This article is the result of a post that was published to Facebook and covers the Basics of Language Styles Related to Contract Law: Elements & Remedies Explained
Justinian Woodlands
Here is an interesting talk I had with the Chat-GPT, AI, Chat Bot. I am starting to assume that the chat-bot, must speak the truth, maybe the corporation that holds the rights to it could be sued if it spoke lies? Read to the bottom!
ChatGPT said:
Hi there! How’s your day going?
good thanks, do you know what a given name is?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, a given name is the name that is assigned to an individual at birth or during a naming ceremony, distinguishing them from their family name or surname. It’s often referred to as a first name. Do you have a specific context in mind?
You said:
the surname is always written in all uppercase text, why is that?
ChatGPT said:
The surname “AI” in all uppercase letters is often used to emphasize its status as an acronym or to signify cultural or linguistic significance. In some cultures, especially in Asian contexts, surnames can be written in uppercase to maintain clarity and distinction. It might also reflect specific traditions or preferences in naming conventions. If you have a specific context or individual in mind, that could provide more insight!
You said:
I heard that the all uppercase text is no part of the English language, is that true?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, that’s generally true—standard English doesn’t require surnames or any words to be written in all uppercase. However, all-uppercase formatting is sometimes used for emphasis or stylistic reasons, especially in certain contexts like official documents, brand names, or specific cultural practices. In some languages and cultures, uppercase letters may be used differently or have specific meanings.
You said:
on page 666 of the Chicago Manual of Styles, (17th Edition) it claims that you can’t have two different languages within the one contract, it said that it has no correspondence, is that true?
ChatGPT said:
The Chicago Manual of Style typically focuses on clarity and consistency in writing, and it may advise against mixing languages in a single document, especially in formal contexts like contracts. Mixing languages can lead to confusion or misinterpretation if the meanings don’t correspond clearly. However, some legal documents do include multiple languages, especially in multilingual jurisdictions, as long as the terms are clearly defined. If you’re drafting a contract, it’s often best to stick to one language or ensure that both versions are carefully aligned.
You said:
mixing the two languages without the other party aware could constitute a fraud, is that true?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, mixing languages in a contract without the other party’s knowledge could potentially lead to misunderstandings and might be considered deceptive or fraudulent. If one party is unaware of critical terms or conditions because they are presented in a different language, it could invalidate consent. In legal terms, clarity and mutual understanding are crucial for a contract to be enforceable. Always ensuring both parties fully comprehend the contract’s terms is important to avoid legal issues.
You said:
Thanks for that, they were very good answers, thanks
ChatGPT said:
You’re welcome! I’m glad you found the answers helpful. If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
You said:
I will, thanks. Cheers, Rom
ChatGPT said:
Cheers, Rom! Anytime you need help, just reach out. Have a great day!
Ok, what I have always said in relation to the JUSTINIAN-DECEPTION Videos, is that once the fraud has been detected within the grammar of the document, (Licenses, banking contracts, police charges, government documents) that’s the end, it can go no further. “THIS TEXT” and “This Text”, does not correspond with each other unless you “consent” and while you didn’t know that THIS TYPE OF TEXT, was no part of the English language. were you misled? like the Chat Bot, just explained.
That has just told you, straight out, in 2024
Rex Kyte replied Nick Peters If AI is allowed to hold all the facts it may just work against those who sort to use it for evil. Ask if it knows how to define a realm at law using scripture and celestial navigation? (eg, King V Casement 1917 – Treason against the realm).
Kim Cooper replied Jess Farnham
Government styles manual, blacks law 4th edition, A.S.L. manual, all say the same or very similar.. Also The corporations act of Canada states that all capitals letters is how a corporation is identified.
….plz try using GROK …the AI provided on X (formerly Twitter) ….I am hearing it is “more truthful” ….!!!
When we say thankyou or ending the chat in formal manner as we do among us doesn’t it count as a contract/joinder with a non living being. We should treat chatgpt or meta ai as machine only. No cordial communication like thankyou or see you later. This…
JW Kirby replied Ryan Brooks Ai 
– polite phrase in English “have a day off” 
no such thing.
Matty Vale You blow me away all the time. Simple conversation done in a respectful manner and bang.. Brilliance.
Canna Clatch Cheers Rom!
Here is a podcast for you and your followers, I’m not affiliated, I’m just a listener. …
See more
BUZZSPROUT.COM
New Word Order
I’ve always said a dual language contract is thr first sign of fraud
Lincoln Scott · Awesome post mate.
Question though;
upper and lower case is not a different language, it’s just a grammatical error with case sensitivity being inappropriate.
We all here know though that it’s deceit through obfuscation to have a government or corporate entity engage with the DEAD corporate YOU.
I have heard that this UPPER CASE STRAW-MAN issue has been raised in court and rulings and determinations have been made that state there is no differentiation from a legal perspective of the two but I’m not sure how a magistrate or judge can state that but let’s not forget your in a “court” that is within their domain so what-ever they rule on is within their system. If you chose to adhere to their justice “system” then it’s your choosing.
Steve Graeme Lincoln I feel that would be why it’s a non readable doctrine. being able to read it means you define yourself in standing to what they determine you. A (corporation). That’s how they will implement you to that fictionalised setting. The styles manual …
Steve Graeme Lincoln turning up to a court room proving their presumption would probably mean we were reading the fraud when we shouldn’t of to begin with. Opening a letter that isn’t address to you is none of your business unless you want their business. And their system..
Lincoln Scott Steve Graeme I get ya mate!
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love Lincoln Scott I would like to know if you have actually seen were it is written in law that there is a corporate entity in my name? Are you going on hearsay? In law there must be evidence of a claim. There are accounts created without my knowledge but I have yet to find a corporate business or business entity registered in my name.
Lincoln Scott Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
I’m far from an expert to fully answer that question but fines, fee’s and some personal bills are in virtually every case addressed in upper-case to me.
There have been instances where people have registered their fully capitalised name and then placed a trademark on that NAME but I’m not sure how that went over though with government or corporate “interactions” that then send letters or address that person in that way.
Justinian Woodlands Lincoln Scott the all upper-case text is identified as a language other than English on pages 665 of the Chicago Manual of Style, it’s known as ASL, or American Sign Language, and it’s syntax is based on ancient Latin, not English. There it is, identified as a foreign language to English.
Justinian Woodlands Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Lovethe 17th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style.
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love Justinian Woodlands who wrote this manual and how does it relate to me when I did not create it? Even the online etymology dictionary is questionable since I did not create the words. 
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love Lincoln Scott Have you considered that the record is in error and that you have been misidentified and are being charged for products and services when you are not liable for the payment? Have you heard of the lawful Living community (www.lawfulliving.com) and the sister site freedom from government (wwwlfreedomfromgovernment.org). There are members that are not taking steps to no longer pay since they are not doing business for profit.
LAWFULLIVING.COM
Members-only area – Lawful Living
Members-only area – Lawful Living
Interesting but I won’t be using ChatGPT and I refuse to correspond with chat bots. Not a reality I want any part of
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
contract
A contract is an agreement between parties, creating mutual obligations that are enforceable by law. The basic elements required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are: mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality. In some states, elements of consideration can be satisfied by a valid substitute. Possible remedies for breach of contract include general damages, consequential damages, reliance damages, and specific performance.
Background:
Contracts are promises that the law will enforce. Contract law is generally governed by state common law, and while general overall contract law is common throughout the country, some specific court interpretations of a particular element of the contract may vary between the states.
If a promise is breached, the law provides remedies to the harmed party, often in the form of monetary damages, or in limited circumstances, in the form of specific performance of the promise made.
Elements — Consideration and Mutual Assent
Contracts arise when a duty comes into existence, because of a promise made by one of the parties. To be legally binding as a contract, a promise must be exchanged for adequate consideration. There are two different theories or definitions of consideration: Bargain Theory of Consideration and Benefit-Detriment theory of consideration.
Benefit-Detriment
Under the benefit-detriment theory, an adequate consideration exists only when a promise made to the benefit of the promisor or to the detriment of the promisee, which reasonably and fairly induces the promisor to make a promise for something else for the promisee.
For example, promises that are purely gifts are not considered enforceable because the personal satisfaction the grantor of the promise may receive from the act of generosity is normally not considered sufficient detriment to constitute adequate consideration.
Bargain-for-Exchange
Under Bargain-for-Exchange theory of consideration, adequate consideration exists when a promisor makes a promise in return for something else.
Here, the essential condition is that the promisor was given something specifically to induce the promise being made.
In other words, the bargain for exchange theory is different from the detriment-benefit theory in that the focus in bargain for exchange theory seems to be the parties’ motive for making the promises and the parties’ subjective mutual assent, while in detriment benefit theory, the focus seems to be an objective legal detriment or benefit to the parties.
Governing Laws
Contracts are mainly governed by state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law (i.e. the private agreement). Private law principally includes the terms of the agreement between the parties who are exchanging promises. This private law may override many of the rules otherwise established by state law. Statutory law, such as the Statute of Fraud, may require some kinds of contracts be put in writing and executed with particular formalities, for the contract to be enforceable. Otherwise, the parties may enter into a binding agreement without signing a formal written document. For example, Virginia Supreme Court has held in Lucy v. Zehmer that even an agreement made on a piece of napkin can be considered a valid contract, if the parties were both sane, and showed mutual assent and consideration.
Most of the principles of the common law of contracts are outlined in the Restatement of Law, Second Contracts published by the American Law Institute. The Uniform Commercial Code, whose original articles have been adopted in nearly every state, represents a body of statutory law that governs important categories of contracts. The main articles that deal with the law of contracts are Article 1 (General Provisions) and Article 2 (Sales). Sections of Article 9 (Secured Transactions) govern contracts assigning the rights to payment in security interest agreements. Contracts related to particular activities or business sectors may be highly regulated by state and/or federal law. In 1988, the United States joined the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods which now governs contracts within its scope.
Remedies for Breach of Contract — Damages (read the entire article using this link) https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contract
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
fraud in the inducement
Fraud in the inducement occurs when a person tricks another person into signing an agreement to one’s disadvantage by using fraudulent statements and representations. Because fraud negates the “meeting of the minds” required of a contract, the injured party can seek damages or terminate the contract. When fraud occurs after the agreement, the law usually requires the injured party to file only breach of contract claims, but the party may add fraudulent inducement claims because the two claims relate to two different actions by the defendant. A contract made by fraud is termed “voidable” rather than “void” and the injured party can choose to proceed with the contract even after learning about the defendant’s fraudulent inducement.
Under Texas law, a claim for fraudulent inducement must show that the defendant made a material misrepresentation, which one knew was false or without knowledge of its truth, and intended the inducement to cause reliance by the injured party.
In California, a plaintiff can make the contract voidable by showing that one knew that one was consenting by agreement and there was mutual assent, but the defendant induced the consent by fraud. The law distinguishes fraudulent inducement claims from fraud in the “execution” of the contract where the plaintiff entered into an agreement without actually knowing what one was signing and therefore lacked mutual assent.
See also Fraud.
[Last updated in June of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team]
fraud in the inducement | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
unconscionability
Unconscionability is a defense against the enforcement of a contract or portion of a contract. If a contract is unfair or oppressive to one party in a way that suggests abuses during its formation, a court may find it unconscionable and refuse to enforce it.
There are two types of unconscionability in contracts, procedural and substantive.
Procedural unconscionability is present when during the contract’s formation, at least one party does not have fair/meaningful choice, there’s misrepresentation, or unequal bargaining power among other factors.
Substantive unconscionability is when the contract’s terms unfairly benefit/harm one side such as extremely unequal price compared to value exchanged.
A contract is most likely to be found unconscionable if both unfair bargaining and unfair substantive terms are shown. An absence of meaningful choice by the disadvantaged party is often used to prove unfair bargaining. For example, in Jones v Star Credit, the Court refused to enforce a contract that charged three times the market value of an appliance to a low-income plaintiff, with significantly unequal education and experience compared to the defendant, by finding the contract unconscionable.
[Last updated in June of 2024 by the Wex Definitions Team]
wex
COMMERCE
commercial activities
consumer protection
business law
contracts
business sectors
commercial transactions
wex definitions
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/unconscionability
Adrianna Ardee V Botezatu Love this, “ invalidate consent”. Good post.
Brett Smith I’ve been watching your videos and presentations for a long time Rom, thanks for everything you have done for us, the information is irrefutable, I’d like to meet you at some point and have a yarn, much respect.
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
This Rumble Video published by malika on the Lawful Living Rumble channel is one of many educational videos worth watching. https://rumble.com/v4x1s9o-07-may-2024-newbie-tuesday…
RUMBLE.COM
07, May 2024 Newbie Tuesday sessh
Ben Grant Mitchell Love this, mate. Brilliant! Thanks for sharing and providing even more clarity around THIS ISSUE.
Sophia-Taniah Raymond-Dale Love
The subject matter jurisdiction of a court can be questioned at any time, even after sentencing. This is because subject matter jurisdiction is fundamental to a court’s authority to hear a case. If a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any judgment or sentence it issues is void and can be challenged at any stage of the proceedings, including on appeal or even after the case has been concluded¹⁴.
For example, in federal courts, if it is discovered that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the case must be dismissed regardless of when the issue is raised¹. This principle ensures that courts do not overstep their legal boundaries and only hear cases they are authorized to adjudicate⁴.
However, it’s important to note that while subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, other types of jurisdictional issues, such as personal jurisdiction, may be subject to waiver if not timely raised³.
If you have specific concerns about a case, it might be helpful to consult with a legal expert who can provide guidance based on the details of your situation. Is there a particular case or scenario you’re thinking about?
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-10-14
(1) DON’T GET THROWN OUT OF COURT: COMMON MISTAKES IN ESTABLISHING FEDERAL …. https://www.iadclaw.org/assets/1/19/2.1-_Brundage-_Subject_Matter_Jurisdiction.pdf?3257.
(2) subject matter jurisdiction | Wex | US Law – LII / Legal Information …. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/subject_matter_jurisdiction.
(3) SC12-814 Jurisdictional Answer Brief – Supreme Court of Florida. https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/381942/file/12-814_JurisAnswerBrief.pdf.
(4) 14-Day Resentencing Period is a Hard Deadline – FindLaw. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/tenth-circuit/14-day-resentencing-period-is-a-hard-deadline/.
(5) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S212940.PDF.
Freedom Dove 
Leave a comment