The topic of the SSN and the SIN is getting some attention and I thought I would share some information I have come by on a Facebook page:
Ken Scott posted on January 9th, 2025 @9:19 am
Since I have found many of the comments educational I decided to copied and past them here:
D.j. Trigg Great post my friend!!!
CM Garner I looked up 20 cfr 422 104,…thats not what it says
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/20/422.104
LAW.CORNELL.EDU
20 CFR § 422.104 – Who can be assigned a social security number.
20 CFR § 422.104 – Who can be assigned a social security number.
Tomas Joines CM Garner maybe give a look to SEDM and or Family Guardian. there are buckets of citations there
Trenton MannTomas Joines there’s absolutely no need to do that he’s literally just proved this to be false so the bs you’re referring to is null
Yvette Levins I just looked it up. This post is not correct.
Ken Scott § 422.104 Who can be assigned a social security number.
(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107 and you are:
(1) A United States citizen; or
(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence or under other authority of law permitting you to work in the United States (§ 422.105 describes how we determine if a nonimmigrant alien is permitted to work in the United States); or
(3) An alien who cannot provide evidence of alien status showing lawful admission to the U.S., or an alien with evidence of lawful admission but without authority to work in the U.S., if the evidence described in § 422.107(e) does not exist, but only for a valid nonwork reason. We consider you to have a valid nonwork reason if:
(i) You need a social security number to satisfy a Federal statute or regulation that requires you to have a social security number in order to receive a Federally-funded benefit to which you have otherwise established entitlement and you reside either in or outside the U.S.; or
(ii) You need a social security number to satisfy a State or local law that requires you to have a social security number in order to receive public assistance benefits to which you have otherwise established entitlement, and you are legally in the United States.
(b) Annotation for a nonwork purpose. If we assign you a social security number as an alien for a nonwork purpose, we will indicate in our records that you are not authorized to work. We will also mark your social security card with a legend such as “NOT VALID FOR EMPLOYMENT.” If earnings are reported to us on your number, we will inform the Department of Homeland Security of the reported earnings.
[68 FR 55308, Sept. 25, 2003]
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale LoveKen Scott I stopped calling myself a citizen when I found out the etymology which has been changed, “belonging to a city”. Then after studying under malika of the lawful living community I’ve come to realize that there are assumptions and presumptions made by everyone when it comes to the use of the term “citizen,” and it is up to each of us to educate ourselves and each other to alleviate the problems that have arisen as a result of these assumptions and presumptions.
Law enforcement should be reminded that when reading and interpreting legislation, the term ejusdem generis applies in every case. This means that whatever is included excludes everything else.
It still has yet to be clarified why they put the word “business” in brackets after my husband’s name when there was a mishap at the U.S.-Canadian border.
As far as I know, all businesses must be registered with the Office of the Secretary of State. Yet, when we did a records request, there was no such business registered.
Here are some concepts that might be relevant to this discussion:
I. The 14th Amendment and Citizenship:
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution defines “citizen” under U.S. law. While it doesn’t explicitly state that a U.S. citizen is a business, it does grant citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States, and people sometimes associate certain legal frameworks (like tax law) with this status. (We have come to realize that the United States is a corporation.)
II. The “Strawman” Theory:
This theory is entangled with the “legal name” theory and the printing of the first name and, when applicable, the middle name, with the family name (or what is being called the surname) being treated as a corporation. Some theories, often associated with sovereign citizen movements, suggest that the government treats individuals as corporations (“strawman”) for certain purposes, like taxation or legal obligations. This is not a legitimate legal theory recognized by courts, and it has been widely debunked. However, it’s a point of contention in some alternative legal circles. Still, people filing court cases often ignore the ejusdem generis principle, using the so-called “legal name” as seen on the birth certificate to open illegitimate cases.
III. U.S. Tax Law (Section 7701):
Under Title 26 of the U.S. Code (the Internal Revenue Code), Section 7701 defines what constitutes a “person” for tax purposes, which can include individuals, corporations, and other entities. This has led some to incorrectly interpret the concept of “person” in a way that implies individuals are treated as businesses, especially in relation to taxation.
IV. 15 U.S. Code § 4724 – Trade Shows
This section does indeed state that a “United States business” includes a United States citizen (as well as other entities like corporations or partnerships). Here’s the relevant part:
(1) The term “United States business” means—
(A) a United States citizen;
(B) a corporation, partnership, or other association created under the laws of the United States or of any State (including the District of Columbia or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States); or
(C) a foreign corporation, partnership, or other association, more than 95 percent of which is owned by persons described in subparagraphs (A) and (B);
V. 26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definition:
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—
(1) Person
The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation.
Section (26) Trade or Business:
The term “trade or business” includes the performance of the functions of a public office.
(29) Internal Revenue Code:
The term “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” means this title, and the term “Internal Revenue Code of 1939” means the Internal Revenue Code enacted February 10, 1939, as amended.
(30) United States Person:
The term “United States person” means—
A) a citizen or resident of the United States,
(B) a domestic partnership,
(C) a domestic corporation,
(D) any estate (other than a foreign estate, within the meaning of
paragraph (31)), and
(E) any trust if—
(i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary
supervision over the administration of the trust, and
(ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the trust.
The above fictions of law are all known as Legal Entities.
There has never been a legal determination made regarding the legitimacy of the so-called “legal name”, my tax status, and/or residency, . Accounts have been created in this name, and this issue needs to be clarified. And I do not remember taking an oath of office as a public servant. If the record cannot be located there is no record.
Perhaps what we should be asking is: If every man is entitled to the essentials of life, including, but not limited to, fresh air, clean water, food, clothing, shelter, etc., then why is he/she being taxed on these essentials when they are clearly not operating a business?
Ken Scott YOU & PERSON
Susean Morrow Ken Scott the question I have is how are they getting us all to work for free?
Maggie Mae Ken Scott one haves proof of being born. A person has a certificate of birth.
Ken Scott Susean Morrow The STATE created LEGAL ORGANIZATION NAME we volunteer our date of birth for, making us surety/debtor
Ken Scott Susean Morrow keeping in mind is a lie, cannot make this stuff up
Joseph Pugh Yes Deceiving little Assets are THEY Not…
Brian Chaffin You are an “agent”https://rumble.com/v3ktk2d-the-agent-is-never-liable-for…?
RUMBLE.COM
The Agent is never liable for the principal unless the Agent doesn’t do their duty.
The Agent is never liable for the principal unless the Agent doesn’t do their duty.
Trenton Mann Ken Scott stop spreading bullshit information. Several people have shown what you’ve posted to be incorrect. Delete the post or you’re just another propaganda agent
______________________________
Ken Scott posted on Facebook January 13th, 2025 @6:18 pm
oeodpnStrs53mJ 6AM31ul50307y3atr:1535ff i7 6u7 g1tl8aam1n3f17 ·
How can “citizens” avoid this Satanic trap?
SSA Handbook § 143
SSA Handbook § 143
Fraud In Connection With Benefit Claims And Earnings Records
*** Falsely claiming a SSN to be mine is a problem as well. The SSA says the SSN belongs to the SSA and we are given that SSN to “use”. Then the citizen actors working for SSA ask for “YOUR SSN” which of course is NOT our SSN at all. Why is nop one questioning this simple fact? Are ‘citizens’ really that stupid? YES.
Fraud In Connection With Benefit Claims And Earnings Records
143.1
When can you be prosecuted for Social Security fraud?
You may be prosecuted as a criminal for fraud if you knowingly:
Furnish false information as to your identity in connection with the establishment and maintenance of Social Security records;
For the purpose of increasing your payment under Social Security or any other Federally funded program; or for the purpose of obtaining such payment:
Use a Social Security number obtained on the basis of false information; or
Falsely represent a number to be your Social Security number;
Make or cause to be made a false statement or misrepresentation of a material fact for use in determining your rights to Social Security or SSI benefits
__________________________________________________________
“Federal Income Taxes ONLY applies to Federal Employees ! Many Supreme Court cases & No American can owe Federal Income taxes UNLESS One Volunteers by filling out a 1014 Form .
Easy fix though Revocation of Election” Allen Paul
______________________ ‘
If interested in getting a different perspective regarding the SSN and Taxation consider taking the classes shared on http://www.freedomfromgovernment.org
It is important to note that there are a number of different ways to interpret the information provided. It is up to us to use the information so that we can make our own conclusion regarding the accounts created in your name:
Here is the url link to the class: https://freedomfromgovernment.org/classes/birth-certificates-and-social-security-accounts/
Here is the url link to the class:
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment