I read the following comment while reading the comments on Facebook Messenger in a group I am part of and wanted to share my thoughts on the subject of a marriage license:
“Hi, I have a question. I manifested commitment from SP and a lot of other things as well. My SP is planning for marriage, but there are some legal things that he has to do, and those legal things are taking time. This is making me angry, frustrated, and doubtful. Now I’m thinking, how come, after having so much knowledge of the law and even getting things through manifesting, am I still getting doubtful?” — Facebook commenter
I said:
“Why do you believe you have legal matters when you are not a legal entity? Do you know what a license is? Do you believe somebody has the authority to dictate how you live your life?”
Then I remembered reading a post about a couple’s decision to get a divorce and then write their own marriage contract. When I did a Google search for the story, the posts that came up were implying that a man and woman needed a license to get married and register their marriage with the government, which is not true.
After waking up and realizing I had been sleepwalking through life, I discovered that so much of what I had believed to be true was actually false. I had been given the impression that I had to do a number of things, and had I known then what I know now, I would never have participated in them. After coming to this realization, I decided to do some research. Back in 2000, I realized that I had learned a false perspective because of who was controlling the information I was reading. It is up to me to take the steps to figure out how my body design works and how to navigate in a world where so many are taking actions based on false information.
Perhaps people should look at why they cannot communicate with their partners to resolve conflicts and why they need a judge to make the decisions they should be making regarding ending the marriage (getting a divorce) and regulating their assets in an amicable and fair where both people are happy with the outcome.
I wanted to see if ChatGPT could help me find the story I had read the previous day, so I left the following comment on ChatGPT:
“Good day. I had read a story on Facebook that talked about a married couple who realized that they did not need a marriage license because neither is a legal entity and they wrote their own contract for their marriage agreement. I cannot find the story, and when I do a Google search, it misidentifies what I am looking for. Can you help me find this story?”
ChatGPT said:
Good day! It sounds like you’re referring to a story about a couple who challenged the concept of marriage licenses and created their own marriage agreement instead. While this is a fairly specific narrative, there are several topics and ideas that could overlap with what you’re describing, particularly around personal sovereignty, self-sovereignty, or natural law arguments regarding marriage.
One possibility is that the story you’re referencing might be linked to ideas that challenge or question the legitimacy of government-issued marriage licenses. Some people hold the belief that the government doesn’t have the authority to regulate marriage or that marriage is a personal contract, not something that requires state intervention. This sort of view might be discussed in the context of legal studies, personal freedom, or individual rights.
If the exact story you’re referring to isn’t showing up in search results, here are a couple of things you can try:
- Keywords: Try using more specific keywords in your searches, such as “couple creates own marriage contract no license,” “couple challenges marriage license with contract,” or “sovereign marriage agreement.”
- Facebook and Social Media Groups: Since the story was shared on Facebook, try revisiting relevant groups, pages, or posts that focus on alternative lifestyles, personal sovereignty, or legal rights. You might even try reaching out to those groups to see if anyone remembers the post.
- Legal and Philosophical Blogs or Forums: There might be blog posts or forum discussions on websites that focus on marriage law, self-sufficiency, or legal reform.
Unfortunately, without more specific details, it’s difficult to track down an exact match for the story, but I hope these suggestions help you get closer to it! Let me know if you need help refining the search or if any additional details come to mind.
I said:
It is frustrating that it is so difficult to find unbiased information on the web
ChatGPT said:
I completely understand your frustration. The internet is full of information, but often it can be overwhelming to sift through the noise and find unbiased, relevant, and accurate sources. This issue is compounded by how algorithms prioritize certain types of content (like sensational or popular topics) over more nuanced or specific information.
Here are a few strategies to help you find better, more objective sources:
- Use Advanced Search Operators: When searching on Google, try using specific operators to narrow down results:
- Use quotation marks for exact phrases:
"couple creates own marriage contract". - Exclude unwanted terms with a minus sign:
marriage contract -license. - Use site-specific searches:
site:reddit.com "marriage contract".
- Use quotation marks for exact phrases:
- Explore Forums and Communities: Websites like Reddit, Quora, and specific legal or philosophy forums often host in-depth, discussion-based content, which might not appear in the top results of Google. Look for niche subreddits or specialized communities (e.g., r/legaladvice or r/selfsovereignty).
- Seek Alternative News Sites or Blogs: Websites that focus on alternative viewpoints, like Medium, The Conversation, or Independent blogs, can sometimes provide a more balanced perspective, especially if mainstream outlets don’t cover niche topics well.
- Filter by Source Type: Look for official legal websites, academic journals, or government resources when researching laws or contracts. They can be more reliable than general articles or opinion pieces, especially if you’re looking for information on legal or historical aspects.
- Cross-reference Information: If you’re finding conflicting information, try to cross-reference sources to get a clearer picture. Multiple reputable sources with the same information are often a good indicator that you’re on the right track.
- Use Fact-Checking Sites: Websites like Snopes or FactCheck.org can sometimes help clarify myths, false claims, or misleading narratives, though they may not always cover every subject.
It’s important to be patient and persistent, especially with a topic that might not have mainstream coverage. If you’re ever stuck or need help refining your search, feel free to reach out. I’d be happy to assist in navigating through the available resources!
So, I did what ChatGPT suggested and resorted to going to Snoops and Factchecker.org.
The Snoop site gave me unrelated articles regarding legal proceedings:
Here is the link to the webpage:
Do Two People Have To Get A Marriage License Or Can They Write Their Own Contract? Articles | Snopes.com
And Factchecker gave the following:
So I went back to Chat GPT and said: I did as you suggested and asked both Snoops and Factchecker.org the following, “Do two people have to get a marriage license or can they write their own contract?” and got a No Results response.
ChatGPT said:
It sounds like the topic you’re asking about—whether two people can write their own marriage contract without a marriage license—might not be a question that’s frequently addressed by fact-checking sites like Snopes or FactCheck.org. These sites tend to focus on verifying widely circulated myths, rumors, or misinformation, and questions about legal alternatives to marriage licenses might not be common enough to have specific entries.
Here are a few steps you can take to dig deeper into this topic:
1. Look into Common Law Marriage:
In some regions or under certain conditions, common law marriage allows couples to be considered legally married without a formal marriage license. The rules for common law marriage vary by jurisdiction, so researching whether it’s recognized in your area could be helpful. Common law marriage is often based on the couple’s actions (living together, presenting themselves as married, etc.) rather than a government-issued license.
2. Research Sovereign or Private Contract Marriages:
Some people advocate for sovereign or private marriage contracts, where they create their own agreements outside of government regulation. However, the legal recognition of such contracts is controversial, and it’s important to note that the government generally requires marriage licenses for legal marriage benefits (like tax filing, healthcare, inheritance, etc.).
3. Check Legal Sources:
For a more concrete understanding, it might help to look at legal or governmental websites. These will give you a clear picture of the laws in your specific location. You can search for terms like “marriage license requirements” or “validity of private marriage contracts” based on your jurisdiction.
4. Legal Advice:
If you’re seriously considering a non-licensed marriage or exploring writing your own contract, consulting with a legal professional is always a good idea. They can provide specific guidance on how to navigate the legalities of marriage and contracts in your region.
It might be more difficult to find straightforward answers in the form of articles or fact checks for niche topics like this, but you’re on the right track by looking into various sources. Let me know if you’d like help with more specific research!
You said:
Why do you think people do not have the wherewithal to question the legitimacy of having to go to the government for a license to get married or go to a priest to validate their vowels?
ChatGPT said:
That’s a thought-provoking question, and I think there are several factors at play that contribute to why many people don’t question the legitimacy of marriage licenses or the role of religious ceremonies in marriage. Here are some of the main reasons:
1. Cultural Tradition and Social Conditioning:
Marriage ceremonies, whether secular (involving a government license) or religious (involving a priest or other spiritual figure), are deeply ingrained in cultural and societal norms. From an early age, many people are taught that these are essential steps to being “officially” married. The idea of marriage has been shaped by tradition for centuries, and it often feels like the “way things are done.” As a result, many people simply accept these practices without questioning them because they’ve been so normalized.
2. Legal and Social Benefits:
Marriage licenses and religious ceremonies are often seen as necessary for securing legal and financial benefits, such as tax advantages, inheritance rights, access to healthcare, and social recognition. For many, these practical benefits outweigh the need to question the legitimacy of the institution. Without a government-issued marriage license, a couple may not enjoy these legal protections, and without a religious ceremony, they might feel that their union is incomplete or lacks spiritual significance.
3. Lack of Awareness or Education:
Most people are not taught the full history or legal implications of marriage, especially in relation to its ties to the government. For instance, the idea that marriage originally began as a legal contract for property rights and inheritance, not a romantic or spiritual union, may not be well-known. Many people don’t question the institution because they haven’t been exposed to alternative views or the historical development of marriage laws. It’s not something that is often debated in mainstream education or media.
4. Fear of Rejection or Marginalization:
Even if someone questions the legitimacy of needing a license or a religious figure to validate their vows, there may be social pressure to conform to conventional practices. Marriage is a significant milestone in many cultures, and those who choose alternative paths may face judgment or isolation. This fear of rejection, whether from family, friends, or society at large, can make it difficult to consider or pursue unconventional options, even if those options make more sense on a personal or philosophical level.
5. Perceived Authority of Institutions:
People often believe that institutions like the government or religious organizations have the authority to determine what is “valid” or “official.” These institutions have long held power in society, and their authority is often assumed without much scrutiny. The idea of questioning or bypassing these systems can feel daunting or even unthinkable for some, as it challenges deeply held beliefs about what is considered legitimate.
6. Desire for Certainty and Structure:
Marriage, as an institution, provides a clear structure and framework for couples. A marriage license issued by the government or a religious ceremony performed by a priest provides a sense of certainty that both the couple and society can rely on. For many, the process feels straightforward and trustworthy, and they may not see any reason to challenge it unless something specifically prompts them to do so.
7. Philosophical or Legal Blind Spots:
Many people may not consider themselves to be “legal entities” or fully understand what that term means, and thus don’t consider the legal implications of a marriage license. The idea that someone could write their own marriage contract might not even occur to them, because they’ve always associated marriage with government or religious involvement. Legal and philosophical ideas about personal sovereignty, contracts, and rights are often more abstract, and many don’t delve deeply into these ideas unless they have a strong personal or intellectual reason to do so.
8. Fear of Complexity or Consequences:
Navigating a world outside of the conventional systems (like bypassing the government or religion in marriage) can seem complicated or even risky. The legal ramifications, or potential difficulty in being recognized by others, may deter people from questioning the status quo. It can seem easier to just follow the established paths, rather than take on the challenge of seeking alternatives and dealing with potential legal or social repercussions.
In essence, many people don’t question these practices because they’ve been conditioned to accept them as standard, and because they provide tangible benefits or societal validation. Challenging these norms requires a deeper level of critical thinking, education, and sometimes a willingness to face discomfort or push back against societal expectations.
However, there is a growing movement of people who are questioning traditional systems, including marriage, and looking for more personalized or sovereign ways to engage in relationships and unions. As more people explore alternative views and ideas, it’s possible that these topics may become more widely discussed and considered in the future.
I have a few well researched friends on Facebook that share what they know and Derrick is a public figure so I decided to share his comment on Marriage what a Marriage License is:
I’ve included the comments published in response to Derrick’s post:
Derrick Gonzalez · Were you ever fully informed of the legal consequences and conditions??
If not you were denied “due process of law”
Did you and your spouse enter into a relationship of polygamy.
Marriage is a civil contract, where there’s three parties: the wife, the husband, and the state.
Van Koten v Van Koten 154 N.E. 146
Glenn-anthony Sending-State Horton · Derrick Gonzalez Of course not
Derrick Gonzalez· The Privacy Act of 1974 went into effect on September 27, 1975, and is a federal law that protects individuals from the misuse of their personal information by the government. The act was a response to the Watergate and COINTELPRO scandals, which involved illegal surveillance of political opponents and individuals deemed subversive. The act’s purpose is to balance the government’s need for information with the rights of individuals to privacy.
Wonder Bee · Derrick Gonzalez I’m glad you brought this act up. This act is also on a lot of agreements like Amex. This act became the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988. Why does Amex mention this on their agreement? Because it’s part of the credit application SSA-89 to which under section 205 of the social security act they have to certify for payment and there is a representative payee involved receiving funds on your entity behalf. How nice!!
Derrick Gonzalez · I always back up what I say with the literature from them.
Dallas Williams · Record in family Bible
John Bey · Blind Adhesion contract. They never gave full disclosure.
Lisa Hatzopoulos · All of this is null And all are harmed except those that financial benefit treasonously?
Lisa Hatzopoulos · So how can we just hold that entire marriage license department of defacto government accountable for harm done to all and end this shit show?
Monty Crockett · I have not vetted yet but was told there is an insurance policy on the marriage of upwards of 11m??
Derrick Gonzalez · Monty Crockett everything the state produces must be bonded
Kendra Fisher · So instead of going through a divorce you could just ditch the license and your done? My friend Steph will be happy to hear that.
Nicole RN · Yes
Rochelle Plus · This is awesome!
Rex Austenaco Waya · 45420
Steven Duke · Is there way to marry without the state so that you can import a wife?
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love · Steven Duke do you actually hear what you are saying/ Where are you porting her? Is she an article of commerce?
Illia Cole · Steven Duke write up your own vows and promises. Get it notarized then recorded at the county registrar office. Also record in your family bible
Steven Duke · Illia Cole know anyone who’s followed through with this and been successful?
Steven Duke · Illia Cole I assume they’ll give you static at the border
Illia Cole · Steven Duke I file and record all my documents at the county register. Once these documents are filed on the record they become true copies( True Bill) I print some up on bond paper also.
Illia Cole · Steven Duke I’m sure they give everyone and everything static at the border
Rosemary Kreml Wuckert · Steven Duke , yes.. you marry under God. This is simple..
Chadrick Davis · Illia Cole it should be published in the newspaper 3x also.
Straw-man Entity · Do you have this document on pdf or word or text. It’s very important information you are providing. Thank you Derrick Gonzalez
Phoebe Freeman · easily annulled a legal marriage can be annulled for fraud in the inducement or fraud in the facutm or fraud in the execution
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT…
- Yes, a legal marriage can be annulled for fraud, which can be classified into different types, such as fraud in the inducement, fraud in the factum, or fraud in the execution:
- Fraud in the inducement: This occurs when one party is misled about significant aspects of the marriage or the other person, such as lying about the ability to have children or concealing major personal details. The person misled entered into the marriage based on false representations.
- Fraud in the factum: This happens when one party is unaware that they are entering into a marriage, perhaps being tricked into signing documents under false pretenses, such as believing the paperwork is for something else, not a marriage.
- Fraud in the execution: This refers to fraud involving the legal documents or procedures of the marriage, where one party does not understand the nature of what they are signing due to misrepresentation or deception.
- In these cases, if a court determines that fraud was involved, the marriage can be annulled, meaning it is treated as though it never legally existed.
- Like
- Reply
Diane Anderson ·We have been married over 50 years. We never had any issues with child support/ or CPS taking our children. My question is what other benefits are to the state beyond child support and CPS powers that could affect us in our current situation. I don’t like this BS of the non disclosure. Perhaps this was the sole intent of the marriage license?
Amber Watkins · I will pay you for your knowledge about CPS or any documents that would be helpful 
Laura Jo McDaniel · Amber Watkins All I know is Do Not Sign anything from them. But, if you do feel like you must then write in above your signature “I am signing under duress” and mark through any blank areas with a big fat X or they’ll fill it in for you in their favor. Remind them that you don’t trust them since they’re known to be involved in child sex trafficking. If you have a roof, electric and running water, plenty of good food and love your children are doing great. Oh, and call Attorney Lusk out of Austin for at least a phone meeting to ask a few questions. Throw his name out at CPS. They’ll walk away backwards real quick.
Lisa Hatzopoulos · How do they use the marriage license to access funding? Is it from strawman account? Or?
Michael Fisher · Just create trust and recoup your rights, titles, and interest of all bonds and securities
Lisa Hatzopoulos · Michael Fisher I don’t trust this dock- u-mental anchoring requiring lawyers anyhow to create another defacto trust
Melissa Palazzolo · Lisa Hatzopoulos yes basically All a marriage license does is tell the state that both man and woman trusts/estates are now combined.
Lisa Hatzopoulos · How does the state access people’s strawman funds for their retirement pension benefit$?
Judy Carrol · Michael Fisher ?
Abner Nelson It’s unconscionable because the state has converted your parental rights into a privilege for their own profit.
Serious question tho, could a fee schedule be presented to the state to “proceed” with the marriage license? For instance a cease and desist/motion to dismiss with prejudice or default on my fees to continue operating this license.
Blake Andriessen · Does this include having children with the woman when you were never married?
Kendra Fisher · How do you get married in Michigan without involving the state?
- Antoine Credit-Guy Flack · Just get married what do you mean?
Nicole RN
· Have a ceremony with witnesses and record with county on your own contract….not the marriage license
Kendra Fisher · Most people want a marriage license to perform the ceremony.
Christina MacNeil Barefoot · Kendra FisherYou just have a ceremony with witnesses, create your own certificate have them sign off record it with SOS or at the county. But you do want to be sure you have an agreement/ contract because you won’t want or be able to use court if you decide to end the marriage. You will want to do everything amicably and amongst each other etc. - Or just log it in a family Bible with signatures of witnesses.
Illia Cole · Kendra Fisher write up your own vows and promises. Get it notarized and Recorded at the county registers office
Salmon Shalom · Kendra Fisher Hmm, how did yahweh say to ?
Cleave to/become one with…
Maria Rosas · Is there another alternative when the ex is not willing to cooperate to agree?
Derrick Gonzalez · Maria Hatch demand their performance through a motion to compel !! Or add the caveat failure to respond is an admission to the following facts
Salmon Shalom · Judicial and juris-dict-sion-AL miss-con-duct.
42 U.S. Code § 1983.
1st Amendment seperation of (“state” = common/mammon/ceasar/unpeaceful) and “church”.
Deprivation of right to speak for self, and dishonors yahweh by taking authority that does not belong to state or government.
1st Cor 6:19 .. Mark 12:17…
13th amendment, due process deprivation, right to speak for property, seizure of property without war-rant, or crime,
Taking ownership by fraud/coercion/lack of adequate information, and enslaving servants of yahweh.
Involuntary slavery/servitude, without being convicted of a crime against a living being on high sea’s = misdemeanor or felony.
14th Amendment, deprivation of equal protection…
Contracts made under duress are unenforceable, “Voluntary consent” requires adequate in-form-a-tion, lack of coercion, force, manipulation, or intimidation, and the freedom to revoke consent at any time…
If Fraud is discovered contracts are void.
Conn-sent to conn-tr-act cannot be given until one has reached the age of majority.
18 USC Ch. 81: PIRACY AND PRIVATEERING.. §1654 June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147…
“Whoever takes the command of or enters on board of any such vessel with such intent; or Whoever purchases any interest in any such vessel with a view to share in the profits thereof”
18 USC Ch. 81: §1658. Plunder of distressed vessel.
(b) Whoever willfully obstructs the escape of any person endeavoring to save his life from such vessel, or the wreck thereof; or
Whoever HOLDS OUT or SHOWS ANY FALSE LIGHT, or EXTINGUISHES ANY TRUE LIGHT, with intent to bring any vessel sailing upon the sea into danger or distress or shipwreck—
Shall be imprisoned not less than ten years and may be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
(S.C.R..1795. 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54), Supreme Court Ruling 1795.- NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters.
“Inasmuch as EVERY GOVERNMENT is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON, an ABSTRACTION, and a >CREATURE< of the MIND ONLY, a government CAN INTERFACE ONLY with OTHER “ART-I-FI-CI-AL PER-SONS” “The IMAGINARY having neither ACTUALITY nor SUBSTANCE, is foreclosed from (CREATING) and ATTAINING >PARITY< with the TANGIBLE”.
“The LEGAL manifestation of this is that NO GOVERNMENT, as well as ANY LAW, agency, aspect, court, etc, can concern itself with anything other than “CORPORATE”, “ARTIFICIAL PERSONS” and THE CONTRACTS BETWEEN THEM.”
John Dziegiel · Derrick Gonzalez can we send you a donation to get your documents or templates to void a marriage?
Antoine Credit-Guy Flack · My ex wife benefits from this system so she’s not signing anything with me can I take them on myself
Christina MacNeil Barefoot · Antoine Credit-Guy Flack You fill it out in a way she either answers or acquiesces and agrees when she does not answer.
Tom Josker · Always interesting, and VERY helpful……………………………Ole Vet…
Kendra Fisher · Is there a link for what he’s reading?
Michael Fisher · They are in the CFR
Derrick Gonzalez · Kendra Fisher no its a document I created to use in court that destroys a marriage license and a dissolution of marriage decree and ends child support
Lilly B · Derrick Gonzalez does this apply to all other contracts as well such as mortgages and etc? I’m taking notes of your video, thank you Derrick.
Linh Stephens · Derrick Gonzalez can I please have a copy of this I need help my abusive exhusband jailed me for two months for inability to pay for child support for a child I didn’t abandoned and didn’t abuse and didn’t ever ask him for child support ever and he just continually to act like a criminal and courts protect criminals
Derek Wilson · Lilly B in my understanding if your capacity is diminished it isn’t diminishe in degrees. You are either of the capacity to contract or not.
Michael Fisher · These are in the “Code of Federal Regulations”
Nicole RN Ty
Kendra Fisher · You have a GREAT last name 
Michael Fisher · I was thinking the same thing. I just didn’t want to come across as a “creep” 
You know how yall ladies can be nowadays 
Kendra Fisher · I’m pretty down to earth. Your good 
Like
Rochelle Plus Been married 40 years, all children are now adults. Both parties are in agreement to dissolve license
Can this just be signed, notarized and filed? If so, is there a specific form?
Or does it need to be run through court?
Michael Fisher · Same for Child Support… You can demand exoneration through Suretyship
Nova De Consuelo· acceptance by acquiescence 72 hours
Nahari Salaam What if the divorce has been settled already?
Jennifer Moore Also in Written form ALL must sign EVERYTHING with the VERY SAME PEN
Audra Schwoerer Jennifer Moore Where is this requirement stated – I have never heard of this. I never let anyone use my pen.
Debby Solomon Thank you for good info as always Derrick. Guessing the significant other might have to respond. Correct?
Chrissy Greco In Maryland
Lia Love What are you reading from?
Antoine Credit-Guy Flack This the remix?
Andrew Brabson Can we get this AFTER THE BROADCAST? I Arrived late
Linh Stephens I comment now but is it too late?
John Bey What were you reading from?
Antoine Credit-Guy Flack What was the question
Maria Fernandez You’re married to the state
Anthony Culotta Thank you !
Anton Carpena Yo sup bro
Jewel Tressler Thank You 
Joe Steinke Thankyou very much
Elizabeth Knight Undersigned Respectfully Your X Without prejudice ucc ‘1-207/308
Caryl Eickstaedt Thank You 
Lisa Hatzopoulos Derrick Gonzalez what are you reading from?
Derrick Gonzalez replied
Derrick Gonzalez Lisa Hatzopoulos my own documents I use in court! Took years to learn it all
Antoine Credit-Guy Flack Request for admissions
Michael Fisher · Follow ·
Doug Anderson glad to be here. even though I’m not married.
Binky Brandt not fully disclosed
Lisa Hatzopoulos Are you for hire?
Michael Fisher He’s dropping the sauce on what you need to know 
Rex Austenaco Waya Thanks
Tim Lennartson Thanks
Lisa Hatzopoulos How the f do we stop this? PERIOD! for protection of life, liberty, and justice for all? HOW?!?
Lisa Hatzopoulos How do we STOP THIS FOREVER AND FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL?
Jennifer Lucas what was that subscription website that you have? I need to get back into this…
Alise Hardesty SelfgovernanceU
Straw-man Entity French hill
Title 1 USC 204
Cornell Law SchoolSearch Cornell
LII U.S. Code Title 1 CHAPTER 3 § 204
Quick search by citation:
Title
enter title
Section
section
1 U.S. Code § 204 – Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States and District of Columbia; citation of Codes and Supplements
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
In all courts, tribunals, and public offices of the United States, at home or abroad, of the District of Columbia, and of each State, Territory, or insular possession of the United States—
(a)United States Code.—
The matter set forth in the edition of the Code of Laws of the United States current at any time shall, together with the then current supplement, if any, establish prima facie the laws of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, in force on the day preceding the commencement of the session following the last session the legislation of which is included: Provided, however, That whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted into positive law the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the United States.
TITLE 42 USC IS NOT ENACTED INTO POSITIVE LAW !
DEMAND THE CONTRACT, THEN DESTROY IT FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS, FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT!
Caroline Amrita Thank you.
Lisa Hatzopoulos https://www.govinfo.gov/help/cfr
Here is a link to the facebook post:
https://www.facebook.com/derrick.gonzalez.507/videos/1166538567779366
Aditionally, here is a link to another friend that has been banned from Facebook that created a facebook page for people that are interested in self educating: https://www.facebook.com/groups/536331853577802
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment