The Legal Name Fraud Shenanigans

I tis odd that we would continue to play in a fictitious world, a world built on a “constructive fraud” and think that is will yield freedom

Do we have the ability to think beyond the environment we are born into?

Jessica ShorterFriends In Law

July 17 at 8:20 AM  · 07-18-21Hello, my mother was arrested yesterday morning and asked that I contact this group for help. If anyone can get back to me asap I would greatly appreciate it.07-20-21Thank you to everyone for all of the information. I am home now, although I learned that even though I have done everything I know to do in the Administrative process nothing was resolved and I am still battling. While held hostage, I did not allow fingerprints nor mug shot. However, they refused to let me go unless I consented to do so. I did not consent. They physically used me to accomplish their goals. But let them tell it, it was not a kidnapping and I was not a hostage. But I was not free to go. What logic. So I went limp and they worked for it. I was given a new date to ‘appear’ in September. (I wish I could actually appear and scare the shit out of these criminals. Although some of them probably pray to Satan himself thus would not be bothered.) Anyway, I have learned a few more pieces of info that may help us on our journey to freedom. 1. Notice to agents is notice to principles is already ignored, BUT on top of that, the wearers of the holocaust cloaks, oft times ARE NOT RECEIVING OUR INSTRUMENTS. At all. This is the second time I have come across this issue in 2 separate venues. The guy on the bench (Bobby) had no idea I had been responding to all presentments and had sent Notice the case had been moved to the US Supreme Court as soon as I received another offer to contract from the Clerk several months ago. 2. Also, silence is acquiesce does not mean stop making moves as these clerks will have One kidnapped no matter what. The clerks do not believe they are obligated to respond to anything at all. Same with the DA and the Mayor. All have my affidavits and instruments received. I addressed the DA and the Clerk while in the venue and it was as though I was not there. I asked them in front of the whole room why the receipt of my instruments was not on the case log. Bobby (the kk ‘judge’) also looked at them waiting for answer and the DA simply racked her papers asked if she was still needed and left. The clerk kept typing. And Bobby moved forward. Why were they not in contempt of court?I refused fingerprints and mugshot. I told them if they could find the Law binding me to give up my right to privacy I would comply. They never found one. I was told prisoners do not have rights. I maintained my temporary self status of ‘kidnapped hostage/political prisoner”. I was not allowed to be released until I gave fingerprints and mugshot. An officer grabbed my hands and fingerprinted me. I did not resist but went limp and verbally refused consent. I have written a letter to Bobby informing him of everything he seems to have missed although he could be lying but now it will be registered that he is in the know. This will give him a personal opportunity to do the right thing. I will also file the UCC-1 as when I sent in my affidavits to the SOS, that is what I was informed to do at the time. I did not because I did not possess full knowledge of the reason and process. I still need more guidance on the UCC-1, but I do believe I see how it separates the Man from the Fiction and birth certificate. Thank you so much everyone and please forgive me for declaring victory so soon. I had completed the Admin process and had not received a response from them in so long…9/10 months maybe. I truly believed it was over. Besides, what else was there to do in the process? Ya live and learn. We WILL overcome. Thank you.

9You, Stephens Jennifer Betina and 7 others43 Comments

Care

CareComment

43 Comments

All Comments

  • Malika Dulce  · FollowDid they give any paperwork for the alleged charges?
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    • Jessica ShorterMalika Dulce I asked if they had the warrant and they said they were waiting on the station to like confirm it I think, I have the whole interaction recorded.1
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4d
    • Malika Dulce  · FollowThat’s where they failed because a warrant must exist prior to, not created after, the arrest and it must be attached to a warrant from a witness to or victim of a crime.4
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4d
    • Jessica ShorterI asked to see the warrant multiple times and they said they were waiting on dispatch and that I didnt have to see it
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4d
    • Malika Dulce  · FollowWrite it up and report them to the agencies they are attempting to enforce statutes of!!1
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4dActiveWrite a reply…
  • Ken AumanThey don’t need a warrant but they do have to cite her with written OFFICER charges to be able to put her in incarceration in a facility. Then they can hold her for 72 hours until the prosecutor decides whether to bring PROSECUTOR charges!IMPORTANT: Here is the chain of authority to complain to per the FBI. . Let’s say you are in a municipality. go up the line as far as you can to complain there is nothing in writing to hold her. if you know anyone that can do a quick habeas corpus do that. I could but im swamped..maybe hard yo do habeas til monday. anyway if municipal police fail or are tied up or not available the county sheriff is allowed to step in.. if they fail or refuse you go to the state police, which is also called the state patrol. if they fail or refuse jurisdiction goes to the attorney general. if the AG fails you go to the FBI. I got this from the FBI multiple times. each agency you have to create paper trails and recordings and escalate to the top of whoever is on duty at the time, and then move on. at 72 hours you have another cause of action for a habeas corpus for holding her without prosecutor charges (a warrant) because now the prosecutor warrants that she has evidence and guess what that evidence is – the OFFICER charges (affidavits).1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    •  · Edited
    • Erica AlleyKen Auman I heard that habeas corpus will work to get my kids back.Would it?
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4d
    • Ken AumanOf course! it works in the law! Law is on paper! real life making it manifest is where experience, prayer and perseverance comes in! How are you coming on what you’re writing!1
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 4d
      •  · Edited
  • Ken AumanWarrant means guarantee so it’s not far off – the officers have to guarantee they witnessed a crime, but they can’t just pick people up and throw them in the clink – the jail by their own laws has to have paperwork showing OFFICERS charges or a PREVIOUS WARRANT.That should give you a better practical understanding of how to articulate this as you go up the line. Also complain to the jail administration about no paperwork.1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    •  · Edited
  • Ken Aumanit’s all about paperwork. don’t get stuck arguing with anyone, move quickly until you exhaust whoever is on duty so you can reach the next agency. get names, ranks, numbers etc and keep a record the best you can. as you move on up so you can give the next agent your good faith information about who failed their duty and why you need their help. Two people have now confirmed you have a right to paperwork and WHY you have that right. PRESS IT.1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    •  · Edited
  • Ken Aumanget a copy of this to your mother. i had a friend who knew this and he screamed about this at the top of his lungs for as long as he could while they tried to fingerprint him etc. because he knew that they knew they needed paperwork to keep him and they didn’t have it.
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
  • Ken Aumani did something similar one time and when they released me the guy that ok’d me to leave said “don’t ever come back here” it was idiotic. i wanted to say if i do i will keep screaming and yelling again, but i didn’t, i was on the way out. they just rough people up sometimes.1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
  • Ken Auman*The reason they said they were waiting for the warrant was to mislead you. If you had asked for the charges they would have fumbled around and not known what to say and made another lie. OR the prosecutor has intentionally mislead the officers in that area. WHY because a warrant is a judicial instrument. They WERE waiting for a warrant but the lie was they have 72 hours to get that. What they DON’T have 72 hours for is for OFFICER charges in order to enter her into a facility.Now that you know this you can explain to them about warrants and see if you can embarass them into helping you more and tell them they have probably been lied to by the prosecutor. That might get them on your side. Tell them you need a supervisor. If you can get this right and explain this right, there’s a better chance that you can get one of them on your side. Pit them against the prosecutor for misleading them maybe that’ll get them on your side.2
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    •  · Edited
    • Jessica ShorterKen Auman I asked for a supervisor, the Mayor and the Sheriff numerous times during the kidnapping. It was refused me. They sent me the jail admin to speak with me.
      • Like
      •  · Reply
      •  · 1dView 3 more replies
      • Jessica ShorterI have filed everything I know to file, except a UCC-1 lien on my Self. The SoS told me to file a UCC-1 when I filed my notices with it. Do you know any thing about this? I do not want to create any more secret contracts with BS.
        • Like
        •  · Reply
        •  · 1d
  • Ken AumanThat is why you need to move fast up the ranks because the higher you go, the more likely the officers will know the difference between an OFFICERS CHARGES and the PROSECUTORS CHARGES which will be a warrant – which she has to bond out on… but YOUR complaint is there is no OFFICER charges so they CAN NOT HOLD HER. That will make higher officers nervous so keeeep going up the line now that you have accurate information to press them with.2
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
    •  · Edited
  • Ken Aumanjail administration knows this also but they pretend they are busy and they test you to see if you know…so…if you really pitch a fit, you have the right information now. try again on each shift they have new people . impugn them all. make them miserable because that may be what it takes. it’s a confidence game. you HAVE to be confident and persevering.1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
  • Ken Aumango out in the lobby and scream!!! when someone comes say THEY ARE HOLDING MY MOM WITH NO CHARGES!!!!!!!!!! HELPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!1
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
  • Ken Auman*if there was a previous warrant they have to have that “within a reasonable amount of time” is what the statutes and law says. that means if they get called out on an emergency they can come back and give it to you or a clerk can give it to you soon… See More
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d
  • Joshua Gutierrezjust offering an accounting perspective of court “charge” (commercial term)An accounting perspective for court“ I present this birth certificate not as evidence of my identity, but evidence of my interest, and I’m here to release my interest for settlement of the “charge”. What is the amount needed for release of settlement? ( the birth certificate is evidence of my foundational estate interest , not identity )( do not cross bar, as not to appear on their surety-ship on land )*the bc is not the interest , it is a claim to the interest certificate of Live Birth – the foundational security*this is a banker’s acceptance : the bc registration # 107-80-647898 , bill the estate is what they attempt. If you put up the estate as surety , they tap into the public estate to underwrite their securities, their bonds, to make them good/marketable.*when you answer to the name/Name/NAME , the courts presume that you are going to put up your public estate as the surety. The document you sign , they take that as your banker’s acceptance , to put your estate as surety , to authorize them to underwrite their bonds/securities because we abandoned the foundational security of the birth certificate. The NAME/Name/name is a fictional clone , a title to the estate.… or you just say : “The estate doesn’t consent to underwrite your bonds” .*what ever money they raised off their securities backed by your estate , belongs to you !that money actually belongs to you , it’s your estate. ~ reclaim your securities !• they attempt to try to tap into your estates – “what’s your name , … date of birth “ they are identifying the estateby giving them that information , “legally speaking” , authorizes them to plunder your estate – legal plunder = theft.~ this is tantamount when dealing with banks , loan agencies , utility companies et alIf you can get a hold of their double book keeping entries , Thrift Financial Reports , balance sheets FR 2046, 2049, 2099 in accordance with FAS5-Accounting Standards Codification 450-20, FAS 95, FAS 133, FAS 125 (securitization accounting), RC-S /RC-B, FFIEC call schedules… you’d see through that deceptive practice innocuously.
  • Case_Bond_Request.docx – Google Drivehttps://drive.google.com/…/1rDl5VZQ0JScXlQALylC…/view…Case_Bond_Request.docxDRIVE.GOOGLE.COMCase_Bond_Request.docxCase_Bond_Request.docx2
    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 4d

Ken AumanI will read your stuff. It seems well presented based on your first comment. I usually burn out reading on this subject because it doesn’t keep my attention long enough.For what it’s worth I do have a basic understanding from your first opening post there and i kind of had that understanding already.But I hope people understand also that besides accounting charges there are moral charges – legitimate moral charges – that require a different kind of payment! But yes if this was fraud and somebody had the time and energy you could approach the authorities in the jail administration and see if they bite with your ideas but I worry that this what you’re doing is buying time for judges to survive and screw more people and that’s not even close to being okay . My priority and interest is Mainline doctrines of law that are backed up with precident and to use them to clean up the existing system by getting rid of Judges lawfully with the doctrines of law that I am mastering.ReAnn Karlan JacksonWe with criminal cases.

Like

 · Reply

 · 4d

Keith LittleI asked one question – what are the charges – seems that can not be divulged even by the one anwering the question to get her mother out: I suggest EVRYONE GET A CONCISSE ENGLISH HANDBOOK AND LEARN HOW TO COMMUNICATE PROPERLY:The CHARGE is ONLY there because someone HAD TO MAKE A TAX ASSESSMENT!!!I ask again: What is the CHARGE(S)…?

Ken AumanTHE 6 ELEMENTS OF A MORAL CHARGE. Somebody asked me a question and I remembered something I wrote over 10 years ago on the six elements of a charge – here it is. I need to turn it into a formal brief. It’s several different things all jammed together right now but it is very valuable information and exhortation and breaking down of issues:6 ELEMENTS OF A CRIMEThe following elements of a “charge” are mandatory as quoted from: Introduction to the Criminal Justice System, page 34, by Hazel B. Kerper, published by West Publishing. Elements of a Crime [before a “crime” can be “charged”](1) a law defining the crime, which is to say a law commanding or prohibiting the act; [law means universally accepted maxim](2) a material element called the actus reus; [description of proof of the act of the crime](3) a mental element called the mens reus; [description of and proof of the motive or intent](4) an injury or result; [clear proof that there is a victim with an injury](5) a causal relationship between the act or conduct and the injury or result;(6) a prescribed penalty [related to protecting further victims] above is older**** Copy and save what I’m posting below here & GIVE IT TO POLICE IF THEY PULL YOU OVER! iT’S A COPY OF THE 6 ELEMENTS OF A CRIME THEY ARE TAUGHT IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SCHOOL – QUOTED STRAIGHT OUT OF THEIR BOOK! BUT THEY IGNORE IT!!!!!!! Mal prohibita crimes are unconstitutional because you are innocent until proven guilty!!!! GO TO CHINA IF YOU WANT THAT KIND OF LAW! WE FORBID IT (supposedly) -MANY OF YOU WILL READ THIS AND LATER IT WILL COME BACK TO MIND AND YOU WILL ASK YOUR SELF WHERE IT WAS THAT YOU SAW THAT!!!!!! SAVE IT NOW!!! ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS SOMEONE IN JAIL OR GOING TO JAIL OR SOMEONE WITH AN ILLEGAL TRAFFIC OR CODES TICKET.BELOW ELEMENTS ARE WHAT IS TAUGHT TO POLICE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE COURSESHOWEVER police never stop and ask once they are arresting people, why the statutes they arrest people under don’t have these 6 elements even the basic element of intent that everyone understands – even a child. A statute which violates the Constitution is void. Traffic tickets for example do not require motive. Therefore they are created under what is called a “bill of attainder” which is specifically banned and outlawed in the Constitution not once, but TWICE, in ART. 1 Sec 8 and ART 1 Sec 10. Getting a ticket is actually an executive branch trial or a legislative branch trial. That’s what bill of attainder means and why it is unconstitutionalThe following 6 elements of a “criminal charge” are mandatory as quoted from: Introduction to the Criminal Justice System, page 34, by Hazel B. Kerper, published by West Publishing.(1) a law defining the crime, which is to say a law commanding or prohibiting the act; [law meaning a bill passed by the State Legislature](2) a material element called the actus reus; [description of proof of the act of the crime](3) a mental element called the mens reus; [description of and proof of the motive or intent](4) an injury or result; [clear proof that there is a victim with an injury](5) a causal relationship between the act or conduct and the injury or result;(6) a prescribed penalty [related to protecting further victims] FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY A LAW HAS TO HAVE THESE 6 ELEMENTS In our form of government we do not have a “government” per se. We have trustees. We cannot give to government trustees the right or authority to do anything that we ourselves cannot do. Can I give someone a “ticket” for going too fast in the publics jointly owned domain and roadways? No, not unless they violate a true crime such as reckless endangerment. Therefore neither can the government trustees give “tickets” which do not incorporate the element of a crime. Can I go next door and tell my neighbor to cut his grass on his private property because it’s too tall? No. Then neither can the government trustees. But what if it might make my property value go down? Unless it’s done with motive and it can be proven, it’s not a crime. So.. No. If you will actually stand up and want to challenge the Constitutionality of something in a specific event or case going on and help keep this country from being mislead and deceived I will be glad to show you examples of how to do this and give you some procedural education. Contact me about it on facebook.

 http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=190679227676061 or go to a seminar on court procedure so you can help inform your representatives. Be responsible to help protect this country. I’m doing my part, what are you doing? U.S. prison population dwarfs that of other nations – The New York 

Timeswww.nytimes.com

 http://www.nytimes.com/…/23iht-23prison.12253738.html… The United States has less than 5 percent of the world’s population. But it has almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners. Terry J. Schultz:Which is further proof that we are a Nation of Laws – and violating our laws has consequences!!!! · Ken Auman Terry J. Schultz We are not a nation of laws, we WERE a nation of laws. now we are a nation of statutes. a criminal law has 6 elements the most common of which people understand – motive. statutes don’t require motive. we are a dictatorship now. all of our statutes violate the Constitution.52 minutes ago · Like· Dorothy Slattery Some laws are not a reason to be jailed. Our jails are horrid!!! I have NEVER done drugs but I do think there is a reasonable limit to how much you can ahve. I do NOT think that jail is a reasonable solution to possessing one joint.47 minutes ago · Like· Ken Auman Possessing a “joint” does not constitute “intent to commit a crime”. In the early part of this country everyone understood basic principles of law. Please read my note I’m about to post a link to and find some law groups online to learn some basic principles from26 minutes ago · Like· Ken Auman or go to a seminar on court procedure so you can help inform your representatives. Be responsible to help protect this country. I’m doing my part, what are you doing? http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=190679227676061These are the 6 elements of a crime which police study in criminal justice, but then they violate their oath & arrest people for—— LAWS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN THESE ELEMENTS ——— MANY OF YOU WILL RE…See MoreBy: Ken Auman elements of a crime.doc · PrintThese are the 6 elements of a crime which police study in criminal justice, but then they violate their oath & arrest people forThese are the 6 elements of a crime which police study in criminal justice, but then they violate their oath & arrest people for1

Ken Auman* I’ve never seen an ordinance or an infraction or a misdemeanor for that matter that has the six elements of a crime. That’s how aberrant our country has become. And keep in mind this is out of police officers direct training that a quote traffic ticket has to have the six elements of a crime as quoted above from West publishing. I’d like to do a zoom class myself and set some who are fighting traffic tickets up with this information and humiliate some prosecutors judges and police.2

Like

 · Reply

 · 3d

 · Edited

Keith LittleEvidently she was never charged with anything…2

Like

 · Reply

 ·ActiveSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelfordKeith Little our energy filed is what is at stake.. it is what they are after.. the money is not the actual issue….

Trusts-and-Court.pdf – Google Drive

the-Use-of-Prison-Bonds-.pdf – Google Drive

ttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1eQy7sKX9E7jHK33ZbEywmvzubXcBPPAZ/view?fbclid=IwAR1UgU02k0tJ8SRHlksQKEKg5phz6oGWP-B_gsOTUqReOOB5UeO5CDCrMJo

Bench warrant response.doc – Google Drive

Request 1099-OID on court case.docx – Google Drive

These are the 6 elements of a crime which police study in criminal justice, but then they violate their oath & arrest people for

—— LAWS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN THESE ELEMENTS ———

MANY OF YOU WILL READ THIS AND LATER IT WILL COME BACK TO MIND AND YOU WILL ASK YOUR SELF WHERE IT WAS THAT YOU SAW THAT!!!!!! SAVE IT NOW!!!  ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS SOMEONE IN JAIL OR GOING TO JAIL OR SOMEONE WITH AN ILLEGAL TRAFFIC OR CODES TICKET.

BELOW ELEMENTS ARE WHAT IS TAUGHT TO POLICE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE COURSES

HOWEVER police never stop and ask once they are arresting people, why the statutes they arrest people under don’t have these 6 elements even the basic element of intent that everyone understands – even a child. 

A statute which violates the Constitution is void.  Traffic tickets for example do not require motive.  Therefore they are created under what is called a “bill of attainder” which is specifically banned and outlawed in the Constitution not once, but TWICE, in ART. 1 Sec 8 and ART 1 Sec 10.  Getting a ticket is actually an executive branch trial or a legislative branch trial.  That’s what bill of attainder means and why it is unconstitutional

The following 6 elements of a “criminal charge” are mandatory as quoted from:  Introduction to the Criminal Justice System, page 34, by Hazel B. Kerper, published by West Publishing.

(1) a law defining the crime, which is to say a law commanding or prohibiting the act;  [law meaning a

            bill passed by the State Legislature]

(2) a material element called the actus reus[description of proof of the act of the crime]

(3) a mental element called the mens reus[description of and proof of the motive or intent]

(4) an injury or result; [clear proof that there is a victim with an injury]

(5) a causal relationship between the act or conduct and the injury or result;

(6) a prescribed penalty [related to protecting further victims]

FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY A LAW HAS TO HAVE THESE 6 ELEMENTS

In our form of government we do not have a “government” per se.  We have trustees.  We cannot give to government trustees the right or authority to do anything that we ourselves cannot do.  Can I give someone a “ticket” for going too fast in the publics jointly owned domain and roadways?  No, not unless they violate a true crime such as reckless endangerment.  Therefore neither can the government trustees give “tickets” which do not incorporate the element of a crime.  Can I go next door and tell my neighbor to cut his grass on his private property because it’s too tall? No.  Then neither can the government trustees.  But what if it might make my property value go down?  Unless it’s done with motive and it can be proven, it’s not a crime.  So.. No.

If you will actually stand up and want to challenge the Constitutionality of something in a specific event or case going on and help keep this country from being mislead and deceived I will be glad to show you examples of how to do this and give you some procedural education.  Contact me about it on facebook.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.