#BARGrievances #WhatTo AskIfYouFindYourselfInCourt

Ignorance and lack of education or wrongful education and indoctrination and dogmatic beliefs cause confusion!!

Information dispels fear as it brings one to a state of self empowerment!!

Knowledge is freedom, knowledge can only be attained through the direct experience of a thing. One can gain knowledge by learning from those that have experienced the thing!!

You will find below links to some great videos by our friend-in-law Alphonse!!!

Attention to all Respondent(s)/Liabellee(s) being either a man or woman acting as an Agent of an Agency or as an Officer of an Office listed herein and those not listed in this document is to be addressed and responded to individually as a Public Servant who has taken an “Oath of Office and is working under respective subparts of the Crown Service Corporation(s) known as “Canada” and or the “United States” and or the “United States of America”.

We require you to thoroughly read all words spelled out in this document, attachments, and exhibits herein written in Plain English without the use of “weasel words” and written with due diligence and with great care.We wish to dispel any and all presumptions and assumptions held by the men and or women or others working as an Agent for an Agency or as an Officer of an Office. And those that are ignorant of the laws and as a result of their education or lack thereof am now making them knowing that their ignorance and or blatant disrespect for the laws resulting in criminal activities have caused substantial harm in these said trespasses.Notice: notification of liability is the first essential element of due process of law.

As silence is acquiescence under the law, silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a lawful or moral and ethical duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be misleading, whether intentionally or not.It pains me to have to spell it out, “we are not the “class of person” as defined in any statute, code, charter, ordinance, act, or perceived law created by the legislators under the B.A.R Association” and we are not the “you/You” as defined when the meaning of the word “you” is someone that owes a debt to the United States.

We require you to answer the following questions:

1. Who has claimed that they have the power and authority to create this word “Bond” and create a piece of paper and call it a “Birth Certificate Bond” or a “Stock Certificate”?

1. (a) how do they magically create this “Birth Certificate Bond” from the creation of the piece of paper a mother and or father wrote on with the baby’s particulars after their baby was born being called the “Live Birth Record”?

2. What gives the Registrar the power to evidence this event?

3. What or who has given the “Registrar” the power to create a “Birth Certificate Bond”, whereby publicly certifying that a property Title is registered as a Security for the national debt?There are those that believe it to be like a Warehouse Receipt for the baby, the delivered goods. [WAREHOUSE RECEIPT]. A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, maybe a negotiable instrument used for financing with inventory as security. it is claimed in – Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition]. At the same time, the bond converts your given name and family name into a tradename. [apparently] Only corporations have a “last name”. [corporations are fictions of the maker of man’s laws] Apparently this fiction called “the State” has the ability to create another fiction that only exists on paper called a “Legal Person”, as a “franchise child” of the “parent corporation”.

This piece of paper called, “The Bond” is sold to the World Bank (Bank of International Settlements, created in 1931 by the Vatican) as Settlor of the Trust. It is said, “The baby’s weight in ounces on the Record of Live Birth is to calculate your market value relative to gold”. “The Bond” becomes a registered Security, which the Treasury uses as Surety for Treasury securities such as Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills.We really need to know the answer to these vital questions, “Who has the power and authority to Monetize our life?” And “who has the power and authority to dictate the price of gold?”

In this ungodly system, “The people truly are the Credit of the Nation”. In this corrupted system, the people’s credit is effectively “human capital”, or “livestock” and is nothing more than the trafficking to benefit the “traffickers”.

We require an explanation as to who or what has the power to create this idea of “The Secret trust” whereby influencing the life of every baby born to earth?

According to the Dark Priests that created these so-called LawsROMAN CANON LAW3.3 Rights Suspension and CorruptionArticle 100 – Cestui Que Vie Trust

Canon 2057

Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, or ifthe man/woman wants to take control upon their Private Person establishing their status andcompetency, The Fiduciary is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary dutiesrequiring their immediate removal and punishment

Canon 2045 By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the Cestui Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private bankseffectively becoming “private trusts” or “Fide Commissary Trusts” administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered “SecretTrusts” whose existence does not need to be divulged.

Canon 2046

From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States became effectively “enemies of the state” and “aliens” which in turn converted the “FideCommissary” private secret trusts to “Foreign Situs” (Private International) Trusts.

Canon 2047

In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the global Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trust system was implemented from 1933 onwards.Canon 2048Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the childforever any rights of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.

Canon 2049

Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

Canon 2050

Since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowinglyand willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto thelive birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby awaythrough the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissorynote is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.

Canon 2051

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims of property of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and EcclesiasticalProperty and the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society and as Executors and Administrators.

Canon 2052

The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Bar Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust of Baptism.

Canon 2053

The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of these secret trusts.

Canon 2054

As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed privateproperty of the Roman Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used.

Canon 2055

While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a member of One Heaven and holder of their own title.

Canon 2056

Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trust based on such false presumptions ceases to have any property.

Canon 2057

Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment. One can take control of it the Trust Estate or “Dissolve” it completely and move all Asset to yourown account and take control of your Copyright Name and NAME Trademark and Tradename. and write a Promissory note as this is Tender Cash.Cancel the bond and demand compensation for the trespass and damages!

The Slavery System

Whether we realized it or not, until recently, we were all ‘legally’ debt or ‘labor’ slaves, as were our parents, our grandparents and great grandparents before us.

Since 1933 every new child born was required to be ‘registered’, thereby creating a Corporate Person, effectively denying that child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

The act of registering a child contracted them as chattel, and the birth record was a deceptive legal way of getting the parents to sign the baby away. The birth record was in fact a promissory note that was converted into a slave bond, which was then sold to a private reserve bank effectively giving ownership of the child to the bank.

Each new baby’s contract was sealed by either a drop of their blood or by an ink impression of their foot onto the birth record. This ‘signature’ was used to create their lifetime value, evidenced by their labor and the taxes and costs of that labor as monetized currency – all designed to keep people in servitude for their entire lifetime.

The banks have been the modern slave owners and as the saying goes, “He who owns the debt owns the people.” The way the Slavery System was imposed on us meant that even if we did end up paying off our house or our car, we never actually owned it, because our right to any Real Property ownership was given away at the registration of our birth.

This has been legal process since 1540 via something called a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and this was still in effect until the recent UCC Rulings changed the legal landscape and reinstated the un-rebuttable fact that no-one can own our ‘selves or own our bodies.The slavery system remained intact for so long because of educational doctrines, the influence of our community at large and because so many people accepted and embraced their slavery by waiting for others to help them or to tell them what they should/could or should/could not do. Enforcers like the police and courts made sure we stayed within the slavery system and incarcerated us if we chose to live as FREE individuals.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/freedom-walkers/the-cestui-qui-vie-trust-canon-law-and-the-thirdfinal-position-of-defacto-law/748998428548552/

42 #U.S.Code § 1983.#CivilAction for #DeprivationOfRights#U.S.CodeEvery person who, under color of any #statute, #ordinance, #regulation, #custom, or usage, of any #State or #erritory or the #DistrictofColumbia, #subjects, or causes to be #subjected, any #citizen of the #UnitedStates or another person within the #jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the #Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any #ActofCongress applicable exclusively to the #DistrictofColumbia shall be considered to be a #statute of the #DistrictofColumbia. (R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

#FictionOfLaw
🙂 ❤ the following video is really great and ie-I absolutely Love Alphonse and wish he knew that he should study the laws and realize all so-called “statutes” come from the Bible. And if he studies the statutes he will come to knows where to send the “bills”!!! ❤ 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0LvJ78bCg4&feature=share
For those that have done the inner work, we are not under any word and are set free from the mental image of the word “God” as we realize our relationship with all life.
We should be invoking a “Spiritual #CourtofEquity“!
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/court_of_equity
The UCC is the Code of The District of Columbia
https://code.dccouncil.us/…/code/titles/28/chapters/25/
Only Congress has the ability to discharge debt!
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .
By the terms of the Constitution, the power of Congress to levy taxes is subject to but one exception and two qualifications.
Articles exported from any State may not be taxed at all. Direct taxes must be levied by the rule of apportionment and indirect taxes by the rule of uniformity. The Court has emphasized the sweeping character of this power by saying from time to time that it reaches every subject,1 that it is exhaustive2 or that it embraces every conceivable power of taxation.3 Despite these generalizations, the power has been at times substantially curtailed by judicial decision with respect to the subject matter of taxation, the manner in which taxes are imposed, and the objects for which they may be levied.
https://constitution.congress.gov/…/artI…/ALDE_00001054/
Send all alleged bills to
United States Department of The Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue North West, Washington, DC 20220
Phone: (202) 622-2000
#Attorn
#Attorney
#Landlord, or #POAs
gives (agents and/or subjects) #NoAuthority
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/244/II/61

Prosecutor Bails Northern Ireland

Tutorial 4 BAR Grievances Part 1

“What a long, strange trips its been”. May we align with the folks that support our efforts to stay on the straight and narrow.

https://archive.org/…/gd71-04-14.sbd.lai.6250.sbefail…

Here are some of my favorite citations:

A defendant can aid himself by other dilatory exceptions against the power of the judge in this manner:–‘Sir, I demand sight and hearing of the commission by which you claim jurisdiction over me.’ And if the judge refuses or cannot show the commission, no one needs to acknowledge him as a judge delegate. (7 Selden Society 93)Rightful judgments ought to endure and stand firm and be inviolably observed until adequate satisfaction is obtained and so first of all it must be seen whether the justice who has to make a judgment is competent.

If he is a delegate and has no warrant from the king, what is done before him will be of no consequence as if it were done before one who is not his proper judge, although such as are summoned ought to come. Yet they should not be obeyed, not only when they have no warrant but also even if they show a warrant which has not proceeded from the king. (99 Selden Society 177)

It is clear that first of all, in order that judgments be valid, it is necessary to see whether the justice has a warrant from the king so that he may judge, for if he has no warrant what will be done before him will have no validity, done, so to speak, before one, not his proper judge. The original writ ought first to be read and then the writ constituting him a justice; if he has no such writ at all, or if he has but it is not at hand, he need not be obeyed, unless the original writ makes mention of his judicial authority.(Bracton, v. 4 p. 278, google Harvard Bracton.)

Only authorized members of the B.A.R. Association or “Legal Society” or those that have sworn an “Oath of Office” can use the “terms” of this society. It does not matter if you are in “commerce” or not. We should tell them “you are speaking a foreign language and it is incomprehensible to me”. If they are going to be using these “terms” then they need to know what the definitions are as written in the statures, charters, codes, ordinances, bills, acts, etc. that they are enforcing. So even people operating business on the roads are not required to hold a “driver’s license”. All licensing and certification is false!!

It is great to see people “Standing Up”.

The “cult” followers have no Jurisdiction over a “man”. It would be advisable to stop calling ourselves a “Canadian”, an “American”, a “taxpayer”, a”citizen”, or anything else. In the process of contracting by calling ourselves, a “Canadian”, or an”American” or a “Taxpayer, or a “Citizen” is seen as accepting the “terms” of the “Service Agreement’. They have convinced us that this is a contract when it is not.

There are specific elements for a “contract” to exist which Alphonse has described in the video and for those that are interested in self educting themsevles there is more information available for free on the following website:

https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/the-parts-of-contract.html

It is advisable to be aware of the definition of the word, “person” and to stop using this word. We are not the “class of person” as defined in their legislation, statutes, codes, charters, acts, ordinances, bills, and so-called, “Laws”.

Time to “make a stand as an enlightened man”. It would serve us all to realize how the “labels” imposed upon us at “birth” have limited our experience of life. It is up to us to use our words wisely.

We do not need “permits” or “licensing” or “certification” to experience life on Gaia/Earth. Am inviting people to be informed. Information is powerful as it brings one to a state of being informed, being informed is empowering. The last 6 or so articles published on my website are packed with valuable and valid information for those that would like to make an honorable stand for “true freedom” from the “cult” known as “The Crown”.

Another brilliant post this one is from by Bodene Sdr

Experience WHO you are by learning WHO you are not

 D I D Y O U K N O W 

 [wo]man are NOT REQUIRED to produce a DRIVERS LICENCE When TRAVELING in your own private capacity on the PUBLIC road from point A to point B  C H E C K O U T www.AWARRIORCALLS.com find out what to say the next time you are approached by these people [ P O L I C Y O F F I C E R S ] …….  Remember these [wo]man ACT as police officers for a ” S E R V I C E C O R P O R A T I O N ”  unless they have a verified claim of trespass you have caused wrong or harm to another [wo]man OR you have a OBLIGATION [contract] that has your wet signature on it with that service corporation then they have NO JURISDICTION [control] to even speak to you…. They are now TRESPASSING without RIGHT.  [wo]man are only ever required to produce a drivers licence when they are using the public roads for commerce, Know the difference between TRAVELING & DRVING – come and learn the C O M M O N L A W – www.AWARRIORCALLS.com – Christopher James

U N L E S S W E K N O W O U R R I G H T S W E H A V E NONE

 I G N O R A N C E I S T H E E N E M Y

 K N O W L E D G E I S T H E S O L U T I O N 

below are the comments attached to the post:

• Luanne LeClair“i don’t answer questions” and “i reserve my right to remain silent”, show them your Notice of Trespass with fee schedule, get all their names and take pictures.2
• Glen Gordonif they persist , ask for a supervisor , they must stop and call to the scene to ensure the cop is not abusing power3
  • Terra BlackAnd what do you do/say when the supervisor comes?
  • Glen GordonTerra Black you explain the situation and tell your side of the story and tell them that you feel your rights are being violated and you want confirmation that the officer that stopped you is within the limits of power
  • Glen Gordonif you are detained or under arrest , they must inform you of your right to have council present , ( which they never do under detention ) but you must ask if you are free to go , if the answer is no then you are detained , at that point they must info… See More
  •  ·Glen GordonAlso, it wouldnt hurt to memorize the name of the chief and or deputy chief of police and do a little research on them , to see where they are from , many chiefs are from another province or city , and when you get stopped by police you can start c… See More1
  •  John BourassaI cannot find that show where that young guy pulled over ends up with the cops asking if he will teach them
  • Lynn ClydeJohn Bourassa
  • https://youtu.be/vfUJLHKKzjg
  • YOUTUBE.COMpolice stop-travel without license, registration, insurance, or tags….right to travel successpolice stop-travel without license, registration, insurance, or tags….right to travel success
  • John BourassaLynn Clyde this is the one, this guy is brilliant!!!2
  • Lynn ClydeJohn Bourassa YES he is! He is the KING! Namasste1
  • Kate CookLynn Clyde wow! That’s unbelievable. Good for him!!!!2
  • Lynn ClydeKate Cook YES he knows who he is.
• Corrine Maciubatrying to figure out how to deal with a photo radar ticket. I know I haven’t entered into a contract with this 3rd party hired to do photo radar by the city. Nor have I caused any harm to myself or others. Any direction would be helpful.
  • Glen GordonCorrine Maciuba send it back saying ‘ Prove it ” This is what i sent them after receiving a jaywalking ticket. Use conditional acceptance . I would be glad to pay any fine if you would please provide proof of claim , failure to do so will result in a fraudulent or false claim and you will be liable for 3x the said amount . Please submit your proof of claim within 21 days . By responding this way , you are no longer on the defense you are on the offense and now they have to prove their claim . i sent this out in early feb this year and have not heard back from them. The proof of claim must be a signed contract by both parties and since they cannot provide one , you win
  • Glen Gordonthis is a dispute a claim form

Mal FendersonOh, it’s just a traffic ticket, you should go to Court and ask for disclosure of the constable’s oath and cross examine him on the meaning of the words. If you can speak French even better, because then it can all be done through a French translator. Or even if you just need certain bits to be in French parceque le Francais est le meilleur lang de liber

Mal FendersonOh, it’s just a traffic ticket, you should go to Court and ask for disclosure of the constable’s oath and cross examine him on the meaning of the words. If you can speak French even better, because then it can all be done through a French translator. Or even if you just need certain bits to be in French parceque le Francais est le meilleur lang de liberte

Mal FendersonOh, it’s just a traffic ticket, you should go to Court and ask for disclosure of the constable’s oath and cross examine him on the meaning of the words. If you can speak French even better, because then it can all be done through a French translator. Or even if you just need certain bits to be in French parceque le Francais est le meilleur lang de liberteik

Mal FendersonOh, it’s just a traffic ticket, you should go to Court and ask for disclosure of the constable’s oath and cross examine him on the meaning of the words. If you can speak French even better, because then it can all be done through a French translator. Or even if you just need certain bits to be in French parceque le Francais est le meilleur lang de liber

Glen Gordonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxKVQGN2JtY

YOUTUBE.COMKey to Winning a Legal Case – Play OffenseKey to Winning a Legal Case – Play Offense

Corrine MaciubaGlen Gordon thank-you so much for taking the time to respond. Greatly appreciate the info and will start working on this

Mal FendersonOh, it’s just a traffic ticket, you should go to Court and ask for disclosure of the constable’s oath and cross examine him on the meaning of the words. If you can speak French even better, because then it can all be done through a French translator. Or even if you just need certain bits to be in French parceque le Francais est le meilleur lang de liberte

• Mal FendersonJe ne suis pas en enfant, mes ami, je suis un frank homme 
• Dave Labrechehttps://www.facebook.com/TheAngryAlbertan/videos/302459201466955 2 great alberta doctors
• Nicky VacondioThank you Bodene. You’re awesome .1
• Michael SellersIs this also true with a license plate for the vehicle?
• ActiveSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelfordOnly authorized members of the B.A.R. Association or “Legal Society” or those that have sworn an “Oath of Office” can use the “terms” of this society. It does not matter if you are in “commerce” or not. We should tell them “you are speaking a foreign language and it is incomprehensible to me”. If they are going to be using these “terms” then they need to know what the definitions are as written in the statures, charters, codes, ordinances, bills, acts, etc. that they are enforcing.
  • Mal FendersonSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelford Well, at bottom it depends what you think words are, your philosophy of language, or of law. Of course, this leads to a sort of circular problem.Aristotle says that a name is a sound significant by treaty, that is, suntheke, which means bilateral agreement, treaty, convention. The other option is diatheke, which is an inheritance, e.g. words are just something that came down from on high. That is the Christian/Jewish/Muslim/Monotheist view. The Greek view is a bit more expansive.Names are spoken sounds that symbolize the affections of the soul, which are significant by treaty. Written marks symbolize spoken sounds.You is a part of speech, didn’t you learn the parts of speech? =
  • ActiveSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelfordMal Fenderson not sure if “words” came down from on high!! Did you know the legal definition of the word “you” is “one who owes a debt to the United States”?
  • Mal FendersonSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelford No, that is not the definition of that word, but good luck! You and me are primitive terms, you either understand the difference or you don’t.
  • Mal FendersonMEUM et TUUM.
  • ActiveSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelfordMal Fenderson have a good read ” (e) You means an individual who owes a debt to the United States within the scope of this subpart”. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/20/422.402
  • LAW.CORNELL.EDU20 CFR § 422.402 – What special definitions apply to this subpart?20 CFR § 422.402 – What special definitions apply to this subpart?
  • ActiveSophia-taniah Borgeson-shackelfordMal Fenderson when we go to court and the judge says, “you” and we respond to the word “you” it is like affirming the definition.
  • Mal Fendersonyes, it says “You means an individual who owes a debt to the United States within the scope of this subpart,” so it is a convenient way to write the subpart.It is done this way so that people who don’t know law can read the section easily. It is ba… See MoreEN.WIKTIONARY.ORGyou – Wiktionaryyou – Wiktionary
  • Mal FendersonBut this does not mean that everyone who says “you” owes a debt to the united states, you is a pronoun, it stands in for a noun.

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.Marginal note:Minimum punishment

(1.1) When a person is prosecuted on indictment and convicted of one or more offences referred to in subsection

(1), the court that imposes the sentence shall impose a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years if the total value of the subject-matter of the offences exceeds one million dollars.Marginal note:Affecting public market

(2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-380.html

Dealing With Debt Collectors

Once we realize there is a Constructive Fraud running it is our duty for the sake of our children to take the right action. Our estate is being robbed and our children are being denied their rightful place in the creative process. The time has arrived to make thieves knowing the jig is up. Will you join me in sending a clear message to the “cult” followers that have acquiesced to the position of the “crown”?!Will you join me by no longer cooperating with these clearly deranged men and women.

We put the letter from the collection agency back in the envelope and closed it with tape and sealed it with a kiss. On the front of the envelope, we drew a line like an arrow through the window pointing to the following message:

“Return to sender No contract. We require you to correct your records. This is an obtrusive and incorrect document. Paid with my full faith and credit in Congress. There is no debt”

On the back of the envelope we printed:

“You have made a mistake. Stop trespass and ie/I will not press charges or prosecute this case. Under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, you have violated this private woman’s inalienable and inherent, and innate right to life, liberty, harmony, and happiness. Am not a business. Am not the class of persons as defined in the statutes. Nore are we the “you” you are looking for. We do not owe a debt to the United States and will not be charged with an arbitrary tax conjured up by the men and women working as agents for a Crown Service Corporation. No Contract exists. Do not move upon this water. Returned to the sender with love and consciousness and peaceful intention. We require you to correct your records. Sealed with a kiss”.

We can also add on the outside of the envelope forward to and give them the address to The Treasury. “2 Spending Power. Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts, and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States”.

Will drive to the post office and put this envelope with the obtrusive letter in the outgoing mailbox today!Am drafting a Notice of Admissions to be included in a document that is being prepared to be served to David Eby is a man that sometimes acts as Attorney General of British Columbia. How often do people during the process of law file a Request for Admissions?

Maxim of Law: “He who does not deny, admits. [A well-known rule of pleading]”, unless expressly denied, the following stands under the penalty of perjury:

We require you to read and respond to the information provided in the following pdf document:

https://sedm.org/Forms/03-Discovery/Admissions.pdf

Has anyone found in the Intellectual Instruments created by the men and women of Congress that they have an obligation to ensure the health and safety of the men and women born to this world or to life itself?

ArtI.S8.C1.2 Spending PowerArticle I, Section 8, Clause 1:The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .The grant of power to provide . . . for the general welfare raises a two-fold question: how may Congress provide for the general welfare and what is the general welfare that it is authorized to promote?

The first half of this question was answered by Thomas Jefferson in his opinion on the Bank as follows: [T]he laying of taxes is the power, and the general welfare the purpose for which the power is to be exercised.

They [Congress] are not to lay taxes ad libitum for any purpose they please; but only to pay the debts or provide for the welfare of the Union. In like manner, they are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose.

1 The clause, in short, is not an independent grant of power, but a qualification of the taxing power. Although a broader view has been occasionally asserted,

2 Congress has not acted upon it and the Court has had no occasion to adjudicate the point.With respect to the meaning of the general welfare the pages of The Federalist itself disclose a sharp divergence of views between its two principal authors. Hamilton adopted the literal, broad meaning of the clause;

3 Madison contended that the powers of taxation and appropriation of the proposed government should be regarded as merely instrumental to its remaining powers; in other words, as little more than a power of self-support.

4 From early times, Congress has acted upon Hamilton’s interpretation. Appropriations for subsidies

5 and for an ever-increasing variety of internal improvements

6 constructed by the Federal Government, had their beginnings in the administrations of Washington and Jefferson.

7 Since 1914, federal grants-in-aid, which are sums of money apportioned among the states for particular uses, often conditioned upon the duplication of the sums by the recipient state, and upon observance of stipulated restrictions as to their use, have become commonplace.The scope of the national spending power came before the Supreme Court at least five times prior to 1936, but the Court disposed of four of the suits without construing the general welfare clause. In the Pacific Railway Cases

8 and Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.,

9 it affirmed the power of Congress to construct internal improvements, and to charter and purchase the capital stock of federal land banks, by reference to its powers over commerce, post roads, and fiscal operations, and to its war powers. Decisions on the merits were withheld in two other cases, Massachusetts v. Mellon and Frothingham v. Mellon,

10 on the ground that neither a state nor an individual citizen is entitled to a remedy in the courts against an alleged unconstitutional appropriation of national funds. In United States v. Gettysburg Electric Ry.,

11 however, the Court invoked the great power of taxation to be exercised for the common defence and general welfare

12 to sustain the right of the Federal Government to acquire land within a state for use as a national park.Finally, in United States v. Butler,

13 the Court gave its unqualified endorsement to Hamilton’s views on the taxing power. Justice Roberts wrote for the Court: Since the foundation of the Nation sharp differences of opinion have persisted as to the true interpretation of the phrase.

Madison asserted it amounted to no more than a reference to the other powers enumerated in the subsequent clauses of the same section; that, as the United States is a government of limited and enumerated powers, the grant of power to tax and spend for the general national welfare must be confined to the enumerated legislative fields committed to the Congress. In this view the phrase is mere tautology, for taxation and appropriation are or may be necessary incidents of the exercise of any of the enumerated legislative powers.

Hamilton, on the other hand, maintained the clause confers a power separate and distinct from those later enumerated, is not restricted in meaning by the grant of them, and Congress consequently has a substantive power to tax and to appropriate, limited only by the requirement that it shall be exercised to provide for the general welfare of the United States. Each contention has had the support of those whose views are entitled to weight. This court has noticed the question, but has never found it necessary to decide which is the true construction. Mr. Justice Story, in his Commentaries, espouses the Hamiltonian position. We shall not review the writings of public men and commentators or discuss the legislative practice. Study of all these leads us to conclude that the reading advocated by Mr. Justice Story is the correct one. While, therefore, the power to tax is not unlimited, its confines are set in the clause which confers it, and not in those of § 8 which bestow and define the legislative powers of the Congress. It results that the power of Congress to authorize expenditure of public moneys for public purposes is not limited by the direct grants of legislative power found in the Constitution.

14By and large, it is for Congress to determine what constitutes the general welfare. The Court accords great deference to Congress’s decision that a spending program advances the general welfare,

15 and has even questioned whether the restriction is judicially enforceable.

16 Dispute, such as it is, turns on the conditioning of funds.As with its other powers, Congress may enact legislation necessary and proper to effectuate its purposes in taxing and spending. In upholding a law making it a crime to bribe state and local officials who administer programs that receive federal funds, the Court declared that Congress has authority to see to it that taxpayer dollars . . . are in fact spent for the general welfare, and not frittered away in graft or on projects undermined when funds are siphoned off or corrupt public officers are derelict about demanding value for dollars.

17 Congress’s failure to require proof of a direct connection between the bribery and the federal funds was permissible, the Court concluded, because corruption does not have to be that limited to affect the federal interest. Money is fungible, bribed officials are untrustworthy stewards of federal funds, and corrupt contractors do not deliver dollar-for-dollar value.

18Earmarked FundsThe appropriation of the proceeds of a tax to a specific use does not affect the validity of the exaction, if the general welfare is advanced and no other constitutional provision is violated. Thus a processing tax on coconut oil was sustained despite the fact that the tax collected upon oil of Philippine production was segregated and paid into the Philippine Treasury.

19 In Helvering v. Davis,

20 the excise tax on employers—the proceeds of which were not earmarked in any way, although intended to provide funds for payments to retired workers—was upheld under the general welfare clause, the Tenth Amendment’s being found inapplicable.Debts of the United StatesThe power to pay the debts of the United States is broad enough to include claims of citizens arising on obligations of right and justice.

21 The Court sustained an act of Congress which set apart for the use of the Philippine Islands, the revenue from a processing tax on coconut oil of Philippine production, as being in pursuance of a moral obligation to protect and promote the welfare of the people of the Islands.

22 Curiously enough, this power was first invoked to assist the United States to collect a debt due to it. In United States v. Fisher,

23 the Supreme Court sustained a statute that gave the Federal Government priority in the distribution of the estates of its insolvent debtors. The debtor in that case was the endorser of a foreign bill of exchange that apparently had been purchased by the United States. Invoking the Necessary and Proper Clause, Chief Justice Marshall deduced the power to collect a debt from the power to pay its obligations by the following reasoning: The government is to pay the debt of the Union, and must be authorized to use the means which appear to itself most eligible to effect that object. It has, consequently, a right to make remittances by bills or otherwise, and to take those precautions which will render the transaction safe.

To read the entire article use this link:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI_S8_C1_2/#:~:text=C1.-,2%20Spending%20Power,the%20United%20States%3B%20.%20.%20

Public Notice; Pronouncement and Announcement: Decree The Living Will

On this day the 21st day of March in the Gregorian year of 2021 at 8 pm pst we make this announcement and pronouncement: Decree The Living Will Being The Maxims Of Law

Make it known for the public record on the public record, ie-I declare and decree, as the source of creation expressing as a woman, this woman being the expression of the Womb of Life in this female body known as queen-sophia-taniah [schackelforc-borgeson] was born on the earth allegedly on July 29, 1959 and called, lorna-lynne of the father’s house of borgeson and the mother’s house of ross.

Whereas, we are not a “citizen.”, or a “citizen of”, this woman is not a “lieutenant of”, a “resident of,” an “inhabitant of”, a “franchise of,” a “subject of,” a “ward of,” the “property of,” the “chattel of”, or “subject to the jurisdiction of” any army, any “monarch” or any corporate “commonwealth,” “federal,” “state,” “territory,” “county,” “council,” “city,” “municipal body politic,” or other “government” allegedly “created” under the “authority” of a “constitution” or other “enactment.” we are not subject to any “legislation,” department, or agency created by such “authorities,” nor to the “jurisdiction” of any “employees”, “officers”, or “agents” deriving their “authority” therefrom. Nor do any of the “statutes” or “regulations” of such “authorities” apply to me or have any “jurisdiction” over me. I’m my own “authority”, the author of my reality, and;

Whereas this expression of source energy known as a woman is not a subject of any “B.A.R. courts” or bound by “precedents” of any “B.A.R. courts,” deriving their “jurisdiction” from an assumed “authority.” Take notice that ie-I hereby cancel and make void from the beginning any such “instrument” or any presumed “election” made by any “government” or any “agency” or “department” thereof, that this woman ever has voluntarily elected to be treated as an “alien”, a “civilian”, “tenant”, a “lieutenant”, “subject” of any “monarch” or a “citizen,” or a “citizen of” or a “resident” of any “commonwealth,” “state,” “territory,” “possession,” “instrumentality,” “enclave,” “division,” “district,” or “province,” subject to their “jurisdiction(s)”. We do not accept being forced to participate in “commerce” as a “commercial instrument” or this expression of life force used as “a human resource”, playing out through “war games”. Am not in the military therefore not subject to military tribunals, NS;

Whereas, I’m my own “authority”, the author of my reality, and;

Whereas we are not liable for the “ignorance of” or lack of knowledge of the laws by “any man” acting as an agent/officer taking action under the “Color of Office” and/or the “Color of Law”; and,

Whereas, with regard to the “Constitution”: this document supposedly setting forth the foundations of a “country” and “its” “government,” has no inherent authority or obligation except to the writers of it and those that have taken an “Oath of Office” as a registered member of the “cult”. A “constitution” written and signed by someone else has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between two or more individuals, and then it is limited only to those individuals who have specifically entered into it. At most, such a document could be a contract between the existing people at the time of its creation, but no one has the right, authority, or power to bind their posterity. Let it be known that ie/I have not knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally entered any such “constitution” contract to oblige me thereby, therefore such a document is inapplicable to me, and anyone claiming to derive their “authority” from such a document has no “jurisdiction” over me, my life force, or how ie/I chose to experience life, and;

Whereas we will not be forced to participate in wearing a face covering, put on a mask, or forced to do anything under the “presumption” or “assumptions” of any “Public Health Authority”. We are not the “class of persons” as defined by the B.A.R. Attorneys that wrote the 22 U.S. Code § 1621 – Definitions or any other statutes, codes, ordinances, bills, or corporate policy, and;

Whereas, as a member of the “Holy Church of Gaia” or by Pamela’s calling “the Holy Church of Woodlyness” choose to experience life in a state of harmlessness, harmlessness to self, and harmlessness to others. The “Holy Church of Gaia” is not engaged in a financial endeavor, we are not a “for-profit” nor a “non-profit” organization. We are not involved in a “commercial” endeavor, and;

Whereas the members of the “Holy Church of Gaia” live by the Golden Rule(s)”to do no harm”. “harmlessness to self and harmless to all others”, “do onto others as you would have them do onto you”. The members are not involved in the “selling” of “buying” of the earth’s resources or “marketing of”, or “selling of”, or “sexploitation of”, the inhabitants of the earth, and;

Whereas. the members make a commitment to be open-hearted, honest, and mindful in their interactions in this orchestra and dance of life, and;

Whereas we will not be coerced into participating in any activity that violates the sovereignty, constitution, ethics, or morality of the members, and;

Whereas anyone willfully participating in the production of, the selling of, and the use of vaccines or any injectable material or technologies that is invasive to the biology under the “Public Health Authority” is participating in the corrupting of man’s genome and participating in genocide!! These activities are a violation of the man’s physical vessel and the natural intelligence of this vessel and disrespectful to the source of its creation, and;

Whereas anyone participating in the marketing of”COVID!9″ or anything involving the “Cornavirus” is participating in fraud and is violating the rights of the innocent and subject to the removal of all rights to freedom, and;

Whereas ie-I call back all property rights from the beginning of the beginning before Genesis and stand as a steward of the air, the water, the oil, the ethers, the land; and,

Whereas ie-I stand as the voice of Gaia declares the Right Us of Will; and,

Whereas the time has arrived to lift the veil of illusion, dissolve the “false light” matrix, take off the blinders, break-free from the hypnotic trance; and,

Whereas we require a full forensic audit through all dimensions, all realities, all space-time and non-space time, forthwith; and,

Whereas let it be known that anyone deliberately creating technology intended to infringe on the expression and functioning of this electromagnetic, mental, emotional, and biological expression known as a man is infringing on my Divine Right and Free Will and thus is committing a trespass; and,

You are now knowing.

Anyone that believes themselves to have a superior right to the aforementioned properties must step forward within 30 days of the date of this “Public Notice” or forever hold their peace.

without recourse,

king-zelen-raymond-dale-queenophia-taniah-lorna-lynne

all rights retained and reserved retroactively to the beginning of the beginning before Genesis

Restoring the Supremacy of Love,

Without Dishonor,

Without Prejudice, Ill will or Frivolity,

Non-Assumpist,

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Witnesses:

Public Notice: To Avoid Liability and Trespass

This day being the 18th day of April in the Gregorian Year of 2021 make it known the following:

Maxims of Law: Maxims of Law for the Expression of Life in and with the

Right Use of Will and in and with Grace

Whereas, a “Notification Of Liability” is the first essential element of due process of law. As silence is acquiescence under the law, silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a lawful or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be misleading, whether intentionally or not. [Cf. 5 cfr 2635.101]; and,

Whereas every man (male and female) has the innate, intrinsic, inherent, and inalienable right by Natural Law the Law of One the Law of Love to be supported in- Life, Freedom, Security of Personal Property. Security of Spirit, in the Pursuit of Happiness and Meaning in Life, Experiencing Life On Purpose and With Purpose; and,

Whereas our offspring being the baby’s we bring forth are not our property. let us explain, even though they are the fruits of their father’s seed and their mother’s egg and of the flesh and blood of their mother they are intelligent, sovereign, and autonomous beings onto themselves as the manifestation of their spirit and of life force energy of the source of all life; and,

Whereas life is simple those that choose to do evil or harm others make life complicated. To do good it is essential that we follow a couple of the “Gold Rules”:

1. cause no loss or injury to the spirit

2.do onto others as you would have others do onto you; and,

Whereas everyone shall now intend to take full responsibility for the life expressed through their unique energy expression called “a body”; and,

Whereas we each have the obligation, duty, and responsibility to acknowledge and support all life, we are eternal life, and,Whereas any (wo)man acting for any one of the many Crown Service Corporation(s) working at a municipal level, provincial/state level, federal level, this “Notice Of Trespass And Notice Of Liability” is given; and,

Whereas it is my duty to inform you that trafficking in man is illegal, forcing the man to believe he must “work” for a “wage” or get a job in order to make a living is forcing a man into servitude. “Human Trafficking” is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labor, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation, for the benefit of the trafficker or others; and,

Whereas when we are born into the world it should not be forced upon us the established society such as that of the Crown with its British Laws being called a “Society” especially when they are detrimental to the experience of life and or diminishing to the spirit; and,

Whereas no baby’s being born into this world shall be forced to conform to the constitutions, morality or lack thereof, and ethics or lack thereof of the creators of said Society; and,

Whereas when the mother and or father and or sibling(s) (parent(s) and or sibling(s)) give a calling to this baby for the purpose of communication it shall not ever be given away and or used with malicious intent or to be used to infringe upon their life essence and or on the will of the child; and,

Whereas the unlawful conversion of this calling given by the mother and or father and or sibling(s) to that of a “Legal Name” whereby creating a “Legal Person” on paper is a fiction and therefore is invalid as it was created without knowledge and does not actually exist in spoken word or the world of form; and,

Whereas, we now dispel all presumption and assumptions by those that created this “Legal Person”; and,

Whereas, we dispel the label of “Laborer” where a man has been forced into being a “Commerce Instrument”; and,

Whereas we make it known for the Public Record on the Public Record, ie/I declare as the source of creation expressing as a man, all man is the king/queen of his/her dominion and not a “citizen, or a “citizen of”, no man is can be a “lieutenant of”, a “resident of,” an “inhabitant of,” a “franchise of,” a “subject of,” a “ward of,” the “property of,” the “chattel of”, or “subject to the jurisdiction of” any “army”, any “monarch” or any corporate “commonwealth,” “federal,” “state,” “territory,” “county,” “council,” “city,” “municipal body politic,” or other “government” allegedly “created” under the “authority” of a “constitution” or other “enactment.” we are not subject to any “legislation,” department, or agency created by such “authorities,” nor to the “jurisdiction” of any “employees”, “officers”, or “agents” deriving their “authority” therefrom. Nor do any of the “statutes” or “regulations” of such “authorities” apply to a man that has not given informed written and verbal consent or has taken an “oath of office” with full expressed knowledge of what they are agreeing to; and,

Whereas, no man has “jurisdiction” or “power of attorney” over another man without prior written and verbal consent; and Whereas an expression of source energy called a man is not a subject of any “B.A.R. courts” or bound by “precedents” of any “B.A.R. Courts,” deriving their “jurisdiction” from and assumed “authorities.”; and,

Whereas from this day forth make it known and notice that we hereby cancel and make void from the ab initio any such “instrument” or any presumed “election” made by any “government” or any “agency” or “department” thereof, that this sentient and living being called “a man” ever has voluntarily elected to be treated as an “alien”, a “civilian”, “tenant”, a “lieutenant”, “subject” of any “monarch” or a “citizen,” or a “resident” of any “commonwealth,” “state,” “territory,” “possession,” “instrumentality,” “enclave,” “division,” “district,” or “province,” subject to their “jurisdiction(s); and,

Whereas, we do not accept being forced to participate in “war games” am not in the military therefore not subject to military tribunals; and,

Whereas choosing for oneself to ingest a substance that is a known poison to the body or act in a way that is detrimental to one’s psychological, emotional, mental, and biological well-being is one thing, being forced to choose at the hands of those initiating covert and the overt military action is a completely different matter and quite another thing. Not having the capacity as a result of incompetency, mental illness, lack of education, being lied to, illiteracy, insanity, or the lacking awareness, renders one that of invalid and incapable of choosing for oneself. In the event that these states are present for the inhabitants of earth then poisoning and murdering is a crime of colossal proportion. in the response thus void of prosecution; and,

Whereas those that know and allow these crimes to continue are beyond redemption for they are choosing to destroy all life; and,

Whereas those that have been by their own volition chosen to remain in lower states of consciousness polarized in their thinking and perceiving, whether unconsciously or consciously choosing to remain in an imbalanced emotional state and that may be incapable of perceiving the harmful effect their lack of awareness and state of consciousness has on creation are violating my right for self-determination as a unique energy signature at a specific state of knowledge; and,

Whereas, each baby born to earth is of their own “authority”, the author of my reality; and,

The Law of Mercy

For at one time we too were foolish, disobedient, misled and enslaved to all sorts of desires and pleasures—living in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another. 4But when the kindness of God our Savior and His love for mankind appeared, 5He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.…

Whereas this term “God” is ill-defined and misused in many cases giving way to many incongruent thoughts being injected into the collective unconscious that have interfered with rationality, such as “the strongest survive”, take away the pollinators, and witness just how long life will continue and just how long one will survive on earth as we know it; and,

Whereas this idea of a hierarchy; arranged in order of rank.”the hierarchical bureaucracy of a local authority” was manufactured as is the “fight’ between “good” and “evil”; the men and women that have freed themselves of religious rhetoric and pardoned themself from dogma as taught in “Mainstream Christian Churches” and who have saught and thus have experienced greater comprehension of the human condition and of creation and know the transformational ability of their light abstain from “fighting” and are absolved; and,

Whereas those entities that have the capacity to transverse time and space and which chose to remain in ignorance whereby choosing to interfere with another’s unique energy signature are violating free will; and,

Whereas, we would like to remind you that the general definition of Judicial Notices is a rule in the Law of Evidence. In the Rules of Law the Law of Evidence allows a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of the fact is so notorious, or well known, or so authoritative, authority, authoritatively attested, that it cannot be reasonably doubted. This is done upon request of the party seeking to rely on the fact at issue; and.

Whereas once a (wo)man who sometimes is acting as a Law Enforcement Officer, Governor, Commissioner, Administer, and or Minister in Office, etc. makes an offensive order and is made known in the conjuring of a thought resulting in the enactment of an order resulting in a trespass then a crime has been committed they shall then be held liable for said crime, and all shall be held responsible for conspiring, and ordering and orchestrating the said “trespass”. being a Criminal Act; and,

Whereas those that have chosen to give orders that infringe upon the rights of others that have and do violate another’s reason for being and/or infringe upon their life, liberty, inherent freedom as creator while in their pursuit of happiness for the purpose of the fulfillment of life are violating free will; and in this Free Will Universe this is seen as a trespass, this is a criminal action; and,

Whereas those entities that have the capacity to transverse time and space and which chose to remain in ignorance whereby choosing to interfere with another’s unique energy signature are violating free will and this is seen as a trespass; and,

Whereas, if we have ever acted in a way that was incriminating we are now absolved and forgiven for the aforementioned reasons, with this in mind true love does not condemn in this no forgiveness is needed; and,

Whereas, let me make it perfectly clear once we have restored competency in our undertaking we now inform every man or woman or other acting as a “Court Clerk”, as a”Judge/Magistrate”, as a Lawyer/Attorney, as a “Police Officer/Policy Enforcer/Revenue Generatrs, Glorified Tax Collector”, as a “Sheriff”, as a “Bailiff”, as well as the bureaucrat, and/or every man or women acting as an employee of the government, and the “de facto” court system, and all other parties that may inquire, we are not a “citizen/Citizen” or a “citizen/Citizen of”, we are none of the labels imposed upon us upon entry into this world. From this time forth we break free from this “lords” curse for we shall forevermore monitor our own coming in and going out, so be it, by the power of 3x3x3 we now make it so; and,

Whereas having a “Birthday” is not “informing on oneself” and is not cause for incrimination and any fanciful ideas around the blowing out of candles is hereby absolved and made obsolete, furthermore, we do not accept any of the fanciful and absurd man-made or draconian ideas designed to discredit the Natural Intelligence of man and diminish the life of man in any way; and,

Whereas the use of a postal code/zip code on any document online or not online, whether government created or not government created does not and has never and will never bind me to any “hidden” presumptions or assumptions by those that created this system designed by entities that do not respect life and prefer to be warmongers; and,

Whereas if we have ever reacted or acted in a way that has been incriminating and or damaging to this expression of life in any we are now by Divine Grace absolved, all are love and loved beyond measure.

/s/ king-zelan-raymond-dale-queen-sophia-taniah-lorna-lynne

David Dapkus it is affirmed, “Lack of full disclosure constitutes a fraud, which is null and void at inception and having no statute of limitation (nunc pro tunc)” !!!

” I reference standard CONTRACT “law” requiring full disclosure by both parties … also refer to 15 USC (5a .. I think) … Fraud & Murder are the only 2 issues that have no limit on “pro-se-cut-ion” !?!”

The techniques used to impose duties of disclosure include the
following. Conduct is often construed as giving a misleading
impression, even though there are no express words of misrepresentation. Silence may be taken as an assertion that there is
nothing of significance to disclose. Some contracts, notably
insurance contracts, are treated as contracts of utmost good faith,
where full disclosure is required. Disclosure of material facts has
been required inmaritime salvage agreements. Implied warranties
may be imposed. Reliefmay be given for mistake, or unconsciona-
• This paper is a summary of a paper presented at the 20th Annual Workshop on
Commercial and Consumer Law held at the University ofToronto on October 12 and 13,
1990.
t Professor, Faculty ofLaw, University ofToronto.
1 Smith v. Hughes (1871), L.R. 6 Q.B. 597 atp. 604.
349
350 Canadian Business Law Journal [Vol. 19
bility. There is a duty to disclose material facts in a fiduciary
relationship.
Reform of the law has been proposed, on moral and economic
grounds, in the direction of requiring a general duty to disclose
material facts of which a contracting party knew, or ought to have
known. The difficulty with this proposal is that it would introduce
much uncertainty, especially if the dispute occurred many years
after the transaction in question. In case of dispute, there would
be much difficulty in determining what facts were material, what
facts were known, and what facts ought to have been known at the
time ofthe transaction. Both parties have an interest in the finality
of completed exchanges, and it is not obvious that it would be an
improvement in the law to encourage the reopening of land sales,
for example, after completion.”

Source: https://www.law.utoronto.ca/documents/waddams/_19-CBLJ-349.pdf

For more information one can should they choose follow this link:

https://freedomdove.net/2021/04/07/how-we-should-be-dealing-with-the-private-b-a-r-society/

Keith Little is one of the teachers in the Lawful Living Commnuty and has shave some valuable information and inshgts from his many years of experiencing and researching.

He has publisheed some very informational videos on his YouTube channell and ie/I invite many to check his videos and send him some love for his dudilegnect to bring this information to mankind.

The Vatican is the commercial center and the source of the trafficking of man and animal!

https://www.paypal.me/keithlittle1

#QUITVOLUNTEERING

How it became the Vatican!

Keith Little Hotepsekhemwy

SetSpounmpsteolurgmrfSnber 7ed, 2hiSr020hcgcf  · 1592515215-08-66-20.2EHP

Keith-Orland: Little…Be it enacted that the herein be notice of obligation due absolute…All duties retained(most commonly referred to as; “rights” and “privileges”)…A private communication – in chambers…Socratic notes# 98792008-l4dm…Letter of credit…Clarifications and points of law – letter of law(color of law) v substance of The law…”

No country can be well governed unless it’s citizens as a body keep religiously before their minds that they are the guardians of the law, and that the law officers are only the machinery for its execution, nothing more.”. Mark Twain———- See: Romans 13 – KJV…(Particular to verse 4 – “minister” and not “ad-minister”)________________________________________Comes now Keith; hereafter referred to as; “@”…Re; Statement(Re-statement) of;

“Written Plea of Guilt”: Case # 10701 AGCR 215189; wherein a written plea of guilt was offered, and rejected for “technicality”(licentious) by a one certain Nathan Callahan… as of rite of @ and now does present a re-statement of guilt, and said same measure of acknowledgement of guilt; is offered with exchange of rebuttal of all clarifications and points of law; each point, point by point and every point; included but not limited to; those referred to herein and attached hereto…Statement of abatement/estoppel…Offer of settlement and closure where valuable consideration is due – recourse and remedy of accord and satisfaction of recoupment of errently abandoned property…Clarification of life Estate of @ – persons of Trust…Joseph;

First; @; as heir; by presenting @; and being; guided by The spiritual hand; do come forth now; with that spirit to guide @’s hand in these matters; @ does will that you take the time necessary to read all of the following in whole…Second; within our last interactions; in which @ was helping guide another being in the Article I courts; that were taking advantage of her not knowing the literal English language; according to “Concise English”; you queried if @ was practicing law… (Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered…)Third; you had previously queried @ within other interactions; for being accused of/charged with “performing in a presumed public capacity”(see; case # 10701 AGCR 215189); if @ knew the English language… @ immediately and belligerently re-sponded with a certain; “Yes”…!Fourth; @ shall not perish for lack of knowledge so; @ does ask for; proof of all things…Fifth; @ has learned that the hospital statement of live birth was registered with the county registrar of Dubuque County on Iowa where @ was begotten of @’s mother and father in earth… this information provided by @’s mother and the doctor; listed as informants; was formatted as an abstract of information… it was then certificated and deposited into a certain account; giving misleading factual formation of a dual citizen of the 14th amendment(which was never lawfully ratified); by and through the State citizen of the transmitting utility, called the Certificate Of Live Birth(long form); and the United States citizen for the public charitable trust, called the Birth Certificate(short form) both being “decedents” and assigned a Social Security Account number of the State person(citizen) and authorizing @ as card holder…Sixth; this registrar attached a number directly related to; the IMF(International Monetary Fund), the SSA(Social Security Administration), the FR(Federal Reserve) of which too a CUSIP#(Committee on Uniform Securities Investment Procedures – CINS; CUSIP International Numbering System) was attached for all future transactions of the account of the dual citizen person…Seventh; @ has learned that each case brought before a court is entered into the CRIS(Court Registry Investment System) for securities purposes as attachments to the original bond in the name of @’s person(s)…Seventh; @ wished to enter a “Written Plea of Guilt” before a certain Nathan Callahan who refused it on a technicality which was never given… @ did not know statements in general could be denied… (an err in the record does not stand – what is done ought be done)Eighth; @ questioned jurisdiction many times and it was Only asserted by the prosecutor; a Michelle Wagner; that they had subject matter and territorial jurisdiction which are merely two of the seven requisites of jurisdiction to have standing to file suit… Not to mention that the prosecutor; a Michelle Wagner; only asserted jurisdiction by statement… Never was personal jurisdiction stated; and thus @ conjectures that proof did not and yet does not exist for either jurisdictions… no such record…Ninth; @ does highly doubt that the prosecution presented any of the following;1 ) Foreign Agent Registration documentation…2 ) Diplomatic notice to the USDOS that a suit was filed against the United States citizen; because; @ never received diplomatic notice from the USDOS in return; as the authorized representative of said citizen…3 ) Proof that the citizen is a corporate entity…Tenth; all statutes are contracts…Eleventh; at the age of 48 @’s mother did look @ in the eyes and state; “Keith, the police are your authority”… This contention would lead one to believe that the police are the authority over all people’s including, but not limited to, yourself… @ does find this very hard to understand or believe… (Matthew – 6; 24… No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.)Twelfth; a process exacted by @ in err; but; was asserted… @ did request W-9’s which were not received… @ did send a 1099A-Acquisition of abandoned property to the IRS which @ believes it was not acted upon due to err… it was implied in statement of protection order that @ was accusing a Michelle Wagner with fraud when no such accusation was made as evidenced by the grammar used in the 3949a form she cited in said motion for protection order… this itself is proof of attempt and honor by @ to make right what ought be right… @ is due recourse and remedy of accord and satisfaction through recoupment of “property” due from such process of acquisitions management… these matters ARE tax events…It is @’s contention and intention that all “courts” are to maintain a one to one level of communication so as to move in good faith and fair dealings…To assert this in the past; @ only had instinct but; today @ has a scope of learning through self education of diligent research And “practice”… @ does not intend to test the law; nor to deny the law but rather; to prove the law… (see; Romans 13 and Luke – 4; 12 and Mathew – 10; 33)That law was denied @ as a child of the almighty; a believer of our Lord Jesus Christ of which it is known; so long as @ does follow His way; @ shall be blameless…Another has brought forth evidence laden with filth… as @ too entered documents asserting various facts in addition to those… as too there exists the maxim: the presence of the body cures the err in the name… the charge of “possession with subsequent charges” is inherently wrong as @ was unlawfully stopped and subsequently unlawfully searched prior to any construction of inventory used against @…(*Possession of evidence without chain of custody in regards to un-clean hands…)Police power as we know today is that of taxation and is evidenced by fines, fees and penalties affixed to statutes and; assessed upon presumption of jurisdiction; by and through; adjudging in absentia or pleading or finding of guilt… the power used in cases brought by policing agencies must not be the power of taxation; for any attempt to levy a tax upon a Right would be open to a clear and valid constitutional objection… This [i]s the fatality in all matters of the cases levied against @…Jurisdiction over @ did not exist; does not exits and is never intended to exist unless voluntarily given with knowing will…The err of the matters that were to be a fatality to the wrongful case brought against @ did cause harm and loss and continue to do so to this day and will continue to do so until these matters are resolved in full…@ stands [o]n the facts on the face of the record as they do exist…This is a private communication for settlement and closure with a meeting of the minds for valuable consideration of forced performances accounted for on the public record…I believe indorsing a check from the prosecutor for @’s performance up to this point with all participants in these matters; would be an amicable resolution when the amount of fair compensation as well as recoupment is discerned; for he can not be held liable as authorized representative but; is very open to tort arising from civil action – however; to proceed further would be subject to additional charges also as set forth in fee schedule(see; attached fee schedule) for such performances…Please read on in notes that are attached and incorporated hereto…(can be detached if ye so will through said accord and satisfaction…)Peacefully;@…________________________________________NOTES:Including but; not limited to the following…1 ) Separation of powers(duties)… Relative to the common duties and civil duties…The executive is the organ exercising authority in and holding responsibility for the governance of a state. The executive executes and enforces law.In political systems based on the principle of separation of powers, authority is distributed among several branches (executive, legislative, judicial)—an attempt to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a small group of people.2 ) HJR192/Public Law 73-10; wherein it is stated that FRN’s have zero value meaning; there is no valuable consideration in transacting with them…3 ) 12 USC 411; wherein it clarifies an equal exchange in terms of lawful coin…4 ) UCC 1-103.3; wherein it states the law is to be uniform throughout all jurisdictions, and UCC 1-105; wherein it clarifies severability, and UCC 3-402b(1); wherein it clarifies non-liability of authorized representative…5 ) Federal Reserve Act(see; Savings to Suitors Clause…)6 ) Social Security Act(notice; this is an act and Not a law…); Specifically; MQGE-Medicare Qualified Government Employee; and; TITLE VII – SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD ESTABLISHMENT § Sections 701, 702, 703… if @ has been forcefully subjected to MQGE acts and penalties for presumed violations of such person; then @ is “surely” due valuable consideration for time of duties of authorized representative to perfect the contractual nexus thereof for proper compensation… also see; Title IV-D Insurances which is the premise of Old Age Pensions… exclusively seeking economic substance for funding social benefits… a scheme and artifice of fraud in @’s opinion…7 ) Administrative Procedures Act; wherein it clarifies procedural conduct…8 ) Judiciary Act 1789; wherein it clarifies separation of powers; and 9th, 10th, 11th amendments to the Federal constitution which also clarify separation of powers…9 ) Clearfield Doctrine; wherein it clarifies all courts operating commercially lower themselves to capacity of mere private citizens…10 ) Calvo Doctrine; wherein jurisdiction is not to be asserted by a larger force of arms merely for that reason… jurisdiction must be righteous…11 ) Foreign Agent Registration Act… (can any participating agents provide these documents…?)12 ) CFR § 93.1-93.2… Diplomatic notice and proof of person… (@ has never received the proper notice from USDOS… nor been provided proof that the defendant is a corporate person)13 ) Federal Acquisitions Act at 48 CFR § 52.212-5: CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED…14) Securities Exchange Act… in relation to securities attached to original CUSIP# of the account of the person… (Note; original “document” is known as; “green card”/ original statement of live birth; clarifying ones “national” status)15 ) 18 USC § 241 and 18 USC § 242… Conspiracy and Deprivation… (4th amendment – secure in person)16 ) 42 USC § 1983…Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights… (4th amendment – secure in person)17 ) 28 USC § 1330, 1332, 1391, 1411 and 1602-1611(Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 1976)…18 ) Scott v McNeal 154 U.S. 34(1894)To wit:SCOTT v. MoNEAL.ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.No. 890. Submitted October 23, 189.-Decided May 14, 1894.”And Mr. Justice Buller said: “Then this case was compared to a probate of a supposed will of a living person; but in such a case the ecclesiastical court have no jurisdiction, and the probate can have no effect: their jurisdiction is only to grant probates of the wills of dead persons. The distinction in this respect is this; if they have jurisdiction, their sentence, as long as it stands unrepealed, shall avail in all other places; but where they have no jurisdiction, their whole proceedings are a nullity.” 3 T. R. 129, 130. And such is the law of England to this day. Williams on Executors, (9th ed.) 478, 1795; Taylor on Ev. (8th ed.) § 1677, 1714.”… (see; https://l.facebook.com/l.php…)19 ) Executor de son tort; Executor De Son Tort refers to a stranger who intermeddles without authority in the distribution of the estate of a deceased person. It can be any person who acts like an executor even though they have no authority to do so…20 )Sarbanes Oxley Act located at;15 U.S. Code Chapter 98 – PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING REFORM AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY…21 ) 1611 KJV BIBLE…22 ) HANS P. GUTH – CONCISE ENGLISH HANDBOOK; FOURTH EDITION…23 )Mathew – 22, 35-38…[35] Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,[36] Master, which is the great commandment in the law?[37] Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.[38] This is the first and great commandment.[39] And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.[40] On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets…24) Matthew – 6; 14-15…[14] For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:[15] But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses…25 ) ROMANS 13…26 ) BOOK OF JOB…27 ) Genesis – 1; 26-29…[26]And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.[27] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.[28] And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.[29] And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat…28 ) CR 60(b)(5)Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable29 ) Maxim of equity; first in time first of right… between equal equities the first in order of time shall prevail. This maxim operates where there are two or more competing equitable interests; when two equities are equal the original interest (i.e., the first in time) will succeed…30 ) Jurisdictional fatalities as follows;A ) (Basso v Utah Power & Light Company 495,F 2d 906 910) – Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and must be proven… even to this day…B ) (Latana v Hopper 102 2d 188) – The court must prove on and for the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted…C ) (Joyce v US 474 2D 215) – A judgement rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a nullity…D ) (CAHA v US 152 US 211 (1894)) – The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government…E ) (Lansing v Smith 4 Wendell 9, 20 (NY)(1829)) – The people of the state are entitled to all rights which formerly belong to the king, by his prerogatives…F ) (Cannon v Commission on Judicial Qualifications 14 Cal. 3d 678, 694 (1975)) – Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process…G ) (Elliott v Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 US 328, 340 (1878)) – Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, it’s judgement and orders are rendered as nullities. They are not viable, but simply void; and form no bar to recovery sought, even prior to av reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgements or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers…H ) (Hill Top Developers v Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So. 2d 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)) – Defense of lack of jurisdiction over subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal…I ) (Joyce v US, 474 F2d 215) – There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction…J ) (Melo v US, 505 F2d 1026) – Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action…K ) (Norman v Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03) – In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record does not show on its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have existed.”…L ) (Rosemond v Lambert, 469 F2d 416 (1972)) – The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction… AND; “The trial court, 330 F.Supp. 549, after a hearing and after reviewing the affidavits, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and other material in the record, concluded that the requisite nexus with interstate commerce was not present and dismissed the case. We affirm.”…M ) (Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1988) 45 Cal.3d 518 , 754 P.2d 724; 247 Cal.Rptr. 378) – Before sending a person to jail for contempt or imposing a fine, judged are required to provide due process of law, including strict adherence to the procedural requirements in the Code of Civil Procedure. Ignorance of these procedures is not a mitigating but an aggravating factor…N ) (US v Anderson, 60 F.Supp. 329 (D.C. Wash. 1945)) – Jurisdiction of court may be challenged at any stage of the proceeding, and also may be challenged after conviction and execution of judgment by way of writ of habeus corpus… (Habeus Corpus – a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.)O ) (US v Gernie, F.Supp. 329 (D.C. N.Y. 1964)) – In a criminal proceeding lack of jurisdiction of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and may be asserted at any time by collateral attack…P ) (US v Lopez and Hagan v Levine both are void for lack of jurisdiction) – In Lopez the circuit court called it right, and in Hagans it had to go to the Supreme Court before it was called right, in both cases void. If one reads the Supreme Court cases they will find and in Lopez it was a jury trial which was declared void for want of jurisdiction. If it [jurisdiction] does not exist, it can not justify conviction or judgement without which power of jurisdiction the State Can Not be said to be “sovereign”. At best, to proceed would be in “excess” of jurisdiction which is as well fatal to the States/USA’s cause…Q ) (Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926)) – Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.”…R ) (Kent v Dulles, 357 US 116, 125) – “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.”…S ) (Dred Scott v Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393) – “The state citizen is immune from all government attacks and procedures, absent contract.”…T ) (Cruden v Neale, 2 N.C. 338 2 S. E. 70(Sup. Ct. N.C. 1796)) – “every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”…U ) Aaron Haas “originally” stopped @ for “driving” offense(s) under which the “certification is false”… (no such record – see; 26 USC 7701(h))V ) Sources for “right to travel” superseding any such “driving authority” -(Allen vs. City of Bellingham, 163 P. 18)(America Mutual Liability Ins. Co. vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200)(Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22)(City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE. 2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232)(Boyd vs. United States, 116 US 616.)(Crandall vs. Nevada, 6 wall 35, 46)(Davis vs. Massachusetts, 167 US 43)(Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781)(Hurtado vs. California, 110 US 516)(International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120)(Kent vs. Dulles(1958) 357 US 116, 125. 2)(Marbury vs. Madison(1803). A void act is void ab initio. 2)(McCulloch vs. Maryland, 4 Wheat 316)(Miranda vs. Arizona, (1996) 384 US 436, 491. 2)(Robertson vs. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147.)(Yick Wo vs. Hopkins, 118 US 356.)…W ) “Personal liberty, or the Right of enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most valuable and sacred Rights, as sacred Right to private property… and is regarded as inalienable. ” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135…X ) US Codes and Regulations;1 ) 26 U.S. Code § 269 – Acquisitions made to evade or avoid income tax…2 ) 26 U.S. Code § 338 – Certain stock purchases treated as asset acquisitions…3 ) 26 USC § 7701(a) – “trade or business”; (26) Trade or business The term “trade or business” includes the performance of the functions of a public office… (this “excludes” what is not included)4 ) 26 USC § 7701(h) – “motor vehicle operator leases”…5 ) 26 USC § 163(j)(9)(C) Motor vehicle The term “motor vehicle” means a motor vehicle that is any of the following: (i) Any self-propelled vehicle designed for transporting persons or property on a public street, highway, or road. (ii) A boat. (iii) Farm machinery or equipment…6 ) 49 U.S. Code§ 31301.Definitions(2)“commerce” means trade, traffic, and transportation…7 ) 41 USC § 111;procurementIn this subtitle, the term “procurement” includes all stages of the process of acquiring property or services, beginning with the process for determining a need for property or services and ending with contract completion and closeout…8 ) 10 USC § 2431a – Acquisition strategy…9 ) Federal Acquisition Regulations § 52.212-548 CFR § 52.212-5 – Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders – Commercial Items…——————–ALSO NOTE:Duns numbers for following: as of January, 2017…1 ) US Government; 0527141962 ) DOJ; 0116696743 ) JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF IOWA; 3607063294 ) BLACK HAWK, COUNTY OF; 0102558345 ) NATHAN A CALLAHAN(Non- acceptance and dishonor of “Written Plea of Guilt” at arraignment of said case); 838656346Note:DUNS – Data Universal Numbering SystemCAGE – Commercial And Government EntitySAM – System Acquisitions ManagementCINS – CUSIP International Numbering SystemCUSIP – Committee on Uniform Securities Investment ProceduresCRIS – Court Registry Investment SystemNAICS – North American Industrial Classification SystemSIC – Standard Industrial Classification——————————United States Tax Court:https://l.facebook.com/l.php…———-26 USC 7701(a)(27);(27)Tax CourtThe term “Tax Court” means the United States Tax Court.All commercial courts are taxable events and thus are tax courts… being subject to 1099 “Acquisition” reporting…_______________________________Final “words”:As all parties must be identifiable and identified – and they Must be identified accurately…When @ was queried of whether @ was knowing of the English language; @ responded with a re-sounding; “Yes!”…This day was the start of a sojourn of truth [i]n the words and The Word for @… @ learned from that experience that language was more important than he ever realized…So; let us re-view some concise truths of the language we speak…It is written; “In beginning was word”… “What” is “word”…?Well; it is first spoken and then heard… You ignored @ before as if you couldn’t hear what he was speaking or see what he has written…This is material for one thing is “subsequent” <<< (The prosecution erred in presenting the case as a possession charge without first discerning the mitigating facts of the case of the “original information” for the “stop”) to the other… One can not charge another for a secondary set of information without first qualifying the first instigating event as valid… it is a nullity being void from beginning…Now; the grammar used in accordance with that of the common law is “concise English”… and it too operates in a mathematical sense with varying factors being “subsequent” to others…Specifically I “speak” of; terms and conditions of contracts… while it may blow your mind; I’ll continue with concise English for such “contracting”…See; the terms of language of contracts consist of words with all manner of prefixes and suffixes that can and most often do change the entire meaning and context of that “root word”… the following is the “root cause” of the loss of such “root knowledge”…We pay for our predecessors sins… we lack the knowledge they lacked passing on… it is written; my people shall perish for they lack knowledge…So; when we see things such as; “de-fend-ant”; and just believe that it must be us; it is only an err in knowledge of the conditional prefix and suffix placed upon the root word that changes the terms of what it means…Having such information and the knowledge of its use gives one the wisdom of insight to exact what is what and who is who…This particular term used in the Article IV courts is actually quite disturbing when one breaks it down…The “de-fend-ant” is what is known as a abstract noun; meaning it is entirely fictional… the suffix ‘ant’ means an “action” has occurred which is a verb… the prefix ‘de’ is as well a verb meaning to take away… so; we are left with the root word and when we contract the terms down(subtract) we get the root word which is fend and being a verb as well… a transitive verb in whole… the misnomer that any being of life could possibly be a de-fend-ant would mean that someone has taken away ones ability to fend for them-self… then to think people are tricked into hiring attorneys to “de-fend” them [a]s the “de-fend-ant”… Just stupid now that I reflect upon it…The very distinct difference is this:The presence [o]f the body cures the err [i]n the name… this is a maxim which is uniform throughout all jurisdictions… the principle of being re-borne; for only He will know thy name… This physical presence too can be “named” but; that name too has a distinct difference as well – uniform… The name of @ when placed in and on documents in concise English as opposed to commercial styles is known as a concrete noun… This concrete noun has the distinction of being real – as in one can see it, hear it, touch it, smell it, taste it… This is the truth behind reality of curing the err of these courts and all matters before them… @ has assured these courts they did Not have jurisdiction and asked many times for proof… to this day; there exists no proof in; on or for any public record; showing and proofing “personal jurisdiction” in these courts or any proper delegating authority…Please be assured; this Is knowledge and you Should note it…————————————————–Forgive @; as @ does forgive others…________________________________________@ does now offer a chance to make right what ought be right; as every man is worthy of his hire…This is your private notice of liability to come to a equitable meeting of our minds to resolve the wrongs done to @ that still exist to this current day…Rightfully,Keith _______________________________________This eighteenth day of the sixth month of the year of our Lord twenty twenty…In ecclesia:Brother Keith-Orland: kin-LittleCare of;General Postnear Waterloo(50704)Republic of IowaWithout the United States

https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep154034/&#8230;

There is information that is not readily availble regading mail and postage and the verbadge used when using the Postal Services.

Keith has wrtten:

Reconciling the Master Trust Account Part Four!


QUIT VOLUNTEERING


I have been bringing these same truths for a number of years now... AND; from first-hand observations and experiences along the way as I go... Please hit the PayPal link and share some love...

____________________________________

http://oag.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Constitution-of-the-Universal-Postal-Union.pdf

____________________________________



https://www.upu.int/en/Universal-Postal-Union/About-UPU/Acts#non-permanent-acts

____________________________________



https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/pdf/aa.pdf

https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/the-parts-of-contract.html

"10 U.S. Code § 1552 - #Correction of military #records: claims incident thereto. The Secretary of a #militarydepartment may correct any military #record of the Secretary's department when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice.

It's all a #military thing, as keeps being revealed over and over.

The #HealthandHumanServices which regulates #CPS/ #Childsupport is #PublicWelfare for #seamen

The #BirthCertificate is for a military department according to 5 usc 301 (pdf version)

#Social security is for title 20 USC/CFR employees which is #DepartmentofEducation.

The #RealEstateLoans are under the #departmentofagriculture!

The #DriverLicense is for the privilege of being for hire in commercial interstate and/or foreign commerce at the pleasure of the #governor

Look at the Executive Branch section of the local state constitution and see who the government can command...

This is why the all require an oath of office on file directly with such agency.

Don't let them lie and say they cannot remove/delete an account that one does and didn't apply and qualify for!" malikca from www.lawfulliving.com

All Is One, and All Is Love and Loved Beyond Measure, ab anitio, from the beginning.

Sending you Light and Love while simultaneously holding you in My Light and in My Love. By the power of 3x3x3 we make it so, and so it is!!

born Lorna Lynne of the father’s house of borgeson and the mothers house of ross.

and named during a Sacred Water Ceremony by Chief White Buffalo as,

“The One That Flows With The River”