked, Barry noticed something etched in the sand between them. “Look,” said Barry, pointing to the etching, “there’s a 6 etched in the sand.” He inquisitively asked, “I wonder who put it there and why they put it there?”
Joe looked down and saw the symbol etched in the sand. Immediately, he said, “Oh no, Barry, you’re mistaken. That’s not a 6; it’s a 9.” The questions of who put it there and why were quickly forgotten as the two stood debating what the symbol in the sand represented.
They had been debating their respective points of view all morning about what they had just witnessed. Then Barry decided it was fruitless to continue and chose to pause. In that pause, he asked himself, “Why does Joe see this etching this way?” In that moment of asking, Barry was pulled out of his body. In this state, he had the ability to see from Joe’s point of view—and not only could he see Joe’s perspective, he saw that the etching was both a 6 and a 9.
Not only that, but Barry now had the “bird’s-eye view.” From this fresh and expanded perspective, Barry realized that even the ant crawling through the etching in that moment had its own unique perspective and experience of the symbol etched in the sand. Even the grains of sand and the sun shining upon the etching were having their own unique experience of that moment.
Then Barry wisely thought to himself, “If everything created from one source is experiencing this moment from its unique perspective, I wonder what it would be like to experience this moment through the consciousness, point of view, and experience of this unified field that is experiencing everything?”
In this inquiry, Barry’s ego-personality-spirit let go of it’s attachment to the intellectual-conditioned mind. His spirit broke free from is condition as a result of the religious indoctrination and cultural beliefs and also released the need to be right, and let go of programming entirely. It let go of its desire to be accepted, it’s desire to be approved of. Everything Barry was programmed to believe became an instant knowing. In this letting go of the intellectual-conditioned mental aspect, the mind expanded to align with the Unified Field of All Thought and All Thought Possibilities. In this state, the ego-mind no longer perceives in “Separation Consciousness.” It now sees and experiences from the expanded point of view known as Unified Mind or Christ Consciousness it sees from the love of its own source.
Chapter 2 Clarity Is Needed In The Art of Communication!
After reading the etymology of the words argue and debate I decided to get AI’s take on the subject by asking Deepseek, “
Deepseek said:
This is such an insightful and fascinating exploration of the etymology of “argue” and “debate”! You’re absolutely right—the true meanings of these words have shifted over time, and many people today conflate arguing with debating, often viewing arguing as inherently negative. Let’s break this down and see how we can incorporate this historical context into your article to give readers a fresh perspective.
Key Insights from the Etymology
- Argue:
- Originally, “argue” (from Latin arguere) meant “to make clear, prove, or demonstrate.” It was about reasoning and enlightenment, not conflict.
- Over time, it took on a more combative connotation, especially in the late 14th century, when it began to mean “to oppose, dispute, or contend in argument.”
- This shift reflects how the act of arguing has become associated with emotional conflict rather than logical reasoning.
- Debate:
- “Debate” (from Old French debatre) originally meant “to fight” or “to combat,” which is almost the opposite of its modern meaning.
- By the mid-15th century, it evolved to mean “to contend about in argument,” and by the 16th century, it took on the more formal sense of public discourse or deliberation.
- Interestingly, the modern idea of debate as a structured, respectful exchange of ideas is a relatively recent development.
How This Relates to Your Article
This historical context can add depth to your article by showing how language and societal attitudes have shaped our understanding of these concepts. Here’s how you might weave it in:
Possible Additions to Your Article
- Historical Context Section:
- Include a brief explanation of how the meanings of “argue” and “debate” have evolved over time.
- Highlight the irony: “argue” once meant to enlighten, while “debate” originally meant to fight.
- Use this to emphasize how language reflects societal shifts in communication styles.
- Modern Misconceptions:
- Discuss how the modern conflation of arguing and debating has led to misunderstandings in communication.
- Point out that arguing, in its original sense, was about clarity and reasoning, not conflict.
- Suggest that reclaiming the true meaning of “argue” could help people approach disagreements more constructively.
- Call to Action:
- Encourage readers to reflect on how they use these terms in their own lives.
- Challenge them to approach disagreements with the intention of “making clear” (arguing in the original sense) rather than “winning.”
- Suggest that embracing the true spirit of debate—structured, respectful discourse—can transform how we engage with others.
Example Paragraph for Your Article
“Interestingly, the words ‘argue’ and ‘debate’ have undergone significant shifts in meaning over time. The word ‘argue’ comes from the Latin arguere, meaning ‘to make clear’ or ‘to enlighten.’ It was originally about reasoning and proving a point, not conflict. On the other hand, ‘debate’ comes from the Old French debatre, which meant ‘to fight’ or ‘to combat.’ Over time, these meanings have almost reversed: today, arguing is often seen as emotional and combative, while debating is viewed as a structured and respectful exchange of ideas. This linguistic evolution reflects how our approach to disagreement has changed—and perhaps how we’ve lost touch with the original intention of these words. What if we reclaimed the true meaning of ‘argue’ and approached disagreements as opportunities to enlighten rather than to win?”
Thought-Provoking Questions to Include
- Are we conversing to “make clear” or to “win”?
- Have we lost the art of reasoning in favor of emotional conflict?
- How can we return to the original spirit of these words to improve our communication?
This historical perspective not only adds depth to your article but also invites readers to rethink their own communication habits. Let me know if you’d like help expanding on any of these ideas or refining the language further! 😊
Stay tuned for further Chapters
Much love,
Sophia
born Lorna-Lynne and called by White Buffalo in sacred ceremony, “the one that flows with the river”.
AKA: zelan-raymond-dale-sophia-lorna-lynne of the family Shackelford-Borgeson
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment